Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Med Virol ; 94(8): 3750-3756, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35506668

RESUMEN

Hospital readmissions due to COVID-19 are one of the main concerns for the health system due to risks to the patient's life and increased use of health resources. Studies focusing on this issue are important to understand the risk factors and create strategies to avoid readmissions. We evaluated the readmission of patients with confirmed COVID-19 in a private hospital in southern Brazil, between March 2020 and 2021. Also, the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and nonadmitted were compared. Poisson regression models with prevalence ratio (PR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were applied to confirm the association between variables and ICU admission. Of the 2084 hospitalized patients with COVID-19, 1806 were discharged alive. Among them, 106 were readmitted for unplanned reasons during one year. Early hospital readmission (≤30 days) occurred in 52.8% of the cases. The main reasons were respiratory, gastroenterological, kidney, and cardiac disease. The median age was 73.0 years old and women correspond to 52.8%. The presence of at least one comorbidity was detected in 87.7% of patients. Hypertension, diabetes, cardiac, and lung disease were more frequent. The ICU admitted patients (n = 43; 40.5%) mostly had 4-5 comorbidities, pulmonary involvement ≥50%, length of stay (LOS), and days between discharge and first readmission. Longer LOS (PR: 3.46; 95% CI: 1.24-5.67), days between discharge/first readmission (PR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.15-5.88), and pulmonary involvement (≥50%; PR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.11-3.54) were independently associated with ICU admission. Longer LOS, longer days between discharge/first readmission, and pulmonary involvement (≥50%) were associated with ICU admission in readmitted patients. Readmissions evaluation is pivotal and may help in ensuring safe care transition and postdischarge follow-up.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Readmisión del Paciente , Cuidados Posteriores , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Alta del Paciente , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Stroke ; 51(1): 240-246, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31847753

RESUMEN

Background and Purpose- The increasing demand and shortage of experts to evaluate and treat acute stroke patients has led to the development of remote communication tools to aid stroke management. We aimed to evaluate the JOIN App smartphone system-a low-cost tool for rapid clinical and neuroimaging data sharing to expedite decision-making in stroke. Methods- Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients treated at a University Hospital in Brazil from December 2014 to December 2015 were evaluated. The analysis included all patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke who underwent initial evaluation by neurology residents followed by JOIN teleconsultation with a stroke neurologist on call for management decisions. An expert panel of stroke neurologists and neuroradiologists revised all cases using a standard Picture Archiving and Communication System imaging workstation within 24 hours and analyzed the decision made with remote assistance during the emergency setting. Results- A total of 720 stroke codes were evaluated with 442 acute ischemic stroke qualifying. Seventy-eight (18%) patients were treated with intravenous thrombolysis. The main reasons for tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) exclusion were symptom onset >4.5 hours (n=295; 67%) and hypodense middle cerebral artery territory area >1/3 (n=31; 7%). The agreement rates between Picture Archiving and Communication System versus JOIN-based thrombolysis decisions were 100% for the stroke (unblinded) and 99.3% for the neuroradiologist (blinded) experts. The use of the application resulted in a significant reduction in the door-to-needle times across the pre- versus postimplementation periods (median, 90 [interquartile range, 75-106] versus 63 [interquartile range, 61-117] minutes; P=0.03). The rates of 90-day excellent outcomes (modified Rankin Scale, 0-1) were 51.3%; 90-day mortality, 2.6%; and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, 3.8%. Conclusions- The JOIN smartphone system allows rapid sharing of clinical and imaging data to facilitate decisions for stroke treatment. The remote application-based decisions seem to be as accurate as the physical presence of stroke experts and might lead to faster times to treatment. This system represents an easily implementable low-cost telemedicine solution for centers that cannot afford the full-time presence of stroke specialists.


Asunto(s)
Aplicaciones Móviles , Neuroimagen , Teléfono Inteligente , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Telemedicina , Terapia Trombolítica , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Aguda , Administración Intravenosa , Anciano , Femenino , Hospitales Especializados , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
Acad Emerg Med ; 21(1): 40-6, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24552523

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) care for acute vascular diseases faces the challenge of overcrowding. A vascular unit is a specialized, protocol-oriented unit in the ED with a team trained to manage acute vascular disorders, including stroke, coronary syndromes, pulmonary embolism (PE), and aortic diseases. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to compare case fatality rates for selected cardiovascular conditions before and after the implementation of a vascular unit. METHODS: Patients with the selected diagnoses admitted to the ED in two different time periods, 2002 through 2005 (before unit opening) and 2007 to 2010 (after vascular unit opening), were identified by ICD-10 codes, and their electronic records were reviewed. Case fatality rates were calculated and compared for both time periods. RESULTS: The period prior to unit implementation (2002 through 2005) included 4,164 patients, and the vascular unit period (2007 to 2010) included 6,280 patients. Overall, the case fatality rate for acute vascular conditions decreased from 9% to 7.3% with vascular unit implementation (p = 0.002). The in-hospital mortality rates for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dropped from 6% to 3.8% (p = 0.003), and for acute PE dropped from 32.1% to 10.8% (p < 0.001). The stroke case-fatality rate did not decrease despite improvements in the quality of stroke health care indicators. CONCLUSIONS: The vascular unit strategy has the potential to reduce overall mortality for most acute vascular conditions.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Unidades Hospitalarias/organización & administración , Brasil , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Aglomeración , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Hospitales Públicos/organización & administración , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA