RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the thyroid glands' radiation dose and the risk of thyroid cancer induction from head or neck computed tomography (CT) examinations. METHODS: In a prospective study, we evaluated all participants of all ages and sex referred for Head or Neck CT Scan at the University College Hospital, Ibadan and Me Cure Healthcare Limited, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Thyroid radiation dose was estimated with impact scan calculator, and real-time dose measurement with thermoluminescent badge dosimeters (TLDs). Data were analysed and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-three participants (128 adults and 35 children) participated in the study. In most participants (74%), the tube voltage was 120 kVp. The estimated median thyroid gland dose by the imPACT scan calculator was 4.95 mGy (range = 1.20-30.0 mGy) and 4.40 mGy (range = 3.0-5.10 mGy), while the real-time dose measured by the TLD was 4.79 mGy (range = 1.73-96.7 mGy) and 2.33 mGy (range = 1.20-3.73 mGy) at Centre A and B, respectively. The estimated median thyroid cancer risk was 2.88 × 10-6 (maximum range of 52 × 10-6) at centre A and a median value of 3.20 × 10-6 with a cancer risk estimate that may reach 17.9 × 10-6 recorded at centre B, compared to a cumulative thyroid cancer risk of 0.12 × 10-5 among the general Nigerian population. CONCLUSIONS: Scanner specifications and technique may significantly contribute to variations seen in thyroid radiation doses. There may be a need to optimise centre protocols and apply dose reference levels for head and neck CT examinations to reduce thyroid cancer risk in Nigeria.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Glándula Tiroides , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Nigeria/epidemiología , Fantasmas de Imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Dosis de Radiación , Glándula Tiroides/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
PURPOSE: In-vivo measurements to determine doses to organs-at-risk can be an essential part of brachytherapy quality assurance (QA). This study compares calculated doses to the rectum with measured dose values as a means of QA in vaginal vault brachytherapy using cylinder applicators. MATERIAL AND METHODS: At the Department of Radiotherapy, University College Hospital (UCH), Ibadan, Nigeria, intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) was delivered by a GyneSource high-dose-rate (HDR) unit with (60)Co. Standard 2D treatment plans were created with HDR basic 2.6 software for prescription doses 5-7 Gy at points 5 mm away from the posterior surface of vaginal cylinder applicators (20, 25, and 30 mm diameters). The LiF:Mg, Ti thermoluminescent dosimeter rods (1 x 6 mm) were irradiated to a dose of 7 Gy on Theratron (60)Co machine for calibration purpose prior to clinical use. Measurements in each of 34 insertions involving fourteen patients were performed with 5 TLD-100 rods placed along a re-usable rectal marker positioned in the rectum. The dosimeters were read in Harshaw 3500 TLD reader and compared with doses derived from the treatment planning system (TPS) at 1 cm away from the dose prescription points. RESULTS: The mean calculated and measured doses ranged from 2.1-3.8 Gy and 1.2-5.6 Gy with averages of 3.0 ± 0.5 Gy and 3.1 ± 1.1 Gy, respectively, for treatment lengths 2-8 cm along the cylinder-applicators. The mean values correspond to 48.9% and 50.8% of the prescribed doses, respectively. The deviations of the mean in-vivo doses from the TPS values ranged from -1.9 to 2.1 Gy with a p-value of 0.427. CONCLUSIONS: This study was part of efforts to verify rectal dose obtained from the TPS during vaginal vault brachytherapy. There was no significant difference in the dose to the rectum from the two methods of measurements.