RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Nosocomial meningitis may occur after procedures affecting the central nervous system or following traumatic injury. The causative infectious organism is commonly Staphylococcus aureus, a Gram-positive bacterium. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of two antibacterial agents, ceftobiprole and vancomycin, in an animal model of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) meningitis. METHOD: The strain of MRSA used was ATCC 43300. The animals were divided into three groups and infected intracisternally with MRSA. Controls received no antibiotherapy while the ceftobiprole group received 25 mg/kg and the vancomycin group received 20 mg/kg intravenously. Blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected at three time points. All animals were euthanized at 73 h after start of treatment. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between both treatment groups and the control animals at 24 h (drug trough) and 73 h (1 h after third dose) after start of treatment in terms of CSF bacterial levels. At 73 h, there was a significant difference in survival between the control group and the two treatment groups but no difference between the treated animal survival rates. CONCLUSION: Intravenous treatment with ceftobiprole and vancomycin appears to be equally effective in a rabbit model of MRSA meningitis.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Cefalosporinas , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Meningitis Bacterianas , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Vancomicina , Animales , Conejos , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Vancomicina/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Meningitis Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Meningitis Bacterianas/microbiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Herein, we analyzed the efficacy of main antibiotic therapy regimens in the treatment of healthcare-associated meningitis (HCAM). MATERIALS/METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 18 tertiary-care academic hospitals Turkey, India, Egypt and Romania. We extracted data and outcomes of all patients with post-neurosurgical meningitis cases fulfilling the study inclusion criteria and treated with empirical therapy between December 2006-September 2018. RESULTS: Twenty patients in the cefepime + vancomycin-(CV) group, 31 patients in the ceftazidime + vancomycin-(CFV) group, and 119 patients in the meropenem + vancomycin-(MV) group met the inclusion criteria. The MV subgroup had a significantly higher mean Glasgow Coma Score, a higher rate of admission to the intensive care unit within the previous month, and a higher rate of antibiot herapy within the previous month before the meningitis episode (p < 0.05). Microbiological success on Day 3-5, end of treatment (EOT) clinical success (80% vs. 54.8%% vs 57.9%), and overall success (EOT success followed by one-month survival without relapse or reinfection 65% vs. 51.6% vs. 45.3%), EOT all cause mortality (ACM) and day 30 ACM (15% vs. 22.6% vs. 26%) did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) among the three cohorts. No regimen was effective against carbapenem-resistant bacteria, and vancomycin resulted in an EOT clinical success rate of 60.6% in the methicillin-resistant staphylococci or ampicillin-resistant enterococci subgroup (n = 34). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed no significant difference in terms of clinical success and mortality among the three treatment options. All regimens were ineffective against carbapenem-resistant bacteria. Vancomycin was unsuccessful in approximately 40% of cases involving methicillin-resistant staphylococci or ampicillin-resistant enterococci.
Asunto(s)
Meningitis , Vancomicina , Humanos , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Meropenem/uso terapéutico , Cefepima/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Meningitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacterias , Staphylococcus , Atención a la Salud , AmpicilinaRESUMEN
Background/aim: Intralesional recombinant epidermal growth factor (EGF) is a new treatment approach for diabetic foot ulcer, approved in 2006. EGF therapy is given as an adjunct to the standard treatment regimen of antibiotics, surgery, and hyperbaric oxygen. EGF accelerates the healing of diabetic foot ulcers and reduces healing time. This single-center study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of intralesional EGF therapy in patients with diabetic foot ulcers.Materials and methods: We present the data of the follow-up patients treated in our clinics. Fifteen patients with diabetic foot ulcers or infections, who had been followed up and treated in our clinics, were included in this retrospective study. All patients were administered intralesional injections of 75 µg of EGF after treatment for infection on their diabetic foot ulcers, three times a week on alternate days. The patients were monitored with respect to treatment response and side effects of EGF.Results: Thirteen patients (86.7%) developed new granulation tissue, 10 patients (66.7%) had complete wound closure, and three patients (20%) showed partial wound closure. No serious side effects requiring discontinuation of EGF therapy were observed. A total of twenty-one bacterial agents were isolated in thirteen patients, and no bacterial growth was observed in the tissue cultures of two patients. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common isolated infectious agent in the tissue cultures (n: 6, 28%). Conclusion: Intralesional injection of EGF on top of the standard treatment regimen appears to be a useful adjuvant therapy option in selected patients.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the antibacterial activity of ceftaroline versus vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) meningitis in an experimental rabbit meningitis model. METHODS: The antibacterial activity of ceftaroline was compared with vancomycin in the treatment of meningitis induced by MRSA strain ATCC 43300 in an experimental rabbit meningitis model. Quantitative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures were performed at the beginning of antibiotic treatment and 24h and 73h after the first antibiotic dose. Furthermore, in vitro time-kill data were investigated at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24h in sterile human serum. RESULTS: The difference between the control group versus both treatment groups was significant when comparing the decrease in colony counts in CSF both at 24h and 73h after the first antibiotic dose (P<0.05). At the end of the experiment, there was a significant difference in survival between both the ceftaroline-treated group and the vancomycin-treated group versus the control group, but not between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the antibacterial activity of both ceftaroline and vancomycin are similar in the treatment of MRSA meningitis in an experimental rabbit meningitis model.
Asunto(s)
Meningitis , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Animales , Cefalosporinas , Conejos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Vancomicina/farmacología , CeftarolinaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In this study we retrospectively reviewed A. baumannii meningitis cases treated with tigecycline including regimens and evaluated the efficacy of tigecycline in the therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Study was performed in seven tertiary-care educational hospitals from five cities of Turkey and one center from France. We extracted data and outcomes of all adult (aged >18) patients with culture proven A. baumannii meningitis treated with tigecycline including antibiotic therapy until April 2016. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients (15 male and eight female) fulfilled our inclusion criteria. All Acinetobacter strains were carbapenem-resistant and susceptible to tigecycline. Six cases received tigecycline monotherapy while 17 received tigecycline including combination therapy (10 with colistin, 4 with netilmicin, 3 with amikacin, 4 with meropenem). Seven of 23 cases (30%) died during the tigecycline including therapy (1 in monotherapy, 4 in colistin, 2 in netilmicin, 1 amikacin, one case received tigecyclineâ¯+â¯netilmicin followed by tigecyclineâ¯+â¯colistin). Hence, overall end of treatment (EOT) success was 70%. However, since further 27% died due to additional nosocomial infections, overall clinical success (relieved symptoms at the EOT and one-month post-therapy survival without any relapse or reinfection) decreased to 43%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that tigecycline may be an alternative in the salvage treatment of nosocomial multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter spp. meningitis. Acinetobacter spp. Meningitis.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Acinetobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Acinetobacter baumannii/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Meningitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Tigeciclina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Meningitis/microbiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
AIM: To examine the variables associated with mortality in patients with Acinetobacter baumannii-related central nervous system infections treated with intrathecal colistin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multi-centre retrospective case control study included patients from 11 centres in Turkey, as well as cases found during a literature review. Only patients with CNS infections caused by multidrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii treated with intrathecal colistin were included in this study. The variables associated with mortality were determined by dividing the patients into groups who died or survived during hospitalisation, and who died or survived from Acinetobacter meningitis. RESULTS: Among the 77 cases enrolled in the study, 35 were found through a literature review and 42 were cases from our centres. Forty-four cases (57.1%) were male and the median age was 48 years (range: 20-78 years). Thirty-seven patients (48%) died during hospitalisation. The variables associated with increased all-cause mortality during hospitalisation included old age (odds ratio, 1.035; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.004-1.067; p=0.026) and failure to provide cerebrospinal fluid sterilisation (odds ratio, 0.264; 95% confidence interval, 0.097-0.724; p=0.01). There is a trend (P=0.062) towards higher mortality with using of meropenem during meningitis treatment. Fifteen cases (19%) died from meningitis. There were no significant predictors of meningitis-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The mortality rate for central nervous system infections caused by multidrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii is high. Old age and failure to provide CSF sterilisation are associated with increased mortality during hospitalisation.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Acinetobacter/mortalidad , Acinetobacter baumannii/patogenicidad , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Ventriculitis Cerebral/mortalidad , Colistina/farmacología , Meningitis Bacterianas/mortalidad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Tienamicinas/farmacología , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Ventriculitis Cerebral/epidemiología , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Espinales , Masculino , Meningitis Bacterianas/epidemiología , Meropenem , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tienamicinas/administración & dosificación , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tigecycline is a relatively new glycylcycline antimicrobial, active in vitro against a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. In this study we evaluated the outcomes of spondylodiscitis cases treated with tigecycline-including therapies retrospectively. METHODS: All adult (age >18 years) cases with a diagnosis of spondylodiscitis, who were treated with a tigecycline-including therapy between 2007 and 2011, were included in the study. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical success with tigecycline at the end of induction, while the secondary efficacy outcome was maintenance of success through 3 months following completion of induction. RESULTS: A total of eight spondylodiscitis cases fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. All cases had back pain, restricted mobility, magnetic resonance findings associated with spondylodiscitis, and microbiology or pathological findings related to spondylodiscitis. All had post-neurosurgical spondylodiscitis. In five cases, tigecycline was started in accordance with the antibacterial susceptibility results from intervertebral tissue biopsy cultures, whereas in three it was started empirically. All cases had received several different antibacterials with failure before receiving tigecycline. The mean duration of tigecycline treatment was 37±21 days. One case was lost to follow-up after 2 days of tigecycline. Primary and secondary success was achieved in the remaining seven cases. CONCLUSIONS: These limited data suggest that tigecycline may have a role in the treatment of refractory spondylodiscitis cases.