Halitosis in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Patients - a Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Halitosis is a relatively inhomogeneous pathology with an extremely high prevalence in the population. Potential risk factors for bad breath include bacterial decomposition of organic material as well as numerous general and systemic diseases. The aim of the present study was to analyze whether certain subgroups of oral and maxillofacial surgery patients have a higher risk of halitosis. Further the impact of halitosis on the patient's quality of life was ascertained. METHODS: A total of 127 oral and maxillofacial patients aged between 19 and 86 years were enrolled in this study. On account of their underlining disease, patients were divided into five different investigation groups. The dental examination comprised tongue coating, periodontal screening index (PSI), gingival index (GI), PI (plaque index), DMF-T values as well as non-stimulated saliva flow rates. Halitosis was monitored both organoleptically according to Rosenberg and instrumentally by means of a Halimeter®, which records the volatile sulfur compounds (VSC values in ppm). Patients were further asked to fill out questionnaires regarding their medical history and oral hygiene, oral health (OHIP-14), and quality of life (BDI-II). RESULTS: Halitosis values, which were recorded by a Halimeter® correlated with the objective Rosenberg golden standard method. Furthermore, halitosis values correlated with elevated PSI, GI, and DMF-T values as well as the degree of tongue coating. Patients with oral cancer showed significantly higher VSC values compared to all other groups. No difference in VSC values could be found between all other patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Halimeter® could be validated as a suitable method for determining halitosis in oral and maxillofacial patients. The significantly increased halitosis values in cancer patients as opposed to all other patient groups suggests the potential of halitosis VSC values as a potential screening method. The development of non-invasive breath tests for diagnosis could be subject of future research.

Evaluation of a portable low-budget three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry system for nasal analysis.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) photogrammetry has reached high standards and accuracy but is mainly conducted with stationary and expensive systems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a low-budget portable system with special regard to the gracile and challenging nasal region. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 3D models of the perinasal area were acquired by impression-taking and the scanning of the generated plaster models (3Shape D500) or with a portable low-budget 3D stereophotogrammetry (FUEL3D® SCANIFY®) system. Four examiners analysed defined landmarks of the generated Standard Tessellation Language files with regard to accuracy and interobserver reliability by using 3dMDvultus™ software. A semi-automatic 3D best-fit analysis of both models was performed by using Geomagic® and the Root Mean Squared (RMS) errors were calculated. RESULTS: 41 volunteers were included, with 22 perinasal and perioral landmarks, 15 3D distances and eight 3D angles being analysed per data set. In a point-based analysis the mean spreads were partially smaller in the plaster model scans. Most measurements showed very high (>0.8) to excellent (>0.9) intraclass correlation coefficients, the lowest being found for columella length (0.686) and left nostril width (0.636). Overall, the mean RMS error between the superimposed surfaces was 0.89 ± 0.22 mm in the best-fit analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The corresponding software program was operator-friendly. The findings indicate that the analysed, affordable and portable system is a feasible solution for 3D image acquisition with comparable accuracy reported in the literature. Further studies will analyse the feasibility in neonates.

The possibilities of a portable low-budget three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry system in neonates: a prospective growth analysis and analysis of accuracy.

BACKGROUND: With the technical development, portable three-dimensional (3D) photogrammetry systems are becoming more en vogue because of cost-effectiveness and comparable accuracy to common stationary 3D systems. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of a low-budget portable system for 3D image acquisition with special regard to the gracile nasal region in neonates. Furthermore, the study aimed to establish a 3D data set of the first 180 days post partum. METHODS: Thirty-three healthy, full-term newborn were enrolled and 3D photographs were prospectively taken monthly with a portable low-budget 3D stereophotogrammetry system (FUEL3D® SCANIFY®) for six months. In the third month, age-matched and corresponding 3D models were acquired by taking an impression of the perinasal area. The resulting plaster models were scanned (3Shape D700, 3Shape® A/S, Denmark). Three examiners analyzed independently 21 defined landmarks of the generated Standard Tessellation Language files with regard to accuracy by using 3dMDvultus™ software. A semi-automatic 3D best-fit analysis of 3D photo and plaster models were performed by using Geomagic® and the Root Mean Squared (RMS) errors were calculated. RESULTS: Statistically significant changes of midfacial distances and angles with a focus on nasal growth during the first 180 days postpartum could be specified in absolute and relative dimensions. Best-fit analysis in the third month revealed a RMS error of 0.72 ± 0.22 mm with a mean standard deviation of 0.71 ± 0.21 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The analyzed portable 3D stereophotogrammetry system is a feasible methodology with good accuracy, even in newborn. A description of the growth as well as the establishment of a 3D data set was performed. Its implementation for basic documentation for example in cleft patients is possible and might reduce the need for impressions and facilitate the communications with parents and the interdisciplinary team.