New strategies to overcome the drawbacks of currently available flu vaccines.

Vaccination represents the most efficient tool to control morbidity and mortality resulting from influenza infections in humans. The currently licensed influenza vaccines provide good protection levels in healthy adults, whereas lower protection is generally achieved in ageing individuals who are at a higher risk of developing severe clinical manifestations. Future improvements in influenza vaccines should address the needs of high risk groups including the elderly, small children and chronic patients. Recently, due to the increased incidence of avian influenza pandemic outbreaks, the prevention of a potential human influenza pandemic turned into another crucial issue in the influenza vaccination field. The development and validation of manufacturing processes for efficient and safe pandemic vaccines became one of the top priorities of health, regulatory and funding agencies all over the world. In the pandemic context, the development of novel vaccines administered via the mucosal route may play a significant role by reducing virus shedding from infected individuals. This chapter provides insights in the limitations of existing manufacturing processes, new approaches to overcome limitation in vaccine production, mechanisms of action of current vaccines and discuss potential strategies to improve the immunogenicity and efficacy of influenza vaccines.

Safety and antigenicity of whole virus and subunit influenza A/Hong Kong/1073/99 (H9N2) vaccine in healthy adults: phase I randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: In 1999, avian influenza A/Hong Kong/1073/99 (H9N2) virus emerged as a pandemic threat to human beings. We aimed to assess safety, tolerability, and antigenicity of whole virus and subunit H9N2 vaccines in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In a phase I randomised trial we randomly assigned 60 participants to whole virus or subunit H9N2 vaccine. Two doses of 7.5 microg, 15 microg, or 30 microg haemagglutinin influenza A H9N2 vaccine, were given 3 weeks apart. We measured antibody responses by haemagglutination-inhibition and microneutralisation. The primary outcome was geometric mean antibody titre 21 days after vaccination. Analysis was per protocol. FINDINGS: Both vaccines were safe and well tolerated. The antibody titres after vaccination did not differ significantly between subunit and whole virus vaccine. 24 of 60 prevaccination serum samples had unexpected reactivity to H9N2, but only in participants older than 32 years, in whom one dose of either vaccine evoked antibody responses associated with protection. In participants aged 32 years or younger, antibody responses to one dose of whole virus or subunit vaccine were poor, fulfilling none of the criteria used for yearly relicensing of interpandemic vaccines. Whole virus vaccine produced a significantly higher probability of seroconversion compared with subunit virus for this age-group. INTERPRETATION: In immunologically naive patients whole-virus vaccine produced better responses than subunit vaccine. Two doses of subunit or whole virus vaccine would leave a large proportion of the naive population (< or =32 years) unprotected against A/Hong Kong/1073/99 (H9N2). Primed patients should be protected with a single dose of either vaccine.

Eleven years of Inflexal V-a virosomal adjuvanted influenza vaccine.

Since the introduction to the Swiss market in 1997, Crucell (former Berna Biotech Ltd.), has sold over 41 million doses worldwide of the virosomal adjuvanted influenza vaccine, Inflexal V. Since 1992, 29 company sponsored clinical studies investigating the efficacy and safety of Inflexal V have been completed in which 3920 subjects participated. During its decade on the market, Inflexal V has shown an excellent tolerability profile due to its biocompatibility and purity. The vaccine contains no thiomersal or formaldehyde and its purity is reflected in the low ovalbumin content. By mimicking natural infection, the vaccine is highly efficacious. Inflexal V is the only adjuvanted influenza vaccine licensed for all age groups and shows a good immunogenicity in both healthy and immunocompromised elderly, adults and children. This review presents and discusses the experience with Inflexal V during the past decade.

Safety and immunogenicity of whole-virus, alum-adjuvanted whole-virus, virosomal, and whole-virus intradermal influenza A/H9N2 vaccine formulations.

Avian influenza H9N2 viruses are considered as a pandemic threat. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of fourteen H9N2 vaccine formulations. A randomized, phase I trial was done in 353 adults, aged 18-82 years. Subjects received two doses of A/Hong Kong/1073/99 (H9N2) whole-virus, alum-adjuvanted whole-virus, virosomal, or intradermal whole-virus vaccine at four doses (1.7, 5, 15 or 45 microg haemagglutinin). Sera were obtained before and three weeks after each vaccination (days 0, 21, and 42) for haemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) and neutralization assays. All formulations were well tolerated. Pre-vaccination sera from subjects aged below or above 40 years had baseline antibody to H9N2 in 1% and 16% of samples. Compared to intramuscular whole-virus vaccine, alum-adjuvanted vaccine was more immunogenic, intradermal vaccine was comparable, and virosomal vaccine less immunogenic. Among subjects under 40 years, two doses (45, 15, and 5 microg) of alum-adjuvanted vaccine achieved seroprotective HAI titres in 50%, 41%, and 39% respectively, and neutralization seroconversions in 83%, 82%, and 78% of recipients. Among subjects over 40 years, one dose (45, 15, and 5 microg) of alum-adjuvanted vaccine achieved seroprotective HAI titres in 50%, 25% and 0% respectively, and neutralization seroconversions in 88%, 63% and 63% of recipients. Among immunologically naive subjects under 40 years, two doses of vaccine are required and alum-adjuvanted vaccines were most immunogenic. Among immunologically primed subjects over 40 years, one dose of whole-virus or alum-adjuvanted vaccine induced immune responses; the second dose provided less additional benefit. However, no vaccine formulation satisfied all European regulatory criteria for pandemic vaccines.

A clinical study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of attenuated measles vaccine administered intranasally to healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of a safe and effective vaccine for over four decades, measles remains one of the most common infectious disease killers of children in the world. Mucosal administration of currently licensed measles vaccine has been proposed to address issues of needle safety and improve vaccine uptake. METHODS: Healthy adult volunteers were randomized to receive live-attenuated monovalent measles virus vaccine (Moraten Berna) via the standard subcutaneous (SQ) or the experimental intranasal (IN) route in a randomized, double-masked fashion. Safety, reactogenicity, immunogenicity, and shedding were assessed. RESULTS: Safety, reactogenicity, and viral shedding were not significantly different in the two study groups. Immunogenicity was markedly lower in the group of volunteers that received vaccine via the IN route. Plaque reduction neutralization (PRN) geometric mean titers (GMT) were 125 (95% confidence interval [CI] 68-228) milli International Units per milliliter (mIU/mL) on day 28 in recipients of IN vaccine versus 645 (95% CI 468-889) mIU/mL in recipients of vaccine SQ; p< 0.001 by Mann-Whitney Rank Sum. 50% of measles non-immune individuals mounted titers above the protective threshold of PRN 200 mIU/mL after IN administration versus 100% of volunteers who received the vaccine SQ. CONCLUSION: Intranasal administration of live-attenuated measles vaccine was safe and well tolerated, but failed to mount significant immune responses when compared to subcutaneous administration. It is possible that higher doses or smaller particle size are necessary for successful intranasal measles vaccination and boosting.

Inflexal V a trivalent virosome subunit influenza vaccine: production.

Inflexal V, a novel virosome-based trivalent influenza vaccine, has been shown to be highly immunogenic and well tolerated in children, young adults, and the elderly. Here we discuss the techniques for the manufacture of Inflexal V, highlighting the purity and consistency of the manufacturing process. Key factors to be taken into account in the construction of Inflexal V are the retention of the natural presentation of antigens, its biodegradability and the presentation of few adverse events. The constituents of the vaccine were also carefully considered based on suitability for human use, adjuvanticity and an innate lack of toxicity.