RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Osgood-Schlatter disease (OSD) and tibial tubercle fractures are pathologies that affect the tibial tubercle apophysis in preadolescents and adolescents. Anatomic alignment of the proximal tibia may explain why some children develop OSD or sustain tibial tubercle fractures and some do not. Recent data has shown an association between posterior tibial slope angle (PTSA) and both OSD and proximal tibia physeal fractures. In this study, we compare radiographic parameters between patients with non-OSD knee pain, knees with OSD, and knees with tibial tubercle fracture to elucidate a difference between these groups. METHODS: Patients treated for OSD, tibial tubercle fractures, and knee pain, from 2012 to 2018, were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic parameters for each study group included PTSA, anatomic lateral distal femoral angle, anatomic medial proximal tibial angle, patellar articular height, and the distance from the inferior aspect of the patellar articular surface. Caton-Deschamps index was then calculated. Demographic data was collected including age, sex, and body mass index. Demographic and radiographic data was compared using analysis of variance tests, χ2 tests, 2-sample t tests, and multiple linear regression. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-one knees in 229 patients met inclusion criteria for the study. In all, 76% were male and the average age of the overall cohort was 14 years old. In patients with tibial tubercle fractures, the majority of fractures were Ogden type 3b (65%). After controlling for demographic variability, average PTSA in the fracture cohort was significantly greater than that in the control cohort (ß=3.49, P<0.001). The OSD cohort had a significantly greater posterior slope (ß=3.14) than the control cohort (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the fracture and OSD cohorts. There was also no difference in Caton-Deschamps index between the 2 study groups when compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that patients with tibial tubercle fractures and patients with OSD have an increased PTSA when compared with the control group. This information adds to the body of evidence that increased tibial slope places the proximal tibial physis under abnormal stress which may contribute to the development of pathologic conditions of proximal tibia such as OSD and tibial tubercle fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; retrospective comparative study.
Asunto(s)
Articulación de la Rodilla/patología , Osteocondrosis/patología , Tibia/patología , Fracturas de la Tibia/patología , Adolescente , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fémur , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Osteocondrosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor , Rótula , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after fusion have been associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and cost. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between implementation of blood-conservation strategies within the perioperative surgical home on transfusion rates for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing spinal fusion. METHODS: Two hundred and thirteen patients (44 preperioperative surgical home, 169 postperioperative surgical home) who underwent posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis between 23 June 2014, and 30 July 2017, were enrolled in this case control study. The perioperative surgical home implemented in March 2015 involved evidence-based perioperative interventions to create a standardized clinical pathway including judicious use of crystalloid management, restrictive transfusion strategy, routine use of cell saver, and standardized administration of anti-fibrinolytics. The primary outcome was odds of perioperative transfusion. Secondary outcomes included volumes of crystalloid, albumin, cell saver, packed red blood cells as well as calculated blood loss. Other variables that were documented included antibrinolytic total dose, mean arterial pressure, temperature, laboratory values, intrathecal morphine dosing, and surgical time. Statistical methods included t test and logistic regression. RESULTS: For the postperioperative surgical home, the odds of perioperative transfusion were 0.30 (95% CI 0.13-0.70), as compared to preperioperative surgical home. In terms of secondary outcomes, calculated blood loss was significantly lower in the postperioperative surgical home patients (27.0 mL/kg preperioperative surgical home vs 22.8 mL/kg postperioperative surgical home; mean difference = -0.24 [-0.44, -0.04]). Although no difference was noted in the amount of intraoperative cell saver or albumin administered, a reduction was noted in mean intraoperative crystalloid given postperioperative surgical home (41.4 mL/kg ± 20.4 mL/kg preperioperative surgical home vs 28.0 mL/kg ± 13.7 mL/kg postperioperative surgical home; log mean difference = 0.37 [95% CI 0.21-0.53], P < 0.001). Postperioperative surgical home patients also had a significantly higher temperature nadir (mean difference = -0.47 [95% CI -0.70 to -0.23]; P < 0.001), received a significantly higher total anti-fibrinolytic dose (mean difference = -3939 [95% CI -5364 to -2495]; P < 0.001), and were exposed to shorter surgical times (mean difference = 0.72 [95% CI 0.36-1.09]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of blood-conservation strategies as part of a perioperative surgical home for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spine fusion resulted in significant decrease in perioperative blood transfusions.
Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Sangre Autóloga/métodos , Atención Perioperativa , Fusión Vertebral , Adolescente , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Periodo Perioperatorio , Escoliosis/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2009, the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on the treatment of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures, which recommended a nonaccidental trauma (NAT) evaluation for all patients below 36 months of age. A recent study of these guidelines found <50% clinical compliance with this treatment recommendation. We aimed to identify areas for improvement in compliance with this guideline. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients presenting to a single pediatric tertiary care hospital with a diaphyseal femur fracture from January 2007 to June 2013 who were below 36 months old. Medical records were reviewed for documentation of a NAT evaluation, patient characteristics, presence of other fractures or injuries, and hospital of presentation. Radiographs were reviewed for fracture pattern. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for differences overall and before and after CPG publication. RESULTS: During the study period, 281 children below 36 months presented with femur fractures; 41% were evaluated for NAT. Overall, the following factors were significantly associated with receipt of a NAT evaluation: younger age (P<0.001), transfer from an outside facility (P=0.027), and identification of another fracture (P=0.004). Before publication of the CPG, nonwhite patients were much more likely to undergo NAT evaluation compared with white patients (43% vs. 19%; P=0.014). After publication of the CPGs, this differential disappeared (43% vs. 47%; P=0.685). Fracture pattern and patient sex did not influence receipt of NAT evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: We found poor utilization of NAT evaluation for patients below 36 months old presenting with femur fracture. Despite CPG publication, only modest improvements in this evaluation occurred over the study period, with less than half of all patients being evaluated. Younger children, patients transferred from other institutions, and patients presenting with concomitant fractures were more likely to undergo NAT evaluation. Compliance with the CPG may be improved by focusing on older children, patients who initially present to tertiary care centers, and those with an isolated femur fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.
Asunto(s)
Maltrato a los Niños/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas del Fémur/epidemiología , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico , Fracturas del Fémur/etiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) following posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis is a difficult complication, with little information published regarding the best preventative comprehensive care plan. The Spine Subgroup of the Quality, Safety, Value Initiative (QSVI) committee of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America undertook a survey to generate an overview of bundle elements in comprehensive SSI care bundles across institutions in North America. The purpose of this study was to develop a toolkit of SSI care bundle elements that could be used in developing future SSI care bundles. METHODS: A survey email was sent to pediatric orthopaedic surgeons requesting a copy of the SSI prevention care bundle used in their practice. Surgeons were included if they had participated in the 2016 POSNA QSVI challenge, indicated they performed pediatric spine surgery, and had a spine SSI bundle. These bundles were evaluated by the QSVI committee and divided into preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative elements with the frequency of use of each element recorded. A follow-up qualitative questionnaire was sent assessing the implementation and development of these SSI bundles. RESULTS: In total, 16 care bundles from 15 different institutions were included for review. The response rate for this survey was 44% of individuals (50/113 QSVI challenge participants) and 43% (15/35) of unique institutions. The most common elements included: use of preoperative antibiotics, use of preoperative chlorhexidine wipes, use of wound irrigation intraoperatively, and a standardized prescription for the length of postoperative antibiotic. Each of these elements was included in ≥75% of the SSI bundles evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: SSI care bundles are increasingly being used by pediatric institutions to lower the risk of SSI following pediatric spinal surgery. This study provides an overview of various care elements used in established SSI care bundles across multiple institutions in North America. It is hoped this data will provide institutions interested in developing their own SSI care bundle with useful information for beginning this process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V-Decision Analysis.
Asunto(s)
Control de Infecciones/métodos , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Escoliosis/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Servicios Preventivos de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Perioperative Surgical Home (PSH) is a patient-centered, team-based approach that aims to improve the value of perioperative care. We implemented a PSH for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who were undergoing posterior spinal fusion at Children's National Health System. We hypothesized that this PSH would improve patient surgical outcomes and reduce hospital length of stay (LOS). METHODS: A multidisciplinary group created evidence-based protocols for the preoperative, operative, postoperative, and postdischarge care of this patient population. After a 5-month design and training period, PSH for spinal fusion was implemented in March 2015, with reduction in LOS as the primary outcome measure. Anesthesia comanagement of patients additionally allowed a new pathway for patients to recover in the postanesthesia care unit and reduce intensive care unit utilization. Patients before and after the implementation of the PSH were compared on clinical and efficiency metrics. RESULTS: The spinal fusion PSH achieved the primary outcome measure by a significant reduction in LOS. Care improvement was illustrated by achievement of the secondary outcome measure of reduced perioperative transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: The PSH model presented a ready structure that proved successful at our institution for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior spinal fusion.
Asunto(s)
Atención Dirigida al Paciente/métodos , Pediatría/métodos , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Escoliosis/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Escoliosis/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medical liability exposure varies based on scope of practice, patient demographics, and location of practice. There is a generally held belief that treatment of pediatric patients increases one's medicolegal risk. We examined a large national database of orthopaedic malpractice claims to determine if pediatric malpractice claims were associated with a less favorable medicolegal outcome compared with adults. METHODS: Physician Insurers Association of America is an association of medical liability insurance carriers providing liability coverage for 60% of private practice physicians in the United States. The Physician Insurers Association of America data registry of closed medical liability claims was examined, including all orthopaedic claims between 1985 and 2012 in this review. Claims were categorized based on the age of the claimant (pediatric: less than 21 y, adult: 21 y or older). These groups were compared based on percentage of claims resulting in payment, indemnity paid, and years between occurrence of incident and filing of claim. In addition, the top 10 most prevalent claims were identified and compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 25,702 closed orthopaedic claims were included. Pediatric claims accounted for 13% of the data. The average time from incident to claim filing was 1.92 years for pediatrics and 1.59 years for adults. Pediatric claims resulted in a higher percent of payment (33% vs. 30%) and average indemnity paid ($189,732 vs. $180,171) compared with adults. Five of the top 10 conditions resulting in a claim in each group were the same. Comparing these 5 conditions, in general there were minimal differences in the average time to claim filing between the groups, but larger average indemnity paid in the pediatric group. CONCLUSIONS: There appear to be moderate differences in outcomes of orthopaedic malpractice claims between adult and pediatric patients. The longer statute of limitations associated with pediatric claims does not appear to portend a less favorable medicolegal outcome or excessively longer time to claims filing for pediatric patients.
Asunto(s)
Mala Praxis/estadística & datos numéricos , Ortopedia , Pediatría , Práctica Privada , Adulto , Niño , Compensación y Reparación , Humanos , Sistema de Registros , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Ultrasonography is a safe, cost-effective tool used to prenatally detect common musculoskeletal conditions, including clubfoot, skeletal dysplasias, limb-length discrepancies, spinal abnormalities, and hand and other upper extremity deformities. With increased detection of such abnormalities, prenatal parental counseling by orthopaedic surgeons is being requested more frequently. Counseling is important for family education on prognosis and treatment options. A thorough understanding of the common musculoskeletal conditions diagnosed on prenatal ultrasonography, classification of these conditions, and the correlations of these classifications to postnatal severity allows the orthopaedic surgeon to conduct well-informed counseling sessions with families. Accurate information and counseling aids parents in understanding their child's diagnosis, assists clinicians in planning treatment algorithms, and optimizes family preparedness.
Asunto(s)
Anomalías Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Consejo , Femenino , Humanos , Anomalías Musculoesqueléticas/embriología , EmbarazoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study calculated the rates of Unplanned Return to the Operating Room (UPROR) in early-onset scoliosis patients who had no previous spine surgery and underwent Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod (MCGR) implantation. METHODS: We reviewed surgical, radiographic, and UPROR outcomes for EOS patients treated with the MCGR implant < 12 years + 11 months of age, had complete preop/postop major curve measurements, and had complete MCGR details. RESULTS: 376 patients underwent MCGR implantation at a mean age of 7.7 years (1.8-12.9). Diagnoses included 106 (28%) idiopathic, 84 (22%) syndromic, 153 (41%) neuromuscular, and 33 (9%) congenital. The mean preop-cobb was 76.7° (9-145°), and an immediate postop correction was 41% (0-84%). We found that 38% (142/376) of patients experienced an UPROR prior to the maximal actuator length being achieved. UPROR occurred at mean 2 years (3 days-5 years) after initial implantation. Of the 142 patients who experienced UPROR there were 148 complications that lead to an UPROR. The most common reason for UPROR was anchor (55/148: 37%) or MCGR implant related (33/148: 22%). Wound related (22/148:15%), Neuro related 4/148: 3%), and other (34/148: 23%) accounted for the remaining UPROR occurrences. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the MCGR UPROR rate was 142/376 (38%) after an average of 2 years post implantation. At 2-year follow-up, only 20% of MCGR patients had experienced an UPROR. However, between 2 and 5 years, the development of an UPROR increased precipitously with only 39% of MCGR patients remaining UPROR free at 5 years post MCGR implantation. The most common reason for UPROR was related to anchor or MCGR implant-related complications. This information can be utilized to set realistic expectations about the need and timing of future surgical procedures with patients and their families.
