Clinical Utility of the Combined Use of CA19-9 and DUPAN-2 in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with normal carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels can have early-stage cancer or advanced cancer without elevation of CA19-9 level; estimating their malignant potential is difficult. This study investigated the clinical utility of the combined use of preoperative CA 19-9 and Duke pancreatic monoclonal antigen type 2 (DUPAN-2) levels in patients with PDAC. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative-intent surgery for PDAC between November 2005 and December 2021 were investigated. Eligible patients were classified into four groups based on these two markers. Among patients with normal CA19-9 levels, those with normal and high DUPAN-2 levels were classified into normal/normal (N/N) and normal/high (N/H) groups, respectively. Among patients with high CA19-9 levels, those with normal and high DUPAN-2 levels were classified into high/normal (H/N) and high/high (H/H) groups, respectively. Survival rates were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Among 521 patients, the N/N, N/H, H/N, and H/H groups accounted for 25.0%, 10.6%, 35.1%, and 29.4% of patients, respectively. The proportions of resectable PDAC in the N/N and H/N groups (71.5% and 66.7%) were significantly higher than those in the N/H and H/H groups (49.1% and 54.9%) (P < 0.01). The 5-year survival rates in the N/N, N/H, H/N, and H/H groups were 66.0%, 31.1%, 34.9%, and 29.7%, respectively; the rate in the N/N group was significantly better than those in the other three groups (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, and P < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Only patients with normal CA19-9 and DUPNA-2 values should be diagnosed with early-stage PDAC.

Prognostic impact of peritoneal washing cytology in patients with biliary tract cancer.

PURPOSE: To elucidate the clinical significance of peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) in patients with resectable biliary tract cancer (BTC). METHODS: Clinical data of patients with BTC, who received PWC at curative intent surgery from March 2009 to December 2021, were retrospectively analyzed. Eligible patients were stratified into two groups according to positive or negative PWC. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were compared between the two groups. Independent factors associated with positive PWC were investigated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Among the 284 patients analyzed, all 53 patients with ampullary carcinoma showed negative PWC and these patients were excluded. Among the remaining eligible 231 patients, 41 patients had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 55 had gall bladder carcinoma, 72 had hilar cholangiocarcinoma, and 63 had distal cholangiocarcinoma. Eleven (4.8%) patients had positive PWC, and 220 (95.2%) had negative PWC. The median recurrence-free survival in the positive and negative PWC groups were 12.0 vs. 60.7 months (p = 0.005); the median overall survival times were 17.0 vs. 60.6 months (p = 0.008), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level over 80 U/mL and multiple lymph node metastasis were independently associated with positive PWC (odds ratio [OR]: 5.84, p = 0.031; OR: 5.28, p = 0.021, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients with positive PWC exhibited earlier recurrence and shorter survival times compared with those with negative PWC.

Insights from managing clinical issues in distal pancreatectomy with en bloc coeliac axis resection: experiences from 626 patients.

BACKGROUND: Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc coeliac axis resection (DP-CAR) for pancreatic body cancer has been reported increasingly. However, its large-scale outcomes remain undocumented. This study aimed to evaluate DP-CAR volume and mortality, preoperative arterial embolization for ischaemic gastropathy, the oncological benefit for resectable tumours close to the bifurcation of the splenic artery and coeliac artery using propensity score matching, and prognostic factors in DP-CAR. METHODS: In a multi-institutional analysis, 626 DP-CARs were analysed retrospectively and compared with 1325 distal pancreatectomies undertaken in the same interval. RESULTS: Ninety-day mortality was observed in 7 of 21 high-volume centres (1 or more DP-CARs per year) and 1 of 41 low-volume centres (OR 20.00, 95 per cent c.i. 2.26 to 177.26). The incidence of ischaemic gastropathy was 19.2 per cent in the embolization group and 7.9 per cent in the no-embolization group (OR 2.77, 1.48 to 5.19). Propensity score matching analysis showed that median overall survival was 33.5 (95 per cent c.i. 27.4 to 42.0) months in the DP-CAR and 37.9 (32.8 to 53.3) months in the DP group. Multivariable analysis identified age at least 67 years (HR 1.40, 95 per cent c.i. 1.12 to 1.75), preoperative tumour size 30 mm or more (HR 1.42, 1.12 to 1.80), and preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level over 37 units/ml (HR 1.43, 1.11 to 1.83) as adverse prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: DP-CAR can be performed safely in centres for general pancreatic surgery regardless of DP-CAR volume, and preoperative embolization may not be required. This procedure has no oncological advantage for resectable tumour close to the bifurcation of the splenic artery, and should be performed after appropriate patient selection.

