The impact of the latest echocardiographic chamber quantification recommendations on the prediction of left atrial appendage thrombus presence by transthoracic echocardiography.

INTRODUCTION: The latest recommendations for echocardiographic chamber quantification have implemented updated normal values for all cardiac chambers. PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of normal and abnormal values of routine echocardiographic parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left atrial volume indexed to body surface area (LAVi) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and to determine the influence of LVEF and LAVi reclassification on the prediction of LAAT by transthoracic echocardiography. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the database of 1674 transesophageal echocardiograms performed between 2012 and 2015 in our echo lab. The study involved patients (mean age 70 ± 7 years, 80% men) with paroxysmal or persistent AF (35 patients with left atrial appendage thrombus [LAAT] and 35 sex- and age-matched controls without LAAT). LVEF and LAVi were categorised in two ways: semi-quantitative using four-degree scale (normal or abnormal graded from mild and moderate to severe) and qualitative (normal vs. abnormal). RESULTS: We reclassified 6 (9%) and 4 (6%) patients with regard to LVEF as well as 38 (54%) and 16 (23%) with regard to LAVi on semi-quantitative and qualitative scale, respectively. After adjustment for effective anticoagulation and approved risk factors in the multivariate models, we identified LVEF categorised in semi-quantitative manner according to both documents, LAVi categorised in a binary manner by new guidelines and semi-quantitative scale by both recommendations as independently associated with LAAT. CONCLUSIONS: Differentiation between normal and abnormal value enhanced the diagnostic meaning of LAVi in the aspect of higher LAAT risk. LVEF reclassification had no significant influence.

Bicuspid aortic valve morphology and its association with aortic diameter: an echocardiographic study.

BACKGROUND: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is strongly associated with aortopathy. Previous studies have suggested that various types of bicuspid aortic valve morphology may differently affect the aortic dilatation. AIM: To evaluate the impact of BAV cusp fusion morphology (type I - right-left coronary cusp fusion; type II - right-noncoronary cusp fusion) on the diameters of the aorta. METHODS: BAV morphology was evaluated retrospectively in a group of 67 consecutive patients with BAV. The control group comprised 1000 randomly selected patients with normal tricuspid aortic valve. Aortic dimensions and other echocardiographic parameters were obtained from the echocardiography database of our department. The diameters of aorta in both BAV sub-types were evaluated at the level of: annulus, the sinus of Valsalva, the sinotubular junction, and the ascending aorta and at the level of the ascending aorta in the control group. RESULTS: Patients with BAV were mainly male (78%), with a mean age of 55.3 ± 16.7 years. The dominant morphology of BAV in the study group was type I (n = 46; 69%). It was associated with increased aortic dimension in comparison to type II BAVs at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva (38.4 ± 5.2 vs. 34.0 ± 4.6 mm, p = 0.002), the sinotubular junction (33.1 ± 5.8 vs. 29.6 ± 5.0 mm, p = 0.035), and the ascending aorta (41.6 ± 7.1 vs. 36.6 ± 6.1 mm, p = 0.006). Indexed aortic diameter was also increased in type I BAV at the level of sinuses of Valsalva (19.6 ± 2.7 vs. 18.1 ± 1.6 mm/m2, p = 0.008) and the ascending aorta (21.3 ± 3.4 vs. 19.3 ± 3.4 mm/m2, p = 0.048). The dimensions of the ascending aorta exceeding the upper normal range limit based on control-group measurements (44.3 mm) were observed more frequently in type I than in type II (33% vs. 10%, p = 0.044). Aortic regurgitation (moderate or severe) occurred in similar percentages of both BAV subtypes (type I: 37% vs. type II: 33%, p = 0.774). There were also no significant differences in aortic valve area (2.2 ± 1.1 vs. 2.0 ± 1.4 cm2, p = 0.163), indexed aortic valve area (1.1 ± 0.6 vs. 1.0 ± 0.6, p = 0.337), peak transvalvular gradient (35.3 ± 20.5 vs. 39.1 ± 28.9 mm Hg, p = 0.862), and mean gradient (18.6 ± 12.3 vs. 22.7 ± 18.2 mm Hg, p = 0.571) and left ventricular ejection fraction (51.8 ± 11.6 vs. 51.8 ± 12.2%, p = 0.978) between type I and type II BAV groups. CONCLUSIONS: Type I BAV cusp fusion morphology is more commonly associated with dilatation of the aorta than type II, especially at the level of the sinus of Valsalva and the ascending aorta.