Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transfusion ; 61(4): 1247-1257, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33481275

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Irradiation of red blood cells (RBCs) inactivates residual donor T lymphocytes to prevent transfusion-associated graft-vs-host disease (TA-GVHD) but can have adverse effects on recipients and inventory management. Reported incidence of TA-GVHD is lower when leukoreduced RBCs and older blood products are transfused; therefore, the impact of leukoreduction and storage was evaluated as an alternative prevention strategy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Effectiveness of leukoreduction filters on white blood cell (WBC) proliferation was evaluated by filtering buffy coat (BC) products and isolating residual WBCs. Additionally, leukoreduced RBCs were spiked with 5 × 106 WBCs on Day 21 of hypothermic storage, then stored and processed on Days 7, 14, and 21 to obtain residual WBCs to investigate the impact of hypothermic storage on their viability and proliferative ability. Viability of residual WBCs was assessed by staining with annexin V and an antibody cocktail for flow cytometry analysis. Proliferative ability was assessed by placing carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester-labeled residual WBCs into culture for 6 days with phytohemagglutinin before flow cytometry assessment. RESULTS: Filtration of BC units depleted WBCs, particularly T lymphocytes, to 0.001% ± 0.003% cells/unit, although proliferative activity remained consistent with prefiltration levels of WBCs. WBCs in stored RBCs remained viable even on Day 21 of storage; however, the proliferative activity decreased to 0.24% ± 0.41%. CONCLUSIONS: Hypothermic storage of RBCs for 21 days or more is sufficient to inactivate T lymphocytes, which may help prevent TA-GVHD when irradiated RBCs are not available.


Asunto(s)
Criobiología/métodos , Eritrocitos/fisiología , Procedimientos de Reducción del Leucocitos/métodos , Reacción a la Transfusión/prevención & control , Conservación de la Sangre/métodos , Proliferación Celular/fisiología , Proliferación Celular/efectos de la radiación , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/efectos adversos , Eritrocitos/efectos de la radiación , Filtración , Citometría de Flujo/métodos , Humanos , Incidencia , Procedimientos de Reducción del Leucocitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Leucocitos/inmunología , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos T/efectos de la radiación , Factores de Tiempo , Reacción a la Transfusión/epidemiología , Reacción a la Transfusión/inmunología
2.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 133(6): 1517-23, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17532950

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Cryopreserved allograft tissue used in the Norwood procedure for infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome causes profound immunologic sensitization, which may complicate future transplantation. Intravenous immunoglobulin has been shown to reduce sensitization after it has developed, allowing successful transplantation. The purpose of this pilot trial was to determine whether intravenous immunoglobulin given before and after the procedure could prevent sensitization to cryopreserved allograft patches used in the initial repair of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. METHODS: Intravenous immunoglobulin (2 g/kg) was given preoperatively, 3 weeks postoperatively, and 4 months postoperatively to 7 infants undergoing the Norwood procedure. Panel-reactive antibodies were measured with flow cytometry preoperatively and at 1, 4, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and compared with values from a contemporary cohort of 12 infants undergoing the Norwood procedure who did not receive intravenous immunoglobulin. RESULTS: The groups were well matched for length and weight at time of surgery. Control infants were somewhat younger than the cohort receiving intravenous immunoglobulin (8 +/- 5 vs 17 +/- 14 days, P = .021). There were no differences in transfusion requirements. There was no difference in the degree of sensitization between control and intravenous immunoglobulin groups at 1 month (class I panel-reactive antibodies 20% +/- 30% vs 4% +/- 9%, P = .443, class II panel-reactive antibodies 17% +/- 27% vs 20% +/- 17%, P = .400), 4 months (class I panel-reactive antibodies 62% +/- 40% vs 73% +/- 41%, P = .813, class II panel-reactive antibodies 49% +/- 42% vs 54% +/- 41%, P = .706), and 12 months (class I panel-reactive antibodies 49% +/- 42% vs 58% +/- 39%, P = .686, class II panel-reactive antibodies 44% +/- 36% vs 49% +/- 42%, P = .651). CONCLUSION: Despite studies showing intravenous immunoglobulin to reduce sensitization, we were unable to demonstrate that intravenous immunoglobulin prevented sensitization after exposure to allograft tissue in neonates undergoing congenital cardiac surgery.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Síndrome del Corazón Izquierdo Hipoplásico/inmunología , Síndrome del Corazón Izquierdo Hipoplásico/cirugía , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Criopreservación , Femenino , Citometría de Flujo , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad/inmunología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Masculino , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Trasplante Homólogo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA