Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 22(7): 1539-1541.e2, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38142835

RESUMEN

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved metastatic melanoma outcomes; however, toxicities, such as hepatitis, can be dose-limiting or even fatal.1 Systemic glucocorticoids and antimetabolite immunosuppressive medications remain the mainstay of treatment for ICI-hepatitis, but options for patients refractory to these therapies are limited.2 Herein we present 3 cases of glucocorticoid-refractory ICI-hepatitis treated with tofacitinib, an inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and 3. These patients represent consecutive patients referred to the Massachusetts General Hospital Severe Immunotherapy Complications service who were determined by our experts to have treatment failure with systemic glucocorticoid and antimetabolite combination therapy between August 2022 and September 2023.3 These were the only 3 patients managed by the Severe Immunotherapy Complications service who were treated with tofacitinib for ICI-hepatitis during that time.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Anciano , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/etiología , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
JCO Precis Oncol ; 8: e2300368, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38237100

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Somatic chromosomal alterations, particularly monosomy 3 and 8q gains, have been associated with metastatic risk in uveal melanoma (UM). Whole genome-scale evaluation of detectable alterations in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in UM could provide valuable prognostic information. Our pilot study evaluates the correlation between genomic information using ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing (ULP-WGS) of cfDNA in UM and associated clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ULP-WGS of cfDNA was performed on 29 plasma samples from 16 patients, 14 metastatic UM (mUM) and two non-metastatic, including pre- and post-treatment mUM samples from 10 patients treated with immunotherapy and one with liver-directed therapy. We estimated tumor fraction (TFx) and detected copy-number alterations (CNAs) using ichorCNA. Presence of 8q amplification was further analyzed using the likelihood ratio test (LRT). RESULTS: Eleven patients with mUM (17 samples) of 14 had detectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). 8q gain was detected in all 17, whereas monosomy 3 was detectable in 10 of 17 samples. TFx generally correlated with disease status, showing an increase at the time of disease progression (PD). 8q gain detection sensitivity appeared greater with the LRT than with ichorCNA at lower TFxs. The only patient with mUM with partial response on treatment had a high pretreatment TFx and undetectable on-treatment ctDNA, correlating with her profound response and durable survival. CONCLUSION: ctDNA can be detected in mUM using ULP-WGS, and the TFx correlates with DS. 8q gain was consistently detectable in mUM, in line with previous studies indicating 8q gains early in primary UM and higher amplification with PD. Our work suggests that detection of CNAs by ULP-WGS, particularly focusing on 8q gain, could be a valuable blood biomarker to monitor PD in UM.


Asunto(s)
ADN Tumoral Circulante , Melanoma , Neoplasias de la Úvea , Femenino , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Monosomía , ADN Tumoral Circulante/genética
4.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 17: 333-339, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36785760

RESUMEN

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare type of melanoma with distinct features from cutaneous melanoma, low response rates to immune checkpoint inhibition, and poor survival rates. Tebentafusp, a bispecific antibody engaging T cells with gp 100 on HLA-A*02:01, was recently approved by the FDA as the first drug of its class and the first treatment approved by the FDA to treat UM. In this review, we summarize the preclinical and clinical data on tebentafusp for UM. We additionally discuss patient selection and the relevant challenges. For the literature search, PubMed search and relevant articles presented at international conferences were used.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Melanoma/patología , Selección de Paciente
5.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther ; 21(3): 299-313, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33249937

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) remains a fatal malignancy, despite the recent addition of immune check point inhibitors (ICIs), an FGFR inhibitor and an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) to the therapeutic armamentarium. The survival rates are particularly dismal after first-line treatment failure, entailing an urgent need for more effective therapies. Advances in understanding biomarkers and identifying targetable molecules have broadened the pathways under investigation in mUC. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes mUC salvage therapy options, including chemotherapy, ICI, and novel promising agents, including targeted therapies, ADCs, cytotoxic agents and vaccines. For the literature review, a PubMed search and relevant data presented at international conferences were used. EXPERT OPINION: The approval of ICIs, FGFR inhibitor erdafitinib and ADC enfortumab vedotin in the salvage setting has transformed the mUC landscape. Yet there are additional promising agents currently under study. Toxicities are observed with ADCs and FGFR inhibitors, but appear manageable in most patients. The molecular heterogeneity and complex tumor biology are challenging barriers for progress in the therapy of mUC. Advances in molecular profiling, defining validated predictive markers, rational combinations of agents and therapeutically actionable targets will help develop personalized compounds with higher efficacy and less toxicity with hopes to improve outcomes for mUC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/farmacología , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Pirazoles/farmacología , Quinoxalinas/administración & dosificación , Quinoxalinas/farmacología , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología
8.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 13(1): 1-6, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31810398

RESUMEN

Introduction: Since the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), there has been continuing and significant progress in urothelial cancer (UC) treatment. However, only about one fifth of UC patients respond to ICI. Recently, erdafitinib was developed for treating locally advanced or metastatic UC (mUC) with FGFR3 or FGFR2 alterations, accounting for 15-20% of patients. Erdafitinib is the first targeted therapy ever approved for mUC.Areas covered: This review summarizes the preclinical and clinical data on erdafitinib for UC. PubMed search and relevant articles presented at international conferences were used for the literature search.Expert opinion: The FDA approval of erdafitinib provided a new treatment option for FGFR-altered UC progressing on platinum-based chemotherapy. It is not clear whether FGFR inhibitor is a preferred second-line treatment choice to ICI. Compared to ICI, erdafitinib has a better response rate in patients with visceral metastases. However, a shorter duration of response and toxicity profile of erdafitinib, particularly ocular toxicity, is an important consideration. Regular eye exams are recommended by the FDA. Tumor profiling during upfront therapy may help identify those who benefit at the time of progression. In summary, a high unmet need remains for new drugs in chemotherapy- and ICI-refractory UC.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Quinoxalinas/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Humanos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/farmacología , Quinoxalinas/efectos adversos , Quinoxalinas/farmacología , Receptor Tipo 2 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptor Tipo 3 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología
9.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 1(1): ofu019, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25734092

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rapid urine tests for infection (urinalysis, dipstick) have low up-front costs. However, many false positives occur, with important downstream consequences, including unnecessary antibiotics. We studied indications, collection technique, and results of urinalyses in acute care. METHODS: This research was a prospective observational study of a convenience sample of emergency department (ED) patients who had urinalysis performed between June 1, 2012 and February 15, 2013 at an urban teaching hospital. Analyses were conducted via t tests, χ(2) tests, and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 195 cases included in the study, the median age was 56 and 70% of participants were female. There were specific symptoms or signs of urinary tract infection (UTI) in 74 cases (38%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 31%-45%), nonspecific symptoms or signs in 83 cases (43%; 95% CI, 36%-50%), and no symptoms or signs of UTI in 38 cases (19%; 95% CI, 14%-25%). The median age was 51 (specific symptoms), 58 (nonspecific symptoms), and 61 (no symptoms), respectively (P = .005). Of 137 patients who produced the specimen without assistance, 78 (57%; 95% CI, 48%-65%) received no instructions on urine collection. Correct midstream clean-catch technique was used in 8 of 137 cases (6%). Presence of symptoms or signs was not associated with a new antibiotic prescription, but positive urinalysis (OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.7-14) and positive urine culture (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1-12) were. Of 36 patients receiving antibiotics, 10 (28%; 95% CI, 13%-43%) had no symptoms or nonspecific symptoms. CONCLUSION: In this sample at an urban teaching hospital ED, urine testing was not driven by symptoms. Improving practice may lower costs, improve efficiency of care, decrease unnecessary data that can distract providers and impair patient safety, decrease misdiagnosis, and decrease unnecessary antibiotics.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA