Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: ethambutol dihydrochloride.

Literature data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing ethambutol dihydrochloride as the only active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) are reviewed. Ethambutol dihydrochloride is a Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) Class III drug with permeability properties approaching the border between BCS Class I and III. BE problems of ethambutol formulations containing different excipients and different dosages forms have not been reported and hence the risk of bioinequivalence caused by excipients is low. Ethambutol has a narrow therapeutic index related to ocular toxicity. However, as long as the prescribers' information of the test product stipulates the need for regular monitoring of ocular toxicity, the additional patient risk is deemed acceptable. It is concluded that a biowaiver can be recommended for IR solid oral dosage forms provided that the test product (a) contains only excipients present in ethambutol IR solid oral drug products approved in ICH or associated countries, for instance as presented in this paper, (b) complies with the criteria for "very rapidly dissolving" and (c) has a prescribers' information indicating the need for testing the patient's vision prior to initiating ethambutol therapy and regularly during therapy.

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: prednisolone.

Literature data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing prednisolone are reviewed. Data on its solubility, oral absorption, and permeability are not totally conclusive, but strongly suggest a BCS Class 1 classification. Prednisolone's therapeutic indications and therapeutic index, pharmacokinetics, and the possibility of excipient interactions were also taken into consideration. Available evidence indicates that a biowaiver for IR solid oral dosage forms formulated with the excipients tabulated in this article would be unlikely to expose patients to undue risks.

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: isoniazid.

Literature data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing isoniazid as the only active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) are reviewed. Isoniazid's solubility and permeability characteristics according to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), as well as its therapeutic use and therapeutic index, its pharmacokinetic properties, data related to the possibility of excipient interactions and reported BE/bioavailability (BA) problems were taken into consideration. Isoniazid is "highly soluble" but data on its oral absorption and permeability are inconclusive, suggesting this API to be on the borderline of BCS Class I and III. For a number of excipients, an interaction with the permeability is extreme unlikely, but lactose and other deoxidizing saccharides can form condensation products with isoniazid, which may be less permeable than the free API. A biowaiver is recommended for IR solid oral drug products containing isoniazid as the sole API, provided that the test product meets the WHO requirements for "very rapidly dissolving" and contains only the excipients commonly used in isoniazid products, as listed in this article. Lactose and/or other deoxidizing saccharides containing formulations should be subjected to an in vivo BE study.

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: prednisone.

Literature data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing prednisone are reviewed. Due to insufficient data prednisone cannot be definitively classified according to the current Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) criteria as both the solubility and the permeability of prednisone are on the borderline of the present criteria of BCS Class I. Prednisone's therapeutic indications and therapeutic index, pharmacokinetics and the possibility of excipient interactions were also taken into consideration. Available evidence indicates that a biowaiver for IR solid oral dosage forms formulated with the excipients tabulated in this article would be unlikely to expose patients to undue risks.

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: acetaminophen (paracetamol).

Literature data are reviewed on the properties of acetaminophen (paracetamol) related to the biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS). According to the current BCS criteria, acetaminophen is BCS Class III compound. Differences in composition seldom, if ever, have an effect on the extent of absorption. However, some studies show differences in rate of absorption between brands and formulations. In particular, sodium bicarbonate, present in some drug products, was reported to give an increase in the rate of absorption, probably caused by an effect on gastric emptying. In view of Marketing Authorizations (MAs) given in a number of countries to acetaminophen drug products with rapid onset of action, it is concluded that differences in rate of absorption were considered therapeutically not relevant by the Health Authorities. Moreover, in view of its therapeutic use, its wide therapeutic index and its uncomplicated pharmacokinetic properties, in vitro dissolution data collected according to the relevant Guidances can be safely used for declaring bioequivalence (BE) of two acetaminophen formulations. Therefore, accepting a biowaiver for immediate release (IR) acetaminophen solid oral drug products is considered scientifically justified, if the test product contains only those excipients reported in this paper in their usual amounts and the test product is rapidly dissolving, as well as the test product fulfils the criterion of similarity of dissolution profiles to the reference product.

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: cimetidine.

