A cross-sectional study of healthcare provider perceptions of the management of epilepsy in pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa is high with a significant treatment gap. In this context, epilepsy presents substantial challenges to effective and safe reproductive and maternal healthcare. To improve this, it is important to understand the views and perceptions of healthcare professionals delivering epilepsy care to this population. METHODS: This study uses an online questionnaire which asked healthcare professionals (both from nursing and medical backgrounds) who work in sub-Saharan African countries to rate a set of pre-established options designed with the feedback of a local focus group of epilepsy experts from countries targeted. The questionnaire consisted of 21 questions and was a mix of multiple choice and Likert scale questions on managing reproductive health in women in local settings. RESULTS: Of 203 healthcare professionals respondents from over 10 countries majority were doctors (48%) or nurses (36%). The Gambia (28.6%), Nigeria (22.2%), Cameroon (13.3%) and Zambia (9.4%) accounted for nearly three-quarters of respondents. Over half (54%) felt that they have the necessary training to counsel women with epilepsy on reproductive health and pregnancy. Only 40% reported they regularly discuss family planning. Carbamazepine was reported to be the most used anti-seizure medication (ASM) for childbearing age women. Key challenges outlined were epilepsy awareness among patients and their families, information deficit on ASMs and pregnancy and access to a sufficient range of ASMs. CONCLUSION: Understanding the challenges faced by health professionals in sub-Sharan Africa, provides better comprehension of the specific "treatment-education gap" in counselling women with epilepsy on ASM risks and benefits.

Perceptions about mental healthcare for people with epilepsy in Africa.

BACKGROUND: Mental illness is commonly comorbid with epilepsy. In sub-Saharan Africa there exists limited access to neurological and psychiatric services predisposing to a "treatment gap" in epilepsy and mental healthcare. AIMS: To understand healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes, and management practices toward epilepsy and comorbid mental illness in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey following the STROBE guidance was conducted among healthcare providers in sub-Saharan Africa. Eleven questions looking to ascertain clinician demographics, knowledge of epilepsy, and comorbid mental illness as well as management practices were developed. FINDINGS: Of 203 responses most (92%) respondents recognized a bi-directional relationship between mental health and epilepsy. However, mental illness screening in people newly diagnosed with epilepsy was infrequently performed (14%). Only 1 in 7 (16%) respondents had high confidence in their clinical competence at managing psychiatric comorbidities. Most would value further training (74%) and improvements to be made in current management practices within their local healthcare settings (94%). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study highlights the need to improve the awareness of management of mental disorders in populations with epilepsy within sub-Saharan Africa in health providers there.

Survey of the perceived treatment gap in status epilepticus care across Sub-Saharan countries from the perspective of healthcare providers.

BACKGROUND: Status epilepticus (SE) is a serious condition disproportionately affecting Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. Little is known about healthcare provider experiences. This study investigated the healthcare provider perspective of SE care. METHODS: A pilot questionnaire was developed for healthcare professionals in SSA countries. It was distributed online at a conference concerning epilepsy care and local coordinators distributed the questionnaire in their networks. It was available online between 16th Jan and 1st Feb 2021. The unvalidated questionnaire questioned practitioner demographics, experience, confidence in SE care, common etiologies encountered, anticipated prognosis in their setting, available treatments, and barriers to care. We assessed practitioner perceptions not their knowledge base around SE care. Thematic analysis was used for open-ended questions. RESULTS: Fifty nine responses were received from 11 countries. Respondents (44% nurses, 46% doctors) reported poor level of adequate SE training (mean self-reported confidence in training 2.9/10 (0/10 very inadequate and 10/10 very adequate training). Delays in arriving at hospital were common with 15 (32%) taking three or more hours and 28 (62%) proposing transport issues and distance were the main reasons for delay. Urban location was significantly associated with clinician confidence. Less than 20% used prehospital benzodiazepine treatment. 46 (78%) stated benzodiazepines were first-line hospital drug management, and 52 (88%) indicated alternative second-line hospital treatments were available. CONCLUSION: A substantial perceived treatment gap in the management of SE in SSA is identified by staff working in SSA. Key issues are around staff training, patient education, medication access, and compliance.