RESUMEN
Hypernatremia, characterized by a plasma sodium concentration above 145 mmol/L, is frequently observed in critically ill patients, often due to factors such as gastrointestinal losses, dehydration, and diabetes insipidus. Psychiatric patients, particularly those with major depressive disorder, are also at risk of developing hypernatremia due to abnormalities in thirst sensation, mineralocorticoid excess, or medication side effects. Severe hypernatremia in psychiatric patients is associated with a high mortality rate, presenting challenges in diagnosis and management. The treatment of chronic hypernatremia (>48 hours) typically involves administering isotonic saline to hypovolemic patients until normalization of vital signs, followed by dextrose 5% in water (D5W) based on water deficit and losses. The goal is to decrease plasma sodium by 8-10 mmol/day. Acute hypernatremia (<48 hours) is corrected with a plasma sodium reduction of 1 mmol/L/hour in the first six to eight hours. While there are no clear guidelines for sodium correction in severe hypernatremia, the literature suggests a safe correction rate of 8-10 mmol/day for chronic hypernatremia and 1 mmol/L/hour for acute cases. In a specific case, a 51-year-old female with severe depression and reduced oral intake was admitted. She exhibited signs of dehydration and was found to have severe hypernatremia (191 mmol/L) with acute kidney injury. Treatment involved D5W, followed by D5W/half-normal saline at 150 mL/hr. Within 24 hours, her plasma sodium decreased to 178 mmol/L and gradually normalized to 143 mmol/L without neurological complications. This case highlights the challenges and underscores the importance of early recognition and management of severe hypernatremia in psychiatric patients. The primary treatment approach addresses water deficits and losses and administers D5W. Recent findings suggest that rapid correction of the condition is acceptable.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) are most important interventions for patients with severe CAP associated with respiratory failure. We analysed utilization trends and predictors of non-invasive and invasive ventilation in patients hospitalized with CAP. METHODS: Nationwide Inpatient Sample and Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project data for years 2008-2017 were analysed. Adult hospitalizations due to CAP were identified by previously validated International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. We then utilized the Cochran-Armitage trend test and multivariate survey logistic regression models to analyse temporal incidence trends, predictors, and outcomes. We used SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) for analysing data. RESULTS: Out of a total of 8,385,861 hospitalizations due to CAP, ventilation assistance was required in 552,395 (6.6%). The overall ventilation use increased slightly; however, IMV utilization decreased, while NIV utilization increased. In multivariable regression analysis, males, Asian/others and weekend admissions were associated with higher odds of any ventilation utilization. Concurrent diagnoses of septicemia, congestive heart failure, alcoholism, chronic lung diseases, pulmonary circulatory diseases, diabetes mellitus, obesity and cancer were associated with increased odds of requiring ventilation assistance. Ventilation requirement was associated with high odds of in-hospital mortality and discharge to facility. CONCLUSION: The use of NIV among CAP patients has increased while IMV use has decreased over the years. We observed numerous factors linked with a higher use of ventilation support. The requirement of ventilation support is also associated with very high chances of mortality and morbidity.