Literature data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing for the approval of immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing cimetidine are reviewed. According to the current Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), cimetidine would be assigned to Class III. Cimetidine's therapeutic use and therapeutic index, its pharmacokinetic properties, data related to the possibility of excipient interactions, and reported BE/bioavailability (BA) problems were also taken into consideration. On the basis of the overall evidence, a biowaiver can be recommended for cimetidine IR products, provided that the test product contains only those excipients reported in this paper in their usual amounts, and that the test and the comparator drug products both are "rapidly dissolving" as per BCS.

Clinical modulation of doxorubicin resistance by the calmodulin-inhibitor, trifluoperazine: a phase I/II trial.

Drug resistance to chemotherapy agents such as doxorubicin appears to be an important cause of therapeutic failure in cancer treatment. Based on preclinical information demonstrating that the phenothiazine calmodulin-inhibitor trifluoperazine can enhance retention and cytotoxicity of doxorubicin in resistant cells, a phase I/II trial of the combination was performed to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of trifluoperazine that could be administered with doxorubicin. Patients with intrinsic (no previous response) and acquired (previous response with relapse) doxorubicin resistance were eligible. Doxorubicin was administered as a 96-hour continuous infusion (60 mg/m2) on days 2 through 5. Trifluoperazine was administered in divided doses orally on days 1 through 6, with dose escalation from 20 to 100 mg/d. Thirty-six patients were evaluable. The MTD of trifluoperazine was 60 mg/d, with dose-limiting toxicity being extrapyramidal side effects. No alteration of doxorubicin toxicity was observed. Seven of the 36 patients responded (one complete response [CR], six partial responses [PR]), with seven of 21 patients having acquired resistance, and zero of 15 with intrinsic resistance demonstrating responses. Doxorubicin plasma levels were not affected by trifluoperazine, and the maximal trifluoperazine plasma levels achieved were 129.83 ng/mL. This trial demonstrates the combination of trifluoperazine and doxorubicin is well tolerated, and the schedule recommended for phase II trials is doxorubicin, 60 mg/m2 (continuous infusion) days 2 through 5, and trifluoperazine, 15 mg four times per day orally days 1 through 6. Continued investigation of this combination is indicated for patients with acquired doxorubicin resistance.

Methoxyphenamine O-demethylase and 5-hydroxylase: a GLC-ECD assay to study their activities and their inhibition by debrisoquine and sparteine.

A GLC-ECD method is described for the determination of the O-desmethyl, N-desmethyl and aromatic 5-hydroxy metabolites of methoxyphenamine in liver homogenates. The O-desmethyl and 5-hydroxy metabolites are deficient in poor metabolizers of debrisoquine and sparteine and the Dark Agouti rat model of this human phenotype. The present analytical method can be useful in determining methoxyphenamine O-demethylase and 5-hydroxylase activities as well as identifying those substrates which inhibit these and are worthy of further study.

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms based on biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS) literature data: chloroquine phosphate, chloroquine sulfate, and chloroquine hydrochloride.

Literature data on the properties of chloroquine phosphate, chloroquine sulfate, and chloroquine hydrochloride related to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) are reviewed. The available information indicates that these chloroquine salts can be classified as highly soluble and highly permeable, i.e., BCS class I. The qualitative composition of immediate release (IR) tablets containing these Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) with a Marketing Authorization (MA) in Belgium (BE), Germany (DE), Finland (FI), and The Netherlands (NL) is provided. In view of these MA's and the critical therapeutic indication of chloroquine, it is assumed that the registration authorities had evidence that these formulations are bioequivalent to the innovator. It is concluded that IR tablets formulated with these excipients are candidates for a biowaiver.

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: ibuprofen.

Literature data are reviewed on the properties of ibuprofen related to the biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS). Ibuprofen was assessed to be a BCS class II drug. Differences in composition and/or manufacturing procedures were reported to have an effect on the rate, but not the extent of absorption; such differences are likely to be detectable by comparative in vitro dissolution tests. Also in view of its therapeutic use, its wide therapeutic index and uncomplicated pharmacokinetic properties, a biowaiver for immediate release (IR) ibuprofen solid oral drug products is scientifically justified, provided that the test product contains only those excipients reported in this paper in their usual amounts, the dosage form is rapidly dissolving (85% in 30 min or less) in buffer pH 6.8 and the test product also exhibits similar dissolution profiles to the reference product in buffer pH 1.2, 4.5, and 6.8.

Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: ranitidine hydrochloride.

