Ethanol-mediated appetitive conditioning in infant rats, but not corticosterone release, is dependent on route of ethanol administration.

A recent study found appetitive reinforcement in infant rats given 1.0 but not 2.0 g/kg ethanol and only when ethanol was delivered intragastrically (i.g., but not if intraperitoneally, i.p.; Nizhnikov, Pautassi, Truxell, & Spear [2009] Alcohol 43, 347-358). Corticosterone release could modulate ethanol's motivational effects. The goal of this study was to replicate the differential capability of i.g. vs. i.p. ethanol to induce conditioning and to find hormonal correlates underlying this phenomenon. Experiment 1 confirmed that 1.0 g/kg ethanol induced conditioned preference in infant rats when given i.g. but not i.p. In Experiment 2 corticosterone was assessed at 20, 40, 60, or 120 min after ethanol (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 g/kg, i.g. or i.p.). Route of administration failed to alter corticosterone release. The 2.0 g/kg, but not 0.5 or 1.0 g/kg, ethanol dose evoked heightened corticosterone release. The results confirm the differing motivational effects associated with i.g. and i.p. ethanol. These effects do not seem to be related to differential corticosterone responsiveness.

Opioid antagonists block the acquisition of ethanol-mediated conditioned tactile preference in infant rats.

It has been difficult to find conditioned preference for tactile cues paired with ethanol intoxication in rats. Toward understanding the ontogeny of ethanol reinforcement, we aimed at establishing a simple and reliable procedure for (1) assessing primary appetitive conditioning to ethanol in infant rats and (2) discerning the role the opioid system plays in ethanol-mediated conditioning at this age. Experiment 1 determined the parameters (i.e., dose, interval of conditioning) for assessing ethanol-mediated conditioning. Pups were then trained with differential Pavlovian conditioning (Experiments 2 and 3) in which ethanol intoxication (1.0-2.0 g/kg, intragastrically or intraperitoneally delivered) was paired with a tactile stimulus (sandpaper) while an alternative texture signaled the absence of ethanol's effects. Unpaired control conditions were also used. Tactile preferences were assessed after two conditioning sessions. Paired rats spent significantly more time on sandpaper than unpaired controls, an effect that was greater after intragastric administration of 1.0 than 2.0 g/kg ethanol. This effect was replicated in Experiments 4a and 4c and found to be inhibited by pretreatment with general (naloxone [NAL]) or specific (d-Pen-Cys-Tyr-d-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 [CTOP] and naltrindole) opioid antagonists. Blood ethanol levels at conditioning were not altered by NAL (Experiment 4b). The study outlines a procedure that reveals appetitive conditioning to ethanol by infant rats. The results are discussed in terms of a potential ethanol-induced activation of the endogenous opioid system during the onset of the intoxication process.