A comparison of the success rate of pneumatic reduction in intussusception between general anesthesia and deep sedation: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: This study was aimed to compare the success rate between patients who underwent general anesthesia and deep sedation. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with intussusception and had no contraindications would receive non-operative treatment first by undergoing pneumatic reduction. The patients were then split in to two groups: one group underwent general anesthesia (GA group), while the other underwent deep sedation (SD group). This study was a randomized controlled trial which compared success rate between two groups. RESULTS: A total of 49 episodes diagnosed with intussusception were random into 25 episodes in GA group and 24 episodes in SD group. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristic between the two groups. The success rates of GA group and SD group were equally 88.0% (p = 1.00). Sub-analysis of the success rate was lower in the patients with high-risk score for failed reduction. (Chiang Mai University Intussusception (CMUI) failed score in success VS failed = 6.9 ± 3.2 vs. 10.3 ± 3.0 p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: General anesthesia and deep sedation offered similar success rates. In cases of high risk of failure, general anesthesia should be considered to accommodate the switch to surgical management in the same setting if the non-operative approach fails. The appropriate treatment and sedative protocol also increase the success of reduction.

Temporal Validation of Chiang Mai University Intussusception Failed Reduction Score (CMUI).

This study aimed to validate the "Chiang Mai University Intussusception Failed Score (CMUI)" for intussusception non-operative reduction. Both a 2-year retrospective and a 5-year prospective consecutive review of patients with intussusception were conducted. Data were collected from January 2013 to December 2020. Related retrospective data of a developmental set from two centers from January 2006 to December 2012 were used. Ten prespecified prognostic factors for failed reduction were collected and from these a predictive score was calculated. The actual results of non-operative reduction were collected and set as a reference standard. Altogether, 195 episodes of intussusception were found. Twenty-two patients were excluded due to contraindications; therefore, a total of 173 episodes were included in the validation dataset. The development data set comprised 170 episodes. We found that no statistical significance was found from comparing the areas under the ROC of two datasets (p-value = 0.31), while specificity of the validation set was 93.8% (88.1-97.3). This temporal validation showed a high specificity and a high affinity for prediction of failed reduction as the development dataset despite being in an era of a higher successful reduction rate. The intensive reduction protocols might be introduced among patients with high-risk scores.