RESUMEN
Somatostatine analogs (SSAs) are currently indicated in the treatment of acromegaly and neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Actually, pregnancy in patients with acromegaly and NETs does not represent an exceptional event because reproductive behavior has changed in the last decades and patients with NETs show more frequently long-term survival. The safety profile of SSAs during pregnancy is still controversial. Concerning acromegaly, based on case reports and series, SSAs administration during pregnancy seems to be relatively well tolerated. Concerning patients with NETs, up to date only one patient with NET receiving SSA during pregnancy has been reported in literature. We report two cases of gastroenteropancreatic-NET patients receiving SSA lanreotide for the entire course of their pregnancy, with favorable outcomes for both mothers and babies. Our experience supports the possibility to continue safely SSA lanreotide during pregnancy in patients with NET.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Intestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Péptidos Cíclicos/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Somatostatina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Cesárea , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Intestinales/patología , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Embarazo , Somatostatina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Introduction: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in recent years has been one of the diseases in the oncology that has experienced the greatest development of targeted therapies.Area covered: On one hand, more and more refined acquisitions of molecular biology are allowing a better sub-classification of this tumor, identifying new and peculiar biological profiles of patients with metastatic renal cancer that will soon be destined for increasingly tailored treatments. On the other hand, immunotherapy has, in a short time, redesigned the perimeter of our knowledge, entering clinical practice in an overpowering and convincing way. Monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoint inhibitors have now entered clinical trials and have demonstrated promising antitumor effect for refractory metastatic renal cancer.Expert opinion: This review summarizes the results of published and reported studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeted therapies enrolling patients with metastatic renal cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales/inmunología , Neoplasias Renales/terapia , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/inmunología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/inmunología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/inmunología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/terapia , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/métodosRESUMEN
Gallbladder neuroendocrine neoplasms (GB-NENs) are rare. The majority of GB-NENs are poorly differentiated, with increased mitotic activity and clinically aggressive course. Surgery is the only curative approach and the optimal medical treatment is uncertain. In this report we describe the case of a woman affected by metastatic well differentiated GB-NEN with increased Ki 67. The patient underwent surgical removal of the gallbladder neoplasm and showed disease recurrence with pulmonary and liver metastases. After achieving a partial chemotherapy response, the patient rapidly died due to progressive disease. This case raises important issues. Well differentiated NENs with a high proliferative index are not included as a specific entity in any of the most widely used nomenclature systems. Moreover considering the proliferative index of the disease, it is reasonable to consider the patient a candidate for chemotherapy. Nevertheless, recently published papers raise the possibility that well differentiated NENs and specific proliferative index cutoff can predict low chemosensitivity in patients with highly proliferative neuroendocrine carcinoma.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/secundario , Anciano , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Clasificación del Tumor , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Sunitinib is the standard care for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The aim of this study was to determine whether a sunitinib regimen of 50 mg/day 2-weeks on/1-week off could maintain the same dose-intensity as the standard 4-weeks on/2-weeks off schedule, and provide the same efficacy in terms of objective response, progression-free survival and overall survival, while reducing drug-related toxicity. METHODS: A total of 31 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma received sunitinib orally at the dose of 50 mg/day in a 2-weeks on/1-week off regimen until disease progression or intolerable toxicities occurred. RESULTS: All enrolled patients were assessable in terms of toxicity and response. They received treatment for a median of 16 months (range 2.0-36.0+ months). A total of 13 patients (42%) obtained an objective response; disease stabilization was achieved in 10 patients (32%), whereas eight patients (26%) experienced disease progression. The most important toxicities were anemia, gastrointestinal effects, fatigue and hypertension, but they were all controlled. CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib 50 mg given orally in a 2-weeks on/1-week off regimen can provide a high response rate and avoid drug-related toxicities, achieving the same dose intensity as the standard schedule, and probably longer disease control.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Indoles/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Sunitinib , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With the availability of multiple treatment options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), new real-world data on disease management and drugs' performance are needed. METHODS: We described characteristics, management and clinical outcomes of patients receiving first-line mCRPC treatment within the Italian cohort of the real-world, prospective, international Prostate Cancer Registry. Patients were enrolled consecutively (2013-2016) in 32 Italian sites and followed for 3 years. RESULTS: 238 patients were included: 157 received first-line abiraterone acetate plus prednisone ("abiraterone" thereafter) and 70 first-line docetaxel; 11 patients receiving other treatments were not considered. Compared with docetaxel-treated patients, those receiving abiraterone were significantly older (age ⩾75: 63.7% vs 38.6%), less frequently had a Gleason score >8 (48.2% vs 67.6%, p<0.005) at initial diagnosis, and more frequently an ECOG score ⩾1 (52.7% vs 36.2%, p<0.05) and comorbidities (76.4% vs 57.1%, p<0.05) at baseline; they reported a lower analgesic use (15.3% vs 30%, p<0.005). In the abiraterone group (median follow-up 22.1 months), median time to progression (TTP) and progression-free survival (PFS) were, respectively, 14.4 months (95% confidence interval, CI, 10.6-18.0) and 13.0 months (95% CI, 9.1-16.8); median overall survival (OS) was not reached, and 3-year OS was 59.1%. In the docetaxel treatment group (median follow-up 25.3 months), median TTP, PFS and OS were, respectively, 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.1-10.3), 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.8-10.3) and 33.2 months (95% CI, 19.2-not estimable). CONCLUSION: This investigation provided valuable information on the overall mCRPC treatment pattern and the effectiveness of first-line abiraterone and docetaxel in a population representative of everyday practice.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Docetaxel , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Supervivencia sin EnfermedadRESUMEN
Non-small-cell lung cancer is a term that encompasses a number of subtypes of lung cancer. In recent years, several intracellular pathways have been studied in order to discover a potential target for novel anticancer therapies such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and reactive oxygen species 1 (ROS1). Increased interest in oncologic treatment research has resulted from the observation that ALK- and ROS1-associated tyrosine kinases show molecular analogies in some of their domains. This discovery led to the hypothesis that target therapy against ALK translocation could have efficacy also in ROS1-positive tumors. Crizotinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that binds the ALK tyrosine kinase domain, blocking its function. We report the case of a woman with heavily pretreated metastatic lung adenocarcinoma harboring ROS1 positivity who experienced a prolonged and dramatic clinical benefit from crizotinib therapy.