Ocular and Nonocular Adverse Events during 3 Years of Soft Contact Lens Wear in Children.

SIGNIFICANCE: Children are being fitted at younger ages with soft contact lenses for myopia control. This 3-year investigation of adverse events related to contact lens wear in 7- to 11-year-old participants helps optometrists understand what to expect when fitting children with soft contact lenses. PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to report the frequency and type of ocular and nonocular adverse events related to soft contact lens wear in children. METHODS: Seven- to 11-year-old children wore soft contact lenses for 3 years. Adverse events were defined by a slit-lamp examination finding of grade 3 or worse; parental report of a clinically meaningful change (determined by the examiner) in eyes, vision, or health; or a clinically meaningful response (determined by examiner) to a symptom checklist. Adverse events were categorized and reported by examiners and finalized by the Executive Committee. The presence or absence of an infiltrate and a list of diagnoses was determined at the conclusion of the study. RESULTS: The 294 participants wore their contact lenses 73.0 ± 26.5 hours per week, and 220 (74.8%) encountered at least 1 adverse event. Of the 432 adverse events, 75.2% were ocular, and 24.8% were nonocular. Contact lens wear was probably or definitely related to 60.6% of the ocular and 2.8% of the nonocular adverse events. None of the ocular adverse events were serious or severe or caused permanent contact lens discontinuation. The corneal infiltrate incidence was 185 cases per 10,000 patient-years of wear (95% confidence interval, 110 to 294). The incidence of moderate ocular adverse events that were definitely or probably related to contact lens wear was 405 cases per 10,000 patient-years of wear (95% confidence interval, 286 to 557). CONCLUSIONS: The adverse events experienced by 7- to 11-year-old myopic children rarely required meaningful treatment and never led to permanent discontinuation of contact lens wear or loss of best-corrected vision.

The impact of a systemwide policy for emergent off-hours venous duplex ultrasound studies.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the impact of an after-hours policy regulating venous duplex ultrasound (VDU) for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) diagnosis on resource utilization and patient care. METHODS: On July 1, 2007, we altered the approach to emergent VDU of patients with potential DVT during off-hours (defined as 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. weekdays, after 3:30 p.m. Saturdays and Sundays). Instead of 24 hr access, we permitted a venous duplex study in the noninvasive vascular laboratory (NIVL) only after meeting set criteria developed collaboratively across services. In the emergency department (ED), we based all VDU requests on a preset modified Wells score (MWS) as determined by the ED physician. Those patients with MWS 0 or 1 and those above 1 who could receive empiric single-dose low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) received next-morning imaging unless consultation with a vascular surgeon created an emergent imaging plan. In parallel, inpatient emergent VDU was permitted only after contact with an attending vascular surgeon and where empiric short-term anticoagulation could not occur safely. We tracked NIVL utilization, patient morbidity, sonographer retention, and satisfaction. RESULTS: The number of overall off-hours emergent VDUs decreased from 59 to 19/month after implementation. Testing was deferred in 52 ED patients: 15 stayed in the ED for testing in the morning and 37 were discharged to be tested the following day. Thirty-one of 37 patients returned for testing as outpatient follow-up. Twenty-eight received ED LMWH while awaiting testing. No adverse events were noted with the delay. The mean MWS for ED after-hours studies was 2.9+/-1.6 and that for deferred ER studies was 2.4+/-1.3 (p=0.005). Incidentally, overall off-hours inpatient and ED VDU requests decreased 64% with no clinical adverse events in the first year. The rate of overall positive studies done off-hours increased from 6.7% to 20% (p<0.0001). Sonographer satisfaction was maintained with regulation of call. CONCLUSION: Our collaborative approach allowed off-hour VDU utilization to decrease without any measurable negative care impact.