Literature and experimental data relevant to the decision to allow a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence testing for the approval of immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing ranitidine hydrochloride are reviewed. According to the current Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), ranitidine hydrochloride should be assigned to Class III. However, based on its therapeutic and therapeutic index, pharmacokinetic properties and data related to the possibility of excipient interactions, a biowaiver can be recommended for IR solid oral dosage forms that are rapidly dissolving and contain only those excipients as reported in this study.

The bioequivalence of highly variable drugs and drug products.

'Highly variable drugs' have been defined as those drugs for which the within-subject variability (WSV) equals or exceeds 30% of the maximum concentration (Cmax) and/or the area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC). Despite the fact that highly variable drugs are generally safe with flat dose response curves, the bioequivalence of their formulations is a problem because the high variability means that large numbers of subjects are required to give adequate statistical power. Highly variable drug products are poor quality formulations where high within-formulation variability (e.g. tablet to tablet variability) poses a problem rather than high innate WSV of the drug itself. A further problem caused by high variability is that a subset of the population may respond differently to the two formulations producing a significant subject x formulation interaction. Practical examples are shown using replicate designs. The methods proposed to deal with the problems posed by highly variable drugs include: (i) Drug regulatory jurisdictions states that the 90% confidence interval (90% CI) around the test to reference geometric mean ratio (GMR) is required to fit with bioequivalence acceptance limits of 0.8 - 1.25 for both Cmax and AUC. The WSV for single point estimation of Cmax is often greater than that for AUC. One strategy therefore is not to require a 90% CI for Cmax of drugs that do not exhibit a toxicity associated with Cmax and merely require the GMR to fall within the acceptance limits. (ii) To arbitrarily broaden the bioequivalence acceptance limits. For example, to permit a sponsor to justify the use of wider limits e.g the 90% CI around the GMR of Cmax values might be required to fit within acceptance limits of 0.75 - 1.33 or even 0.70 - 1.42. (iii) A more systematic approach would be to broaden the acceptance limits by scaling to either the residual variance from a 2-period design or to the WSV of the reference product in a replicate design. Subsequent evaluations of scaling procedures have demonstrated that smaller numbers of subjects are required for bioequivalence studies on formulations of highly variable drugs. A disadvantage of scaling is that the method is less sensitive to differences between the means compared with unscaled treatment, such that the GMR may prove to be unacceptably low or high. This possibility has let to a suggestion that the GMR must fall within acceptance limits of 0.8 - 1.25 in scaled treatments. (iv) A similar method is to scale the metric rather than the acceptance limits. This method was proposed by the United States' Food and Drug Administration in the context of Individual bioequivalence, but may also be applied (v) to average bioequivalence. (vi) To carry out bioequivalence studies at steady state whenever a multiple dose regimen is ethically acceptable for healthy volunteers. This solution is based on the observation that high variability in a single dose study tends to be dampened at steady state, thus increasing statistical power. Drug regulators have not favored this approach on the grounds that bioequivalence testing should be based on the most discriminating test possible. (vii) Finally the use of metabolite data has been proposed since in many (but by no means all) cases, metabolite is less highly variable than that of the parent drug. This subject remains controversial except when the administered substance is a prodrug which converted by metabolism into the active drug.

Exposure measures applied to the bioequivalence of two sustained release formulations of bupropion.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of the exposure measures C(max) (peak exposure), AUC(E) (early exposure) and AUC (total exposure) on the bioequivalence of two sustained release formulations of bupropion (i) in the fasted state and (ii), after a high fat meal. The ratio C(max)/AUC (sensitive to rate of absorption) was also evaluated. METHODS: A two-formulation, two-sequence, four-period replicate design study was performed in 29 healthy men and women after an overnight fast. Similarly, a two-period study was performed in 20 healthy men and women after ingestion of a high fat breakfast. Plasma concentrations of bupropion were measured by HPLC/MS/MS and the data were analyzed (SAS PROC MIXED) by the Schuirmann-Sattersthwaite procedure (four-period study) and by the two one-sided test procedure (SAS PROC GLM) (two-period study). Standard bioequivalence limits of 80 - 125% were applied to all measures including AUC(E) and C(max)/AUC. RESULTS: In the fasting study, the mean plasma concentration vs. time curves from (including over the first 24 hours) following the two administrations of each formulation were similar although there was a significant difference in median t(max) between formulations. This may have contributed to a low estimate of geometric mean ratio (GMR) for AUC(E) (69%) which was judged to have failed bioequivalence. There was also rather low GMRs for Cmax (88%) and C(max)/AUC (89%) but these measure passed because the within-subject variabilities (WSV) were relatively low (19.6% and 11.2%, respectively). Total exposure (AUC(last)) met standard bioequivalence limits of 80 - 125% easily. The raw data from the two-period fed also showed differences in the shapes of the plasma concentration vs. time curves around C(max) although there was no difference in median t(max). The WSV at median t(max) was high (34%) as was the GMR (117%) for AUCE which failed, as did C(max) (GMR 112%). The WSV was very high at early time points before settling into a "plateau" at about 11%. DISCUSSION: There was no "spike" in the plasma concentration vs. time profiles up to median t(max) or beyond and therefore there was no evidence of dose dumping of the test formulation in either fasted or fed states. No bioequivalence limits have been set for AUC(E) but the application of standard BE limits of 80 to 125% meant that the fed study was clearly underpowered given the high WSV at early time points. CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed on the interesting concept of early exposure. The WSV is often high at median t(max) which means that standard bioequivalence limits of 80 - 125% may be inappropriate. Despite the lack of dose dumping, application of AUC(E) to the fasting study, would have resulted in failure to declare bioequivalence since the GMR for this measure was only 69.5%. Application of a 90% confidence interval to AUC(E) to the fed study would have required powering to cope with the fact that this measure was highly variable.

Enantioselective pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dl-threo-methylphenidate in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Nine boys with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder took part in a study in which d-methylphenidate, l-methylphenidate, dl-methylphenidate, or placebo were administered in a double-blind, four-way, randomized, crossover design. Plasma levels of the isomers of methylphenidate were monitored by means of an enantioselective assay method. The ability of the children to perform tasks that required sustained attention was monitored by a battery of computer tests. There was no evidence of interconversion between the enantiomers in vivo, although the presence of the d-isomer significantly altered the pharmacokinetics of the l-antipode. The presence of the l-isomer did not affect the pharmacokinetics of d-methylphenidate. The computer tests revealed a drug-induced improvement in sustained attention that was entirely attributable to the d-enantiomer. There was no evidence to suggest that the effectiveness of d-methylphenidate was in any way compromised by the presence of its antipode.

Metabolism of methoxyphenamine in extensive and poor metabolizers of debrisoquin.

Urine and plasma concentrations of methoxyphenamine (MP) and three of its metabolites were determined after a single oral 60.3 mg dose of MP hydrochloride to healthy subjects of known debrisoquin (D) phenotype. Urine was collected from five extensive (EM) and five poor (PM) metabolizers of D for 12 hours and analyzed after treatment with beta-glucuronidase/sulfatase. There were marked interphenotype differences in the total urinary excretion of O-demethylmethoxyphenamine (ODMP) and 5-hydroxymethoxyphenamine (5HMP), as well as in MP/ODMP and MP/5HMP ratios. In contrast, the urinary output of N-demethylmethoxyphenamine (NDMP) or MP/NDMP ratios showed no interphenotype differences. Plasma data from two EMs and two PMs showed that the mean values for maximum concentration t1/2, and total AUC for MP were two-, three-, and sixfold greater, respectively, in PMs than in EMs. The plasma levels of ODMP and 5HMP were higher in EMs than in PMs, whereas the converse was true for NDMP. Thus, O-demethylation and aromatic 5-hydroxylation of MP are defective in PMs of D, resulting in increased MP and NDMP plasma levels. The form of cytochrome P-450 involved in the N-demethylation of MP is different from that responsible for O-demethylation and aromatic 5-hydroxylation.

Elevation of plasma concentrations of haloperidol after the addition of fluoxetine.

Fluoxetine (20 mg/day) was added for 7-10 days to stable doses of haloperidol given to eight psychotic patients. Mean plasma concentrations of haloperidol were elevated by 20% (p less than 0.05), but extrapyramidal side effects did not increase appreciably, indicating a relatively minor interaction between these agents.

Distribution of fluphenazine and its metabolites in brain regions and other tissues of the rat.

