Endovascular Treatment Versus Best Medical Management in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Strokes: Results From the ATTENTION Multicenter Registry.

BACKGROUND: The authors compare the effectiveness and safety of endovascular treatment (EVT) versus best medical management (BMM) in strokes attributable to acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO). METHODS: The present analysis was based on the ongoing, prospective, multicenter ATTENTION (Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion) trial registry in China. Our analytic sample comprised 2134 patients recruited at 48 sites between 2017 and 2021 and included 462 patients who received BMM and 1672 patients who received EVT. We performed an inversed probability of treatment weighting analysis. Qualifying patients had to present within 24 hours of estimated BAO. The primary clinical outcome was favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-3) at 90 days. We also performed a sensitivity analysis with the propensity score matching-based and the instrumental variable-based analysis. RESULTS: In our primary analysis using the inversed probability of treatment weighting-based analysis, there was a significantly higher rate of favorable outcome at 90 days among EVT patients compared with BMM-treated patients (adjusted relative risk, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.19-1.65]; absolute risk difference, 11.8% [95% CI, 6.9-16.7]). The mortality was significantly lower (adjusted relative risk, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.69-0.88]; absolute risk difference, -10.3% [95% CI, -15.8 to -4.9]) in patients undergoing EVT. Results were generally consistent across the secondary end points. Similar associations were seen in the propensity score matching-based and instrumental variable-based analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, EVT was associated with significantly better functional outcomes and survival at 90 days. Well-designed randomized studies comparing EVT with BMM in the acute BAO are needed. REGISTRATION: URL: www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifier: ChiCTR2000041117.

The relationship between occlusion patterns and outcomes after thrombectomy in patients with acute internal carotid artery occlusion.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES: Ischemic stroke caused by acute internal carotid artery occlusions (AICO) is usually associated with high disability and mortality. We aimed to investigate whether occlusion patterns significantly influence clinical outcome in patients receiving endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of databases from two comprehensive stroke centers and consecutively investigated patients who had underwent EVT. AICO was defined as acute internal carotid artery occlusions (cervical segment to terminal segment). The clinical characteristics, intervention parameters, and prognosis data were collected. Leptomeningeal collaterals (LMC) were assessed with the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology scale (ASITN/SIRs), graded on a 5-point scale. The occlusion patterns based on Willisian collaterals were categorized into I-type, L-type, and T-type by contralateral carotid artery injections at digital subtraction angiography. Multivariate regression models were applied to evaluate the relationship between occlusion patterns and the prognosis of patients at 90 days after stroke. RESULTS: A total of 213 patients were included in the study. Of those,142 (66.7%) achieved successful reperfusion and 64 (30.0%) achieved favorable outcomes at 90 days. Overall, 26 (12.2%), 117 (54.9%), and 70 (32.9%) cases respectively suffered from I-type, L-type, and T-type occlusion. In addition, patients with I-type occlusions had a higher percentage of complete LMC compared with L-type or T-type occlusions (88.5% versus 30.8% versus 27.1%, P< 0.0167). In multivariable logistic regression, we found T-type occlusion was no longer an independent predictor of poor functional outcomes in AICO after adjusting LMC (T versus I, OR, 2.555, 95%CI: 0.717-9.103, P = 0.148; L versus I, OR, 0.815, 95%CI: 0.258-2.574, P = 0.727). CONCLUSIONS: For ACIO, occlusion patterns are still a topic that needs attention. Furthermore, compensatory LMC may affect the association between occlusion patterns and functional prognosis in AICO. Occlusion patterns and LMC status distinguish the nature and impact of AICO on expected EVT and subsequent clinical outcomes.

Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of malignant cerebral edema in acute basilar artery occlusion after endovascular treatment: a secondary analysis of the ATTENTION trial.

OBJECTIVE: Malignant cerebral edema (MCE) is a life-threatening complication of ischemic stroke. Few studies have evaluated MCE in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) receiving endovascular treatment (EVT). Therefore, the authors investigated the incidence, predictors, and functional outcomes of MCE in BAO patients undergoing EVT. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion (ATTENTION) trial, a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial that compared endovascular treatment with conventional care of patients with BAO at 36 centers in China. Brain edema was retrospectively assessed using the Jauss score for all available follow-up scans, and patients with a Jauss score ≥ 4 were classified as having MCE. Clinical functional independence was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2, and a good outcome was defined as an mRS score of 0-3 at the 90-day follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore the predictors of MCE and the impact of MCE on prognosis. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were analyzed, and 13.2% of patients developed MCE. Multivariate analysis showed that the baseline Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (OR 0.722, 95% CI 0.548-0.950; p = 0.020) and the number of procedures (OR 1.594, 95% CI 1.051-2.419; p = 0.028) were significantly associated with MCE. After adjusting for confounding factors, the presence of MCE was significantly associated with a lower rate of functional independence (OR 0.115, 95% CI 0.023-0.563; p = 0.008), a lower rate of good outcome (OR 0.092, 95% CI 0.023-0.360; p = 0.001), and a higher rate of mortality (OR 5.373, 95% CI 2.055-14.052; p = 0.001) at the 90-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: MCE is not uncommon in BAO patients undergoing EVT and is associated with poor outcomes. Baseline GCS score and the number of procedures were predictors of MCE. In clinical practice, it is crucial that physicians identifying MCE after EVT in patients with BAO and identification of MCE will help in the selection of an appropriate pharmacological treatment strategy and close monitoring.