Towards optimizing cefepime/tazobactam (WCK 4282) exposure to achieve efficacy against piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant ESBL infections: dose recommendations for various renal functions, including intermittent haemodialysis, in healthy individuals.

OBJECTIVES: WCK 4282 is a novel combination of cefepime 2 g and tazobactam 2 g being developed for the treatment of infections caused by piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant ESBL infections. The dosing regimen for cefepime/tazobactam needs to be optimized to generate adequate exposures to treat infections caused by ESBL-producing pathogens resistant to both cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam. METHODS: We developed pharmacokinetic population models of cefepime and tazobactam to evaluate the optimal dose adjustments in patients, including those with augmented renal clearance as well as various degrees of renal impairment, and also for those on intermittent haemodialysis. Optimal doses for various degrees of renal function were identified by determining the PTA for a range of MICs. To cover ESBL-producing pathogens with an cefepime/tazobactam MIC of 16 mg/L, a dosing regimen of 2 g q8h infused over 1.5 h resulted in a combined PTA of 99% for the mean murine 1 log10-kill target for the cefepime/tazobactam combination. RESULTS: We found that to adjust for renal function, doses need to be reduced to 1 g q8h, 500 mg q8h and 500 mg q12h for patients with CLCR of 30-59, 15-29 and 8-14 mL/min (as well as patients with intermittent haemodialysis), respectively. In patients with high to augmented CLR (estimated CLCR 120-180 mL/min), a prolonged 4 h infusion of standard dose is required. CONCLUSIONS: The suggested dosing regimens will result in exposures of cefepime and tazobactam that would be adequate for infections caused by ESBL-producing pathogens with a cefepime/tazobactam MICs up to 16 mg/L.

Pharmacodynamics of Temocillin in Neutropenic Murine Infection Models.

Temocillin is used for the treatment of various infections caused by Enterobacterales. The pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) index that is best correlated with the activity of beta-lactams is the percentage of time that the unbound concentration exceeds the MIC (%fT>MIC). However, the %fT>MIC needed for a bacteriostatic or killing effect of temocillin is unknown in thigh and lung infection models. In the present study, we studied the temocillin PK in plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of infected neutropenic mice and determined the plasma exposure-response relationships for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Neutropenic murine thigh and lung infection models were used. The bacterial loads in the thighs or lungs were determined. A sigmoid maximum-effect model was used to fit the plasma exposure-response relationship. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption best described temocillin PK (clearance [CL], 1.03 L/h/kg; volume of distribution [V], 0.457 L/kg). Protein binding was 78.2% ± 1.3% across different plasma concentrations. A static effect was achieved for all strains in both the thigh and lung infection models. However, the median %fT>MIC needed for a static effect was much lower in the lung infection model (27.8% for E. coli and 38.2% for K. pneumoniae) than in the thigh infection model (65.2% for E. coli and 64.9% for K. pneumoniae). A 1-log kill was reached for all strains in the lung infection model (median %fT>MIC values of 42.1% for E. coli and 44.1% for K. pneumoniae) and 7 out of 8 strains in the thigh infection model (median %fT>MIC values of 85.4% for E. coli and 74.5% for K. pneumoniae). These data support the use of temocillin in patients with pneumonia.

Plasma protein binding of ceftriaxone in critically ill patients: can we predict unbound fractions?

BACKGROUND: Standard antibiotic dosing is not suitable for critically ill patients, due to altered pharmacokinetics (PK) in these patients. Knowledge of protein binding is important for optimizing antibiotic exposure because only the unbound fraction is pharmacologically active. If unbound fractions can be predicted, minimal sampling techniques and less costly methods can be routinely used. METHODS: Data from the DOLPHIN trial, a prospective randomized clinical trial that included critically ill patients, were used. Total and unbound ceftriaxone concentrations were determined using a validated UPLC-MS/MS method. A non-linear saturable binding model was made using 75% of the trough concentrations and validated on the remaining data. Our model and previously published models were tested for their performance for subtherapeutic (<1 mg/L) and high (>10 mg/L) unbound concentrations. RESULTS: In total, 113 patients were sampled [Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation version 4 (APACHE IV) score 71 (IQR 55-87), albumin 28 g/L (IQR 24-32)]. This resulted in 439 samples (trough = 224, peak = 215). Unbound fractions were significantly different between samples taken at trough and peak times [10.9% (IQR 7.9-16.4) versus 19.7% (IQR 12.9-26.6), P < 0.0001], which was not explained by concentration differences. Our model and most literature models showed good sensitivity and low specificity to determine high and subtherapeutic ceftriaxone trough concentrations using only the total ceftriaxone and albumin concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftriaxone protein binding is not concentration related in critically ill patients. Existing models show good ability to predict high concentrations, but low specificity in predicting subtherapeutic concentrations.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of polymyxin B in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae murine infection models.