Asunto(s)
Reoperación , Escoliosis , Humanos , Niño , Escoliosis/cirugía , Preescolar , Femenino , Masculino , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Lactante , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Quirófanos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The evolution of MCGR technique has led to modifications in the configuration of the proximal construct to decrease the incidence of implant-related complications (IRC) and revision surgeries. However, there is no data characterizing the performance of the most used configurations reducing the risk of complications. METHODS: 487 patients were identified from an international multicenter EOS database. INCLUSION CRITERIA: EOS patients, primary dual MCGR, complete radiographs, and minimum of 2-year follow-up. 76 patients had incomplete X-rays, 5 had apical fusions, and 18 had inconclusive complications, leaving 388 patients for review. A digital spine template was created to document UIV; number of levels; number, type, and location of anchors; as well as implant configuration. First available postoperative and latest follow-up radiographs were reviewed by two senior surgeons and two spine fellows. UPROR due to IRC was defined as any change in proximal anchors between the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs. RESULTS: The most common proximal construct configuration: UIV at T2 (50.0%) with 17.5% UPROR, followed by T3 (34.0%) with 12.1% UPROR; number of levels was three (57.1%) with 16.8% UPROR and two (26.0%) with 17.0% UPROR; number of proximal anchors was six (49.9%) with 14.1% UPROR and four (27.0%) with 18.3% UPROR. The most common anchors were all screws (42.0%) with 9.9% UPROR, and all hooks (26.4%) with 31.4% UPROR (P < 0.001). The construct with the lowest rate of UPROR was a UIV at T2, with six anchors (all screws) across three levels (42 cases), with 0% UPROR. Other construct combinations that yielded 0% UPROR rates were UIV of T3, six anchors (all screws) across three levels (25 cases), and a UIV of T3 with six anchors (screws and hooks) across three3 levels (9 cases). CONCLUSION: Proximal anchor configuration impacts the incidence of UPROR due to IRC in MCGR. UIV at T2 and T3 compared to T4, and the use of all screws or combination of screws and hooks compared to all hooks were associated with a lower UPROR rate. The most common construct configuration was T2 UIV, three levels, six anchors, and all screws. The use of a combination of six anchors (screws or screws and hooks) across three levels with a UIV at T2 or T3 was associated with a lower UPROR rate. Additional research is needed to further evaluate the variables contributing to configuration selection and their association with IRC.
Asunto(s)
Reoperación , Escoliosis , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Niño , Escoliosis/cirugía , Escoliosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Femenino , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adolescente , Quirófanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , PreescolarRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can be treated with instrumented fusion, but the number of anchors needed for optimal correction is controversial. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized study that included patients undergoing spinal fusion for single thoracic curves between 45° and 65°, the most common form of operatively treated AIS. Of the 211 patients randomized, 108 were assigned to a high-density screw pattern and 103, to a low-density screw pattern. Surgeons were instructed to use ≥1.8 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the high-implant-density group or ≤1.4 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the low-implant-density group. The primary outcome measure was the percent correction of the coronal curve at the 2-year follow-up. The power analysis for this trial required 174 patients to show equivalence, defined as a 95% confidence interval (CI) within a ±10% correction margin with a probability of 90%. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was equivalent between the high-density and low-density groups at the 2-year follow-up (67.6% versus 65.7%; difference, -1.9% [95% CI: -6.1%, 2.2%]). In the per-protocol cohorts, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was also equivalent between the 2 groups at the 2-year follow-up (65.0% versus 66.1%; difference, 1.1% [95% CI: -3.0%, 5.2%]). A total of 6 patients in the low-density group and 5 patients in the high-density group required reoperation (p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of spinal fusion for primary thoracic AIS curves between 45° and 65°, the percent coronal curve correction obtained with use of a low-implant-density construct and that obtained with use of a high-implant-density construct were equivalent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Cifosis , Escoliosis , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Adolescente , Escoliosis/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tornillos Óseos , Cifosis/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosAsunto(s)
Fusión Vertebral , Niño , Humanos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Atención PerioperativaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Segmental spinal dysgenesis (SSD) is a rare congenital spinal abnormality affecting the thoracic and lumbar region of the spine, as well as the spinal cord of neonates and infants. The purpose of the study was to analyze our institution's surgical case series to provide insights into our best practices to contribute to SSD management principles, while conducting a comprehensive literature review. METHODS: Following institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of SSD surgical cases was examined to observe clinical findings, radiographic findings, management, surgical intervention, and outcomes. Keywords in the comprehensive literature review included SSD, congenital spinal dysgenesis, congenital spinal stenosis, spinal aplasia, and surgery. RESULTS: Three cases underwent successful surgical management with either improvement or maintenance of neurological baseline. Patients were diagnosed at an average age of 2.7 months, while surgical intervention averaged at 40.3 months with fecal incontinence, neurogenic bladders, spinal cord compression, clubfoot, and concerns for worsening spinal deformity as surgical indicators. The average time for follow-up was 33.7 months and no complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Operative management for SSD is a clinically complex decision that requires multidisciplinary input and care. Patients should be observed at neurological baseline and receive intervention at the appropriate time to allow sufficient growth for functioning without permitting drastic disease progression. Consideration of patient size and spinal instrumentation are significant towards surgical success.
Asunto(s)
Médula Espinal , Columna Vertebral , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Región Lumbosacra , Procedimientos NeuroquirúrgicosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Standardized care pathways for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing PSF improve clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that having dedicated spine personnel would decrease surgical time and improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: 367 patients with AIS had a PSF within a standardized perioperative care pathway. Cases with 1-3 dedicated spine team members (any combination of circulating nurse, surgical technologist, and anesthesiologist) were compared to teams with none. The impact of individual members was also analyzed. Parametric or non-parametric tests were used for each outcome based on the distribution of the data points. These included one-way ANOVA models, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Surgical time and total OR time were significantly decreased with the participation of each additional dedicated team member resulting in 43.86 min less surgical time and 50.8 min less total OR time when three team members were present compared to no team members. If the nurse was a spine member, the surgical time was lower (p = 0.037). If the technologist was a team member, the surgical time and total OR time were lower (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively). Lastly, if the anesthesiologist was a member of the team, the anesthesia time was lower (p = 0.003). No significant clinical differences were observed. CONCLUSION: Having dedicated surgical team members decreases surgical and total OR time for AIS patients undergoing PSF, and this OR efficiency improves as the dedicated team is more robust. OR surgical teams did not influence clinical outcomes. Hospitals should strongly consider developing surgical teams to improve OR efficiency of PSF cases.
Asunto(s)
Cifosis , Escoliosis , Fusión Vertebral , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos , Humanos , Adolescente , Escoliosis/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Columna VertebralRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The etiology of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) has been shown to significantly influence baseline parent-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures as assessed by the Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ). We sought to assess the influence of distraction-based surgery and scoliosis etiology on EOSQ 2 years following surgical intervention remains unclear. METHODS: A retrospective review of a multi-center prospective EOS database was performed. Children untreated with distraction-based, growth friendly instrumentation for EOS with completed baseline and 2-year post-surgical EOSQ were included. Children were subdivided by curve etiology individually and in combined cohorts (congenital/idiopathic [C/I], neuromuscular/syndromic [NMS]). EOSQ domains and compositive HRQoL score at presentation and 2-year follow-up were compared across C-EOS etiologies. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as ≥ 20% change in domain score and compared across etiologies. RESULTS: 150 children with EOS met inclusion criteria (mean 7.09 ± 2.6 years, 58.9% female). There were no differences in EOSQ domains between Congenital vs. Idiopathic nor NM vs. Syndromic etiologies at any timepoint. Combined C/I children demonstrated significantly higher EOSQ scores than combined NMS at initial and 2-years post-treatment. Etiology remained the only independent predictor of 2-year EOSQ composite HRQoL score. Overall, the vast majority of children demonstrated stable HRQoL composite scores, with a trend toward more positive MCID in NMS etiologies. CONCLUSION: EOS etiology remains the most significant influence on EOSQ scores 2 years following surgical intervention. However, the majority of patients, regardless of etiology, maintain stable HRQoL scores suggesting that surgery may only serve to stabilize HRQoL at 2 years.
Asunto(s)
Escoliosis , Niño , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Escoliosis/cirugía , Escoliosis/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , PadresRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Cervical spine disorders in children are relatively uncommon; therefore, paradigms for surgical and nonsurgical clinical management are not well established. The purpose of this study was to bring together an international, multidisciplinary group of pediatric cervical spine experts to build consensus via a modified Delphi approach regarding the clinical management of children with cervical spine disorders and those undergoing cervical spine stabilization surgery. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to identify consensus statements for the management of children with cervical spine disorders requiring stabilization. A survey of current practices, supplemented by a literature review, was electronically distributed to 17 neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons experienced with the clinical management of pediatric cervical spine disorders. Subsequently, 52 summary statements were formulated and distributed to the group. Statements that reached near consensus or that were of particular interest were then discussed during an in-person meeting to attain further consensus. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% agreement on a 4-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree). RESULTS: Forty-five consensus-driven statements were identified, with all participants willing to incorporate them into their practice. For children with cervical spine disorders and/or stabilization, consensus statements were divided into the following categories: A) preoperative planning (12 statements); B) radiographic thresholds of instability (4); C) intraoperative/perioperative management (15); D) postoperative care (11); and E) nonoperative management (3). Several important statements reaching consensus included the following recommendations: 1) to obtain pre-positioning baseline signals with intraoperative neuromonitoring; 2) to use rigid instrumentation when technically feasible; 3) to provide postoperative external immobilization for 6-12 weeks with a rigid cervical collar rather than halo vest immobilization; and 4) to continue clinical postoperative follow-up at least until anatomical cervical spine maturity was reached. In addition, preoperative radiographic thresholds for instability that reached consensus included the following: 1) translational motion ≥ 5 mm at C1-2 (excluding patients with Down syndrome) or ≥ 4 mm in the subaxial spine; 2) dynamic angulation in the subaxial spine ≥ 10°; and 3) abnormal motion and T2 signal change on MRI seen at the same level. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the authors have demonstrated that a multidisciplinary, international group of pediatric cervical spine experts was able to reach consensus on 45 statements regarding the management of pediatric cervical spine disorders and stabilization. Further study is required to determine if implementation of these practices can lead to reduced complications and improved outcomes for children.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Niño , Humanos , Técnica Delphi , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Cuidados Posoperatorios , ConsensoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The focus of this modified Delphi study was to investigate and build consensus regarding the medical management of children with moderate and severe acute spinal cord injury (SCI) during their initial inpatient hospitalization. This impetus for the study was based on the AANS/CNS guidelines for pediatric SCI published in 2013, which indicated that there was no consensus provided in the literature describing the medical management of pediatric patients with SCIs. METHODS: An international, multidisciplinary group of 19 physicians, including pediatric neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, and intensivists, were asked to participate. The authors chose to include both complete and incomplete injuries with traumatic as well as iatrogenic etiologies (e.g., spinal deformity surgery, spinal traction, intradural spinal surgery, etc.) due to the overall low incidence of pediatric SCI, potentially similar pathophysiology, and scarce literature exploring whether different etiologies of SCI should be managed differently. An initial survey of current practices was administered, and based on the responses, a follow-up survey of potential consensus statements was distributed. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% of participants reaching agreement on a 4-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree). A final meeting was held virtually to generate final consensus statements. RESULTS: Following the final Delphi round, 35 statements reached consensus after modification and consolidation of previous statements. Statements were categorized into the following eight sections: inpatient care unit, spinal immobilization, pharmacological management, cardiopulmonary management, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, genitourinary management, gastrointestinal/nutritional management, and pressure ulcer prophylaxis. All participants stated that they would be willing or somewhat willing to change their practices based on consensus guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: General management strategies were similar for both iatrogenic (e.g., spinal deformity, traction, etc.) and traumatic SCIs. Steroids were recommended only for injury after intradural surgery, not after acute traumatic or iatrogenic extradural surgery. Consensus was reached that mean arterial pressure ranges are preferred for blood pressure targets following SCI, with goals between 80 and 90 mm Hg for children at least 6 years of age. Further multicenter study of steroid use following acute neuromonitoring changes was recommended.
RESUMEN
Toe walking is a bilateral gait abnormality in which a normal heel strike is absent and most weight bearing occurs through the forefoot. This abnormality may not be pathologic in patients aged <2 years, but it is a common reason for referral to an orthopaedic surgeon. Toe walking can be caused by several neurologic and developmental abnormalities and may be the first sign of a global developmental problem. Cases that lack a definitive etiology are categorized as idiopathic. A detailed history, with careful documentation of the developmental history, and a thorough physical examination are required in the child with a primary report of toe walking. Treatment is based on age and the severity of the abnormality. Management includes observation, stretching, casting, bracing, chemodenervation, and surgical lengthening of the gastrocnemius-soleus complex and/or Achilles tendon. An understanding of idiopathic toe walking as well as treatment options and their outcomes can help the physician individualize treatment to achieve optimal results.
Asunto(s)
Marcha/fisiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Caminata/fisiología , Humanos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/fisiopatología , Dedos del Pie/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Higher case volumes correlate with improved clinical outcomes across surgical specialties. This study establishes case volume benchmarks after completion of pediatric orthopedic fellowship training. Case logs for orthopedic surgery residents and pediatric orthopedic fellows at accredited programs were analyzed (2017-2018 to 2020-2021). Case volumes for pediatric orthopedic surgery were compared using parametric tests. Case logs from 3,000 orthopedic surgery residents and 149 pediatric orthopedic fellows were analyzed. There was an increase in total pediatric cases among orthopedic surgery residents over the study period (273 ± 68 to 285 ± 76, 1.1% annual increase, P<0.001). On average, pediatric orthopedic fellows reported 276 cases: Spine deformity (55 cases, 20%), foot and ankle deformity (45 cases, 16%), hip reconstruction (34 cases, 12%), limb deformity (32 cases, 12%), trauma lower limb (24 cases, 9%), treatment of supracondylar humerus fracture (23 cases, 8%), trauma upper limb (19 cases, 7%), clubfoot (18 cases, 7%), soft tissue procedures (13 cases, 5%), open treatment of femoral shaft fractures (6 cases, 2%), and treatment of infection (7 cases, 3%). Pediatric orthopedic fellows effectively doubled their pediatric case volume from fellowship training. The distribution of pediatric orthopedic fellow case volume percentiles was: 10th - 191 cases; 30th - 237 cases; 50th - 275 cases; 70th - 318 cases; 90th - 382 cases. Case volume benchmarks can help inform orthopedic trainees, faculty, and patients about the impact of pediatric orthopedic fellowship training. More research is needed to elucidate optimal training environments for future pediatric orthopedic surgeons.
RESUMEN
The national recommendations for school screening programs for scoliosis in the United States have undergone a shift in perspective over the past two decades. In 2004, the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommended against screening programs but changed its recommendation to be inconclusive in 2018. Early diagnosis of scoliosis can allow for close monitoring of the deformity and early initiation of bracing treatment when appropriate, with the goal of preventing costly and invasive surgical intervention. Several different diagnostic tools are available, including Adam's forward bending test alone, Adam's forward bending test with scoliometry, the humpometer, and Moiré topography, each with varying degrees of sensitivity and specificity. Controversy prevails over the cost efficacy of screening programs and possible unnecessary exposure of adolescents to radiation for confirmatory radiographs after a positive screening test. However, the recent definitive evidence of bracing treatment efficacy in slowing the progression of scoliotic curves and preventing the need for surgery indicates that school screening programs may still have a role in allowing early diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Escoliosis , Adolescente , Tirantes , Diagnóstico Precoz , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Escoliosis/diagnóstico , Escoliosis/terapia , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe the clinical and radiographic profile of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients treated with traditional growing rods (TGR) during the magnetically-controlled growing rod (MCGR) era. METHODS: A US multicenter EOS database was reviewed to identify (1) patients who underwent TGR after MCGR surgery was introduced at their institution, (2) patients who underwent MCGR during the same time period. Of 19 centers, 8 met criteria with all EOS etiologies represented. Clinical notes were reviewed to determine the indication for TGR. Patient demographics and pre-operative radiographs were compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 25 TGR and 127 MCGR patients were identified. The TGR patients were grouped by indication into the sagittal plane profile (n = 11), trunk height (n = 6), co-morbidities/need for MRI (n = 4), and other (ex: behavioral issues, remaining growth). Four patients had a combination of sagittal profile and short stature with sagittal profile listed as primary factor. The TGR short trunk group had a mean T1-S1 length of 192 mm vs 273 mm for the MCGR group (p = 0.0002). The TGR sagittal profile group, had a mean maximal kyphosis of 61° vs 55° for the MCGR group (p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: TGR continues to have a role in the MCGR era. In this study, the most commonly reported indications for TGR were sagittal plane profile and trunk height. These results suggest that TGR is indicated in patients of short stature with stiff hyperkyphotic curves. As further experience is gained with MCGR, the indications for TGR will likely be refined.