RESUMEN
Statin therapy is a cornerstone in the management of dyslipidemia, both in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. Despite strong guidelines supporting statin use, concerns regarding side effects, particularly musculoskeletal symptoms, contribute to statin intolerance and patient reluctance. While statin intolerance is reported in 5% to 30% of patients, its true prevalence may be overestimated due to the influence of the nocebo effect. Factors associated with higher incidence of statin intolerance include older age, female sex, comorbidities such as diabetes and chronic kidney disease, and concurrent use of medications such as antiarrhythmic agents or calcium channel blockers. Clinical characterization of statin intolerance requires thorough evaluation and exclusion of alternative causes of musculoskeletal symptoms. Strategies to address statin intolerance include reassessing cardiovascular risk, engaging in shared decision-making, statin rechallenge after appropriate washout periods, dosage titration for tolerability, and consideration of alternative therapies when low-density lipoprotein goals cannot be achieved with statins. This review provides an overview of the spectrum of statin intolerance, its clinical assessment, and a systematic approach to caring for a patient with statin intolerance.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Dislipidemias/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Persona de Mediana Edad , AncianoRESUMEN
Background: Before the COVID-19 pandemic began, medical staff and academic department workers reported increasing levels of stress and burnout because of strain on the health care system. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated this strain and introduced several novel stressors, which included transitioning to remote work. Safe and scalable strategies are needed to help health care workers cope with these stressors. Aromatherapy may help address this need. Objectives: To assess the effect of 2 aromatherapy interventions (essential oil blends termed STILL and FOCUS) on perceived mental/psychological health parameters for academic department workers working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Participants were advised to use STILL for 5 days (Monday through Friday). After a 2-day washout period (Saturday and Sunday), participants were instructed to use FOCUS for 5 days (Monday through Friday). Participants completed a visual analog scale survey evaluating restlessness, fatigue, anxiety, stress, happiness, energy, relaxation, calmness, and well-being before and after each of the 2 intervention periods. Results: Twenty academic department remote workers participated in the study. Mental/psychological health surveys were completed by 6 participants before and after using STILL and by 10 before and after using FOCUS. Five participants answered all survey questions before and after both interventions. Although mean (SD) perceived stress scores improved after both the STILL (4.3 [2.3] vs 1.8 [1.7], P = .03) and FOCUS (2.9 [2.3] vs 1.5 [1.4], P = .02) interventions, this improvement was not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction (adjusted α = .006). Most participants (73.3%) reported that participating in the study was worthwhile, and 81.3% indicated that they would recommend aromatherapy to others. Conclusions: The STILL and FOCUS aromatherapy interventions did not significantly improve mental/psychological health parameters for remote academic department workers, although perceived stress was marginally improved and participants reported a perceived benefit from using aromatherapy.