BACKGROUND: Although polymyxin B has been in use since the late 1950s, there have been limited studies done to unravel its pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) index. METHODS: We determined, in neutropenic infected mice, the PK, plasma protein binding and PK/PD index best correlating with efficacy for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic profile showed non-linear PK; dose was significantly correlated with absorption rate and clearance. The inhibitory sigmoid dose-effect model for the fCmax/MIC index of E. coli fitted best, but was only modestly higher than the R2 of %fT>MIC and fAUC/MIC (R2 0.91-0.93). For K. pneumoniae the fAUC/MIC index had the best fit, which was slightly higher than the R2 of %fT>MIC and fCmax/MIC (R2 0.85-0.91). Static targets of polymyxin B fAUC/MIC were 27.5-102.6 (median 63.5) and 5.9-60.5 (median 11.6) in E. coli and in K. pneumoniae isolates, respectively. A 1 log kill effect was only reached in two E. coli isolates and one K. pneumoniae. The PTA with the standard dosing was low for isolates with MIC >0.25 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that fAUC/MIC can describe the exposure-response relationship for polymyxin B. The 1 log kill effect was achieved in the minority of the isolates whereas polymyxin B PK/PD targets cannot be attained for the majority of clinical isolates with the standard dosing regimen, indicating that polymyxin B may be not effective against serious infections as monotherapy.

Dose optimization of cefotaxime as pre-emptive treatment in critically ill adult patients: A population pharmacokinetic study.

AIMS: To describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of cefotaxime as pre-emptive treatment in critically ill adult patients, including covariates and to determine the probability of target attainment (PTA) of different dosage regimens for Enterobacterales and Staphylococcus aureus. METHODS: Five samples were drawn during 1 dosage interval in critically ill patients treated with cefotaxime 1 g q6h or q4h. PK parameters were estimated using NONMEM (v7.4.2). The percentage of patients reaching 100% fT>MICECOFF was used to compare different dosage regimens for Enterobacterales and S. aureus. RESULTS: This study included 92 patients (437 samples). The best structural model was a 2-compartment model with a combined error, interindividual variability on clearance, central volume and intercompartmental clearance. Correlations between interindividual variability were included. Clearance increased with higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; creatinine clearance) and albumin concentration. For Enterobacterales, 1 g q8h reached 95% PTA and continuous infusion (CI) of 4 g 24 h-1 100% PTA at the highest eGFR and albumin concentration. For S. aureus the predefined target of 95% PTA was not reached with higher eGFR and/or albumin concentrations. CI of 6 g 24 h-1 for S. aureus resulted in a minimum of 99% PTA. CONCLUSION: Cefotaxime PK in critically ill patients was best described by a 2-compartment model with eGFR and albumin concentration as covariates influencing clearance. For Enterobacterales 1 g q8h or CI of 4 g 24 h-1 was adequate for all combinations of eGFR and albumin concentration. For S. aureus CI of 6 g 24 h-1 would be preferred if eGFR and albumin concentration exceed 80 mL min-1 and 40 g L-1 respectively.

Population plasma and urine pharmacokinetics and the probability of target attainment of fosfomycin in healthy male volunteers.

PURPOSE: A population pharmacokinetic model of fosfomycin was developed in healthy volunteers after intravenous administration, and different dosing regimens were evaluated in terms of the probability of target attainment for Escherichia coli using both plasma and urinary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets. METHODS: Eight healthy men received fosfomycin as both intermittent 8 g q8h and continuous infusion 1 g/h with a loading dose of 8 g in a crossover study design. Dense sampling was conducted during both regimens. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed using NONMEM. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to evaluate the Probability of Target Attainment (PTA) of different dosing regimens using bactericidal (AUC24h/MIC of 83 and 75%T>MIC) and bacteriostatic (AUC24h/MIC of 25) plasma targets and bacteriostatic (AUC24h/MIC of 3994) urine target. RESULTS: A total of 176 plasma and 86 urine samples were available for PK analysis. A two-compartment model with a urine compartment best described the data. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) showed a significant correlation with renal clearance and was implemented in the final model. Simulation results show that the dose of 4 g q8h reached 100% of PTA using bactericidal and bacteriostatic targets for MIC up to 16 mg/L. CONCLUSION: For the clinical breakpoint of 32 mg/L, the standard dosing regimen (4 g q8h) might not be sufficient to reach the bactericidal target. Higher dosing of 8 g q8h as an intermittent infusion or 0.75 g/h as a continuous infusion might be required. Continuous infusion resulted in better attainment of the %T>MIC target than intermittent infusion.

Cefepime pharmacodynamic targets against Enterobacterales employing neutropenic murine lung infection and in vitro pharmacokinetic models.

BACKGROUND: Very limited studies, so far, have been conducted to identify the pharmacodynamic targets of cefepime, a well-established fourth-generation cephalosporin. As a result, conventional targets representing the cephalosporin class are used for cefepime target attainment analysis. OBJECTIVES: We employed both a neutropenic murine lung infection model and an in vitro pharmacokinetic model (IVPM) to determine cefepime's pharmacodynamic target [percentage of the dosing interval during which unbound drug concentrations remain higher than the MIC (%fT>MIC)] for bacteriostatic and 1 log10 kill effects. METHODS: Ten strains with cefepime MICs ranging from 0.03 to 16 mg/L were studied in the lung infection. In the IVPM, five cefepime-resistant strains with cefepime/tazobactam (fixed 8 mg/L) MICs ranging from 0.25 to 8 mg/L were included. Through 24 h dose fractionation, both in lung infection and IVPM (in the latter case, tazobactam 8 mg/L continuous infusion was used to protect cefepime), varying cefepime exposures and corresponding pharmacodynamic effect scenarios were generated to identify the pharmacodynamic targets. RESULTS: Using a non-linear sigmoidal maximum-effect (Emax) model, the cefepime's plasma fT>MIC for 1 log10 kill in lung infection ranged from 17% to 53.7% and a combined exposure-response plot yielded 30%. In the case of IVPM, T>MIC ranged from 6.9% to 75.4% with a mean value of 34.2% for 1 log10 kill. CONCLUSIONS: Both in vivo and in vitro studies showed that cefepime's pharmacodynamic requirements are lower than generally reported for cephalosporins (50%-70% fT>MIC). The lower requirement for cefepime could be linked with factors such as cefepime's better permeation properties and multiple PBP affinity-driven enhanced bactericidal action.

Binding of temocillin to plasma proteins in vitro and in vivo: the importance of plasma protein levels in different populations and of co-medications.

BACKGROUND: Temocillin plasma protein binding (PPB) in healthy individuals is reported to be ∼85% but had not been studied in patients. OBJECTIVES: To obtain normative data on temocillin PPB in patients in relation to infection and impact of co-medications widely used in ICU. METHODS: Plasma was obtained from healthy individuals (Group #1), non-ICU patients with UTI (Group #2), ICU patients with suspected/confirmed ventriculitis (Group #3) or with sepsis/septic shock (Group #4). Total and unbound temocillin concentrations were measured in spiked samples from temocillin-naive donors (in vitro) or in plasma from temocillin-treated subjects (in vivo). The impact of diluting plasma, using pharmaceutical albumin, or adding drugs potentially competing for PPB was tested in spiked samples. Data were analysed using a modified Hill-Langmuir equation taking ligand depletion into account. RESULTS: Temocillin PPB was saturable in all groups, both in vitro and in vivo. Maximal binding capacity (Bmax) was 1.2-2-fold lower in patients. At 20 and 200 mg/L (total concentrations), the unbound fraction reached 12%-29%, 23%-42% and 32%-52% in Groups #2, #3, #4. The unbound fraction was inversely correlated with albumin and C-reactive protein concentrations. Binding to albumin was 2-3-fold lower than in plasma and non-saturable. Drugs with high PPB but active at lower molar concentrations than temocillin caused minimal displacement, while fluconazole (low PPB but similar plasma concentrations to temocillin) increased up to 2-fold its unbound fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Temocillin PPB is saturable, 2-4-fold lowered in infected patients in relation to disease severity (ICU admission, hypoalbuminaemia, inflammation) and only partially reproducible with albumin. Competition with other drugs must be considered for therapeutic concentrations to be meaningful.

Health Care Costs of Target Attainment for Beta-Lactam Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of the EXPAT Study.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing beta-lactam antibiotic treatment is a promising method to reduce the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and therefore reduce ICU costs. We used data from the EXPAT trial to determine whether beta-lactam antibiotic target attainment is a cost determinant in the ICU. METHODS: Patients included in the EXPAT trial were divided into target attainment and target nonattainment based on serum antibiotic levels. All hospital costs were extracted from the hospital administration system and categorized. RESULTS: In total, 79 patients were included in the analysis. Target attainment showed a trend toward higher total ICU costs (€44,600 versus €28,200, P = 0.103). This trend disappeared when correcting for ICU length of stay (€2680 versus €2700). Renal replacement therapy was the most important cost driver. CONCLUSIONS: Target attainment for beta-lactam antibiotics shows a trend toward higher total costs in ICU patients, which can be attributed to the high costs of a long stay in the ICU and renal replacement therapy.

Barriers and Facilitators in the Clinical Implementation of Beta-Lactam Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A Critical Review.

BACKGROUND: With increasing knowledge of beta-lactam pharmacodynamics and interpatient and intrapatient variability in pharmacokinetics, the usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is becoming increasingly clear. However, little research has been conducted to identify potential barriers and facilitators in the clinical implementation of beta-lactam TDM. This study provides an overview of the current practices of beta-lactam TDM and barriers and facilitators in its implementation. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using the Ovid MEDLINE database in April 2021, without restrictions on the publication date. All studies reporting the implementation of beta-lactam antibiotic TDM in critically ill patients through questionnaires or surveys were included in this review. RESULTS: Six eligible studies were identified from 215 records, all of which were cross-sectional. All studies identified barriers and facilitators in the implementation of beta-lactam TDM in critically ill patients. The main barriers were insufficient knowledge about various aspects regarding the implementation of beta-lactam TDM and the unavailability of assays. Furthermore, a delay in the acquisition of TDM results reduces the probability of physicians altering drug dosages. Finally, doubts about the cost-effectiveness and clinical effectiveness of beta-lactam TDM in critically ill patients hinder broad implementation. Moreover, to improve the willingness of physicians to use beta-lactam TDM, collaboration between physicians and clinical pharmacists and clinical microbiologists should be strengthened. CONCLUSIONS: Although the evidence for application of beta-lactam TDM continues to grow, its clinical implementation remains limited. To enable optimal implementation of these antibiotics in critically ill patients, several barriers need to be overcome regarding logistics, equipment availability, clinical evidence, and proof of cost-effectiveness.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients: Current Practice and Future Perspectives With a Focus on Clinical Outcome.

PURPOSE: Early initiation of antibiotics is essential for ameliorating infections in critically ill patients. The correct dosage of antibiotics is imperative to ensure their adequate exposure. Critically ill patients have altered pharmacokinetic parameters and are often infected by less susceptible microorganisms. Differences in drug disposition are not considered with standard doses of antibiotics. This can lead to suboptimal antibiotic exposure in critically ill patients. To overcome this problem of suboptimal dosing, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a strategy commonly used to support individualized dosing of antibiotics. It is routinely used for vancomycin and aminoglycosides in clinical practice. In recent years, it has become apparent that TDM may also be used in other antibiotics. METHODS: This review summarizes the evidence for TDM of antibiotics in critically ill patients, focuses on clinical outcomes, and summarizes possibilities for optimized TDM in the future. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: After reviewing the literature, we can conclude that general TDM implementation is advised for glycopeptides and aminoglycosides, as evidence of the relationship between TDM and clinical outcome is present. For antibiotics, such as beta-lactams, fluoroquinolones, and linezolid, it seems rational to perform TDM in specific patient cases. TDM involving other antibiotics is supported by individual cases, specifically to decrease toxicity. When focusing on future possibilities to improve TDM of antibiotics in critically ill patients, implementation of model-informed precision dosing should be investigated because it can potentially streamline the TDM process. The logistics of TDM, such as turnaround time and available equipment, are challenging but may be overcome by rapid bioanalytical techniques or real-time monitoring of drug concentrations through biosensors in the future. Education, clinical information on targets, and clinical outcome studies are other important factors that facilitate TDM implementation.

Barriers and facilitators for therapeutic drug monitoring of beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin in the ICU: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated that failure of achieving pharmacodynamic targets of commonly used antibiotics is common in critically ill patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can contribute to optimize the exposure of beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin. While evidence for TDM of these antibiotics is growing, translation into clinical implementation remains limited. Therefore, perceived barriers and facilitators are important for implementing TDM in this population. The primary aim of this study was to identify healthcare professionals' barriers and facilitators for the implementation of TDM of beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin in Dutch intensive care units (ICU). METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional online survey among healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in antibiotic treatment of ICU patients. An adapted version of the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations was sent out. Items were considered barriers when ≥ 20% of participants responded with a negative answer. If ≥ 80% of the participants responded with a positive answer, the item was considered a facilitator. RESULTS: Sixty-four HCPs completed the survey, of which 14 were from academic hospitals, 25 from general hospitals, and 25 from teaching hospitals. Most participants were hospital pharmacists (59%) or medical specialists (23%). Eleven barriers and four facilitators for implementation of TDM of beta-lactams were identified; 17 barriers for TDM of ciprofloxacin and no facilitators. The most important barriers were a lack of conclusive evidence, organizational support, and low availability of assays. Additional barriers were a lack of consensus on which specific patients to apply TDM and which pharmacodynamic targets to use. Identified facilitators for beta-lactam TDM implementation are low complexity and high task perception, combined with the perception that TDM is important to prevent side effects and to adequately treat infections. Twenty-eight percent of participants reported that flucloxacillin could be analyzed in their hospital. Assay availability of other beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin was lower (3-17%). CONCLUSION: Several barriers were identified that could obstruct the implementation of TDM of beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin in the ICU. In particular, education, clear guidelines, and organizational support should be considered when creating tailored implementation strategies. Finally, evidence of beneficial clinical outcomes on TDM of beta-lactams and ciprofloxacin can enhance further implementation.

Failure of target attainment of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients and associated risk factors: a two-center prospective study (EXPAT).

BACKGROUND: Early and appropriate antibiotic dosing is associated with improved clinical outcomes in critically ill patients, yet target attainment remains a challenge. Traditional antibiotic dosing is not suitable in critically ill patients, since these patients undergo physiological alterations that strongly affect antibiotic exposure. For beta-lactam antibiotics, the unbound plasma concentrations above at least one to four times the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for 100% of the dosing interval (100%ƒT > 1-4×MIC) have been proposed as pharmacodynamic targets (PDTs) to maximize bacteriological and clinical responses. The objectives of this study are to describe the PDT attainment in critically ill patients and to identify risk factors for target non-attainment. METHODS: This prospective observational study was performed in two ICUs in the Netherlands. We enrolled adult patients treated with the following beta-lactam antibiotics: amoxicillin (with or without clavulanic acid), cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, and meropenem. Based on five samples within a dosing interval at day 2 of therapy, the time unbound concentrations above the epidemiological cut-off (ƒT > MICECOFF and ƒT > 4×MICECOFF) were determined. Secondary endpoints were estimated multivariate binomial and binary logistic regression models, for examining the association of PDT attainment with patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were included, of whom 63.3% achieved PDT of 100%ƒT > MICECOFF and 36.7% achieved 100%ƒT > 4×MICECOFF. Regression analysis identified male gender, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2, and high body mass index (BMI) as risk factors for target non-attainment. Use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and high serum urea significantly increased the probability of target attainment. In addition, we found a significant association between the 100%ƒT > MICECOFF target attainment and ICU length of stay (LOS), but no significant correlation was found for the 30-day survival. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional beta-lactam dosing results in low target attainment in the majority of critically ill patients. Male gender, high BMI, and high eGFR were significant risk factors for target non-attainment. These predictors, together with therapeutic drug monitoring, may help ICU clinicians in optimizing beta-lactam dosing in critically ill patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry (EXPAT trial), NTR 5632 . Registered on 7 December 2015.

Population pharmacokinetics and target attainment of ciprofloxacin in critically ill patients.

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a population pharmacokinetic model of ciprofloxacin intravenously in critically ill patients, and determine target attainment to provide guidance for more effective regimens. METHODS: Non-linear mixed-effects modelling was used for the model development and covariate analysis. Target attainment of an ƒAUC0-24/MIC ≥ 100 for different MICs was calculated for standard dosing regimens. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to define the probability of target attainment (PTA) of several dosing regimens. RESULTS: A total of 204 blood samples were collected from 42 ICU patients treated with ciprofloxacin 400-1200 mg/day, with median values for age of 66 years, APACHE II score of 22, BMI of 26 kg/m2, and eGFR of 58.5 mL/min/1.73 m2. The median ƒAUC0-24 and ƒCmax were 29.9 mg•h/L and 3.1 mg/L, respectively. Ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics were best described by a two-compartment model. We did not find any significant covariate to add to the structural model. The proportion of patients achieving the target ƒAUC0-24/MIC ≥ 100 were 61.9% and 16.7% with MICs of 0.25 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. Results of the PTA simulations suggest that a dose of ≥ 1200 mg/day is needed to achieve sufficient ƒAUC0-24/MIC ratios. CONCLUSIONS: The model described the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in ICU patients adequately. No significant covariates were found and high inter-individual variability of ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics in ICU patients was observed. The poor target attainment supports the use of higher doses such as 1200 mg/day in critically ill patients, while the variability of inter-individual pharmacokinetics parameters emphasizes the need for therapeutic drug monitoring to ensure optimal exposure.

Pregnancy-related pharmacokinetics and antimicrobial prophylaxis during fetal surgery, cefazolin and clindamycin as examples.

Antimicrobial prophylaxis during surgery aims to prevent post-operative site infections. For fetal surgery, this includes the fetal and amniotic compartments. Both are deep compartments as drug equilibrium with maternal blood is achieved relatively late. Despite prophylaxis, chorio-amnionitis or endometritis following ex utero intrapartum treatment or fetoscopy occur in 4.13% and 1.45% respectively of the interventions. This review summarizes the observations on two commonly administered antimicrobials (cefazolin, clindamycin) for surgical prophylaxis during pregnancy, with emphasis on the deep compartments. For both compounds, antimicrobial exposure is on target when we consider the maternal and fetal plasma compartment. In contrast, amniotic fluid concentrations-time profiles display a delayed and much more blunted pattern, behaving as deep compartment. For cefazolin, there are data that document further dilution in the setting of polyhydramnios. Along this deep compartment concept, there is some accumulation during repeated administration, modeled for cefazolin and observed for clindamycin. The relative underexposure to antimicrobials in amniotic fluid may be reflected in the pattern of maternal-fetal complications after fetal surgery, and suggest that antimicrobial prophylaxis practices for fetal surgery should be reconsidered. Further studies should be designed by a multidisciplinary team (fetal surgeons, clinical pharmacologists and microbiologists) to facilitate efficient evaluation of antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Optimizing dosing of nitrofurantoin from a PK/PD point of view: What do we need to know?

Nitrofurantoin is an old antibiotic and an important first-line oral antibiotic for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections. However despite its long term use for over 60 years, little information is available with respect to its dose justification and this may be the reason of highly variable recommended doses and dosing schedules. Furthermore, nitrofurantoin is not a uniform product -crystal sizes of nitrofurantoin, and therefore pharmacokinetic properties, differ significantly by product. Moreover, pharmacokinetic profiling of some products is even lacking, or difficult to interpret because of its unstable chemical properties. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data is now slowly becoming available. This review provides an overview of nitrofurantoins antibacterial, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. This shows that a clear rationale of current dosing regimens is scanty.

The pharmacokinetics of nitrofurantoin in healthy female volunteers: a randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Use of nitrofurantoin has increased significantly since its recent repositioning as a first-line agent for uncomplicated cystitis by multiple guidelines. However, current dosing regimens were developed in an era before robust pharmacokinetic testing and may not be optimal. Furthermore, formulations have been modified over the years. OBJECTIVES: To reassess the plasma and urinary pharmacokinetic profile of macrocrystalline nitrofurantoin in two commonly used dosing regimens. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized crossover pharmacokinetic trial, 12 healthy adult female volunteers were randomized to receive oral nitrofurantoin 100 mg q8h on days 1 and 2 and, after a washout period, 50 mg q6h on days 30 and 31, or the same dosing schemes in reversed order. Urine and blood were collected at steady state and analysed by UPLC. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by WinNonlin. RESULTS: Plasma peak concentrations were low (mean 0.33 mg/L, SD 0.08, and 0.69 mg/L, SD 0.35, after 50 and 100 mg, respectively) and dose dependent. The AUC0-24 was higher (6.49 versus 4.43 mg·h/L, P = 0.021) for the 100 mg q8h dosing regimen, but the dose-normalized AUC was similar for the two regimens. In contrast, urinary concentrations were dose independent: increasing the nitrofurantoin dose delayed the time to peak urinary concentration, while steady-state AUC0-24 values remained unchanged (943.49 and 855.95 mg·h/L at 50 mg q6h and 100 mg q8h, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma concentrations were relatively low and dose dependent. The dose-independent urinary concentrations suggest that excretion of nitrofurantoin into the urine is saturable. Pharmacodynamic studies are urgently required to determine the impact of these findings.