Rats were given 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg oral doses of fluphenazine (FLU) dihydrochloride daily for 15 days. FLU and its sulfoxide (FL-SO), 7-hydroxy (7-OH-FLU) and N4'-oxide (FLU-NO) metabolites were assayed in plasma, liver, kidney, fat, whole brain, and brain regions by specific and sensitive radioimmunoassays (RIA). All metabolites were detected in tissues at higher levels than in plasma, and the levels increased with dose. FLU was 10- to 27-fold higher in brain regions than in plasma. Brain vs plasma levels of FLU correlated more closely than levels of its metabolites. Liver contained the highest levels of all analytes at all doses. FLU-SO was the major metabolite in brain regions (24% to 96% of FLU) and accumulated in fat 43 to 75 times more than FLU. Levels of 7-OH-FLU and FLU-NO were very low in brain (1% to 20% of FLU). FLU-SO and FLU-NO had only 1% to 3% the affinity for D1 and D2 receptors, but 7-OH-FLU had 20% the D2 and 5% the D1 affinity of FLU. The low affinity for dopamine receptors and low brain-levels of metabolites of FLU indicate that they are not likely to contribute importantly to pharmacologic responses of FLU. Also, the estimated relative "activity factor" for these compounds in the brain indicated that the contribution to neuropharmacologic activity by metabolites is less than 1% of FLU. Consequently, clinical monitoring of plasma FLU alone may be sufficient.

Binding of phenothiazine neuroleptics to plasma proteins.

The binding of chlorpromazine, trifluoperazine, perphenazine, desipramine, propranolol and salicylic acid to human plasma and isolated plasma proteins was studied using equilibrium dialysis. Unlike salicylic acid, an acidic compound only bound to human serum albumin, the basic drugs were bound to all plasma protein fractions studied (albumin, alpha 1-acid glycoprotein, lipoproteins, gamma-globulins) with alpha 1-acid glycoprotein an important binding protein for each of them. The interaction of chloropromazine, perphenazine and trifluoperazine with alpha 1-acid glycoprotein was studied using Scatchard analysis. The primary class of binding sites revealed a low capacity (n = 0.5-1) and a high affinity (K = 10(5)-10(6) M-1) for the phenothiazines. The interaction of chlorpromazine, perphenazine and trifluoperazine with albumin was of the high capacity-low affinity type. In binding studies using plasma obtained from healthy volunteers, alpha 1-acid glycoprotein was found to be a very important binding protein for the basic drug studied with the exception of desipramine. This shows that results derived from binding studies using isolated protein fractions should be interpreted with caution.

Pharmacokinetics of long-acting injectable neuroleptic drugs: clinical implications.

The authors review the literature regarding the pharmacokinetics of long-acting injectable neuroleptic drugs (LINS). There are important differences between LINS and oral neuroleptics that affect their pharmacokinetics. By avoiding first pass metabolism in gut and liver, LINS result in lower circulating concentrations of metabolites than are found after oral administration. In addition, LINS take more time to reach a stable steady state than their oral counterparts. The clinical significance of these pharmacokinetic properties is discussed. The authors recommend that when patients are being changed from oral neuroleptics to LINS, that this conversion be done gradually over several months.

A placebo-controlled trial of fluoxetine added to neuroleptic in patients with schizophrenia.

Following a 2-week placebo lead-in, schizophrenic patients were randomly assigned to fluoxetine 20 mg/day or placebo added to depot neuroleptic for a 6-week, double blind trial. All patients had received a stable dose of depot neuroleptic for at least 6 months and did not meet criteria for depression. Serum samples were obtained at baseline and at weeks 4 and 6. Scores on the negative symptom subscale of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) were significantly lower at week 6, controlling for baseline scores, in patients receiving fluoxetine (n = 20) compared to patients receiving placebo (n = 21). Measures of psychosis, depression, global functioning and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) did not differ between groups at week 6. Fluoxetine administration was associated with a mean 65% increase in serum fluphenazine concentrations in 15 patients and a mean 20% increase in serum haloperidol concentrations in three patients. The change in negative symptoms at week 6 did not correlate with serum concentrations of fluoxetine or norfluoxetine, but did inversely correlate with S-norfluoxetine, an active stereoisomer of fluoxetine. For these chronically ill patients, fluoxetine significantly improved negative symptoms and did not worsen EPS, despite causing substantial elevation in serum concentrations of neuroleptics.