Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 97
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
N Engl J Med ; 384(24): 2273-2282, 2021 06 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33882218

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many pregnant persons in the United States are receiving messenger RNA (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) vaccines, but data are limited on their safety in pregnancy. METHODS: From December 14, 2020, to February 28, 2021, we used data from the "v-safe after vaccination health checker" surveillance system, the v-safe pregnancy registry, and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to characterize the initial safety of mRNA Covid-19 vaccines in pregnant persons. RESULTS: A total of 35,691 v-safe participants 16 to 54 years of age identified as pregnant. Injection-site pain was reported more frequently among pregnant persons than among nonpregnant women, whereas headache, myalgia, chills, and fever were reported less frequently. Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester). Adverse neonatal outcomes included preterm birth (in 9.4%) and small size for gestational age (in 3.2%); no neonatal deaths were reported. Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in persons vaccinated against Covid-19 who had a completed pregnancy were similar to incidences reported in studies involving pregnant women that were conducted before the Covid-19 pandemic. Among 221 pregnancy-related adverse events reported to the VAERS, the most frequently reported event was spontaneous abortion (46 cases). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Vigilancia en Salud Pública/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunas Sintéticas/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven , Vacunas de ARNm
2.
Sex Transm Dis ; 51(8): 509-515, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38647241

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In response to the 2022 mpox outbreak in the United States, people with higher potential for exposure to mpox were recommended to receive 2 doses of the JYNNEOS vaccine. Vaccine safety was monitored using 2 complementary systems. METHODS: The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a passive surveillance system that accepts reports of adverse events after vaccination. VAERS is capable of rapidly identifying rare adverse events and unusual reporting patterns. Medical records were requested and reviewed for adverse events of special interest, including myocarditis. Adverse event reporting rates were calculated as the number of verified adverse event cases divided by the number of JYNNEOS doses administered. V-safe for mpox was a voluntary smartphone-based vaccine safety surveillance system that sent enrolled persons text messages linked to health surveys asking about reactions and health impact events occurring after vaccination. RESULTS: There were 1,207,056 JYNNEOS doses administered in the United States. VAERS received 1927 reports for JYNNEOS. The myocarditis reporting rate per million doses was 2.69 after dose 1 and 8.64 after dose 2. V-safe had 213 participants complete at least one health survey. Rates of injection site and systemic reactions were similar in the first week after dose 1 and dose 2. CONCLUSIONS: JYNNEOS vaccine safety surveillance findings from VAERS and v-safe did not identify any unexpected safety concerns. The VAERS reporting rate for myocarditis was similar to previously published population background rates.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Brotes de Enfermedades , Mpox , Vacuna contra Viruela , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Miocarditis/epidemiología , Miocarditis/inducido químicamente , Teléfono Inteligente , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra Viruela/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra Viruela/efectos adversos , Mpox/prevención & control
3.
J Pediatr ; 262: 113643, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37517652

RESUMEN

We assessed the safety of hexavalent vaccine diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis, inactivated poliovirus, hepatitis b, and haemophilus influenzae b conjugate vaccine in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Five hundred-one reports of adverse events (AEs) were identified; 21 (4.2%) were serious. Most frequently reported AEs were fever (10.2%) and injection site erythema (5.4%). AEs reported were consistent with findings from prelicensure studies.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina , Vacunas contra Haemophilus , Humanos , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/efectos adversos , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados/efectos adversos , Vacunas Combinadas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Conjugadas
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(23): 621-626, 2023 06 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37289661

RESUMEN

As of May 7, 2023, CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends that all children aged 6 months-5 years receive at least 1 age-appropriate bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose. Depending on their COVID-19 vaccination history and history of immunocompromise, these children might also need additional doses* (1-3). Initial vaccine safety findings after primary series vaccination among children aged 6 months-5 years showed that transient local and systemic reactions were common whereas serious adverse events were rare (4). To characterize the safety of a third mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose among children aged 6 months-5 years, CDC reviewed adverse events and health surveys reported to v-safe, a voluntary smartphone-based U.S. safety surveillance system established by CDC to monitor health after COVID-19 vaccination (https://vsafe.cdc.gov/en/) and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a U.S. passive vaccine safety surveillance system co-managed by CDC and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (https://vaers.hhs.gov/) (5). During June 17, 2022-May 7, 2023, approximately 495,576 children aged 6 months-4 years received a third dose (monovalent or bivalent) of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and 63,919 children aged 6 months-5 years received a third dose of Moderna vaccine.† A third mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was recorded for 2,969 children in v-safe; approximately 37.7% had no reported reactions, and among those for whom reactions were reported, most reactions were mild and transient. VAERS received 536 reports after a third dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for children in these age groups; 98.5% of reports were nonserious and most (78.4%) were classified as a vaccination error.§ No new safety concerns were identified. Preliminary safety findings after a third dose of COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 6 months-5 years are similar to those after other doses. Health care providers can counsel parents and guardians of young children that most reactions reported after vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccine were mild and transient and that serious adverse events are rare.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunación , Vacunas/efectos adversos
5.
J Infect Dis ; 226(Suppl 4): S431-S440, 2022 10 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36265846

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: . The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is the United States national passive vaccine safety surveillance system. We updated the data on the safety of single-antigen varicella vaccine (VAR) and assessed the safety of combination measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine (MMRV) licensed in the United States using VAERS data. METHODS: US VAERS reports received after administration of VAR and MMRV during 2006-2020 were identified. Reports were analyzed by vaccine type, age, seriousness, most common adverse events (AEs), and concomitant vaccines. We reviewed medical records of selected reports of AEs of special interest and conducted empirical Bayesian data mining to identify disproportionally reported AEs. RESULTS: During 2006-2020, approximately 132.8 million VAR doses were distributed; 40 684 reports were received in VAERS (30.6/100 000 doses distributed), with 4.1% classified as serious (1.3/100 000 doses distributed). Approximately 35.5 million MMRV doses were distributed; 13 325 reports were received (37.6/100 000 doses distributed) with 3.3% classified as serious (1.3/100 000 doses distributed). The most common adverse health events after both VAR and MMRV were injection site reactions (31% and 27%), rash (28% and 20%), and fever (12% and 14%), respectively. Vaccination errors accounted for 23% of reports after VAR administration and 41% after MMRV administration, but ≥95% of them did not describe an adverse health event. AEs associated with evidence of vaccine strain varicella-zoster virus (vVZV) infection included meningitis, encephalitis, herpes zoster, and 6 deaths (all in immunocompromised persons with contraindications for vaccination). No new or unexpected AE was disproportionally reported. CONCLUSIONS: No new or unexpected safety findings were detected for VAR and MMRV given as recommended, reinforcing the favorable safety profiles of these vaccines. Providers should obtain specimens for viral testing and strain-typing for serious AEs if they consider vVZV as the possible causative agent.


Asunto(s)
Sarampión , Paperas , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán) , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Vacuna contra la Varicela , Teorema de Bayes , Paperas/prevención & control , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Sarampión/prevención & control , Vacunas Atenuadas/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola , Vacunas Combinadas
6.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(3): 77-83, 2020 Jan 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31971933

RESUMEN

Since 2005, a single dose of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine has been recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for adolescents and adults (1,2). After receipt of Tdap, booster doses of tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td) vaccine are recommended every 10 years or when indicated for wound management. During the October 2019 meeting of ACIP, the organization updated its recommendations to allow use of either Td or Tdap where previously only Td was recommended. These situations include decennial Td booster doses, tetanus prophylaxis when indicated for wound management in persons who had previously received Tdap, and for multiple doses in the catch-up immunization schedule for persons aged ≥7 years with incomplete or unknown vaccination history. Allowing either Tdap or Td to be used in situations where Td only was previously recommended increases provider point-of-care flexibility. This report updates ACIP recommendations and guidance regarding the use of Tdap vaccines (3).


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Comités Consultivos , Anciano , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Inmunización Secundaria , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
7.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 143(4): 1465-1473, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30654049

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis, a rare and potentially life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction, can occur after vaccination. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe reports of anaphylaxis after vaccination made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) during 1990-2016. METHODS: We identified domestic reports of anaphylaxis within VAERS using a combination of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activity queries and Preferred Terms. We performed a descriptive analysis, including history of hypersensitivity (anaphylaxis, respiratory allergies, and drug allergies) and vaccines given. We reviewed all serious reports and all nonserious reports with available medical records to determine if they met the Brighton Collaboration case definition for anaphylaxis or received a physician's diagnosis. RESULTS: During the analytic period, VAERS received 467,960 total reports; 828 met the Brighton Collaboration case definition or received a physician's diagnosis of anaphylaxis: 654 (79%) were classified as serious, and 669 (81%) had medical records available. Of 478 reports in children aged less than 19 years, 65% were male; childhood vaccines were most commonly reported. Of 350 reports in persons aged 19 years or greater, 80% were female, and influenza vaccines were most frequently reported. Overall, 41% of reports described persons with no history of hypersensitivity. We identified 8 deaths, 4 among persons with no history of hypersensitivity. CONCLUSION: Anaphylaxis after vaccination is rare in the United States and can occur among persons with no history of hypersensitivity. Most persons recover fully with treatment, but serious complications, including death, can occur.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Anafilaxia/etiología , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 61(6): 980-7, 2015 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26021988

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vaccines are among the safest medical products in use today. Hundreds of millions of vaccinations are administered in the United States each year. Serious adverse reactions are uncommon. However, temporally associated deaths can occur following vaccination. Our aim was to characterize main causes of death among reports submitted to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a spontaneous vaccine safety surveillance system. METHODS: We searched VAERS for US reports of death after any vaccination from 1 July 1997 through 31 December 2013. Available medical records, autopsy reports, and death certificates were reviewed to identify cause of death. RESULTS: VAERS received 2149 death reports, most (n = 1469 [68.4%]) in children. Median age was 0.5 years (range, 0-100 years); males accounted for 1226 (57%) reports. The total annual number of death reports generally decreased during the latter part of the study period. Most common causes of death among 1244 child reports with available death certificates/autopsy reports included sudden infant death syndrome (n = 544 [44%]), asphyxia (n = 74 [6.0%]), septicemia (n = 61 [4.9%]), and pneumonia (n = 57 [4.6%]). Among 526 adult reports, most common causes of death included diseases of the circulatory (n = 247 [46.9%]) and respiratory systems (n = 77 [14.6%]), certain infections and parasitic diseases (n = 62 [11.8%]), and malignant neoplasms (n = 20 [3.8%]). For child death reports, 79.4% received >1 vaccine on the same day. Inactivated influenza vaccine given alone was most commonly associated with death reports in adults (51.4%). CONCLUSIONS: No concerning pattern was noted among death reports submitted to VAERS during 1997-2013. The main causes of death were consistent with the most common causes of death in the US population.


Asunto(s)
Causas de Muerte , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/mortalidad , Vacunas/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunas/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven
11.
Clin Infect Dis ; 60(10): e58-65, 2015 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25637587

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the safety of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine in adults. We reviewed reports of adverse events (AEs) to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to assess safety in this previously understudied group. METHODS: VAERS is the national spontaneous vaccine safety surveillance system coadministered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US Food and Drug Administration. We searched the VAERS database for US reports of adults aged ≥19 years who received the MMR vaccine from 1 January 2003 to 31 July 2013. We clinically reviewed reports and available medical records for serious AEs, pregnancy reports, and reports for selected prespecified outcomes. RESULTS: During this period, VAERS received 3175 US reports after MMR vaccine in adults. Of these, 168 (5%) were classified as serious, including 7 reports of death. Females accounted for 77% of reports. The most common signs and symptoms for all reports were pyrexia (19%), rash (17%), pain (13%), and arthralgia (13%). We did not detect any new safety findings in empirical Bayesian data mining. We identified 131 reports of MMR vaccine administered to a pregnant woman; the majority of these vaccinations were in the first trimester and in 83 (62%), no AE was reported. CONCLUSIONS: In our review of VAERS data, we did not detect any new or unexpected safety concerns for MMR vaccination in adults. We identified reports of pregnant women exposed to MMR, which is a group in whom the vaccine is contraindicated, suggesting the need for continued provider education on vaccine recommendations and screening.


Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/patología , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artralgia/inducido químicamente , Artralgia/epidemiología , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Exantema/inducido químicamente , Exantema/epidemiología , Femenino , Fiebre/inducido químicamente , Fiebre/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/inducido químicamente , Dolor/epidemiología , Embarazo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
12.
Clin Infect Dis ; 61(6): 864-70, 2015 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26060294

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reporting of adverse events (AEs) following vaccination can help identify rare or unexpected complications of immunizations and aid in characterizing potential vaccine safety signals. We developed an open-source, generalizable clinical decision support system called Electronic Support for Public Health-Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP-VAERS) to assist clinicians with AE detection and reporting. METHODS: ESP-VAERS monitors patients' electronic health records for new diagnoses, changes in laboratory values, and new allergies following vaccinations. When suggestive events are found, ESP-VAERS sends the patient's clinician a secure electronic message with an invitation to affirm or refute the message, add comments, and submit an automated, prepopulated electronic report to VAERS. High-probability AEs are reported automatically if the clinician does not respond. We implemented ESP-VAERS in December 2012 throughout the MetroHealth System, an integrated healthcare system in Ohio. We queried the VAERS database to determine MetroHealth's baseline reporting rates from January 2009 to March 2012 and then assessed changes in reporting rates with ESP-VAERS. RESULTS: In the 8 months following implementation, 91 622 vaccinations were given. ESP-VAERS sent 1385 messages to responsible clinicians describing potential AEs. Clinicians opened 1304 (94.2%) messages, responded to 209 (15.1%), and confirmed 16 for transmission to VAERS. An additional 16 high-probability AEs were sent automatically. Reported events included seizure, pleural effusion, and lymphocytopenia. The odds of a VAERS report submission during the implementation period were 30.2 (95% confidence interval, 9.52-95.5) times greater than the odds during the comparable preimplementation period. CONCLUSIONS: An open-source, electronic health record-based clinical decision support system can increase AE detection and reporting rates in VAERS.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Gestión de Riesgos , Vacunas/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ohio , Vacunas/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven
13.
J Pediatr ; 166(4): 992-7, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25598306

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize adverse events (AEs) after Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccines reported to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a spontaneous reporting surveillance system. STUDY DESIGN: We searched VAERS for US reports after Hib vaccines among reports received from January 1, 1990, to December 1, 2013. We reviewed a random sample of reports and accompanying medical records for reports classified as serious. All reports of death were reviewed. Physicians assigned a primary clinical category to each reviewed report. We used empirical Bayesian data mining to identify AEs that were disproportionally reported after Hib vaccines. RESULTS: VAERS received 29,747 reports after Hib vaccines; 5179 (17%) were serious, including 896 reports of deaths. Median age was 6 months (range 0-1022 months). Sudden infant death syndrome was the stated cause of death in 384 (51%) of 749 death reports with autopsy/death certificate records. The most common nondeath serious AE categories were neurologic (80; 37%), other noninfectious (46; 22%) (comprising mainly constitutional signs and symptoms); and gastrointestinal (39; 18%) conditions. No new safety concerns were identified after clinical review of reports of AEs that exceeded the data mining statistical threshold. CONCLUSION: Review of VAERS reports did not identify any new or unexpected safety concerns for Hib vaccines.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Haemophilus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/efectos adversos , Haemophilus influenzae tipo b/inmunología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Cápsulas Bacterianas , Teorema de Bayes , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Infecciones por Haemophilus/mortalidad , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
MMWR Recomm Rep ; 63(RR-01): 1-14, 2014 Feb 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24572654

RESUMEN

This report compiles and summarizes all recommendations from CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding prevention and control of Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) disease in the United States. As a comprehensive summary of previously published recommendations, this report does not contain any new recommendations; it is intended for use by clinicians, public health officials, vaccination providers, and immunization program personnel as a resource. ACIP recommends routine vaccination with a licensed conjugate Hib vaccine for infants aged 2 through 6 months (2 or 3 doses, depending on vaccine product) with a booster dose at age 12 through 15 months. ACIP also recommends vaccination for certain persons at increased risk for Hib disease (i.e., persons who have early component complement deficiencies, immunoglobulin deficiency, anatomic or functional asplenia, or HIV infection; recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplant; and recipients of chemotherapy or radiation therapy for malignant neoplasms). This report summarizes current information on Hib epidemiology in the United States and describes Hib vaccines licensed for use in the United States. Guidelines for antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis of contacts of persons with Hib disease also are provided.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Haemophilus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/administración & dosificación , Esquemas de Inmunización , Comités Consultivos , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Cápsulas Bacterianas , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Quimioprevención/normas , Preescolar , Trazado de Contacto , Aprobación de Drogas/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Haemophilus/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 210(6): 561.e1-6, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24378675

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize adverse events (AEs) after hepatitis A vaccines (Hep A) and hepatitis A and hepatitis B combination vaccine (Hep AB) in pregnant women reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a spontaneous reporting surveillance system. STUDY DESIGN: We searched VAERS for AEs reports in pregnant women who received Hep A or Hep AB from Jan. 1, 1996-April 5, 2013. Clinicians reviewed all reports and available medical records. RESULTS: VAERS received 139 reports of AEs in pregnant women; 7 (5.0%) were serious; no maternal or infant deaths were identified. Sixty-five (46.8%) did not describe any AEs. For those women whose gestational age was available, most were vaccinated during the first trimester, 50/60 (83.3%) for Hep A and 18/21 (85.7%) for Hep AB. The most common pregnancy-specific outcomes following Hep A or Hep AB vaccinations were spontaneous abortion in 15 (10.8%) reports, elective termination in 10 (7.2%), and preterm delivery in 7 (5.0%) reports. The most common nonpregnancy specific outcome was urinary tract infection and nausea/vomiting with 3 (2.2%) reports each. One case of amelia of the lower extremities was reported in an infant following maternal Hep A immunization. CONCLUSION: This review of VAERS reports did not identify any concerning pattern of AEs in pregnant women or their infants following maternal Hep A or Hep AB immunizations during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Hepatitis A/inmunología , Hepatitis B/inmunología , Vacunas contra Hepatitis Viral/efectos adversos , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología
16.
Obstet Gynecol ; 144(2): 283-287, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38781590

RESUMEN

We identified U.S. reports of postmenopausal bleeding in the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) between December 13, 2020, and December 13, 2021. Among 711,224 VAERS reports after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination, during our study period, we identified 554 presumptive postmenopausal bleeding reports; 434 were further classified as verified based on data abstracted from reports and medical records, when available. In the United States, by December 14, 2021, 58.8 million women aged 50 years or older had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, corresponding to approximately seven verified VAERS postmenopausal bleeding reports per 1 million women aged 50 years or older who received a COVID-19 vaccine. Reports of postmenopausal bleeding after COVID-19 vaccination in VAERS were rare, and causes of postmenopausal bleeding based on medical record review were consistent with known causes of postmenopausal bleeding.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Posmenopausia , Hemorragia Uterina , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Anciano , Hemorragia Uterina/etiología , Hemorragia Uterina/inducido químicamente , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación/efectos adversos
17.
Vaccine ; 42(9): 2380-2384, 2024 Apr 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38462432

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pregnant persons are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 illness. Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for everyone, including pregnant persons. However, data are limited on the safety of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and summarize reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a national spontaneous reporting system, among pregnant persons who received bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS: VAERS U.S. reports of adverse events (AEs) in pregnant persons who received the bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine from 9/1/2022-03/31/2023 were identified. Clinicians reviewed all reports and available medical records. AEs of these reports were compared with AEs reported to VAERS following monovalent mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccination in pregnancy. RESULTS: VAERS received 136 reports for pregnant persons who received bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine; 87 (64 %) after BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), and 48 (35 %) after mRNA-1273 (Moderna); 28 (20.6 %) reports were classified as serious. The most common pregnancy-specific outcomes reported included 12 (8.8 %) spontaneous abortions (<20 weeks gestation), 6 (4.4 %) episodes of preterm delivery, and 5 (3.7 %) reports of preeclampsia. One stillbirth (≥20 weeks gestation) was reported. No maternal or infant deaths were reported. There were 6 reports of AEs in infants, which included 3 reports of admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit: two infants with low birth weight, and one infant with a patent ductus arteriosus and patent foramen ovale. Non-pregnancy-specific adverse events were mostly COVID-19 infection and systemic reactions (e.g., headache, fatigue). Pregnancy-specific conditions were reported less frequently after bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccination compared to monovalent mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccination (3rd and 4th dose). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review of reports to VAERS, the safety profile of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant persons was comparable to that observed for monovalent mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccination (3rd and 4th dose) in pregnant persons.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
18.
Obstet Gynecol ; 143(5): 704-706, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38394669

RESUMEN

The GSK and Pfizer respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines are both indicated for adults aged 60 years and older, but only the Pfizer product is approved for use in pregnancy to prevent RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease in infants aged younger than 6 months. To assess for vaccine administration errors (ie, administration of the GSK RSV vaccine to pregnant persons) VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System), a U.S. passive reporting system, was searched for the time period from August 2023 to January 2024. A total of 113 reports of these administration errors were identified. Most reports (103, 91.2%) did not describe an adverse event. These administration errors are preventable with proper education and training and other preventive measures.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/prevención & control , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/inducido químicamente , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/efectos adversos , Vacunación , Errores Médicos
19.
Drug Saf ; 47(5): 487-493, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38411838

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Bivalent mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines may be simultaneously administered with other recommended vaccines, including seasonal influenza vaccines. However, few studies have evaluated the safety of co-administration of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to describe reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) after co-administration of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines. METHODS: We searched the VAERS database for reports of adverse events (AEs) following co-administration of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines during the period of September 1, 2022-March 31, 2023. We assessed the characteristics of these reports and described the most frequently reported AEs. Clinicians reviewed available medical records for reports of serious AEs and adverse events of special interest (AESI). RESULTS: During the period of 1 September 2022 through 31 March 2023, VAERS received 3689 reports of AEs following co-administration of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines. The median age of vaccinees was 59 years (interquartile range 39, 70 years); 342 reports (9.3%) were classified as serious. The most common AEs among non-serious reports were severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection (785, 23.5%), cough (592, 17.7%), and fatigue (568, 17.0%). The most common AEs among serious reports were Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (88, 25.7%), dyspnea (81, 23.7%), and condition aggravated (55, 16.1%). DISCUSSION: Reports of AEs following co-administration of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines did not reveal any unusual or unexpected patterns of AEs. Increased reporting of certain events (e.g., COVID-19) was expected due to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reporting requirements. CDC and FDA will continue to monitor the safety of co-administration of mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal influenza vaccines.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Humanos , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , ARN Mensajero , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano
20.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 208(6): 478.e1-6, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23453881

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We characterized reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event (AE) Reporting System (VAERS) of pregnant women who received meningococcal polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccine Menactra (MenACWY-D; Sanofi Pasteur Inc., Swiftwater, PA). STUDY DESIGN: We searched VAERS for reports of pregnant women who received MenACWY-D from Jan. 1, 2005 through Dec. 31, 2011. We conducted clinical review of reports and available medical records. RESULTS: Of 103 identified reports, 38 (36.7%) did not describe any AE. No maternal or infant deaths were reported. The most frequent pregnancy-specific AE was spontaneous abortion in 17 (16.5%) reports. Urinary tract infections and fever with vomiting were the most frequent nonpregnancy-specific AEs found in 4 (3.9%) and 3 (2.9%) reports, respectively. We identified 1 report with a major congenital anomaly (aqueductal stenosis and severe ventriculomegaly). CONCLUSION: Our comprehensive review of reports to VAERS in pregnant women after MenACWY-D did not identify any concerning patterns in maternal, infant, or fetal outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Meningitis Meningocócica/prevención & control , Vacunas Meningococicas/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Aborto Espontáneo/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Vacunas Meningococicas/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA