South Pole Telescope optics.

The South Pole Telescope is a 10 m diameter, wide-field, offset Gregorian telescope with a 966-pixel, millimeter-wave, bolometer array receiver. The telescope has an unusual optical system with a cold stop around the secondary. The design emphasizes low scattering and low background loading. All the optical components except the primary are cold, and the entire beam from prime focus to the detectors is surrounded by cold absorber.

Improving safety on the front lines: the role of clinical microsystems.

The clinical microsystem puts medical error and harm reduction into the broader context of safety and quality of care by providing a framework to assess and evaluate the structure, process, and outcomes of care. Eight characteristics of clinical microsystems emerged from a qualitative analysis of interviews with representatives from 43 microsystems across North America. These characteristics were used to develop a tool for assessing the function of microsystems. Further research is needed to assess microsystem performance, outcomes, and safety, and how to replicate "best practices" in other settings.

A replicable and customizable approach to improve ambulatory care and research.

Health care is a service industry. A fundamental attribute of many successful service industries is the "small replicable unit (SRU)." There are three essential elements of an SRU: (1) the smallest core unit of activity, (2) micromeasures designed to help manage the core activities, and (3) combinations of the activities and measures to match local customer needs. In this article, we describe a model for geriatric care based on "SRU thinking." We demonstrate how this approach places measurement of patient values, clinical improvement strategies, and research objectives into day-to-day health care delivery.

Building knowledge of health care as a system.

A system is a functionally related group of interacting, interrelated, or interdependent elements forming a complex whole with a common aim. This article presents a method--a 10-step exercise--for building knowledge of the elements of an interdependent system of health care. Those who seek to improve the work of a system can use this exercise for designing and relating new improvement efforts to the general work of the organization.

Continually improving the health and value of health care for a population of patients: the panel management process.

Today's primary care provider faces the challenge of caring for individual patients as well as caring for populations of patients. This article offers a model--the panel management process--for understanding and managing these activities and relationships. The model integrates some of the lessons learned during the past decade as we have worked to gain an understanding of the continual improvement of health care after we have understood that care as a process and system.

Building a quality future.

How can healthcare leaders stay ahead of the curve? What can they do to see what the future holds and to secure a place for their employees and their organizations? They must begin doing today what they need to do to survive tomorrow. Furthermore, they must take wise action today or there will be no tomorrow. This article looks into the future and connects it with what we must see and do today. The article begins with a glimpse of the future and with an exploration of what people really want from health and healthcare. Next, it examines what appear to be inexorable megatrends and healthcare trends that are sweeping through society. This leads us to consider the quality and value imperatives that must be faced to secure a stake in the healthcare delivery. We will discuss a model for managing care for individual patients and small populations by focusing on where patients, populations, and caregivers meet--at the front lines of patients care. We conclude with some advice on how to build sustainable organizations by exploiting the inevitable.

Improving health care, Part 2: A clinical improvement worksheet and users' manual.

BACKGROUND: Small tests of change can be conducted in everyday clinical practice, thereby turning the health care delivery team into reflective practitioners who can learn from, and improve on, their work. CLINICAL IMPROVEMENT WORKSHEET AND USERS' MANUAL--CASE STUDY: The worksheet has been designed as a simple tool for applying clinical improvement to the core clinical delivery process. A carpal tunnel surgery (CTS) team was formed to improve outcomes and reduce costs for patients and to promote improvements in quality and value. The team wanted to determine if surgical patients treated with local anesthesia in an ambulatory setting have superior satisfaction with care, comparable clinical and functional outcomes, and lower medical (and social) costs. For the first time, standardized assessments of patient case mix, treatment processes, and health outcomes were designed into the delivery process by gathering data from the patient and from the surgeon presurgery and 4 weeks and 12 weeks postsurgery. Results for the first 49 of 50 to 100 consecutive patients show improved outcomes and reductions in costs, from $937 to $405 per patient. LESSONS LEARNED: Even though CTS was selected to be a quick and noncontroversial opportunity, considerable effort had to be expended to ensure that all clinicians and other affected staff would understand and support "the new way". RECOMMENDATIONS: "Ramp up" improvements as time passes, more and more change trials are conducted and their complexity increases. To ease implementation of changes, teams can diagram core process "components" and attach measures, use flowcharts to plan and monitor implementation and use change management thinking to help sharpen the plan and anticipate problems.

Improving health care, Part 1: The clinical value compass.

CLINICAL VALUE COMPASS APPROACH: The clinical Value Compass, named to reflect its similarity in layout to a directional compass, has at its four cardinal points (1) functional status, risk status, and well-being; (2) costs; (3) satisfaction with health care and perceived benefit; and (4) clinical outcomes. To manage and improve the value of health care services, providers will need to measure the value of care for similar patient populations, analyze the internal delivery processes, run tests of changed delivery processes, and determine if these changes lead to better outcomes and lower costs. GETTING STARTED--OUTCOMES AND AIM: In the case example, the team's aim is "to find ways to continually improve the quality and value of care for AMI (acute myocardial infection) patients." VALUE MEASURES--SELECT A SET OF OUTCOME AND COST MEASURES: Four to 12 outcome and cost measures are sufficient to get started. In the case example, the team chose 1 or more measures for each quadrant of the value compass. OPERATIONAL DEFINITION OF MEASURES: An operational definition is a clearly specified method explaining how to measure a variable. Measures in the case example were based on information from the medical record, administrative and financial records, and patient reports and ratings at eight weeks postdischarge. COMMENTS: Measurement systems that quantify the quality of processes and results of care are often add-ons to routine care delivery. However, the process of measurement should be intertwined with the process of care delivery so that front-line providers are involved in both managing the patient and measuring the process and related outcomes and costs.

Improving health care, Part 4: Concepts for improving any clinical process.

BACKGROUND: One promising method for streamlining the generation of "good ideas" is to formulate what are sometimes called change concepts-general notions or approaches to change found useful in developing specific ideas for changes that lead to improvement. For example, in current efforts to reduce health care costs by discounting provider charges, the underlying generic concept is "reducing health care costs," and the specific idea is "discounting provider charges." Short-term gains in health care cost reduction can occur by pursuing discounts. After some time, however, limits to such reduction in costs are experienced. Persevering and continuing to travel down the "discounting provider charges" path is less likely to produce further substantial improvement than returning to the basic concept of "reducing health care costs." THE HIP REPLACEMENT CASE: An interdisciplinary team aiming to reduce costs while improving quality of care for patients in need of hip joint replacement generated ideas for changing "what's done (process) to get better results." After team members wrote down their improvement ideas, they deduced the underlying change concepts and used them to generate even more ideas for improvement. Such change concepts include reordering the sequence of steps (preadmission physical therapy "certification"), eliminating failures at hand-offs between steps (transfer of information from physician's office to hospital), and eliminating a step (epidural pain control). CONCLUSION: Learning about making change, encouraging change, managing the change within and across organizations, and learning from the changes tested will characterize the sustainable, thriving health systems of the future.

Improving health care, Part 3: Clinical benchmarking for best patient care.

BACKGROUND: Benchmarking, which shows that a much better way of doing something may be possible, stimulates local interest in changing and in making changes previously thought not possible. A PLANNING WORKSHEET: The Worksheet has five basic steps: Identify measures, determine resources needed to find the "best of the best," design a data collection method and gather data, measure the best against own performance to determine gap, and identify the best practices producing best-in-class results. CASE EXAMPLE--BOWEL SURGERY: The Accelerating Clinical Improvement Bowel Surgery Team at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (Lebanon, NH) was formed in November 1994 to improve the care of patients with diagnosis-related group (DRG) 148 or 149. Consulting two large, administrative databases and the medical literature, the team found that a substantial gap existed between the bowel surgery delivery process and the best results, as far as they were known, among comparable organizations. After flowcharting the delivery process, the team identified the high-leverage steps: same-day services, general surgery clinic, and routine care. The team then planned three successive PDCA (plan-do-check-act) cycles: utilization of same-day services for all elective surgery patients, establishment of a standardized preoperative bowel preparation, and utilization of pre- and postoperative routine care orders. These improvement cycles resulted in a reduction in length of stay from 9.66 to 8.29 days. Implementation of a critical pathway resulted in a further reduction to 5.04 days. CONCLUSION: Benchmarking can play an integral role in clinical improvement work and can stimulate wise clinical changes and promote measured improvements in quality and value.