Percutaneous Saphenous Vein Arterialization.

PURPOSE: In patients with no-option critical limb-threatening ischemia, venous foot arterialization can be considered the last chance before major amputation. Up until now, a really significant limitation of endovascular arterialization compared with surgery was the possibility to obtain arterial flow into the foot only through the deep plantar network. TECHNIQUE: Two 5-mm snares are placed: one in the proximal tibial artery and the other in the great saphenous vein. After passing through these snares with a needle and a guidewire and closing the snares, the guidewire is pulled through the proximal arterial sheath and the distal venous sheath. Thus, the arterial-venous connection is created. A covered stent is, then, placed between the artery and the vein to avoid leakage. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our knowledge, this is the first described totally percutaneous arterialization of the superficial dorsal venous foot system, through reverse flow in the great saphenous vein.

Treatment of bypass failure in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia - open surgery vs. percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy.

Background: Lower limb bypass occlusion in patients with chronic limb threating ischemia remains a challenge. We can choose between different treatment options: open surgery, local thrombolysis, thrombectomy/atherectomy devices. In this pilot study, we compare clinical outcomes and treatment costs between open surgery (OS) and percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (pMTH). Patients and methods: This pilot study represents a retrospective analysis of hospital data of 48 occluded bypasses admitted from 2013 to 2018. Only patients presenting with severe ischemia and recrudescence of symptoms (Rutherford 4-6) were included in the current analysis. Two cohorts of patients were analysed: patients who underwent OS and patients that underwent pMTH. Primary clinical outcomes were one-year cumulative patency and limb salvage rates. Total cost was calculated as a sum of intra- and post-operative costs. To weigh clinical benefits against the economic consequences of OS versus pMTH a cost-effectiveness framework was adopted. Results: We analysed a series of 48 occluded bypasses 17 treated with open surgery and 31 with pMTH. Procedural success was 100% in both groups. When comparing one-year death rates (p-value = .22) and re-occlusion rates (p-value = .43), no statistically significant differences were observed between the two cohorts. Mean patency duration in the surgery cohort was significantly shorter (p-value < .05). Primary patency (OS 41.2% vs. pMTH 48.4%) and limb salvage rate (OS 88.2% vs. pMTH 90.3%) at one year are similar in both groups. The total cost of surgery was substantially higher (OS 10,159€ vs. pMTH 8,401€) Conclusions: This pilot study, although limited to 48 occluded bypasses, demonstrates that endovascular treatment with pMTH is less invasive, less time consuming and less expensive, and produces greater health benefits than traditional OS.

Effects of alpha lipoic acid and its R+ enantiomer supplemented to hyperbaric oxygen therapy on interleukin-6, TNF-α and EGF production in chronic leg wound healing.

CONTEXT: Lipoic acid (LA) and hyperbaric oxygenation therapy (HBOT) improve chronic wound healing. OBJECTIVE: We compared the effects of LA or its enantiomer R-(+)-lipoic acid (RLA) on wound healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Groups LA + HBOT (L), RLA + HBOT (R) and placebo + HBOT (P). Lesion areas measured before treatment and on 20th and 40th day. The biopsies and plasma were harvested before treatment and on 7th and 14th (measurements of VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; EGF, epidermal growth factor, TNF-α and IL-6). RESULTS: Ulcers improved more on RLA. In both L and R groups, EGF and VEFG increased in time. RLA decreased IL-6 on T7 and T14, which did not happen with LA. TNF-α levels decreased on T14 in both LA and RLA. DISCUSSION: The improved wound healing is associated with increased EGF and VEGF and reduced plasma TNF-α and IL-6. CONCLUSION: RLA may be more effective than LA in improving chronic wound healing in patients undergoing HBO therapy.

Percutaneous Deep Venous Arterialization Using an IVUS-Guided Technique in no-Option Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: 24-Month Results.

PURPOSE: In some patients, revascularization is not possible or is not effective. For these, percutaneous deep vein arterialization (p-DVA) could be considered an alternative treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term results of an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided technique that has only one percutaneous access. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective monocentric study on 18 no-option CLTI limbs treated with an IVUS-guided p-DVA. The primary outcome measures are: the freedom from major adverse events (MAEs) and survival at 30 days; limb salvage and amputation free survival (AFS) at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. The secondary outcome measures are: procedural success, survival, patency and wound healing. RESULTS: We treated 14 patients with no-option CLTI, carrying out 18 p-DVA. Median age was 74,4 years (60-87). All these patients had a previous failed angioplasty of the tibial and foot arteries. Procedural success rate, defined as the establishment of arterial flow into the venous system of the foot, was 100%. No deaths and MAEs recorded at 30 days. Survival was 100%, 83.4% and 77.8%; limb salvage was 88.9%, 77.8% and 77.8%; AFS was 88.9%, 61.1% and 55.6% at 6, 12 and 24 months. Complete wound healing was 18.7% at 6 months, 80.0% at 12 months and 100% at 24 months. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, the IVUS-guided p-DVA seems to be safe and effective for no-option CLTI patients, with no mortality related to the intervention, an acceptable limb salvage rate and amputation free survival.