Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
World J Urol ; 36(4): 595-601, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29459996

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There is no information about the evolution of robotic programs in public hospitals of Latin-America. OBJECTIVE: To describe the current status and functioning of robotic programs in Latin-American public hospitals since their beginning to date. METHODS: We conducted a survey among leading urologists working at public hospitals of Latin-America who had acquired the Da Vinci laparoscopic-assisted robotic system. Questions included: date the program started, its utilization by other services, number and kind of surgeries, surgery paying system, surgery related deaths, occurrence and reasons of robotic program interruptions and its use for training purposes. Medians and 25-75 centiles (IQR) were estimated. RESULTS: Since 2009, there are ten public hospitals of four Latin-American countries that acquired the Da Vinci robotic system. The median number of months robotic programs has been functioning without considering transitory interruption: 43 (IQR 35, 55). Median number of urologic and total surgeries performed: 140 (IQR 94, 168) and 336 (IQR 292, 621), respectively. The corresponding median number of urologic and total surgeries performed per month: 3 (IQR 2, 5) and 8 (IQR 5, 11). Median number of total surgeries performed per year per institution was 94 (IQR 68,123). The median proportion of urologic cases was 40% (IQR 31, 48), ranging from 24 to 66%. Five of ten institutions had their urology programs transitory or definitively closed due to the high burden costs. CONCLUSION: Adoption and development of robotic surgery in some public hospitals of Latin-America have been hindered by high costs.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales Públicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , América Latina , Evaluación de Necesidades , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 47(2): 229-33, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25425439

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections are a common problem encountered by primary care, emergency physicians and urologists. A complicated urinary tract infection (CUTI) responds less effectively to the standard treatment. E. coli is the most common pathogen (40-70 %). In Mexico, there are ciprofloxacin resistance rates of 8-73 %, to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 53-71 % and cephalosporins 5-18 %, with an ESBL E. coli prevalence of 10 %. For infections producing gas or purulent material, the percutaneous or endoscopic drainage is the standard. OBJECTIVE: To describe the management of patients with CUTIs, their specifically clinical course and eventual culture results determining the most common isolated microorganisms and their resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical records of patients hospitalized with CUTIs from January 2012 to July 2013 were reviewed. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-three patients were included. Acute pyelonephritis was the most common presentation (53.2 %). The most common microorganism was E. coli (83 %), with ESBL prevalence of 71.4 % and a resistance to quinolone, cephalosporin and trimethoprim of 89.7, 64.7 and 60.3 %, respectively. The most common factors associated with development of CUTIs were recent use of antibiotics (95.3 %) and obstructive uropathy (73.4 %). A total of 41 % received carbapenems and 40.5 % received minimally invasive treatments. Overall mortality was 2.9 %. DISCUSSION: There were a greater ESBL-producing pathogen prevalence and an over 50 % resistance to classically first-choice antibiotics. The minimally invasive treatments for complicated infections are fundamental; however, nephrectomy still has a role. CONCLUSIONS: Wide-spectrum antimicrobial therapy and minimally invasive approaches are the most common treatments for CUTIs in our center, and a reevaluation regarding antibiotic use in Mexico needs to be done.


Asunto(s)
Absceso , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/diagnóstico , Escherichia coli , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Absceso/microbiología , Absceso/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Epididimitis/microbiología , Epididimitis/terapia , Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , México , Persona de Mediana Edad , Orquitis/microbiología , Orquitis/terapia , Prostatitis/microbiología , Prostatitis/terapia , Pielonefritis/microbiología , Pielonefritis/terapia , Pionefrosis/microbiología , Pionefrosis/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Infecciones Urinarias/complicaciones , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Adulto Joven , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA