Relative risk of second malignant neoplasms highest among young adult cancer patients - a population-based registry study in Finland.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to explore the incidence of second malignant neoplasms (SMNs) among adult cancer patients in Finland diagnosed with their first primary cancer (FPC) in 1992-2021. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study used data from the population-based Finnish Cancer Registry (FCR). Risk estimates were calculated using the standardised incidence ratio (SIR), the ratio of observed second cancers compared to the expected numbers assuming the same cancer incidence as the corresponding sex-age-calendar year -split of the general population. RESULTS: A total of 573,379 FPCs were diagnosed during 1992-2021. During the follow-up, 60,464 SMNs were diagnosed. Male cancer patients had neither a decreased nor an increased risk (SIR 1.00 [95% CI, 0.99-1.01]) and female patients had an 8% increased risk (SIR 1.08 [95% CI, 1.06-1.09]) of developing any SMN compared to a FPC in the general population. The highest SIR of any SMN was observed in patients aged 20-39 -years at FPC diagnosis, and the SIR decreased by increasing age at diagnosis. Patients with lymphoid and haematopoietic tissue neoplasms, cancers of the mouth and pharynx, endocrine glands, respiratory and intrathoracic organs, skin, and urinary organs had the highest SIRs, while patients with cancers of the male genital organs and the female breast had the lowest SIRs. INTERPRETATION: Elevated SIRs were observed in cancer patients diagnosed at an early age and for FPCs known to be in large part attributable to lifestyle factors, which highlights the importance of monitoring and encouraging lifestyle changes.

Accurate pattern-based extraction of complex Gleason score expressions from pathology reports.

PURPOSE: The Gleason score is an important grading factor of prostate cancer. Gleason scores can be extracted from pathology report texts using regular expressions, but previously developed programmes have targeted only relatively simple Gleason score expressions. We developed a programme capable of extracting also complex expressions. The programme is relatively easy to adapt to other languages and datasets. METHODS: We developed and evaluated our regular expression-based programme using manually processed pathology reports of prostate cancer cases diagnosed in Finland in 2016-2017. Both simple and complex Gleason score expressions were targeted. We measured the performance of our programme using recall, precision, and the F1. The proportion of complex Gleason score expressions was estimated as the complement of the recall when only addition expressions (e.g. "Gleason 3 + 4") were targeted. RESULTS: The detection of values (scores and score components) is based on mandatory keywords before or after the value. The programme favours precision over recall by primarily allowing for lists of optional expressions between keyword-value pairs and only secondarily allowing for arbitrary expressions. The programme is straightforward to adapt to new datasets by modifying the lists of mandatory and optional expressions. The full and addition-only programmes had 92% (95% CI: [90%, 95%]) and 65% ([61%, 70%]) recall and high precision (98% [97%, 99%] and 100% [99%, 100%]), respectively. The estimated proportion of complex Gleason score expressions was 100-65 = 35%. CONCLUSIONS: Even complex Gleason score expressions can be extracted with high recall and precision using regular expressions. We recommend implementing automated Gleason score extraction where possible by adapting our validated programme.

Correction: Association of symptoms and interval breast cancers in the mammography-screening programme: population-based matched cohort study.

The authors report that the labels indicating the symptom types and no symptom lines in the original version of Figure 2 were missing. The correct version of Figure 2 with the labels included is provided below.

Association of symptoms and interval breast cancers in the mammography-screening programme: population-based matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the association between symptoms reported at breast cancer screening visits and interval cancers (ICs) in a prospective manner. METHODS: This population-based matched cohort study uses data of the Finnish National Breast Cancer Screening Programme that invites women aged 50-69 years old during 1992-2012. Subjects who attended screening with symptoms were matched with asymptomatic reference cohorts based on age at screening visit, year of invitation, number of invited visits and municipality of invitation. The primary outcome was ICs. RESULTS: Women with a lump had a threefold (hazard ratio 3.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.0-4.6) risk of ICs and a higher risk (hazard ratio 1.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.0) at the subsequent visit compared with those without a lump. The fatal interval cancer risk increased by 0.39 per 1000 screens with a lump. The cumulative incidences of interval cancer increased within a month of a mammography-negative visit with a lump and after about 6 months of the visit with retraction or nipple discharge. CONCLUSION: Women with breast symptoms have a clearly increased risk of interval breast cancer after the screening visit. Our findings indicate the need for different screening strategies in symptomatic women.

