Association between stigmatisation and experiences of evidence-based practice by psychiatric rehabilitation staff in Japan: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Mental health professionals are one of the groups holding harmful stigmatisation towards people with mental illness. AIMS: To investigate the association between the performance of evidence-based practice (EBP) and the staff's level of stigmatisation in Japan. METHODS: The study enrolled 179 staff members in psychiatric day-care, psychiatric community outreach teams, and psychiatric rehabilitation teams at 14 psychiatric hospitals. The Positive Attitudes Scale (PAS), the Japanese-language version of the Social Distance Scale (SDSJ) and the Recovery Attitude Questionnaire (RAQ) were employed as outcome measures. Scores on each scale were compared between participants who performed EBPs and those who had never performed EBPs. RESULTS: Approximately 40% of the staff engaged in at least assertive community treatment, supported employment or family psychoeducation. The staff who performed EBPs had significantly higher scores on PAS (MD, 7.09; 95% CIs, 4.09-10.09) and RAQ (MD, 1.30; 95% CIs, 0.36-2.25) but lower scores on SDSJ (MD, -2.41; 95% CIs, -3.50 to -1.32) than those who never performed EBPs. Multivariate analyses found that EBP experience was associated with a low level of staff stigmatisation after controlling for confounders. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that an individual EBP experience is associated with their reduced stigmatisation.

Family support in assertive community treatment: an analysis of client outcomes.

Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is an outreach-based case management model that assists people with severe mental illness through an intensive and integrated approach. In this program, a multidisciplinary team provides medical and psychosocial services. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the following two ACT intervention strategies: "replacement" (supporting the clients) versus "backup" (supporting family members who provide care to clients). Admission days, psychiatric symptoms, quality of life, self-efficacy, and service satisfaction ware evaluated as outcome variables. To identify effective methods of supporting family members, clients living with family were divided into two groups based on the amount and types of services received-the backup group and the replacement group. ANCOVA was used to compare the outcomes between the two groups. The replacement group displayed significantly better psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, self-efficacy, and service satisfaction scores. No differences in admission days or quality of life were found. Clients provided more support directly to clients themselves than to family members was found to have better client outcomes in improving psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, and self-efficacy, resulting in higher levels of service satisfaction. This indicates that society should reduce the responsibility of the family and share responsibility for the care of people with mental illness to effectively improve outcomes for people with mental illnesses.

Development of the Nurse Attitude Scale short form: factor analysis in a large sample of Japanese psychiatric clinical staff.

The Nurse Attitude Scale (NAS) measures nurses' Expressed Emotion. A short form of the NAS was developed and its reliability and validity examined. After performing factor analysis using 1252 samples, three factors were extracted. Cronbach's alpha for individual subscales was 0.852 for Hostility, 0.846 for Criticism and 0.645 for Positive Remarks. There was a significant correlation between individual subscales in the NAS short form and corresponding subscale in the Maslach Burnout Inventory (P < 0.001). The NAS short form seems to have acceptable reliability and validity.

Relationship between financial competence and cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia.

The present study examined financial competence in patients with schizophrenia and the relationship between their financial competence and cognitive function. The subjects consisted of 25 patients with schizophrenia (10 inpatients and 15 outpatients) and 22 normal controls who were community-dwelling people with no psychiatric disorders or cognitive deficit. To assess the subjects' cognitive function and financial competence, they completed the Japanese version of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (COGNISTAT), which has 10 subtests, and the Financial Competency Assessment Tool (FCAT), which has six subordinate domains of financial competence. Patients with schizophrenia performed significantly worse than the controls in all scores on the FCAT. The financial scores that were significantly different between the patients and the normal controls were significantly positively correlated with the scores on several COGNISTAT subtests (e.g. comprehension). These results suggest that patients with schizophrenia have problems with financial competence and that these problems may be accounted for by deficits in several cognitive functions.