The Impact of Telemedicine during Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Pandemic and Future Perspectives: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spread worldwide since December 2019, causing the COVID-19 pandemic. Several measures have taken place in many countries to avoid further spread of the virus and to manage infected people according to disease severity. Notably, telemedicine (TM) was successfully used to manage less severe patients. Our aim was to assess the impact and the edges of using TM in home-isolated or hospitalized patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection and its further application. METHODS: We performed a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, focusing on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English and available on PubMed database. Full texts were blindly reviewed and then assessed according to PICO model. RESULTS: Our research identified a total of 1,959 records, of which 24 were potentially eligible through the articles full-text review. Six papers were included for data extraction and 18 articles were excluded: 10 articles were not RCTs and 8 articles did not involve SARS-CoV-2 patients. The TM application showed an improvement in psychological stress, mental disorders, and a significant reduction of general stress in patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection. The effectiveness of using TM in rehabilitative respiratory programs has been also reported. Furthermore, the benefits of TM application in tailored monitoring of vital parameters in home-isolated patients helped clinicians to early identify a deterioration of clinical conditions. CONCLUSION: The use of TM during COVID-19 pandemic represented a novel, intriguing, versatile, and useful tool to support clinical practice. This evidence suggests considering TM in a wider range of clinical applications.

The management of Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis in different medical settings: Where does that leave us? An Italian nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis (FPF) is an emerging group of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) caused by mutations mainly involving "telomere-related genes" and "surfactant-related genes". Although, in 2023, European Respiratory Society proposed a statement for FPFs management, these still remain a burden. Our work aimed to evaluate the management and impact of FPF in three Italian different medical settings: University Hospitals (UHs), non-University Hospitals (N-UHs) and outpatient clinics. METHODS: This survey was created by ILDs Study Group Società Italiana di Pneumologia/ Italian Respiratory Society (SIP-IRS) and diffused via email to all SIP-IRS members. The descriptive statistical analysis was conducted through GraphPad Prism software (version 8.0).  Results: Twenty participants replied to the survey, of which 65% (13/20) worked at UH while the remaining 25% (6/20) and 5% (1/20) worked at N-UH and outpatient clinics, respectively. Centers with, at least, 150 ILD patients visits/year followed a higher number of FPF patients, regardless of University affiliation (p=0.0046). Despite significant discrepancies in genetic testing and availability of counselling were registered, no statistically significant differences in patients' anamnesis assessment were observed between UHs and N-UHs (p=0.4192 and p=0.6525). However, there were relevant differences in the number of FPF patients undergoing genetic assessment in the Centers with Genetics Lab or Unit inside the Hospital (p=0.0253). There was no consensus regarding the impact of FPF diagnosis on lung transplantation and screening of asymptomatic relatives. Similarly, no differences were reported in antifibrotic prescriptions between UHs and N-UHs. Although the typical UIP pattern was the most common radiological pattern observed in FPF patients, there were no differences in the prevalence of histopathological patterns between UH and N-UH. CONCLUSIONS: Improving pulmonologists' knowledge of the approach, diagnosis and management of FPF is a global medical topic. Scientific societies can provide significant support in raising physicians' awareness of this issue.