Is surgical resection justified for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with distant abdominal organ metastasis? A position paper by experts in pancreatic surgery at the Joint Meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) & the Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) 2022 in Kyoto.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a typical refractory malignancy, and many patients have distant organ metastases at diagnosis, such as liver metastasis and peritoneal dissemination. The standard treatment for unresectable PDAC with distant organ metastasis (UR-M) is chemotherapy, but the prognosis remained poor. However, with recent dramatic developments in chemotherapy, the prognosis has gradually improved, and some patients have experienced marked shrinkage or disappearance of their metastatic lesions. With this trend, attempts have been made to resect a small number of metastases (so-called oligometastases) in combination with the primary tumor or to resect the primary and metastatic tumor in patients with a favorable response to anti-cancer treatment after a certain period of time (so-called conversion surgery). An international consensus meeting on surgical treatment for UR-M PDAC was held during the Joint Congress of the 26th Meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) and the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) in Kyoto in July 2022. The presenters showed their indications for and results of surgical treatment for UR-M PDAC and discussed their advantages and disadvantages with the experts. Although these reports were limited to a small number of patients, findings suggest that these surgical treatments for patients with UR-M PDAC who have had a significant response to chemotherapy may contribute to a prognosis of prolonged survival. We hope that this article summarizing the discussion and agreements at the meeting will serve as the basis for future trials and guidelines.

Surgical resection for liver recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of surgical resection for liver recurrence in patients with curatively resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The medical records of patients with a liver recurrence after undergoing curative pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological and prognostic factors were analyzed, as was the clinical impact of surgical resection for liver recurrence. RESULTS: Overall, 502 patients underwent curative pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resection. Of the 311 patients with recurrence after curative pancreatectomy, 71 (23%) had an initial recurrence in the liver, with 35 having solitary recurrence (11%). Patients with solitary, two or three, or more than four recurrences had median overall survival times of 28.5, 18.0, and 12.2 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Surgical indications for liver recurrence in our institution included solitary tumor, good disease control under chemotherapy after recurrence for > 6 months, and sufficient remnant liver function. Ten patients who met our institutional policy inclusion criteria underwent liver resection. Among 35 patients with initially solitary liver recurrence, those who underwent liver resection outlived those who did not (57.6 months vs. 20.1 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis of overall survival, solitary liver recurrence and liver resection were independent favorable prognostic factors in patients with initial liver recurrence. CONCLUSION: In selected patients with solitary liver recurrence after curatively resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, liver resection may be a treatment option.

Prognostic impact of lung recurrence in patients with biliary tract cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the initial recurrence site following resection for biliary tract carcinoma (BTC), focusing on lung recurrence. METHODS: The clinical data of patients with recurrent BTC who underwent curative intent surgery between March 2009 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The prognosis of patients with recurrent BTC was investigated in each recurrence site. Eligible patients were classified into two groups according to lung or non-lung recurrence. Clinicopathological factors, survival after recurrence, and overall survival were compared between the two groups. Independent factors associated with survival after recurrence were investigated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 119 patients, the initial recurrence site was local in 26 (21.8%) patients, liver in 19 (16.8%), peritoneum in 14 (11.8%), lymph node in 12 (10.1%), lung in 11 (9.2%), multiple organs in 32 (26.9%), and others in 5 (4.2%). The survival period after recurrence in patients with lung recurrence was significantly longer than those in patients with other six recurrence patterns. The median survival after recurrence was 34.3 and 9.3 months in lung recurrence and non-lung recurrence groups, respectively (p < 0.0001); that after initial surgery was 50.8 and 26.4 months, respectively (p = 0.0383). Multivariate analysis revealed that lung recurrence and normal albumin level at recurrence were independently associated with survival after recurrence (Hazard Ratio (HR), 0.291; p = 0.0128; HR, 0.476; p = 0.00126, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Survival period after recurrence was significantly longer in patients with lung recurrence.

Difficulty of adjuvant chemotherapy administration in patients with biliary tract cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to elucidate the difficulty of adjuvant chemotherapy administration in patients with biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). METHODS: Clinical data of patients with BTC who underwent curative-intent surgery were retrospectively analyzed. The eligible patients were stratified into two groups according to the presence or absence of adjuvant chemotherapy administration (adjuvant and non-adjuvant groups), and the clinicopathological features were compared between the two groups. The ratios of adjuvant chemotherapy administration were investigated in each surgical procedure. Independent factors associated with no administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were analyzed using multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Among 168 eligible patients, 141 (83.9%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (adjuvant group), while 27 (16.1%) did not (non-adjuvant group). The most common surgical procedure was pancreaticoduodenectomy in the adjuvant group, and it was hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection (BDR) in the non-adjuvant group, respectively. The rate of no adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly higher in patients who underwent hepatectomy with BDR than in those who underwent other surgeries (p < 0.001). The most common cause of no adjuvant chemotherapy was bile leak in 12 patients, which occurred after hepatectomy with BDR in ten patients. Multivariate analyses revealed that hepatectomy with BDR and preoperative anemia were independently associated with no adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatectomy with BDR and subsequent refractory bile leak can be the obstacle to adjuvant chemotherapy administration in patients with BTC.

Prognostic factor in patient with recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To elucidate prognostic factors for post-recurrence survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: Patients who underwent curative-intent surgery for PDAC between January 2014 and May 2020 were identified. Among them, patients who had postoperative recurrences and received chemotherapy were retrospectively investigated. Independent prognostic factors for survival after recurrence were investigated using multivariate analyses. Eligible patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of the identified prognostic factors, and survival times after recurrence were compared. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients with recurrent PDAC were included. Multivariate analysis showed that red blood cell (RBC) transfusion (HR, 2.80; p = 0.0051), low albumin level (HR, 1.84; p = 0.0402), and high carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level at recurrence (HR, 2.11; p = 0.0258) were significant predictors of shorter survival after recurrence. The median survival times after recurrence in the transfusion and non-transfusion groups were 5.5 vs. 18.1 months (p < 0.0001), respectively; those in the low and normal albumin groups were 10.1 vs. 18.7 months (p = 0.0049), and those in the high and normal CA19-9 groups were 11.5 vs. 22.6 months (p = 0.0023), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: RBC transfusion, low albumin, and high CA19-9 levels at recurrence negatively affected survival after recurrence in patients with PDAC.

Preoperative risk factors for positivity of peritoneal lavage cytology in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the era of neoadjuvant therapy.

BACKGROUND: The preoperative risk factors for positive peritoneal lavage cytology (CY) are unknown, especially in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy. In addition, the optimal indications for staging laparoscopy (SL) are still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the preoperative risk factors of CY positivity in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with surgical resection and to determine the optimal indications for SL. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 493 patients with PDAC, including 356 treated with upfront surgery and 137 treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The preoperative risk factor for CY positivity was investigated along with stratification according to NAC. RESULTS: Among the 493 patients, 36 (7.3%) were CY-positive. The CY-positive frequency in patients who received and did not receive NAC was 9 (6.6%) and 27 (7.6%), respectively. In the multivariate analyses, no independent preoperative predictive factor was found in patients who received NAC, whereas body and tail PDAC were identified as an independent risk factor for CY positivity in patients who did not receive NAC. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative risk factors of CY-positive PDAC are body and tail PDAC in 356 patients who did not receive NAC. However, there is no useful predictive factor for CY positivity in patients treated with NAC. Based on these results, it was difficult to determine the optimal indication for SL especially in NAC cases.

Impact of disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 12 on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with surgical resection and perioperative chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: A disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 12 (ADAM12) has been reported to influence tumor progression and chemosensitivity in human cancers. We assessed the prognostic impact of ADAM12 and its predictive value for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with surgical resection. METHODS: ADAM12 expression was immunohistochemically examined in 428 patients with PDAC who underwent surgical resection. The association of ADAM12 expression with clinicopathological factors and survival was also analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with high ADAM12 expression exhibited significantly shorter median disease-free survival (DFS) (high ADAM12: 17.8 vs. low ADAM12: 37.9 months; P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (high ADAM12: 33.1 vs. low ADAM12: 65.0 months; P < 0.001). A multivariate analysis revealed that high ADAM12 expression was an independent risk factor for poor DFS (P < 0.001) and OS (P < 0.001) in all eligible patients. Of 100 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), high ADAM12 expression was significantly associated with poor DFS in a subset of patients treated with the nab-paclitaxel (PTX) neoadjuvant regimen (P = 0.03), whereas the prognostic value of ADAM12 was not evident in patients not treated with nab-PTX (P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: A negative prognostic value of high ADAM12 expression was observed in patients with PDAC treated with surgical resection, which was enhanced in patients treated with NAC, including nab-PTX. These results suggested that ADAM12 expression can predict nab-PTX chemosensitivity in PDAC and reflect PDAC progression.

Neoadjuvant therapy contributes to nodal downstaging of pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the impact of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (BR/LAPC) on the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) nodal status. METHODS: The medical records of BR/LAPC patients who underwent surgery with curative intent were retrospectively reviewed. The nodal status was compared between patients who underwent upfront surgery (UFS) and those who received NAT. Moreover, clinicopathological factors and prognostic factors for overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: In all, 200 patients with BR/LAPC, 78 with UFS, and 122 with NAT were enrolled. The nodal status was significantly lower in patients after NAT than after UFS (p = 0.011). A multivariate analysis of overall survival showed that UFS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.61, p = 0.024) and N2 status (HR 2.69, p < 0.001) were independent poor prognostic factors. The median serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level after NAT in N2 patients was 105 U/mL, which was significantly higher than that of patients with N0 (p = 0.004) and N1 (p = 0.008) status. CONCLUSION: Patients with BR/LAPC who underwent surgery after NAT had significantly lower N2 status and better prognosis than patients who underwent UFS. Elevated CA19-9 levels after NAT indicated a higher nodal status.

Optimal lymph-node dissection for pancreatic tail cancer.

PURPOSE: The optimal range of lymph-node dissection for pancreatic tail cancer remains unclear. We investigated the location and frequency of lymph-node metastases to identify the correct range of lymph-node dissection for pancreatic tail cancer. METHODS: We analyzed clinical data retrospectively, on patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for resectable left-sided pancreatic cancer, between February, 2006 and March, 2021. Eligible patients were divided into two groups according to the tumor location: those with pancreatic tail cancer (Pt group) and those with pancreatic body or body and tail cancer (non-Pt group). RESULTS: Of the 96 patients analyzed, 61 (64%) were assigned to the Pt group and 35 (36%) were assigned to the non-Pt group. Metastases to stations 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, and 18 were found in 0 (0%), 0 (0%), 0 (0%), 4 (7%), 18 (30%), 2 (4%), and 10 (17%) patients in the Pt group, and in 1 (3%), 4 (12%), 2 (6%), 1 (3%), 18 (51%), 3 (9%), and 6 (17%) patients in the non-Pt group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Lymph-node dissection at stations 7, 8, and 9 might not be necessary in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer confined to the pancreatic tail.

Left-sided Portal Hypertension After Pancreaticoduodenectomy With Resection of the Portal Vein/Superior Mesenteric Vein Confluence in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: A Project Study by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate how often left-sided portal hypertension (LPH) develops and how LPH affects the long-term outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and resection of the portal vein (PV)/superior mesenteric vein (SMV) confluence. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Little is known about LPH after PD with resection of the PV/SMV confluence. METHODS: Overall, 536 patients who underwent PD with PV/SMV resection were enrolled. Among them, we mainly compared the SVp group [n=285; the splenic vein (SV) was preserved] and the SVr group (n = 227; the SV was divided and not reconstructed). RESULTS: The incidence of variceal formation in the SVr group increased until 3 years after PD compared with that in the SVp group (38.7% vs 8.3%, P < 0.001). Variceal bleeding occurred in the SVr group (n = 9: 4.0%) but not in the SVp group (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the risk factors for variceal formation were liver disease, N factor, conventional PD, middle colic artery resection, and SV division. The only risk factor for variceal bleeding was SV division. The platelet count ratio at 6 months after PD was significantly lower in the SVr group than in the SVp group (0.97 vs 0.82, P < 0.001), and the spleen-volume ratios at 6 and 12 months were significantly higher in the SVr group than in the SVp group (1.38 vs 1.00 and 1.54 vs 1.09; P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PD with SV division causes variceal formation, bleeding, and thrombocytopenia.

Clinical Implications of Pre- and Postoperative Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The clinical implications of pre- and postoperative KRAS-mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) present in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have remained an unresolved issue. This study sought to investigate the clinical significance of pre- and postoperative ctDNA analyses and their impact on the prognosis of PDAC patients. METHODS: Digital droplet polymerase chain reaction detected ctDNA in pre- and postoperative plasma samples prospectively obtained from patients with resectable and borderline-resectable PDAC. Its associations with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. The patients were sorted according to the presence of pre- and postoperative ctDNA, and its ability to stratify prognosis was evaluated. RESULTS: The study analyzed 97 patients. Both pre- and postoperative ctDNA were detected in 9 patients, and neither was detected in 55 patients. Whereas 15 patients harbored only preoperative ctDNA, 18 patients had only postoperative ctDNA. The multivariate analysis showed that the presence of preoperative ctDNA was associated with poorer OS (P = 0.008) and that postoperative ctDNA was not associated with either RFS or OS. Survival did not differ significantly between the patients with a positive shift in ctDNA status and those without detectable pre- or postoperative ctDNA. CONCLUSIONS: For the patients with PDAC, the presence of preoperative ctDNA was significantly associated poor OS, whereas postoperative ctDNA was not associated with poor survival. A positive change in ctDNA did not affect patients' survival.

Survival impact of distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic body carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The survival benefit associated with distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) for patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic body carcinoma is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of DP-CAR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic body carcinoma. METHODS: Medical records of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent distal pancreatectomy (DP, n = 102) and DP-CAR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 32) between 2008 and 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: All patients who underwent DP-CAR had tumor contact with the celiac axis. Of these, 30 patients underwent preoperative embolization of the common hepatic artery. The pretreatment tumor size of patients who underwent DP-CAR was larger (P < 0.001), and rates of blood transfusion (P = 0.003) and postoperative complications (P = 0.016) were higher in patients who underwent DP-CAR compared with patients who underwent DP. The 5-year survival rate of patients who underwent DP and DP-CAR were 50.6% and 41.1%, respectively (median survival time, 65.9 vs 37.0 months). For all 134 patients, pretreatment serum CA19-9 levels (P < 0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001), and lymph node status (P = 0.035) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: DP-CAR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic body carcinoma may bring the same survival impact as DP, despite increased morbidity.

Preoperative risk factors for para-aortic lymph node positivity in pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the preoperative risk factors for para-aortic lymph node (PALN) positivity, including micrometastasis, in pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Medical records of patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent curative resection were retrospectively reviewed, and the relationships between preoperative risk factors and PALN positivity were identified. Clinicopathological and prognostic factors for overall survival were analyzed. Micrometastasis was investigated by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: 400 patients were enrolled. PALN positivity by hematoxylin and eosin staining, micrometastasis, and negative were found in 46 (11%), 32 (8%), and 322 (81%) patients, respectively. The median overall survival times of patients with PALN positivity, including micrometastasis, was 22.5 months. Multivariate logistic regression identified borderline or locally advanced status (p=0.037), elevated preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level (p<0.001), larger tumor size ≥30 mm (p=0.001) and larger PALN size ≥10 mm (p=0.019) as independent preoperative risk factors of PALN positivity. Multivariate overall survival analysis demonstrated borderline or locally advanced status (p=0.013), elevated preoperative CA19-9 level (p<0.001) and PALN positivity (p=0.048) were independent poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Borderline or locally advanced status, elevated preoperative CA19-9 level, and larger tumor and PALN size were risk factors for PALN positivity, and thus, they may contribute to the optimization of preoperative treatments for patients with potential PALN positivity.

Identification of Preoperative Risk Factors for Poor Survival in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Upfront Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to identify preoperative risk factors for poor survival in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with upfront surgery. METHODS: Medical records of 268 patients with resectable PDAC defined by resectability status who underwent upfront surgery were reviewed retrospectively. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify preoperative risk factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Moreover, a binary logistic regression model was built to determine preoperative independent risk factors of 2- and 3-year recurrence and survival. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses identified CA19-9 (≥100 U/mL, p < 0.001) as an independent risk factor for poor RFS, and worse performance status (1 or 2, p = 0.03), platelet:lymphocyte ratio (<150, p = 0.04), and preoperative CA19-9 (≥100 U/mL, p < 0.001) as independent risk factors for poor OS. Moreover, preoperative CA19-9 (≥100 U/mL) was the only independent risk factor identified for 2- and 3-year recurrence and survival. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Preoperative CA19-9 (≥100 U/mL) was the most reliable preoperative predictive factor for poor survival in resectable PDAC treated with upfront surgery. These findings warrant further clinical trials investigating efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy targeting the subset of patients with resectable PDAC who have elevated preoperative CA19-9, namely, those with high risk of poor prognosis.

Prognostic significance of dissecting the nerve plexus around the common hepatic artery in pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the positivity rate of the nerve plexus (NPL) around the common hepatic artery (CHA), as well as the impact of dissecting the NPL-CHA, during surgical resection of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Clinicopathological factors, including hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry, were compared between the resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) and borderline resectable PC (BRPC) groups. Moreover, the relationship between the NPL-CHA status and overall survival (OS) was investigated. RESULTS: In this study, 136 eligible patients were divided into the RPC (72) and BRPC (64) groups. In the RPC group, all patients were negative for H&E staining and microinvasion, whereas 13 (20%) and five patients (8%) were positive for H&E staining and microinvasion, respectively, in the BRPC group. The median OS times in the NPL-CHA-positive and -negative groups were 29.8 and 60.2 months, respectively (p = 0.088). The multivariate analysis of OS indicated an elevated initial carbohydrate antigen 19-9, lymph node (LN) metastasis, and lack of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), which independently predicted poor outcomes. In the BRPC subgroup, contact with the CHA on preoperative computed tomography (CT) was a high-risk factor for NPL-CHA positivity. CONCLUSION: NPL-CHA positivity was only present in the BRPC group. In the absence of CT evidence of CHA contact, NPL-CHA dissection may not have survival benefits.

Is surgery justified for elderly patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? Reappraisal from a viewpoint of comorbidity and organ function.

PURPOSE: The benefit of surgery for older patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) has not been established and the differences in the general condition of younger vs. older patients remain unclear. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative surgery for EHCC were divided into two groups according to age: those younger than 75 years old (younger group) and those aged 75 years or older (older group). We analyzed the clinical data of the two groups retrospectively. RESULTS: Among the 116 patients analyzed, 45 (38.8%) were in the older group. Regarding comorbidity, only cardiac disease was significantly more common in the older patients; however, the cardiac function of the two groups was identical. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of kidney and lung disease, but renal function was significantly deteriorated and the incidence of the mixed ventilatory defect was significantly greater in the older group. The overall 5-year survival rates for the younger and older groups were 52.4% vs. 50.4% of all cholangiocarcinoma patients (p = 0.458), 42.4% vs. 51.3% of those with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (p = 0.718), and 69.0% vs. 49.1% of those with distal cholangiocarcinoma (p = 0.534), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Improved survival after surgery can be expected in well-selected older cholangiocarcinoma patients. Comorbidities were not necessarily reflected in organ function, with precise organ function assessment being more important when selecting surgical candidates.

The prognostic impact of peritoneal washing cytology for otherwise resectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients.

The clinical importance of peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) for cholangiocarcinoma patients remains unclear. The clinical data of 137 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients who received PWC and curative surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Among the 137 patients analyzed, five (3.6%) had positive PWC, and 132 (96.4%) had negative PWC. The median survival time in patients with negative PWC was 6.45 years, and the overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 86.5%, 75.3%, and 51.6%, respectively. The median survival time in patients with positive PWC was 2.56 years, and the overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 60.0%, 60.0%, and 40.0%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that positive lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001), positive perineural invasion (P = 0.014) and no use of adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001), but not positive PWC were independently associated with a worse overall survival. In conclusion, surgery and subsequent chemotherapy might be a therapeutic option for cholangiocarcinoma patients with positive PWC.