Safety and Efficacy of Radial Artery Access for Peripheral Vascular Intervention: A Single-Center Experience.

Radial artery (RA) access has been increasingly utilized for coronary procedures because of lower rates of access-site complications and improved patient satisfaction. However, limited data are available for RA access for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI). We performed a retrospective review of 143 patients who underwent PVI through RA access from February 2020 to September 2022 at a single institution. Baseline characteristics and follow-up data were ascertained from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Of 491 PVI, 156 (31.8%) were performed through the RA. Anatomical locations for intervention were the femoral (44.8%), iliac (31.1%), popliteal (9.6%) peroneal (2.7%), tibial (9.9%), and subclavian (1.9%) arteries. Procedural access was obtained through the right RA (92.9%), left RA (4.5%), or right ulnar artery (2.6%) using the 6 French R2P Destination Slender sheath in 85, 105, and 119 cm lengths. Atherectomy was used in 34.7%. Mean contrast volume was 105.5 ml and the average fluoroscopy time was 18.5 minutes. Conversion to femoral access occurred in 3 cases (1.9%) because of arterial spasm and noncrossable lesions. Concomitant pedal access occurred in 2 cases (1.3%). Periprocedural complication rate was 3.84%, of which access-site hematoma was most common (3.2%); none required blood transfusion, surgical intervention, or additional hospital stay. There was 1 case (0.64%) of in-hospital stroke. The mortality rate at 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year was 1.4%, 2.8%, and 4.2%, respectively. In conclusion, RA access is feasible for diverse PVI, and future studies are needed to assess safety and benefit compared with femoral artery access.

Causes and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Who Failed Screening for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) has recently emerged as a promising alternative to surgery for tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, a significant proportion of patients fail screening for TTVI, and little is known about their characteristics and natural history. This study sought to investigate causes of screen failure and outcomes of patients declined for TTVI. This was a retrospective single-center study of 32 patients who were ineligible for participation in transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement and tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair trials. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to the therapy they received: optimized medical therapy (OMT) group or intervention group. The mean age was 82 ± 7.8 years and 68.8% were women. The most common reasons for TTVI exclusion were anatomic/procedural impediment (53.1%), inclusion criteria not met (40.6%), and multivalvular disease (6.3%). Overall, 19 patients (59.4%) did not undergo subsequent tricuspid intervention. The clinical outcomes of these patients who received OMT alone were poor, with a 1-year composite of cardiac death or heart failure readmission of 47.4%. These rates were worse than in patients who subsequently underwent an intervention, albeit not statistically significant (OMT: 47.7% vs 23.1% interventions, p = 0.3), and were significantly more pronounced in the subgroup of patients who were excluded for anatomic/procedural limitations (OMT: 70% vs 14.3% interventions, p = 0.05). In conclusion, patients ineligible for TTVI, particularly, those with anatomic/procedural limitations, and treated medically have poor outcomes. These data underscore the importance of earlier referral and support the need for further transcatheter therapy iterations.

Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Replacement With Balloon- Versus Self-Expanding Valves in Patients With Degenerated Stentless Aortic Bioprosthesis.

Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been associated with favorable outcomes in patients with degenerated stentless bioprosthesis. However, whether the outcomes after ViV TAVR for failed stentless bioprosthesis differ between balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) and self-expanding valves (SEVs) remains unknown. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed 59 consecutive patients who underwent ViV TAVR for failed stentless bioprsothesis with BEVs (n = 42) versus SEVs (n = 17) in a single-health care system between 2013 and 2022. Overall, the mean age was 70.8 years and 74.6% were men. The mean transcatheter valve size was 26.3 ± 2.2 mm for BEVs and 26.4 ± 4 mm for SEVs (p = 0.93). The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 6.0 ± 3.6 for BEVs and 7.5 ± 5.5 for SEVs (p = 0.22). Compared with patients who received BEVs, those who received SEVs had higher rates of device malposition (2.4% vs 23.5%, p <0.01), postdeployment balloon dilation (11.9% vs 35.5%, p = 0.04) and need for a second transcatheter device (2.4% vs 35.5%, p <0.01). However, both groups showed similar improvement in aortic valve function at 30-day and 1-year follow-up (incidence of 1-year severe patient-prosthesis mismatch in BEVs: 17.6% vs 14.3% in SEVs, p = 0.78). The 1- and 3-year mortality did not differ between BEVs and SEVs (11.9% vs 11.8% and 25% vs 30%, respectively, Log rank p = 0.9). In conclusion, performing ViV TAVR for failed stentless bioprsothesis is technically challenging, especially when using SEVs; however, satisfactory positioning is possible in most cases, with excellent hemodynamic and clinical outcomes with BEVs and SEVs.

Distal Versus Proximal Radial Artery Access for Cardiac Catheterization: 1-Year Outcomes.

Proximal radial artery (PRA) access for cardiac catheterization is safe but can jeopardize subsequent use of the artery because of occlusion. Distal radial artery (DRA) access in the anatomical snuffbox preserves the RA but safety and potential detrimental effects on hand function are unknown. We aimed to assess hand function and complications after DRA and PRA. In this single-center trial, 300 patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to cardiac catheterization through DRA or PRA. The primary end point of change in hand function from baseline to 1 year was a composite of the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, hand grip test, and thumb-forefinger pinch test. The secondary end points included access feasibility and complications. Of 216 patients with 1-year completed follow-up, 112 were randomly allocated to DRA and 104 to PRA, with balanced demographics and procedural characteristics. Both groups had similar access site bleeding rates (DRA 0% vs PRA 1.4%, p = 0.25). Radial artery occlusion occurred in 1 PRA patient versus 2 in DRA. There was no significant difference in change of hand function, median (interquartile range) hand grip (DRA 0.7 [-3 to 4.5] vs PRA 1.3 [-2 to 4.3] kg, p = 0.57), pinch grip (DRA -0.1 [-1.1 to 1] vs PRA -0.3 [-1 to 0.7] kg, p = 0.66), and Quick DASH (DRA 0 [-6.6 to 2.3] vs PRA 0 [-4.6 to 2.9] points, p = 0.58). The composite of hand function was comparable between PRA and DRA. In conclusion, DRA is a safe strategy for cardiac catheterization, with a low complication rate. Compared with PRA, there is no increased risk of hand dysfunction or radial artery occlusion at 1 year.

Tricuspid regurgitation burden following transcatheter aortic valve replacement requiring early pacemaker implantation.

Background: Conduction abnormality requiring the implantation of a permanent pacemaker (PPM) is a well-known and clinically important complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, PPM implantation may result in lead-associated tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR). This study sought to determine the incidence and progression of TR following PPM implantation after TAVR. Methods: This was a retrospective review of all echocardiograms of patients who underwent PPM following TAVR at the Baylor Scott & White hospitals from 2012 to 2021. The primary endpoint was TR progression at 30 days and 1 year. A subanalysis comparing the change in TR progression between small and large TAVR devices was also conducted. Secondary outcomes included all-cause death at 30 days and 1 year. Results: Out of the 2744 patients who underwent TAVR between April 2012 and August 2021, 177 patients (6.5%) subsequently received a new PPM. There was a statistically significant progression of TR at 1-year follow-up (McNemar's P value = 0.02). TR progression rates were comparable between the small and large valve groups at 1-year follow-up (4% vs 11%, P = 0.09, respectively). Conclusion: In this single healthcare system study, we demonstrated a significant progression of TR in patients with PPM post TAVR at 1 year.

Impact of iodinated contrast shortage on contrast-associated acute kidney injury: a single center experience.

Background: In March 2022, a COVID-19 outbreak disrupted the global supply of iodine contrast media (ICM). Healthcare systems implemented contrast-saving strategies to maintain their remaining ICM supplies. This study sought to determine the impact of contrast shortage on the incidence of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI). Methods: This was a retrospective study of 265 patients undergoing 278 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) during 4-month periods prior to (9/1/2021 to 12/31/2021) and during (5/1/2022 to 8/31/2022) contrast shortage at a single center. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CA-AKI between study periods. Results: A total of 148 and 130 PCIs were performed before and during contrast shortage, respectively. The incidence of CA-AKI significantly decreased from 11.5% to 4.6% during contrast shortage (P = 0.04). During the shortage, average contrast volume per PCI was significantly lower (123 ± 62 mL vs 88 ± 46 mL, P < 0.001), while coronary imaging was significantly higher (34.3% vs 50%, P = 0.009) compared to preshortage. All-cause mortality at discharge was comparable between study periods (2.8% vs 3.3%, respectively; P = 0.90). Conclusion: The scarcity of ICM for PCI procedures in this single-center experience was associated with a significant increase in the utilization of intravascular imaging and a significant reduction in CA-AKI.

Five-Year Outcomes of Measured and Predicted Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Data on the long-term outcomes of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and clinical outcomes of measured PPM (PPMM) and predicted PPM (PPMP) in patients who underwent TAVI. This is a retrospective analysis of 3,016 patients who underwent TAVI at a large health care system between 2012 and 2021. Effective orifice area indexed to body surface area (EOAi) was measured at discharge using the continuity equation. EOAi was predicted according to the published predictive tables for each model and size of the valve. Primary end point was 5-year survival rate. Mean age was 80 years, and 55.6% were male. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score was 4.66%. 74.9% of patients received a balloon-expandable valve (BEV), and 25.1% received a self-expanding valve (SEV). The incidence of severe PPM was markedly lower when defined by predicted versus measured EOAi (0.8% vs 6.3%, p <0.001) and when assessed in SEV versus BEV (5.3% vs 6.6%, p = 0.02). Neither severe PPMp nor severe PPMM was associated with 5-year mortality (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.66, p = 0.095; hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 2.49, p = 0.954, respectively), irrespective of the presence of high residual pressure gradient. Neither BEV nor SEV was associated with an increased 5-year mortality, irrespective of PPM definition or severity. In this large health care system analysis, neither severe PPMP nor severe PPMM was associated with 5-year all-cause mortality. There was no difference between BEV and SEV in terms of mortality, irrespective of the definition or severity of PPM.

Distal Versus Proximal Radial Artery Access for Cardiac Catheterization: 30-Day Outcomes of the DIPRA Study.

Background Proximal radial artery (pRA) access for cardiac catheterization is safe but can jeopardize subsequent use of the artery because of occlusion. Distal radial artery (dRA) access in the anatomical snuffbox preserves the radial artery, but safety and potential detrimental effects on hand function are unknown. Methods and Results In the DIPRA (Distal Versus Proximal Radial Artery Access for Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention) study, a single-center trial, 300 patients were randomized 1:1 to cardiac catheterization through dRA or pRA. The primary end point of change in hand function from baseline to 30 days was a composite of the QuickDASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) questionnaire, hand-grip test, and thumb forefinger pinch test. Secondary end points included access feasibility and complications; 254 of 300 patients completed follow-up at 30 days; of these, 128 were randomized to dRA and 126 to pRA with balanced demographic and procedural characteristics. Both groups had similar rates of access site bleeding (dRA 0% versus pRA 1.4%; P=0.25). Six patients with dRA failed access compared with 2 patients with pRA. Radial artery occlusion occurred in 2 pRA versus none in dRA. There were no significant differences in change in hand function, median hand-grip (dRA 0 [-3.2, 3.3] versus pRA 0.7 [-2.3, 3.3] kg; P=0.21), pinch-grip (dRA -0.3 [-1.2, 0.5] versus pRA 0 [-0.9, 0.9] kg; P=0.09), and QuickDASH (dRA 0 [-4.6, 2.3] versus pRA 0 [-4.6, 2.3] points, P=0.96). There was no significant difference in the composite of hand function between pRA and dRA. Conclusions dRA is a safe strategy for cardiac catheterization with a low complication rate. Compared with pRA, there is no increased risk of hand dysfunction at 30 days. Registration URL: https://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04318990.

Assessment of TVT and STS Risk Score Performances in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Background: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score has been used to risk stratify patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The Transcatheter Valve Therapy (TVT) score was developed to predict in-hospital mortality in high/prohibitive-risk patients. Its performance in low and intermediate-risk patients is unknown. We sought to compare TVT and STS scores' ability to predict clinical outcomes in all-surgical-risk patients undergoing TAVR. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing TAVR from 2012-2020 within a large health care system were retrospectively reviewed and stratified by STS risk score. Predictive abilities of TVT and STS scores were compared using observed-to-expected mortality ratios (O:E) and area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUCs) for 30-day and 1-year mortality. Results: We assessed a total of 3270 patients (mean age 79 ± 9 years, 45% female), including 191 (5.8%) low-risk, 1093 (33.4%) intermediate-risk, 1584 (48.4%) high-risk, and 402 (5.8%) inoperable. Mean TVT and STS scores were 3.5% ± 2.0% and 6.1% ± 4.3%, respectively. Observed 30-day and 1-year mortality were 2.8% (92/3270; O:E TVT 0.8 ± 0.16 vs STS 0.46 ± 0.09), and 13.2% (432/3270), respectively. In the all-comers population, both TVT and STS risk scores showed poor prediction of 30-day (AUC: TVT 0.68 [0.62-0.74] vs STS 0.64 [0.58-0.70]), and 1-year (AUC: TVT 0.65 [0.62-0.58] vs STS 0.65 [0.62-0.58]) mortality. After stratifying by surgical risk, discrimination of the TVT and STS scores remained poor in all categories at 30 days and 1 year. Conclusions: An updated TAVR risk score with improved predictive ability across all-surgical-risk categories should be developed based on a larger national registry.