Can Hypnotherapy Be Considered a Valuable Component in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease? Insights from a Comprehensive Review.

Despite advancements in medication,managing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains challenging, necessitatingalternative control methods. Gut-directed hypnotherapy, known for alleviating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), is debated as an IBD management method. Anextensive search across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.govuncovered five randomized trials and two case series involving IBD patients undergoing hypnotherapy. A small trial reported statistically significant remission at one year (p = .04), but larger trials, including one with 63 patients, showed no significant gastrointestinal improvements. The first case series noted post-intervention reduction in the mediators of inflammation in rectal mucosal, without long-term monitoring. The second case series observed the absence of flare episodes in 12 of 13 ulcerative colitis patients during follow-up, possibly influenced by the simultaneous use of two drugs alongside hypnotherapy. Psychological outcomes, demonstrated no significant differences between hypnotherapy and control groups. While current literature doesn't decisively support hypnotherapy for managing IBD symptoms, it underscores the importance of further research, including randomized clinical trials, to thoroughly assess its effectiveness in this context.

Effectiveness and safety of darvadstrocel in patients with complex perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease: a systematic review.

Background: Managing complex perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (CD) remains challenging, despite current medical and surgical treatment approaches. Darvadstrocel, a therapy utilizing adipose-derived stem cells, shows promise in promoting tissue regeneration and healing, offering a novel and effective treatment for fistula management. Method: A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus to identify studies involving patients with complex perianal fistulizing CD treated with darvadstrocel. Results: In total, 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 5 observational studies with retrospective data collection and 2 observational studies with prospective design were included in the final review. Data from the European ADMIRE-CD RCT demonstrated that darvadstrocel is superior to placebo in terms of clinical and imaging improvement over both the short and long term. These findings align with the prospective studies analyzed in this systematic review. The rate of treatment-emergent adverse events in the ADMIRE-CD trial's RCTs was similar in both the darvadstrocel and control groups, with perianal abscess being the most common adverse event up to 52 weeks after drug administration. Retrospective studies indicated no side-effects beyond 52 weeks. Conclusions: Darvadstrocel appears to be a new, potentially effective and safe treatment option for the management of complex perianal fistulas. However, more randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of the drug.

The current role of Tofacitinib in acute severe ulcerative colitis in adult patients: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Despite rescue therapy, acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is associated with a high risk of colectomy, while treatment options remain limited. Tofacitinib, a rapidly acting Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is gaining ground as an effective alternative treatment option for the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis, which may prevent emergency colectomy. METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase was undertaken for studies of adult patients with ASUC treated with tofacitinib. RESULTS: In total, two observational studies, seven case series and five case reports incorporating 134 patients who received tofacitinib in ASUC were identified with a follow-up period ranging from 30 days to 14 months. Overall, the pooled colectomy rate was 23.9% (95% CI 16.6-31.2). The pooled 90-day and 6-month colectomy free rate were 79.9% (95% CI 73.1-86.7) and 71.6% (95% CI 64-79.2) respectively. The most frequent adverse event was C. Difficile infection. CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib appears to be a promising option for the treatment of ASUC. Randomized clinical trials are required to further access the efficacy, safety and optimal dose of tofacitinib in cases of ASUC.