Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Thorax ; 77(7): 724-726, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35483893

RESUMEN

Accurately explaining perioperative mortality and risk to patients is an essential part of shared decision making. In the case of lung cancer surgery, the currently available multivariable mortality prediction tools perform poorly, and could mislead patients. Using data from 2004 to 2012, this group has previously produced data tables for 90-day postoperative mortality, to be used as a communication aid in the consenting process. Using National Lung Cancer Clinical Outcomes audit data from 2017 to 2018, we have produced updated early mortality tables, to reflect current thoracic surgery practice.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos , Humanos , Neumonectomía/efectos adversos
2.
Thorax ; 74(12): 1140-1146, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31558626

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer screening (LCS) by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) offers an opportunity to impact both lung cancer and coronary heart disease mortality through detection of coronary artery calcification (CAC). Here, we explore the value of CAC and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment in LCS participants in the Lung Screen Uptake Trial (LSUT). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, current and ex-smokers aged 60-75 were invited to a 'lung health check'. Data collection included a CVD risk assessment enabling estimation of 10 year CVD risk using the QRISK2 score. Participants meeting the required lung cancer risk underwent an ungated, non-contrast LDCT. Descriptive data, bivariate associations and a multivariate analysis of predictors of statin use are presented. RESULTS: Of 1005 individuals enrolled, 680 were included in the final analysis. 421 (61.9%) had CAC present and in 49 (7.2%), this was heavy. 668 (98%) of participants had a QRISK2≥10% and QRISK2 was positively associated with increasing CAC grade (OR 4.29 (CI 0.93 to 19.88) for QRISK2=10%-20% and 12.29 (CI 2.68 to 56.1) for QRISK2≥20% respectively). Of those who qualified for statin primary prevention (QRISK2≥10%), 56.8% did not report a history of statin use. In the multivariate analysis statin use was associated with age, body mass index and history of hypertension and diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: LCS offers an important opportunity for instituting CVD risk assessment in all LCS participants irrespective of the presence of LDCT-detected CAC. Further studies are needed to determine whether CAC could enhance uptake and adherence to primary preventative strategies.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Transversales , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevención Primaria/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Dosis de Radiación , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Calcificación Vascular/complicaciones , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen
4.
Chest ; 163(6): 1599-1607, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36640995

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruption to health-care services and delivery worldwide. The impact of the pandemic and associated national lockdowns on lung cancer incidence in England have yet to be assessed. RESEARCH QUESTION: What was the impact of the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence and presentation of lung cancer in England? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, incidence rates for lung cancer were calculated from The National Lung Cancer Audit Rapid Cancer Registration Datasets for 2019 and 2020, using midyear population estimates from the Office of National Statistics as the denominators. Rates were compared using Poisson regression according to time points related to national lockdowns in 2020. RESULTS: Sixty-four thousand four hundred fifty-seven patients received a diagnosis of lung cancer across 2019 (n = 33,088) and 2020 (n = 31,369). During the first national lockdown, a 26% reduction in lung cancer incidence was observed compared with the equivalent calendar period of 2019 (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.71-0.78). This included a 23% reduction in non-small cell lung cancer (adjusted IRR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.74-0.81) and a 45% reduction in small cell lung cancer (adjusted IRR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.46-0.65) incidence. Thereafter, incidence rates almost recovered to baseline, without overcompensation (adjusted IRR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98). INTERPRETATION: The incidence rates of lung cancer in England fell significantly by 26% during the first national lockdown in 2020 and did not compensate later in the year.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Incidencia , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Inglaterra/epidemiología
5.
Br J Radiol ; 91(1090): 20170460, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28749712

RESUMEN

Screening for lung cancer using low-dose CT has already been implemented in North America following the results of the National Lung Screening Trial. Outside North America, clinicians and researchers are addressing issues that may have a major impact on the success of screening programmes by reviewing results of existing trials and by designing new research and pilot programmes. This review summarizes the work that has been done to try to answer the remaining questions and highlights potential barriers which may affect screening uptake and cost-effectiveness.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Dosis de Radiación , Radiólogos/provisión & distribución , Medición de Riesgo , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/diagnóstico por imagen , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA