RESUMEN
Various infection control measures implemented during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic have reduced the number of respiratory infections, which are the most common cause of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. Here, we investigated whether infectious disease prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic reduced COPD exacerbations and the characteristics of patients exhibiting exacerbations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We included outpatients and inpatients with moderate or severe COPD exacerbations who required systemic steroids between April 1, 2018 and March 31, 2022. Their medical records were retrospectively compared and analyzed in 2-year intervals (before and during the COVID-19 pandemic). During the 4-year observation period, 70,847 outpatients and 2,772 inpatients were enrolled; 55 COPD exacerbations were recorded. The number of COPD exacerbations decreased from 36 before to 19 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Regarding the characteristics of patients with exacerbations, the % forced expiratory volume in one second (52.3% vs. 38.6%, P = 0.0224) and body mass index (BMI) (22.5 vs. 19.3, P = 0.0127) were significantly lower during the COVID-19 pandemic than before the pandemic. The number of COPD exacerbations during the pandemic decreased. Additionally, the tendency for a reduction in COPD exacerbation was greatest in patients with preserved lung function or above-standard BMI patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , Japón/epidemiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , COVID-19/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Volumen Espiratorio ForzadoRESUMEN
Background: Hyperprogressive disease is an unexpected response pattern observed in immune checkpoint therapy and associated with poor prognosis. The rechallenge of programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors can be a treatment option in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who once responded to them. Here, we reported the hyperprogressive phenomenon after PD-1/PD-L1 rechallenge in a patient with NSCLC. Case Description: This case report described a patient with recurrent large cell lung cancer undergoing hyperprogressive disease with pleural and pericardial dissemination shortly after the pembrolizumab rechallenge, although he had a favorable response to the initial pembrolizumab treatment. A lower ratio of CD8+ T cells to Foxp3+ regulatory T cells was distributed in the cell blocks of pleural and pericardial effusion which were taken after hyperprogressive disease, compared to the resected tumor microenvironment. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was lower in peripheral blood when the disease was controlled and it rose when the disease progressed. Notably, NLR increased dramatically when hyperprogression occurred. Conclusions: For the first time, we reported that a patient who showed a favorable response to initial anti-PD-1 treatment underwent hyperprogressive disease when rechallenging the same immunotherapy. The increased Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in the tumor microenvironment and the longitudinal change of NLRs in peripheral blood were suggested to be associated with hyperprogressive disease.
RESUMEN
A bronchobiliary fistula (BBF) is an uncommon but severe complication after radiofrequency ablation (RFA). However, the definitive salvage methods are controversial. We herein report a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatic abscess and BBF following RFA. We also review previous reports of BBF after RFA. The patient was a man in his 70s who underwent RFA for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in the subphrenic area. Despite percutaneous transhepatic abscess drainage, bilioptysis persisted. Finally, the BBF was occluded with an endobronchial Watanabe spigot under fiber-optic bronchoscopy. Placing an endobronchial Watanabe spigot should be considered as a salvage therapy for refractory BBF following RFA.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Biliar , Fístula Bronquial , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Ablación por Catéter , Absceso Hepático , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia , Masculino , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Fístula Biliar/etiología , Fístula Biliar/cirugía , Fístula Bronquial/etiología , Fístula Bronquial/cirugía , Absceso Hepático/etiología , Absceso Hepático/cirugía , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death, and COPD exacerbation worsens the prognosis. Eosinophilic airway inflammation is a COPD phenotype that causes COPD exacerbation and is correlated with peripheral blood eosinophil count. We analyzed real-world data of COPD patients to assess the risk factors of COPD exacerbation focusing on blood eosinophils. Materials and Methods: Patients with COPD who visited our hospital between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018, were recruited, and their background information, spirometry data, laboratory test results, and moderate-to-severe exacerbation events during the one-year follow-up period were collected from the electronic medical records and analyzed. The COPD exacerbation risk factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: Twenty-two of 271 (8.1%) patients experienced moderate-to-severe exacerbation. Patients with exacerbation showed worse pulmonary function, and we found that a high blood eosinophil count (≥350 cells/µL; p=0.014), low % FEV1 (<50%; p=0.002), increase in white blood cell (≥9000 cells/µL; p=0.039), and use of home oxygen therapy (p=0.005) were risk factors for future exacerbations. We also found a strong correlation between eosinophil count cut-offs and exacerbation risk (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). On the other hand, there was no relation between exacerbation risk and inhalation therapy for COPD. Conclusion: In a real-world setting, peripheral blood eosinophil count could be a predictor of future COPD exacerbation.
Asunto(s)
Eosinofilia , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Eosinófilos , Recuento de Leucocitos , Pulmón , Biomarcadores , Progresión de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Atezolizumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) that is often associated with the development of several immune-related adverse events, including fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus (F1DM). Here, we present the case of a 73-year-old woman who was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma after surgical lung lobectomy. Two years later, she developed pulmonary metastasis, and atezolizumab treatment was initiated after seven years. However, she only completed two cycles of atezolizumab treatment because of disease progression. Four months after the interruption of atezolizumab treatment, she presented to the emergency department with fatigue and vomiting. On admission, she had a serum glucose level of 962 mg/dL, metabolic acidosis, and elevated ketone body levels. She was diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis induced by atezolizumab treatment. Her symptoms improved by insulin therapy. When ICIs are administered, care should be taken regarding the development of F1DM.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab are the currently available biologics used to treat asthma in Japan. Anaphylaxis following treatment with mepolizumab or benralizumab is considered rare. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 35-year-old woman with severe asthma, who experienced anaphylaxis following the administration of benralizumab, mepolizumab, and omalizumab, separately. The therapy with biologics was chosen to avoid the repeated use of systemic corticosteroids for asthma exacerbations. The mechanisms underlying anaphylaxis caused by these three biologics remain unclear. The patient's asthma symptoms and lung function improved after treatment with bronchial thermoplasty. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report of an asthmatic patient developing anaphylaxis after commencement of benralizumab, mepolizumab, and omalizumab therapy. These three biologics should be administered carefully, and patients should be monitored for anaphylaxis.