Pre-emptive replacement of water treatment components improves responsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in maintenance haemodialysis patients: a quality improvement report.

Hypo-responsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) has been associated with increased mortality. We examined the effect of water treatment component replacement on declining ESA responsiveness in the absence of chemical or microbiological standards failure. Pre-emptive renewal of the water treatment system supplying 802 standard-flux haemodialysis patients resulted in a significant rise in haemoglobin from (mean ± SD) 12.1 ± 1.2 to 12.3 ± 1.0 g/dl (p < 0.0001), accompanied by a significant decrease in prescribed dose of darbepoetin alfa from 47.9 ± 27.3 to 44.7 ± 27.6 µg/week (p < 0.0001). ESA responsiveness improved significantly from 0.060 ± 0.041 to 0.055 ± 0.040 µg/kg/g · dl(-1) (p < 0.0001) and the number of patients no longer requiring ESA therapy increased threefold. These benefits were derived in the absence of haemolysis or significant changes in water quality. Renewal of water system components should be conducted even in the absence of proven microbiological and chemical failure.

Cohort Study of Outpatient Hemodialysis Management Strategies for COVID-19 in North-West London.

BACKGROUND: Dialysis patients are at risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We managed COVID-19 hemodialysis outpatients in dedicated satellite dialysis units. This provided rare opportunity to study early disease progress in community-based patients. We aimed to (i) understand COVID-19 progression, (ii) identify markers of future clinical severity, and (iii) assess associations between dialysis management strategies and COVID-19 clinical outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of all outpatients managed at a COVID-19 hemodialysis unit. We analyzed data recorded as part of providing COVID-19 clinical care. We analyzed associations between features at diagnosis and the first 3 consecutive hemodialysis sessions in patients who required future hospital admission, and those who had died at 28 days. RESULTS: Isolated outpatient hemodialysis was provided to 106 patients over 8 weeks. No patients received antiviral medication or hydroxychloroquine. Twenty-one patients (20%) were admitted at COVID-19 diagnosis; 29 of 85 patients (34%) were admitted after initial outpatient management; 16 patients (15%) died. By multivariate analysis, nonactive transplant list status, use of institutional transport, and increased white cell count associated with future hospitalization and increased age associated with death. Oxygen saturations progressively decreased over the first 3 dialysis sessions in the cohorts that progressed to future hospital admission or death. Mean ultrafiltration volume of the first 3 hemodialysis sessions was reduced in the same cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient hemodialysis in patients with COVID-19 is safe for patients and staff. Features at the first 3 dialysis sessions can identify individuals at risk of future hospitalization and death from COVID-19.