Proportion of women with self-reported opportunistic mammography before organized screening.

BACKGROUND: In Finland, organized nationwide breast cancer (BC) screening is biennially offered for women aged 50-69 years. The aim was to estimate, for the first time in Finland, the proportion of women having opportunistic mammography at age less than 50 years and to investigate the role of BC family history and educational level for having opportunistic mammography. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study material comprises two self-administered, population-based questionnaires from altogether 9845 healthy women; 4666 women in Women's Health and Use of Hormone-study (WHH survey), and 5179 in Breast Cancer Screening, Lifestyle and Quality of Life-study (EET survey). We report the estimated proportions of women with self-reported opportunistic mammography at age <50 years in percentages. RESULTS: The response percentages were 53% in the WHH survey and 52% in the EET survey. The percentage of women with self-reported opportunistic mammography was 66.7% and 60.4% in the two questionnaires, respectively. Regarding family history of BC, 76.5% and 68.5% of women with BC family history in a first degree relative reported having had a mammography, in contrast to that of 65.5% and 59.4% of women without BC family history. Opportunistic mammography was also more common in women with >12 years of education than women with ≤12 years of education. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Overall, some two thirds of the women reports of having had a mammography before organized screening started. Opportunistic mammography was more likely among women with a positive family history of BC in a first degree relative as well as more than 12 years of education. Regardless of low response activity, the observed popularity of opportunistic mammography before organized screening gives ground for further evaluation of the related health care practices. Screening activity before organized screening also influences the evaluation of the screening program, as women have different, indeterminate histories of pre-organized screening.

Nordcan.R: a new tool for federated analysis and quality assurance of cancer registry data.

Aim of the article: We present our new GDPR-compliant federated analysis programme (nordcan.R), how it is used to compute statistics for the Nordic cancer statistics web platform NORDCAN, and demonstrate that it works also with non-Nordic data. Materials and methods: We chose R and Stata programming languages for writing nordcan.R. Additionally, the internationally used CRG Tools programme by International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO) was employed. A formal assessment of (GDPR-compliant) anonymity of all nordcan.R outputs was performed. In order to demonstrate that nordcan.R also works with non-Nordic data, we used data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Results: nordcan.R, publicly available on Github, takes as input cancer and general population data and produces tables of statistics. Each NORDCAN participant runs nordcan.R locally and delivers its results to IARC for publication. According to our anonymity assessment the data can be shared with international organizations, including IARC. nordcan.R incidence results on Norwegian and Dutch data are highly similar to those produced by two other independent methods. Conclusion: nordcan.R produces accurate cancer statistics where all personal and sensitive data are kept within each cancer registry. In the age of strict data protection policies, we have shown that international collaboration in cancer registry research and statistics reporting is achievable with the federated analysis approach. Undertakings similar to NORDCAN should consider using nordcan.R.

Spillover improved survival in non-invited patients of the colorectal cancer screening programme.

Objectives In colorectal cancer screening, randomized clinical trials have shown a 16% mean reduction in colorectal cancer mortality, but the Finnish randomized health services study showed no effect. We quantified spillover (the total indirect effect caused by the programme on the non-invited) and corrected the effectiveness estimate of the Finnish programme. Methods We retrieved from the Finnish Cancer Registry data on all non-invited colorectal cancer patients diagnosed in 1999-2013 in municipalities that adopted screening ( n = 18,948). Patients were stratified by three 5-year diagnostic periods and two calendar periods of programme adoption in the municipality of residence. Follow-up ended on 31 December 2013. We measured the spillover effect in patient survival, based on differences of adjusted estimates of the colorectal cancer-related hazard of death between pairs of consecutive diagnostic periods. Results The spillover effect was estimated as 9 percentage points (95% confidence interval: -1 to 19 percentage points). It was 13 percentage points in men (-1 to 26 percentage points) and 5 percentage points in women (-9 to 20 percentage points). The corrected effect estimate of implementing screening in Finland was 5 percentage points. Conclusions The corrected Finnish effectiveness estimate was consistent with estimates from randomized trials. Indirect effects (spillover) bias the invitee-control contrast. In this case, spillover was an inherent benefit of the Finnish programme.

Quality measures of the population-based Finnish Cancer Registry indicate sound data quality for solid malignant tumours.

BACKGROUND: The Finnish Cancer Registry (FCR) has collected population-based data on cancer incidence for scientific research and statistical purposes since 1953. Our aim was to provide a comprehensive quality assessment of the current cancer registry data in Finland. METHODS: We used established quantitative and semi-quantitative techniques to address four main dimensions of data quality: completeness, comparability, validity and timeliness for the period 1953-2013, with a special focus on cancers diagnosed in 2009-2013. For completeness, hospital admissions and outpatient visits were used as an independent data source. RESULTS: In 2009-2013, 153 147 incident tumours were registered in the FCR. Of them, 91% were solid tumours. The completeness for all solid tumours was estimated at 96%, and for non-solid tumours at 86%. Potential underreporting was most prominent for tumours which are not typically histologically verified such as haematological malignancies and non-malignant tumours of the central nervous system. Of all cancers, 93% were morphologically verified, with variation by primary site. The proportion of cancers with uncertain or ill-defined primary site and the proportion of death certificate only registrations were both low at 1.9% and 2.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The FCR provides overall accurate and close to complete national cancer data for solid malignant tumours. Registration of tumours with no histology is still compromised. This warrants continuous communication with clinicians to ensure undisturbed data flow, and active trace-back using external data sources such as hospital administrative data. In addition, broad diagnosis categories would be less sensitive to diversity of input and data quality when international comparisons are made.

Impact of major life events on breast-cancer-specific mortality: A case fatality study on 8000 breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that long-term activation of the body's stress-response system and subsequent overexposure to stress hormones may be associated with increased morbidity. However, evidence on the impact of major life events on mortality from breast cancer (BC) remains inconclusive. The main aim of this study is to investigate whether major negatively or positively experienced life events before or after diagnosis have an effect on BC-specific mortality in women who have survived with BC for at least 2 years. METHODS: We conducted a case fatality study with data on life events from a self-administered survey and data on BC from the Finnish Cancer Registry. Cox models were fitted to estimate BC mortality hazard ratios (MRs) between those who have undergone major life events and those who haven't. RESULTS: None of the pre-diagnostic negative life events had any effect on BC-specific mortality. Regarding post-diagnostic events, the effect was greatest in women with moderate scores of events. As for event-specific scores, increased BC mortality was observed with spouse unemployment, relationship problems, and death of a close friend. By contrast, falling in love and positive developments in hobbies were shown to be associated with lower BC mortality (MRs 0.67, 95%CI: 0.49-0.92 and 0.74, 95%CI: 0.57-0.96, respectively). In an analysis restricted to recently diagnosed cases (2007), also death of a child and of a mother was associated with increased BC mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Some major life events regarding close personal relationships may play a role in BC-specific mortality, with certain negative life events increasing BC mortality and positive events decreasing it. The observed favorable associations between positive developments in romantic relationships and hobbies and BC mortality are likely to reflect the importance of social interaction and support.

Long-Term Causes of Death and Excess Mortality After Carotid Artery Ligation.

OBJECTIVE: Carotid artery ligation (CAL) is used to treat large and complex intracranial aneurysms. However, little is known about long-term survival and causes of death in patients who undergo the procedure. This study was intended to evaluate if patients who have undergone CAL have long-term excess mortality and what the causes of death are. METHODS: All patients were treated at Helsinki University Hospital between 1937 and 2009. Patients who had undergone CAL and survived ≥1 year after the procedure were included in the cohort. Follow-up was until death or 2015 (2711 patient-years). Causes of death were reviewed and relative survival ratios calculated using the Ederer II method and a matched population. RESULTS: There was 12% excess mortality in all patients 20 years after CAL and 22% after 30 years. A higher proportion of the patients who had subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) died during follow-up compared with unruptured patients undergoing CAL. Cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular accident were the leading causes of death. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with unruptured aneurysms did not experience as much excess mortality as those who had an SAH. The higher proportion of deaths observed in ruptured patients may be partly because of long-term excess mortality conferred by the SAH itself or SAH risk factors. Although the entire population did display excess mortality compared with the general population, this may be because of shared risk factors for aneurysm development and rupture and the cause of death.