Protamine dosing and its impact in cardiac surgery transfusion practice-A retrospective bi-institutional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding after cardiac surgery is common and continues to require 10-20% of the national blood supply. Transfusion of allogeneic blood is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Excessive protamine in the absence of circulating heparin after weaning off CPB can cause anticoagulation and precipitate bleeding. Hence, adequate dose calculation of protamine is crucial yet under evaluated. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective bi-institutional analysis of cardiac surgical patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-assisted cardiac surgery to assess the impact of protamine dosing in transfusion practice. Total 762 patients were identified from two institutions using electronic medical records and the Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) database who underwent cardiac surgery using CPB. Patients were similar in demographics and other baseline characteristics. We divided patients into two groups based on mg of protamine administered to neutralize each 100 U of unfractionated heparin (UFH)-low-ratio group (Protamine: UFH ≤ 0.8) and high-ratio group (Protamine: UFH > 0.8). RESULTS: We observed a higher rate of blood transfusion required in high-ratio group (ratio >0.8) compared with low-ratio group (ratio ≤0.8) (p < .001). The increased requirement was consistently demonstrated for intraoperative transfusions of red blood cells, plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate. CONCLUSION: High protamine to heparin ratio may cause increased bleeding and transfusion in cardiac surgical patients. Protamine to heparin ratio of 0.8 or lower is sufficient to neutralize circulating heparin after weaning off cardiopulmonary bypass.

Women in Anesthesiology and the Mid-Career Stall: Why They Are Not Advancing Into Senior Leadership.

Women anesthesiologists face many challenges when trying to advance their careers and find balance in personal and professional endeavors. In this article, we introduce the reader to several concepts central to understanding the challenges faced by mid-career women anesthesiologists and highlight why these challenges become particularly pronounced when women enter the mid-career stage. We describe how lack of constructive actionable feedback combined with lack of mentorship and sponsorship negatively affects women in the workplace. We also outline barriers and bias that mid-career women anesthesiologists face in high-level leadership roles along with the disproportionally high burden of nonpromotable work. We present a discussion of mistreatment and burnout, which are compounded by concurrent demands of parenthood and a professional career. We conclude with the impact that these barriers have on mid-career women anesthesiologists and recommendations for mitigating these challenges. They include a systematic increase in mentorship and sponsorship, an individualized professional development strategy, and an improved and comprehensive approach to promotion.

Role of Cardiac Anesthesiologists in Intraoperative Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) Protocol: A Retrospective Single-Center Study Analyzing Preliminary Results of a Yearlong ERACS Protocol Implementation.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS) has been gaining rapid acceptance after multiple studies have demonstrated promising results in improved outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery in other surgical fields (eg, colorectal, orthopedic, thoracic, etc). Cardiac surgery has several unique challenges, including sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass and associated coagulopathy, blood transfusion, and postoperative intensive care requirement. Nonetheless, selective cardiac surgical patients can still benefit from ERACS. Guidelines for perioperative care in cardiac surgery, previously published by the ERACS Society, are weighted heavily in preoperative and postoperative management without much focus on intraoperative care provided by anesthesiologists. To address this gap and to explore anesthesiology's contribution in achieving ERACS, the study authors' cardiac anesthesiology division, in collaboration with cardiac surgery, introduced the ERACS protocol in their institution in February 2020. METHODS: The cardiac anesthesiology division, in collaboration with cardiac surgery, introduced the ERACS protocol consisting of multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, including the introduction of regional blocks, hemostasis management protocol, reversal of neuromuscular blockade, and administration of antiemetics in the authors' institution in February 2020. They have conducted a retrospective chart review study comparing patients who have received ERACS measures with a similar historic cohort who underwent cardiac surgery prior to initiation of an ERACS protocol. The primary outcomes of the study were to determine patients' time to extubation, postoperative opioid consumption, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and incidence of postoperative complications (eg, postoperative nausea vomiting [PONV], bleeding, ICU readmission, delirium. RESULTS: The ERACS patients showed reduced opioid consumption (intraoperative fentanyl; postoperative fentanyl, as well as oxycodone, in the first 6 hours postoperatively), lesser mechanical ventilation (2.5 hours less), shorter ICU stays (5 hours less), shorter hospital LOS (1 day), and lesser incidence of PONV. None of the ERACS patients required blood transfusion. The study authors performed an anonymous survey among the anesthesiologists and ICU providers to assess providers' satisfaction, which showed 92% of survey takers agreed that the ERACS protocol should be continued for future cardiac patients, and 61% of survey takers reported superior pain control in ERACS group of patients while managing those patients. DISCUSSION: The ERACS is achievable after the careful implementation of a series of measures. It does not signify only fast-track extubation and opioid-sparing analgesia, and must be implemented in the entire perioperative period beginning from preoperative clinic to postoperative rehabilitation. Cardiac anesthesiologists play a vital role in execution of intraoperative ERACS measures. Both providers and patients themselves are key stakeholders. A larger randomized prospective trial is warranted to solidify the inference.

Pulmonary prehabilitation and smoking cessation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize the current literature on pulmonary prehabilitation programs, their effects on postoperative pulmonary complications, and the financial implications of implementing these programs. Additionally, this review has discussed the current trends in pulmonary prehabilitation programs, techniques for improving rates of perioperative smoking cessation, and the optimal timing of these interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Prehabilitation is a series of personalized multimodal interventions tailored to individual needs, including lifestyle and behavioral measures. Pulmonary prehabilitation has shown to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). SUMMARY: The implications of clinical practice and research findings regarding PPCs are an increased burden of postoperative complications and financial cost to both patients and hospital systems. There is convincing evidence that pulmonary prehabilitation based on endurance training should be started 8-12 weeks prior to major surgery; however, similar rates of improved postoperative outcomes are observed with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) for 1-2 weeks. This shorter interval of prehabilitation may be more appropriate for patients awaiting thoracic surgery, especially for cancer resection. Additionally, costs associated with creating and maintaining a prehabilitation program are mitigated by shortened lengths of stay and reduced PPCs. Please see Video Abstract, http://links.lww.com/COAN/A90.

Coagulation management during liver transplantation: monitoring and decision making for hemostatic interventions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Rebalanced hemostasis describes the precarious balance of procoagulant and antithrombotic proteins in patients with severe liver failure. This review is aimed to discuss currently available coagulation monitoring tests and pertinent decision-making process for plasma coagulation factor replacements during liver transplantation (LT). RECENT FINDINGS: Contemporary viscoelastic coagulation monitoring systems have demonstrated advantages over conventional coagulation tests in assessing the patient's coagulation status and tailoring hemostatic interventions. There is increasing interest in the use of prothrombin complex and fibrinogen concentrates, but it remains to be proven if purified factor concentrates are more efficacious and safer than allogeneic hemostatic components. Furthermore, the decision to use antifibrinolytic therapy necessitates careful considerations given the risks of venous thromboembolism in severe liver failure. SUMMARY: Perioperative hemostatic management and thromboprophylaxis for LT patients is likely to be more precise and patient-specific through a better understanding and monitoring of rebalanced coagulation. Further research is needed to refine the application of these tools and develop more standardized protocols for coagulation management in LT.

The FIBTEM paradox: Do coronary artery bypass grafting patients with high baseline FIBTEM clot firmness need more allogeneic blood transfusion?

BACKGROUND: Fibrinogen thromboelastometry (FIBTEM) test is clinically used for rotational thromboelastometry as a surrogate measure of fibrinogen. Elevated fibrinogen might confer protection against bleeding after major surgery. This single-center study was conducted to assess any relationship between baseline FIBTEM value and exposure to allogeneic transfusion in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were obtained retrospectively from local FIBTEM data and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database between 2016 and 2019. Preoperative FIBTEM 10-min amplitude (A10) was categorized as low (≤ 18 mm), intermediate (19-23 mm), or high (≥24 mm). The primary outcome was any transfusion during the hospitalization, including red blood cells (RBCs), platelets, plasma, and cryoprecipitate. A multivariable regression model was used to adjust for confounders and calculate an odds ratio (OR) for any transfusion. RESULTS: The high FIBTEM group included more female and African-American patients, as well as urgent surgery. The STS predicted risks of morbidity and mortality were greater, and anemia was most prevalent with high FIBTEM. Unadjusted blood transfusion rates were increased with high FIBTEM due to RBC transfusion, but non-RBC transfusion was highest with low FIBTEM. After adjustments, a lower OR for transfusion was associated with high FIBTEM (0.426; 95% confidence interval, 0.199-0.914) compared to low FIBTEM. CONCLUSION: The high FIBTEM group frequently presented with anemia and comorbidities, and received more RBCs but not non-RBC products. Postoperative blood loss was less with high FIBTEM, and after adjustments, it conferred protection against any transfusion.

Heyde Syndrome-Pathophysiology and Perioperative Implications.

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients with calcific aortic valve stenosis (AVS), termed Heyde syndrome, was first described by Edward C. Heyde. The strong association between valvular replacement and the eradication of clinically significant GI bleeding confirmed an underlying pathophysiologic relationship. The rheologic stress created by AVS increases proteolysis of von Willebrand factor (VWF), resulting in loss of predominantly high-molecular-weight VWF (Hmw VWF). Angiodysplastic vessels present in patients with AVS, coupled with the lack of functioning Hmw VWF, increase the risk for GI bleeds. Aortic valve replacement, both surgical and transcatheter-based, is often a definitive treatment for GI bleeding, leading to recovery of Hmw VWF multimers. Perioperative management of patients involves monitoring their coagulation profiles with relevant laboratory tests and instituting appropriate management. Management can be directed in the following two ways: by improving internal release of VWF or by administration of external therapeutics containing VWF. It is important for perioperative physicians to obtain an understanding of the pathophysiology of this disease process and closely monitor the bleeding pattern so that targeted therapies can be initiated.

Perioperative Management of Patients With Hereditary Angioedema With Special Considerations for Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder mostly due to the deficiency of C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH). Reduced C1-INH activity below ~38% disrupts homeostasis of bradykinin (BK) formation by increasing kallikrein activation and causes recurrent angioedema attacks affecting the face, extremities, genitals, bowels, oropharynx, and larynx. HAE symptoms can be debilitating and potentially life-threatening. The recent clinical developments of biological and pharmacological agents have immensely improved acute and long-term care of patients with moderate-to-severe HAE. The therapies are given as on-demand and/or prophylaxis, and self-administration is highly recommended and performed with some agents via intravenous or subcutaneous route. Perioperative clinicians need to be familiar with the symptoms and diagnosis of HAE as well as available therapies because of the potential need for airway management, sedation, or anesthesia for various medical and surgical procedures and postoperative care. Cardiovascular surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass is a unique condition in which heparinized blood comes into direct contact with an artificial surface while pulmonary circulation, a major reserve of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), becomes excluded. These changes result in systemic kallikrein activation and BK formation even in non-HAE patients. The objectives of this review are (1) to review pathophysiology of HAE and laboratory testing, (2) to summarize pertinent pharmacological data on the prophylactic and on-demand treatment strategies, and (3) to discuss available clinical data for perioperative management in cardiovascular surgery.

Near Total Occlusion of Right Ventricle by Cardiac Mass.

The incidence of primary cardiac tumors is very rare (0.02%) with the majority being benign. Angiosarcoma is the most common malignant cardiac tumor. However, regardless of the histological nature of cardiac tumors, they can cause life-threatening mechanical obstruction. We present a case of urgent surgical removal of a right ventricular (RV) mass. Echocardiography was instrumental for confirmation of the diagnosis, delineation of the anatomical extent of the tumor, evaluation for associated structural involvement and assessment of repair along with constant hemodynamic monitoring.

Ethical and clinical dilemma from an incidental cardiac lipoma in a young and healthy patient.

Incidental cardiac tumors are rare and mostly detected on autopsy as patients largely remain asymptomatic. However, diagnosis of an incidental cardiac mass on unrelated workup can pose significant ethical and clinical challenge to the care team. Surgical resection has been the most successful intervention for most primary cardiac tumors; which involves cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted major surgery and is not risk free. Cardiac lipoma is the second most common primary cardiac benign tumor. We report a case of a young otherwise healthy patient who had a cardiac lipoma on computerized tomography scan that was done to rule out kidney stone.

Implementation of Bilateral Rectus Sheath Blocks in Conjunction With Transversus Thoracis Plane and Pectointercostal Fascial Blocks for Immediate Postoperative Analgesia After Cardiac Surgery.

Pain continues to be a well-known complication of cardiac surgery in the postoperative period and intravenous opioid analgesia has traditionally been employed to manage cardiac surgical pain. However, both components have contributed to a multitude of undesirable adverse effects which can further exacerbate delays in recovery. Often overlooked in the analgesic plan, chest tube pain contributes significantly to the overall postoperative pain from cardiac surgery. Novel regional anesthetic blocks have shown great promise as analgesic adjuncts for cardiothoracic anesthesia but preliminary investigations focus primarily on management of sternotomy pain. Reduction of chest tube pain should be considered while implementing regional blocks to control surgical pain. This study presents a case where the rectus sheath block minimized chest tube pain after aortic valve replacement in conjunction with intercostal nerve blocks and a multimodal analgesic plan.

Selected Transesophageal Echocardiographic Parameters of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Predict Length of Stay Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft-A Prospective Observational Study.

(1) Importance: Abnormal left ventricular (LV) diastolic function, with or without a diagnosis of heart failure, is a common finding that can be easily diagnosed by intra-operative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The association of diastolic function with duration of hospital stay after coronary artery bypass (CAB) is unknown. (2) Objective: To determine if selected TEE parameters of diastolic dysfunction are associated with length of hospital stay after coronary artery bypass surgery (CAB). (3) Design: Prospective observational study. (4) Setting: A single tertiary academic medical center. (5) Participants: Patients with normal systolic function undergoing isolated CAB from September 2017 through June 2018. (6) Exposures: LV function during diastole, as assessed by intra-operative TEE prior to coronary revascularization. (7) Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was duration of postoperative hospital stay. Secondary intermediate outcomes included common postoperative cardiac, respiratory, and renal complications. (8) Results: The study included 176 participants (mean age 65.2 ± 9.2 years, 73% male); 105 (60.2%) had LV diastolic dysfunction based on selected TEE parameters. Median time to hospital discharge was significantly longer for subjects with selected parameters of diastolic dysfunction (9.1/IQR 6.6−13.5 days) than those with normal LV diastolic function (6.5/IAR 5.3−9.7 days) (p < 0.001). The probability of hospital discharge was 34% lower (HR 0.66/95% CI 0.47−0.93) for subjects with diastolic dysfunction based on selected TEE parameters, independent of potential confounders, including a baseline diagnosis of heart failure. There was a dose−response relation between severity of diastolic dysfunction and probability of discharge. LV diastolic dysfunction based on those selected TEE parameters was also associated with postoperative cardio-respiratory complications; however, these complications did not fully account for the relation between LV diastolic dysfunction and prolonged length of hospital stay. (9) Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with normal systolic function undergoing CAB, diastolic dysfunction based on selected TEE parameters is associated with prolonged duration of postoperative hospital stay. This association cannot be explained by baseline comorbidities or common post-operative complications. The diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction can be made by TEE.