Review of the pharmacokinetic properties of nitrofurantoin and nitroxoline.

Nitrofurantoin and nitroxoline are oral antibiotics for the treatment or prophylaxis of acute urinary tract infections. New interest in both these drugs is increasing because of the emergence of resistance to other antibiotics, but knowledge of their pharmacokinetics (PK) is lacking since they were developed before the advent of standardized research for drug approval. The aims of this review were to (i) summarize the PK data reported in the literature and (ii) to identify PK knowledge gaps. The current body of PK knowledge of both drugs appears to be poor and mainly based on old studies. Nitrofurantoin PK values were obtained from studies using many variables, e.g. formulations, crystal sizes and analytical methods, resulting in high interindividual variability in PK parameters and no uniform PK profile. Clinical experience and PK data for nitroxoline are even more limited since the drug is registered in only Germany and a few (Eastern European) countries. Clinical studies in relevant patient populations are needed with commercially available nitrofurantoin and nitroxoline formulations at approved dosing regimens to more fully characterize their PK profiles, and to investigate the influence of patient characteristics on these profiles in order to optimize efficacy and avoid toxicity and emergence of resistance. Only with this updated knowledge and efficacy data from well-structured trials can both drugs maintain their antimicrobial activity against uropathogens.

MIC-based dose adjustment: facts and fables.

Over recent decades, several publications have described optimization procedures for antibiotic therapy in the individual patient based on antimicrobial MIC values. Most methods include therapeutic drug monitoring and use a single MIC determination plus the relevant pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics to adjust the dose to optimize antimicrobial drug exposure and antibacterial effects. However, the use of an MIC obtained by a single MIC determination is inappropriate. First, routine clinical laboratories cannot determine MICs with sufficient accuracy to guide dosage owing to the inherent assay variation in the MIC test. Second, the variation in any MIC determination, whatever method is used, must be accounted for. If dose adjustments are made based on therapeutic drug monitoring and include MIC determinations, MIC variation must be considered to prevent potential underdosing of patients. We present the problems and some approaches that could be used in clinical practice.

Susceptibility of ESBL Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae to fosfomycin in the Netherlands and comparison of several testing methods including Etest, MIC test strip, Vitek2, Phoenix and disc diffusion.

Objectives: Fosfomycin susceptibility testing is complicated and prone to error. Before using fosfomycin widely in patients with serious infections, acquisition of WT distribution data and reliable susceptibility testing methods are crucial. In this study, the performance of five methods for fosfomycin testing in the routine laboratory against the reference method was evaluated. Methods: Ten laboratories collected up to 100 ESBL-producing isolates each (80 Escherichia coli and 20 Klebsiella pneumoniae). Isolates were tested using Etest, MIC test strip (MTS), Vitek2, Phoenix and disc diffusion. Agar dilution was performed as the reference method in a central laboratory. Epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) were determined for each species and susceptibility and error rates were calculated. Results: In total, 775 E. coli and 201 K. pneumoniae isolates were tested by agar dilution. The ECOFF was 2 mg/L for E. coli and 64 mg/L for K. pneumoniae. Susceptibility rates based on the EUCAST breakpoint of ≤32 mg/L were 95.9% for E. coli and 87.6% for K. pneumoniae. Despite high categorical agreement rates for all methods, notably in E. coli, none of the alternative antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods performed satisfactorily. Due to poor detection of resistant isolates, very high error rates of 23.3% (Etest), 18.5% (MTS), 18.8% (Vitek2), 12.5% (Phoenix) and 12.9% (disc diffusion) for E. coli and 22.7% (Etest and MTS), 16.0% (Vitek2) and 12% (Phoenix) for K. pneumoniae were found. None of the methods adequately differentiated between WT and non-WT populations. Conclusions: Overall, it was concluded that none of the test methods is suitable as an alternative to agar dilution in the routine laboratory.