Conus medullaris trauma: is there a greater risk in parturients?

BACKGROUND: There is some evidence that anaesthetists often perform neuraxial blocks at a higher lumbar interspace than intended. It may be questioned whether parturients are at greater risk for neurological damage when the dura is perforated at a more cephalad interspace than L2-L3. METHODS: Thirty-six patients scheduled for elective Caesarean delivery under CSE anaesthesia were selected for study. Using a B-D Durasafe Adjustable needle combination, the skin-to-epidural distance and the width of the epidural space were measured and matched with 36 female patients undergoing the same anaesthetic technique for orthopaedic procedures. RESULTS: Pregnant patients had a higher bodyweight (77 vs. 67 kg, p = 0.007) than those scheduled for orthopaedic surgery. The skin-to-epidural distance was similar in both groups (5.3 vs. 5.1 cm, p = 0.3). The width of the epidural space was 1.1 mm larger in parturients (8.2 vs. 7.1 mm, p = 0.04). More patients in this group had tip-to-tip distances exceeding 10 mm (25 vs. 12%). CONCLUSION: The greater epidural space or tip-to-tip distance between the epidural and spinal needle points in term parturients results in a lower margin of safety with respect to the distance from the dura to spinal cord or conus medullaris. Puncturing the correct interspace is, therefore, of crucial importance in pregnant patients.

Sevoflurane but not propofol preserves myocardial function in coronary surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane has been shown to protect against myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury in animals. The present study investigated whether these effects were clinically relevant and would protect left ventricular (LV) function during coronary surgery. METHODS: Twenty coronary surgery patients were randomly assigned to receive either target-controlled infusion of propofol or inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane. Except for this, anesthetic and surgical management was the same in all patients. A high-fidelity pressure catheter was positioned in the left ventricle and the left atrium. LV response to increased cardiac load, obtained by leg elevation, was assessed before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Effects on contraction were evaluated by analysis of changes in dP/dt(max). Effects on relaxation were assessed by analysis of the load dependence of myocardial relaxation (R = slope of the relation between time constant tau of isovolumic relaxation and end-systolic pressure). Postoperative concentrations of cardiac troponin I were followed during 36 h. RESULTS: Before CPB, leg elevation slightly increased dP/dt(max) in the sevoflurane group (5 +/- 3%), whereas it remained unchanged in the propofol group (1 +/- 6%). After CPB, leg elevation resulted in a decrease in dP/dt(max) in the propofol group (-5 +/- 4%), whereas the response in the sevoflurane group was comparable to the response before CPB (5 +/- 4%). Load dependence of LV pressure fall (R) was similar in both groups before CPB. After CPB, R was increased in the propofol group but not in the sevoflurane group. Troponin I concentrations were significantly lower in the sevoflurane than in the propofol group. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane preserved LV function after CPB with less evidence of myocardial damage in the first 36 h postoperatively. These data suggest a cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane during coronary artery surgery.

Effects of propofol, desflurane, and sevoflurane on recovery of myocardial function after coronary surgery in elderly high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: The present study investigated the effects of propofol, desflurane, and sevoflurane on recovery of myocardial function in high-risk coronary surgery patients. High-risk patients were defined as those older than 70 yr with three-vessel disease and an ejection fraction less than 50% with impaired length-dependent regulation of myocardial function. METHODS: Coronary surgery patients (n = 45) were randomly assigned to receive either target-controlled infusion of propofol or inhalational anesthesia with desflurane or sevoflurane. Cardiac function was assessed perioperatively and during 24 h postoperatively using a Swan-Ganz catheter. Perioperatively, a high-fidelity pressure catheter was positioned in the left and right atrium and ventricle. Response to increased cardiac load, obtained by leg elevation, was assessed before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Effects on contraction were evaluated by analysis of changes in dP/dt(max). Effects on relaxation were assessed by analysis of the load-dependence of myocardial relaxation. Postoperative levels of cardiac troponin I were followed for 36 h. RESULTS: After CPB, cardiac index and dP/dt(max) were significantly lower in patients under propofol anesthesia. Post-CPB, leg elevation resulted in a significantly greater decrease in dP/dt(max) in the propofol group, whereas the responses in the desflurane and sevoflurane groups were comparable with the responses before CPB. After CPB, load dependence of left ventricular pressure drop was significantly higher in the propofol group than in the desflurane and sevoflurane group. Troponin I levels were significantly higher in the propofol group. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane and desflurane but not propofol preserved left ventricular function after CPB in high-risk coronary surgery patients with less evidence of myocardial damage postoperatively.