Effects of angiotensin II in the management of perioperative hypotension in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Due to the mechanisms of action of conventional catecholamine vasopressors, there is increased risk of renal allograft injury and adverse events in transplant recipients with fluid-refractory distributive shock during the perioperative period. As such, mechanistically alternative vasopressors like angiotensin II (ATII) may avoid these complications, but there is an absence of data supporting use in this population. METHODS: This was a single-center, single-arm, open-label, phase 4 study conducted as a 1-year pilot of 20 adult renal transplant recipients receiving ATII as their first continuous infusion vasopressor in the perioperative period. The study aim was to systematically assess the safety and hemodynamic effects of ATII. Safety was assessed based on the incidence of adverse events. Hemodynamic effect was assessed by the achievement of per protocol hemodynamic goals (i.e., SBP ≥120 mmHg) and the need for adjunct vasopressors. RESULTS: Most cases involved deceased donors (70%), with a corresponding mean (SD) cold ischemia time of 14.7 (8.6) h. Over a surgery duration of 5.3 (1.2) h, subjects received 3.2 (2.0) L of total volume resuscitation prior to ATII initiation. No adverse events were directly related to ATII administration. Throughout this period, ATII was utilized for a median of 1.0 (IQR, 1.5) h intraoperatively (N = 7), 26.5 (IQR, 84.8) h postoperatively (N = 4), and 63.8 (IQR, 57.8) h in subjects who required ATII both intra- and postoperatively (N = 9). Only one of the 20 patients needed adjunct continuous infusion vasopressors in addition to ATII. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the observations of this pilot study, ATII is a safe and effective vasopressor option for renal transplant recipients requiring perioperative hypotension reversal.

Perioperative Vasopressors are Associated with Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients in a Primarily Black and Hispanic Cohort.

Introduction: Negative outcome studies of vasopressors in kidney transplant have not focused on patient populations that are predominantly Black or Hispanic. Project Aims: The evaluation sought to investigate the independent impact of perioperative vasopressors on postoperative renal allograft function in a sample drawn from a primarily Black and Hispanic population. Design: Retrospective, observational, single-center evaluation of patients > 18 years old who underwent kidney transplantation comparing outcomes based on vasopressor exposure. Results: The study included 150 patients of which 60 received vasopressors. The primary outcome differed between groups with delayed graft function occurring in 17(28%) versus 11(12.2%) occurring more often in those that received perioperative vasopressors (P = 0.02). The serum creatinine at postoperative day 7 was higher (2.69 vs1.52 mg/dL, P = 0.004), postoperative day 7 eGFR was worse (27.3 vs 52.9 mL/min/1.73m2, P = 0.002) in patients who received vasopressors. Patients who received perioperative vasopressors experienced more postoperative arrhythmias (15% vs 8%, P = 0.007), insulin infusion therapy (26.7% vs 13.3%, P = 0.04), and increased hospital length of stay (6 days vs 5 days, P = 0.006). Using IPWRA, patients receiving vasopressors were more likely to experience delayed function, relative risk difference of 22% (95% CI:0.08-0.35;P = 0.002) and in multivariate logistic regression modeling, an increased odds ratio of 3.2 (95% CI:1.1-8.62;P = 0.022). Conclusions: The use of perioperative vasopressors was independently associated with worsened early renal allograft function including delayed graft function, increased adverse events such as postoperative arrhythmias, and longer ICU length of stay. Further investigation is needed surrounding vasopressor use in this population.