Validation of the German classification system for quality assessment of right-sided colon cancer specimens.

AIM: The German classification system of the completeness of mesocolic excision aims to assess the quality of right-sided colonic cancer surgery by review of photographs. We aimed to validate the reliability of the classification in a clinical context. METHOD: The study was based on a cohort of patients undergoing resection for right-sided colon cancer in two university hospitals served by the same group of pathologists. Prospectively collected photographs of the specimens were assessed twice by six colorectal surgeons to determine the intra-rater and inter-rater accuracy of the German classification and a modification assessing extended right-sided resections. RESULTS: Specimens from 613 resections for right-sided colon cancer were reviewed. Twenty-one specimens were found to be non-assessable, leaving 436 right hemicolectomies, 139 extended right hemicolectomies and 17 right-sided subtotal colectomies. Intra-rater reliability was 0.57-0.74 and weighted kappa coefficients 0.58-0.74, without differences between subgroups. The percentage of agreement between all six participants was 20.3% for all specimens, 21.1% for right hemicolectomy specimens and 18.1% for extended hemicolectomy and right-sided subtotal colectomy specimens. For the right hemicolectomy specimens, the model-based kappa coefficient for agreement was 0.27 (95% CI 0.24-0.30) and for association 0.45 (95% CI 0.41-0.49). CONCLUSION: The German classification of right hemicolectomy specimens showed low intra-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement and association. The use of this classification for scientific purposes appeared not to be reliable.

Risk of Local Recurrence After Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: Post-Hoc Sensitivity Analysis of a Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: A causal treatment effect of complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer on the risk of recurrence has been shown, but it is still unclear whether this is caused solely by a risk reduction of local recurrence. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess to what extent complete mesocolic excision contributes to the risk of local recurrence. DESIGN: This study was a posthoc analyses of data from a population-based cohort. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and competing risk analyses were used to estimate the possible causal effects of complete mesocolic excision. SETTING: Data were collected from the 4 public colorectal cancer centers in the Capital Region of Denmark. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing elective colon resections for right-sided colon cancer without distant metastases during the period 2010-2013 were included. One center performed complete mesocolic excision and the remaining 3 centers performed conventional resections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of solely local recurrence 5.2 years after surgery. Secondary outcomes were solely distant recurrence and both local and distant recurrence diagnosed within 180 days. RESULTS: A total of 807 patients were included with 186 undergoing complete mesocolic excision and 621 conventional resections. The 5.2-year cumulative incidence of a solely local recurrence was 3.7% (95% CI, 0.5-6.1) after complete mesocolic excision compared with 7.0% (5.0-8.9) in the control group, and the absolute risk reduction of complete mesocolic excision was 3.7% (2.5-7.1; p = 0.035). The absolute risk reduction on local and distant recurrence was 3.4% (1.3-5.6; p = 0.002) and on solely distant recurrence was 3.1% (0.0-6.2; p = 0.052). LIMITATIONS: The recurrence risk after conventional resection might be underestimated by the use of inappropriate modalities to diagnose local recurrence for some patients and the shorter duration in this group. CONCLUSION: This study shows a causal treatment effect of complete mesocolic excision on the risk of a solely local recurrence and of distant recurrence with or without local recurrence. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B832 .RIESGO DE RECURRENCIA LOCAL DESPUÉS DE LA ESCISIÓN MESOCÓLICA COMPLETA PARA EL CÁNCER DE COLON DEL LADO DERECHO: ANÁLISIS DE SENSIBILIDAD POST-HOC DE UN ESTUDIO POBLACIONALANTECEDENTES:Se ha demostrado un efecto del tratamiento causal de la escisión mesocólica completa para el cáncer de colon del lado derecho sobre el riesgo de recurrencia, pero aún no está claro si esto se debe únicamente a una reducción del riesgo de recurrencia local.OBJETIVO:Evaluar en qué medida la escisión mesocólica completa se atribuye al riesgo de recurrencia local.DISEÑO:Análisis posthoc de datos de una cohorte poblacional. Se utilizaron análisis de probabilidad inversa de ponderación del tratamiento y de riesgo competitivo para estimar los posibles efectos causales de la escisión mesocólica completa.AJUSTE:Datos de los cuatro centros públicos de cáncer colorrectal en la Región Capital de Dinamarca.PACIENTES:Pacientes sometidos a resecciones de colon electivas por cáncer de colon derecho sin metástasis a distancia durante el período 2010-2013. Un centro realizó escisión mesocólica completa, el resto resecciones convencionales.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la incidencia acumulada de la recidiva local únicamente, 5,2 años después de la cirugía. Los resultados secundarios fueron únicamente la recidiva a distancia y ambas,la recidiva local y a distancia diagnosticada dentro de los 180 días.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 807 pacientes, 186 sometidos a escisión mesocólica completa y 621 resecciones convencionales. La incidencia acumulada de 5,2 años de una recidiva únicamente local fue del 3,7% (IC del 95%: 0,5 a 6,1) después de la escisión mesocólica completa en comparación con el 7,0% (5,0 a 8,9) en el grupo de control, y la reducción del riesgo absoluto de la escisión mesocólica completa fue del 3,7% (2,5-7,1; p = 0,035). La reducción del riesgo absoluto de recidiva local y distante fue del 3,4% (1,3-5,6; p = 0,0019) y de recidiva únicamente a distancia 3,1% (0,0-6,2; p = 0,052).LIMITANTES:El riesgo de recurrencia después de la resección convencional podría subestimarse por el uso de modalidades inapropiadas para el diagnostico de la recurrencia local en algunos pacientes y la duración más corta en este grupo.CONCLUSIÓN:Este estudio muestra un efecto del tratamiento causal de la escisión mesocólica completa sobre el riesgo de una recidiva únicamente local y de recidiva a distancia con o sin recidiva local. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B832 . (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Recurrence after complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer: post hoc sensitivity analyses-early recurrence, surgery by specialist and dissection in the mesocolic plane.

AIM: The aim was to investigate whether the previously reported causal treatment effect of complete mesocolic excision on the risk of recurrence was biased by inclusion of patients with potentially undiagnosed disseminated disease at the time of surgery, by non-specialist surgery, or caused by mesocolic plane dissection. METHOD: A population of 1069 patients, 813 undergoing conventional resection and 256 complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer during the period 2008-2013, was stepwise reduced in the following order by excluding patients with recurrence diagnosed within 6 months of the resection, having surgery performed by a non-specialist without supervision, and specimens assessed as not being mesocolic plane dissection. The primary outcome measure was risk of recurrence after 5.2 years using competing risk analyses. RESULTS: The absolute risk reduction of complete mesocolic excision was 6.0% (95% CI 1.8-10.2; P = 0.0049) after excluding patients with recurrence within 6 months of resection, 6.1% (95% CI 1.9-10.4; P = 0.0045) after excluding non-specialist surgery, and 7.5% (95% CI 2.9-12.0; P = 0.0013) after the exclusion of patients whose specimens were assessed as dissections not being performed in the mesocolic plane. CONCLUSION: The absolute risk reduction of recurrence after complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer in our previous study was not biased by potentially undiagnosed disseminated disease at the time of surgery or non-specialist surgery, and was not solely caused by dissection in the mesocolic plane. Central vascular dissection with central lymphadenectomy seems a major factor for better oncological results.

Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Application of the principles of total mesorectal excision to colon cancer by undertaking complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been proposed to improve oncological outcomes. We aimed to investigate whether implementation of CME improved disease-free survival compared with conventional colon resection. METHODS: Data for all patients who underwent elective resection for Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage I-III colon adenocarcinomas in the Capital Region of Denmark between June 1, 2008, and Dec 31, 2011, were retrieved for this population-based study. The CME group consisted of patients who underwent CME surgery in a centre validated to perform such surgery; the control group consisted of patients undergoing conventional colon resection in three other hospitals. Data were collected from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) database and medical charts. Patients were excluded if they had stage IV disease, metachronous colorectal cancer, rectal cancer (≤ 15 cm from anal verge) in the absence of synchronous colon adenocarcinoma, tumour of the appendix, or R2 resections. Survival data were collected on Nov 13, 2014, from the DCCG database, which is continuously updated by the National Central Office of Civil Registration. FINDINGS: The CME group consisted of 364 patients and the non-CME group consisted of 1031 patients. For all patients, 4-year disease-free survival was 85.8% (95% CI 81.4-90.1) after CME and 75.9% (72.2-79.7) after non-CME surgery (log-rank p=0.0010). 4-year disease-free survival for patients with UICC stage I disease in the CME group was 100% compared with 89.8% (83.1-96.6) in the non-CME group (log-rank p=0.046). For patients with UICC stage II disease, 4-year disease-free survival was 91.9% (95% CI 87.2-96.6) in the CME group compared with 77.9% (71.6-84.1) in the non-CME group (log-rank p=0.0033), and for patients with UICC stage III disease, it was 73.5% (63.6-83.5) in the CME group compared with 67.5% (61.8-73.2) in the non-CME group (log-rank p=0.13). Multivariable Cox regression showed that CME surgery was a significant, independent predictive factor for higher disease-free survival for all patients (hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.42-0.83), and also for patients with UICC stage II (0.44, 0.23-0.86) and stage III disease (0.64, 0.42-1.00). After propensity score matching, disease-free survival was significantly higher after CME, irrespective of UICC stage, with 4-year disease-free survival of 85.8% (95% CI 81.4-90.1) after CME and 73.4% (66.2-80.6) after non-CME (log-rank p=0·0014). INTERPRETATION: Our data indicate that CME surgery is associated with better disease-free survival than is conventional colon cancer resection for patients with stage I-III colon adenocarcinoma. Implementation of CME surgery might improve outcomes for patients with colon cancer. FUNDING: Tvergaards Fund and Edgar and Hustru Gilberte Schnohrs Fund.

[Late perforation following laparoscopic gastric bypass]. / Sen perforation af tyndtarm efter laparoskopisk gastrisk bypass.

We present two cases in which the patients were admitted to a local hospital with acute abdominal pain four or five months after having undergone laparoscopic gastric bypass. In both cases, operation revealed a perforation of the small bowel close to the distal anastomosis. In the first case, a massive constipation of the small bowel was most likely a contributing factor. In the second case, the cause was a kink of the entero-entero anastomosis leading to obstruction and finally perforation of the biliary limp. Late perforations are among the rarely reported complications associated with gastric bypass but as our two cases illustrate they are important to keep in mind.