Could we safely omit a Repeat Transurethral Resection of the Bladder (re-TURB) after Hexaminolevulinate Photodynamic Diagnostics (PDD)-TURB?

OBJECTIVE: Bladder cancer (BC) is considered one of the malignancies with moderate-high incidence, high rate of recurrence and costly management. Diagnosis and staging are thus important for therapeutic purposes. Considering the risk of residual tumour and understaging, in specific cases, international guidelines recommend performing a second transurethral resection of the bladder (reTURB). Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of hexaminolevulinate Photodynamic Diagnostics (PDD) at first TURB on the rate of residual tumour. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed patients undergoing TURB in our centre between 2012 and 2020. Eightytwo patients had a re-TURB after a first complete TURB with a delay < 3 months. Patients who had an incomplete first resection were excluded. We compared patients who underwent standard white light cystoscopy/TURB and then hexaminolevulinate PDDguided reTURB (group A, n = 49) and patients with PDD-cystoscopy/ TURB at the first procedure then white light cystoscopy/reTURB (group B, n = 33). The residual tumour rate at reTURB as well as median recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Residual tumour at reTURB was detected in 48.8% of cases in our cohort, with a significant difference between the two groups (71.4% in group A versus 12.5% in group B, p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 22 months, the median RFS was 15 months in Group A and 32 months in Group B, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Using PDD at the time of the initial TURB had a statistically significant impact on the rate of residual tumour at the reTURB. Nevertheless, the percentage of residual tumour even with the use of PDD does not allow for safely omitting second resection. Performing a reTURB with PDD for patients who did not have it initially, provides the same benefit in terms of recurrence-free survival.

The impact of prostate biopsy on erectile and ejaculatory function: A prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on erectile and ejaculatory function following transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies of the prostate (TRUS-Bx) in sexually active men. METHODS: Monocentric prospective study from May 2021 to January 2022 of consecutive patients with suspected prostate cancer [elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) level and/or abnormal digital rectal examination] undergoing TRUS-Bx. The 15-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15), Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PDET) and short form of Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ-EjD Short Form) were assessed before, one and three months after TRUS-Bx. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the risk of temporary post-biopsy erectile and/or ejaculatory dysfunctions. The statistical significance was set as p value < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 276 consecutive patients were included in the study. The median age, PSA and biopsy cores were 65 years (IQR 59-69), 7 ng/ml (IQR 5-9.7) and 16 (IQR 12-16), respectively. We compared the IIEF subdomains before TRUS-Bx vs. one or three months: the erectile function (EF) decreased after one month (p<0.001) but recovered after three months (p=0.833); the Orgasmic Function (OF), the Sexual Desire (SD), the Intercourse Satisfaction (IS), the Overall Satisfaction (OS), and Total IIEF decreased significantly after both one and three months compared to pre-biopsy values (p < 0.05). As for ejaculatory function (EjF), PDET, MSHQ-EjD Short Form 1, 2, 3 and MSHQ-EjD Short Form 4 scores decreased significantly after one month (p < 0.001), but they returned to pre-biopsy values after 3 months: p = 0.538, p = 0.071 and p = 0.098, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study proved that EF, assessed through IIEF- 15, and ejaculatory function, assessed through PDET and MSHQ-EjD Short Form, were negatively affected by TRUS-Bx one month after the procedure and recovered after three months. Interestingly, the other IIEF-15 subdomains (OF, SD, IS, OS and Total) resulted as significantly reduced also after 3 months: this issue highlights the importance of carefully considering the indication to TRUS-Bx.