RESUMEN
Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) is a rare haematological disorder characterized by monocytosis and dysplastic changes in myeloid cell lineages. Accurate risk stratification is essential for guiding treatment decisions and assessing prognosis. This study aimed to validate the Artificial Intelligence Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes (AIPSS-MDS) in CMML and to assess its performance compared with traditional scores using data from a Spanish registry (n = 1343) and a Taiwanese hospital (n = 75). In the Spanish cohort, the AIPSS-MDS accurately predicted overall survival (OS) and leukaemia-free survival (LFS), outperforming the Revised-IPSS score. Similarly, in the Taiwanese cohort, the AIPSS-MDS demonstrated accurate predictions for OS and LFS, showing superiority over the IPSS score and performing better than the CPSS and molecular CPSS scores in differentiating patient outcomes. The consistent performance of the AIPSS-MDS across both cohorts highlights its generalizability. Its adoption as a valuable tool for personalized treatment decision-making in CMML enables clinicians to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from different therapeutic interventions. Future studies should explore the integration of genetic information into the AIPSS-MDS to further refine risk stratification in CMML and improve patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica , Leucemia , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos , Humanos , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/genética , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Pronóstico , Inteligencia Artificial , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/terapia , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/tratamiento farmacológico , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Outcomes for silver coated megaprostheses (SC-MP) used in cases of end-stage periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have not been clearly defined. Although attractive, concerns over implant longevity and the risk of infection relapse exist among the scientific community. Therefore, we sought to investigate the effect of silver coating in lower-extremity MPs used in such difficult-to-treat scenarios. The study's primary hypothesis was that the periprosthetic infection control rate would be higher in patients with silver-coated implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Non-interventional retrospective study with a historical comparison group. We identified all consecutive end-stage hip and knee PJI cases at our center managed with exchange arthroplasty using a silver-coated megaprosthesis from January 2016 to March 2021, these cases were compared with a historical cohort of end-stage PJI cases managed with uncoated megaprostheses. The main outcome studied was infection control rate. Secondarily, we analyzed the short-to-medium-term survivorship of this type of silver-coated implant. RESULTS: Fifty-nine megaprostheses used in cases of end-stage PJI were included in this study. We identified 30 cases of chronic hip or knee PJI in which a silver-coated modular megaprosthesis was implanted. Our non-coated megaprosthesis (NC-MP) historical group included 29 patients. Both groups had similar demographic characteristics. We found no statistically significant differences in infection control rate (80% vs. 82.8%, p = 0.47) or implant survivorship (90% vs. 89.65%, p = 1) after a mean follow-up for SC-MP of 46.43 months, and 48 months for the non-coated MP group. In relapsed cases, there were no differences in infection eradication after DAIR (66% SC-MP vs. 60% NC-MP success rate, p = 1). During the follow-up we observed one case of skin argyria without further repercussion. CONCLUSION: We were unable to confirm our initial hypothesis that use of silver-coated implants in end-stage PJI scenarios may be associated with better outcomes in terms of infection control or implant survivorship.
Asunto(s)
Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Prótesis de Cadera , Prótesis de la Rodilla , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Plata , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/instrumentación , Diseño de Prótesis , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: According to Vancouver classification, B2 type fractures are most often treated with removal of the loose stem and implantation of a long stem that bypasses the fracture site. However, there is a controversy about the stem fixation that should be used: cemented or cementless. Hence, this study aims to compare cemented and cementless stems in prosthetic revision due to Vancouver B2 (VB2) periprosthetic hip fracture. METHODS: A retrospective study was done including all the patients treated with stem exchange due to VB2 periprosthetic hip fracture in a tertiary hospital between 2015 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups according to the stem fixation used: cemented or cementless. Functional outcomes, hospital stay, surgical time, complication rate, and mortality were compared between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: Of the 30 included patients, 13 (43.4%) were treated with cementless stems and 17 (56.7%) with cemented stems. There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, anesthesia risk scale (ASA) or functional capacity prior to the intervention. Patients treated with cementless stems had a higher complication and reintervention rate than those treated with cemented stems: 62 and 45% versus 34 and 6% (p = 0.035; p = 0.010), respectively. Furthermore, in the group of cementless stems a higher proportion of non-union was found (53.8% vs. 17.6%; p = 0.037). Also, the hospital stay (33 vs. 24 days; p = 0.037) and the time to full weight-bearing (21 days vs. 9 days; p < 0.001) were longer in the cementless stem group. CONCLUSION: Cemented fixation in stem revision due to Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fracture could be an optimal option with faster recovery which could decrease the rate of complications and reintervention, without compromising the fracture healing and patient mortality. Thus, this option can be considered when an anatomical reduction can be obtained, especially in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities in which a less aggressive surgical option should be considered.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Cementos para Huesos , Fracturas de Cadera , Prótesis de Cadera , Fracturas Periprotésicas , Reoperación , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Fracturas Periprotésicas/cirugía , Fracturas Periprotésicas/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Tempo Operativo , Falla de Prótesis , Diseño de Prótesis , CementaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures involve stem stability and they have been classically treated with revision surgery. Crucial factors such as age, clinical comorbidities and functional status are often neglected. The current study aims to compare clinical outcomes between patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or femoral stem exchange. METHODS: This is a retrospective study that includes all Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures in a tertiary referral hospital from 2016 to 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1. Patients treated with an ORIF and Group 2. Patients treated with stem replacement. The outcomes that were compared between groups included demographic data, functional capacity, complications and mortality. RESULTS: 29 periprosthetic Vancouver B2 fractures were finally analyzed. 11 (37.9%) were treated with ORIF (Group 1) and 18 (62.1%) by stem replacement (Group 2). Surgery time (143 vs. 160 min), hemoglobin drop (1.8 vs. 2.5 g/dL) and hospital stance (25.5 vs. 29.6 days) were shorter in Group 1. According to complications, 18.2% of patients in the ORIF group had orthopedic complications compared with 44.4% in the revision group. In the revision group, 3 cases needed a two-stage revision and one of these revisions ended up with a resection arthroplasty (Girdlestone). The first-year mortality rate was 27% in Group 1 and 11% in Group 2. DISCUSSION: ORIF treatment seems to be a less aggressive and complex procedure which can lead to a faster general recovery. Revision surgery can imply a higher risk of orthopedic complications which can be severe and may require further aggressive solutions. The ORIF group mortality was similar to the proximal femur fracture rate (20-30%). In conclusion, ORIF treatment seems to be a good option especially in fragile patients with low functional demand when anatomical reduction is possible.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas de Cadera , Fracturas Periprotésicas , Reoperación , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Fracturas Periprotésicas/cirugía , Fracturas Periprotésicas/etiología , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Fracturas de Cadera/mortalidad , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Reducción Abierta/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Ankle fracture-dislocations (AFD) often necessitate staged management involving temporary external fixation (EF) due to mechanical instability or blistering. However, limited literature exists on the optimal temporary immobilization method for low-energy closed AFD. This study compared baseline patient and fracture characteristics, along with clinical and radiological outcomes between AFD initially immobilized with EF versus splinting. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients with AFD temporarily immobilized using EF or splinting, followed by definitive open reduction and internal fixation. Quality of reduction (QOR) was assessed for each patient post-initial immobilization and after the definitive surgery. RESULTS: The study encompassed 194 patients: 138 treated with a splint (71.1%) and 56 (28.9%) with EF. Secondary loss of reduction had occurred in three patients who were splinted (2.2%). The mean ages in the EF and splint groups were 63.2 and 56.1 years, respectively (p = 0.01). Posterior malleolus fracture (PMF) and blisters were more prevalent in EF patients (69.6% vs. 43.5% for PMF and 76.8% vs. 20.3% for blisters, respectively; p = 0.05 and p < 0.01). Postoperative complication rates were 8.9% for EF versus 10.9% for splinting (p = 0.69). Satisfactory final QOR was attained in 79.8% of patients treated with a splint versus 64.3% with EF (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Patients immobilized by EF presented with poorer baseline characteristics and had more unstable injuries. Nevertheless, postoperative complication rates were comparable. Thus, EF appears to be a valuable tool for standardizing outcomes in AFD patients with a less favorable prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Tobillo , Fractura-Luxación , Inmovilización , Férulas (Fijadores) , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Fracturas de Tobillo/cirugía , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fractura-Luxación/cirugía , Fractura-Luxación/diagnóstico por imagen , Inmovilización/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Anciano , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fijadores ExternosRESUMEN
Humoral immunity in COVID-19 includes antibodies (Abs) targeting spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) SARS-CoV-2 proteins. Antibody levels are known to correlate with disease severity, but titers are poorly reported in mild or asymptomatic cases. Here, we analyzed the titers of IgA and IgG against SARS-CoV-2 proteins in samples from 200 unvaccinated Hospital Workers (HWs) with mild COVID-19 at two time points after infection. We analyzed the relationship between Ab titers and patient characteristics, clinical features, and evolution over time. Significant differences in IgG and IgA titers against N, S1 and S2 proteins were found when samples were segregated according to time T1 after infection, seroprevalence at T1, sex and age of HWs and symptoms at infection. We found that IgM + samples had higher titers of IgG against N antigen and IgA against S1 and S2 antigens than IgM - samples. There were significant correlations between anti-S1 and S2 Abs. Interestingly, IgM + patients with dyspnea had lower titers of IgG and IgA against N, S1 and S2 than those without dyspnea. Comparing T1 and T2, we found that IgA against N, S1 and S2 but only IgG against certain Ag decreased significantly. In conclusion, an association was established between Ab titers and the development of infection symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19 , Inmunoglobulina A , Inmunoglobulina G , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/virología , COVID-19/sangre , Inmunoglobulina A/sangre , Inmunoglobulina A/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Femenino , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Proteínas de la Nucleocápside de Coronavirus/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Inmunoglobulina M/inmunología , Inmunidad Humoral , Fosfoproteínas/inmunologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To identify risk factors predisposing patients to poor outcomes after fixation of periprosthetic hip fractures around femoral stems. METHODS: Prospective multicentre cohort study of fractures around a hip replacement stem managed by internal fixation. The primary outcome was one-year mortality, while secondary outcomes were local complications and healthcare burden-related outcomes (nursing facility utilization and hospital length of stay). RESULTS: One-year mortality was 16.2%. Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index score (OR=1.17; 95%CI=1.03-1.33)), Pfeiffer Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) score (OR=1.16; 1.06-1.28), prosthetic dysfunction (OR=1.90; 1.00-3.61), and postoperative medical complications (OR=1.97; 1.06-3.68) were predictors of mortality. Patients with prior prosthetic dysfunction, lower Pfeiffer SPMSQ scores, Vancouver A fractures, and fractures fixed only using cerclages were at higher risk of local complications, which occurred in 9.3% of cases. Medical (OR=1.81; 1.05-3.13) and local complications (OR=5.56; 2.42-3.13) emerged as consistent risk factors for new institutionalization. Average hospitalization time was 13.9±9.2 days. Each day of fixation delay led to an average 1.4-day increase in total hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Frail periprosthetic hip-fracture patients with poorer functional status, dysfunctional replacements, and postoperative complications are at increased risk of mortality. Postoperative complications are more common in patients with dysfunctional arthroplasties, Vancouver A fractures, and fixation using cerclages alone. Postoperative complications were the most consistent predictor of higher healthcare resource utilization.