Frailty in patients with IDH-mutant gliomas: experience from a high-volume tumor center.

PURPOSE: Gliomas are increasingly diagnosed in an aging population, with treatment outcomes influenced by factors like tumor genetics and patient frailty. This study focused on IDH-mutant gliomas and assessed how frailty affects 30-day readmission and overall survival (OS). We aimed to address a gap in understanding the impact of frailty on this specific glioma subtype. METHODS: 136 patients with an IDH-mutant glioma between 2007 and 2021 were identified at our institution. High frailty was classified by scores ≥ 1 on the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) and ≥ 3 on the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Patient and tumor characteristics including age, sex, race, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), Body Mass Index (BMI), tumor type and location, type of operation, and therapy course were recorded. Outcomes measured included 30-day readmission and overall survival (OS). Analysis was conducted utilizing logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Of the 136 patients, 52 (38%) had high frailty: 18 with CCI ≥ 3, 34 with mFI-5 ≥ 1. High frailty correlated with increased BMI (CCI: 30.2, mFI-5: 30.1 kg/m2), more neurological deficits (CCI: 61%, mFI-5: 56%), and older age at surgery (CCI: 63, mFI-5: 48 years). Hospital readmission within 30 days occurred in 8 (5.9%) patients. Logistic regression indicated no significant difference in 30-day readmission rates (CCI: p = 0.30, mFI-5: p = 0.62) or median OS between high and low frailty groups. However, patients treated at our institution with newly diagnosed tumors with high mFI-5 had a 6.79 times higher adjusted death hazard than those with low mFI-5 (p = .049). CONCLUSION: Our analysis revealed that CCI and mFI-5 were not significantly associated with 30-day nor OS. However, in patients with non-recurrent tumors, there was a significant association of mFI-5 with OS. Further study of frailty with larger cohorts is warranted to enhance prognostication of outcome after neurosurgical treatment.

Revision of failed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with reverse: short-term clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of failed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is increasing. This can often present a challenging clinical situation with substantial bone loss and limited reconstruction options. This study reports a single tertiary referral center's experience with revision of failed rTSA managed with revision rTSA of bone-interfacing components. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, all revision shoulder arthroplasty cases performed at a single institution between 2012 and 2020 were reviewed. Cases in which rTSA was revised to a new rTSA construct with revision of at least 1 bone-interfacing implant (humeral stem and/or baseplate) with a minimum 2-year follow-up were identified. Characteristics of revision cases-including indications, bony stock, revised components, and use of bone graft-were collected. All patients were contacted for patient-reported outcome measures at a minimum of 2 years after surgery. In addition, the incidence and indication for any reoperation after revision were determined. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with an average age of 66 years (range: 46-82 years), with 19 (58%) being female, met the inclusion criteria and had a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (range: 2-8 years). The most common indication for revision rTSA included humeral component loosening (33%; 11/33), baseplate loosening (27%; 9/33), and instability (21%; 7/33). Prerevision infectious workup demonstrated no cases of periprosthetic shoulder infection. Thirteen cases had massive bone loss-5 treated with humeral allograft prosthetic composite, 5 with glenoid bone grafting, and 3 with custom glenoid implant. In total, 10 of 33 cases (30%) required reoperation at a mean of 13 months (range: 1-44 months) for instability (4), humeral loosening (2), infection (1), baseplate loosening (1), or periprosthetic fracture (1). The reoperation rate for patients with revised baseplates only, humerus only, or combined was 23% (3/13), 28% (5/18), and 27% (3/11), respectively. Overall, the visual analog scale pain score improved from 6.5 preoperatively to 2.0 (P < .001), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 30.7 to 67.5 (P < .001). However, the postoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score averaged only 51.2% (range: 2-100%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that failed rTSA can be salvaged with a revision rTSA. However, patient expectations for functional improvements should be tempered, and a high reoperation rate should be expected.

Three-dimensional analysis of biplanar glenoid deformities: what are they and can they be virtually reconstructed with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty implants?

BACKGROUND: Descriptions of glenoid deformities in glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) have focused on the axial plane. Less is known regarding arthritic glenoids with higher amounts of superior inclination and little evidence exists to guide management of inclination or combined version-inclination deformity when performing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). We hypothesized that biplanar deformities (BD) would be present in a higher proportion of GHOA patients than previously appreciated, and these deformities would be difficult to adequately reconstruct with contemporary aTSA implants. METHODS: A retrospective query was performed of GHOA patients indicated for TSA 2012-2017 with a computed tomography (CT) scan within three months of surgery. Images were uploaded to three-dimensional (3D) software for automated measurements. Glenoids with superior inclination ≥10°, and retroversion ≥20° were considered to have BD. Walch classification was determined, and C-type glenoids were excluded. Rotator-cuff muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured and fatty infiltration was graded. Glenoids with BD were virtually planned for aTSA with correction to neutral inclination and version, then with 5° superior inclination and 10° retroversion. RESULTS: Two-hundred and sixty-eight shoulders in 250 patients were included; average age was 65 years, 67% male. There were no differences in inclination between Walch types (P = .25). Twenty-nine shoulders with BD were identified (11%). These deformities were not associated with age (P = .47) or gender (P = .50) but were skewed towards Walch B-type, specifically B2 (P = .03). Acromial index and posterior humeral head subluxation were higher in BD patients (P = .04, P < .001, respectively). Biplanar deformities had similar cuff CSA compared to those without but were less frequently associated with fatty infiltration of the subscapularis (P = .05). When correcting to neutral version and inclination, 41% BD could not be reconstructed. Of those that could, 94% required augmented implants. When correcting to 5° superior inclination and 10° retroversion, 10% could not be reconstructed. Of those that could, 58% required augmented implants. With partial correction, augment use was predicted by retroversion >26° (P = .009). Inclination did not predict augment use (P = .90). Final implant position commonly involved unseating in the posterosuperior quadrant and cancellous exposure in the anteroinferior quadrant. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective computed tomography (CT)-based study of 268 shoulders with GHOA found an 11% prevalence of BD. These deformities were commonly associated with Walch B2 wear patterns. Virtual aTSA planning showed a high failure rate (41%) when correcting to neutral version and inclination. Posteriorly augmented implants were frequently required, and often still involved unseating in the posterosuperior quadrant, increased cancellous exposure in the anteroinferior quadrant, and vault perforation.

Predictors of pain development for contralateral asymptomatic degenerative rotator cuff tears based on features of an ipsilateral painful cuff tear: a prospective longitudinal cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Prior rotator cuff disease natural history studies have focused on tear-related factors that predict disease progression within a given shoulder. The purpose of this study was to examine both patient- and tear-related characteristics of a painful rotator cuff tear that predict future pain development and functional impairment in a shoulder with a contralateral asymptomatic cuff tear. METHODS: This was a prospective longitudinal cohort study of patients aged ≤65 years who underwent surgery for a painful degenerative rotator cuff tear and possessed an asymptomatic contralateral tear. Patients were followed up prospectively by shoulder ultrasound, physical examination, and functional score assessment. The primary outcome was change in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score at 2 years. Secondary outcomes included the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) depression and anxiety scores, and Veterans RAND-12 (VR-12) mental component score (MCS). RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included, with a mean follow-up period of 37 months (range, 24-42 months). In 17 patients (26%), contralateral shoulder pain developed at a median of 15.2 months (interquartile range [IQR], 10.5 months). No difference in age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, or occupational demand was noted between patients in whom pain developed and those in whom pain did not develop. In the presenting painful shoulder, there was no difference in baseline tear size, muscle degeneration, or biceps pathology between groups. The mean baseline tear length (8.6 mm vs. 3.8 mm, P = .0008) and width (8.4 mm vs. 3.2 mm, P = .0004) were larger in asymptomatic shoulders in which pain subsequently developed compared with those in which pain did not develop. However, there was no difference in mean tear enlargement (P = .51 for length and P = .90 for width). There were no differences in baseline ASES, WORC, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), or HADS depression and anxiety scores between shoulders in which pain developed and those in which pain did not develop; however, patients in whom pain developed reported a lower baseline VR-12 MCS (53.3 vs. 57.6, P = .04). Shoulders in which pain developed had higher visual analog scale pain scores (2.9 [standard deviation (SD), 2.5] vs. 0.6 [SD, 1.0]; P = .016), lower ASES scores 75 [SD, 33] vs. 100 [SD, 11.6]; P = .001), and significant changes in all WORC scales with pain onset compared with those that remained asymptomatic. The study showed no significant difference in changes in the HADS anxiety and depression scores but found a significant increase in the VR-12 MCS in patients in whom pain developed (7.1 [interquartile range, 12.6] vs. -1.9 [interquartile range, 8.7]; P = .036). CONCLUSION: In one-quarter of patients with painful cuff tears, pain developed in a contralateral asymptomatic cuff tear that resulted in a measurable decline in function within 3 years. Our analysis showed that only the baseline tear size of the asymptomatic shoulder was predictive of pain development. There were no tear-related features of the presenting painful rotator cuff tear or indices of mental health and physical function or occupational demand that were predictive of future pain development at short-term follow-up.

ABTC-0904: targeting glioma stem cells in GBM: a phase 0/II study of hedgehog pathway inhibitor GDC-0449.

PURPOSE: Gliomagenesis and resistance of glioblastoma (GBM) are believed to be mediated by glioma stem cells (GSC). Evidence suggests that SHH signaling promotes GSC proliferation and self-renewal. METHODS: ABTC-0904 was a two-arm, multicenter phase 0/II study of GDC-0449, an oral inhibitor of Smoothened (SMO) in patients undergoing resection for recurrent GBM. All patients (Arms I and II) had surgery and received drug post-operatively. Only patients in Arm I received drug prior to surgery. The primary objective was to determine 6-month progression free survival (PFS-6). Secondary endpoints include median PFS (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS), response rate, and toxicity. Correlative studies included bioanalysis of GDC-0449, and inhibition of SHH signaling, GSC proliferation and self-renewal. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were enrolled. Pharmacokinetics of GDC-0449 in plasma demonstrated levels within expected therapeutic range in 75% of patients. The proportion of tumorcells producing CD133+ neurospheres, neurosphere proliferation, self-renewal, and expression of the SHh downstream signaling was significantly decreased in Arm I following GDC-0449 treatment (p < 0.005; p < 0.001 respectively) compared to Arm II (no drug pre-op). Treatment was well tolerated. There were no objective responders in either arm. Overall PFS-6 was 2.4% (95% CI 0.9-11.1%). Median PFS was 2.3 months (95% CI 1.9-2.6) and mOS was 7.8 months (95% CI 5.4-10.1). CONCLUSIONS: GDC-0449 was well tolerated, reached tumor, and inhibited CD133+ neurosphere formation, but had little clinical efficacy as a single agent in rGBM. This suggests growth and maintenance of rGBM is not solely dependent on the SHH pathway thus targeting SMO may require combined approaches.

Rapid detection of isthmus block and rhythm change using local electrogram changes during complex atrial flutter ablation.

AIMS: Multiple re-entry circuits may operate simultaneously in the atria in the form of dual loop re-entry using a common isthmus, or multiple re-entrant loops without a common isthmus. When two or more re-entrant circuits coexist, ablation of an individual isthmus may lead to a seamless transition (without significant changes in surface electrocardiogram, coronary sinus activation or tachycardia cycle length) to a second rhythm, and the isthmus block can go unnoticed. METHODS AND RESULTS: We hypothesize and subsequently illustrate in three patient cases, methods to rapidly identify a transition in the rhythm and isthmus block using local electrogram changes at the ablation site. CONCLUSION: Local activation sequence changes, electrogram timing, and the behaviour of pre-existing double potentials can reveal isthmus block promptly when rhythm transitions occur during ablation of multiloop re-entry tachycardias.

Clinical and descriptive characteristics associated with high-grade meningioma in a large clinical series.

PURPOSE: We studied 571 patients with intracranial meningioma for clinical characteristics and tumor location associated with high grade meningioma (WHO II/III). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were participants in a multicentre epidemiologic study of risk factors for primary brain tumors including meningioma recruited from September 2005 to November 2019. We included patients 18 or older with a recent diagnosis of a primary intracranial meningioma of any subtype (ICD9/10: 9530-0, 9531-0, 9532-0, 9537-0, 9533-0, 9534-0, 9530-0, 9538-1, 9538-3) who were enrolled at neuro-oncology and neuro-surgery clinics in the southeastern U.S. RESULTS: The median patient age was 58 years (IQR: 48-68) and the majority of patients were female (n = 415; 72.7%) and Caucasian (n = 516; 90.4%). Most patients were symptomatic (n = 460; 80.6%) and their tumours more commonly occurred in a non-skull base location (n = 298; 52.2%). A total of 86 patients (15.0%) had a WHO grade II/III meningioma. Compared to patients with WHO grade I tumours, patients with WHO II/III meningiomas were over 3-times more likely to be male (odds ratio (OR): 3.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.98, 5.35) adjusting for age, race, symptomatic presentation, and skull-based location. Moreover, a WHO grade II/III meningioma was substantially less likely to be observed in asymptomatic patients (OR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.42), and in patients with a skull-based tumour (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.66), adjusting for other factors. Male gender, symptomatic tumour, and a non-skull base location were independently associated with WHO grade II/III meningioma. CONCLUSION: These findings may shed additional light on the underlying pathogenesis of meningioma.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of adults with progressive glioblastoma update: introduction and methods.

INTRODUCTION: The management of glioblastoma at the time of progression is an important facet of all physicians involved in neuro-oncology. This is an update of the evidence-based guidelines for management of progressive glioblastoma published by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons and American Association of Neurological Surgeons in 2014. METHODS: The medical literature from July 1, 2012 through March 31, 2019 was searched in MEDLINE® and Embase® and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry, and Cochrane Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects to determine if information was available to update, modify or create new recommendations related to imaging, cytoreductive surgery, neuropathology, radiotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. RESULTS: The writing group utilized the information from the updated literature search to formulate recommendations that were exclusively evidence based and not founded on potentially biased consensus or expert opinion. CONCLUSION: The series of guideline documents provides an update of the information and recommendations that could be derived in the 2014 version. It sets a benchmark as to what we really know about the management of this difficult disease. It also provides clues to key investigations that are necessary to move us toward truly effective disease control.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of radiation therapy in the management of progressive and recurrent glioblastoma in adults.

TARGET POPULATION: These recommendations apply to adult patients (18 years of age and above) with progressive/recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (pGBM) after first line combined multimodality treatment. QUESTION: Can re-irradiation (by using conventional radiotherapy, fractionated radiosurgery, or single fraction radiosurgery) be used in patients with pGBM after the first adjuvant combined multimodality treatment with radiation and chemotherapy? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: When the target tumor is amenable for additional radiation, re-irradiation is recommended as it provides improved local tumor control, as measured by best imaging response. Such re-irradiation can take the form of conventional fractionation radiotherapy, fractionated radiosurgery, or single fraction radiosurgery. LEVEL III: Re-Irradiation is recommended in order to maintain or improve a patient's neurological status and quality of life prior to any further tumor progression.

Letter to the Editor.

PURPOSE: The new "Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines Update on the Role of Neuropathology in the Management of Progressive Glioblastoma in Adults" was recently published in this journal. This was published using the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System terminology. The wording for the new update on the role of neuropathology for progressive glioblastoma now warrants being updated to the new WHO 2021 classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System to bring it into line with current parlance. METHODS: The content of the WHO 2021 Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System terminology was reviewed to determine which components of the updated terminology for glioblastoma apply to the new guideline. RESULTS: Upon review of the content of the WHO 2021 Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System, "glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype WHO grade 4" was deemed closest to the tumors referred to as glioblastoma in the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System terminology as used in the new guideline. CONCLUSION: The term "glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype WHO grade 4" was chosen for this update and substituted for "glioblastoma" in the questions and recommendations for the "Update on the Role of Neuropathology in the Management of Progressive Glioblastoma".

Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of cytoreductive surgery in the management of progressive glioblastoma in adults.

QUESTION: In patients with previously diagnosed glioblastoma who are suspected of experiencing progression, does repeat cytoreductive surgery improve progression free survival or overall survival compared to alternative interventions? TARGET POPULATION: These recommendations apply to adults with previously diagnosed glioblastoma who are suspected of experiencing progression of the neoplastic process and are amenable to surgical resection. RECOMMENDATION: Level II: Repeat cytoreductive surgery is recommended in progressive glioblastoma patients to improve overall survival.

Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of neuropathology in the management of progressive glioblastoma in adults.

TARGET POPULATION: These recommendations apply to adult patients with progressive or recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). QUESTION: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma does testing for Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 or 2 mutations provide new additional management or prognostic information beyond that derived from the tumor at initial presentation? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: Repeat IDH mutation testing is not necessary if the tumor is histologically similar to the primary tumor and the patient's clinical course is as expected. QUESTION: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma does repeat testing for MGMT promoter methylation provide new or additional management or prognostic information beyond that derived from the tumor at initial presentation and what methods of detection are optimal? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: Repeat MGMT promoter methylation is not recommended. QUESTION: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma does EGFR amplification or mutation testing provide management or prognostic information beyond that provided by histologic analysis and if performed on previous tissue samples, does it need to be repeated? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: In cases that are difficult to classify as glioblastoma on histologic features EGFR amplification testing may help in classification. If a previous EGFR amplification was detected, repeat testing is not necessary. Repeat EGFR amplification or mutational testing may be recommended in patients in which target therapy is being considered. QUESTION: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma does large panel or whole genome sequencing provide management or prognostic information beyond that derived from histologic analysis? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: Primary or repeat large panel or whole genome sequencing may be considered in patients who are eligible or interested in molecularly guided therapy or clinical trials. QUESTION: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma should immune checkpoint biomarker testing be performed to provide management and prognostic information beyond that obtained from histologic analysis? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: The current evidence does not support making PD-L1 or mismatch repair (MMR) enzyme activity a component of standard testing. QUESTION: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma are there meaningful biomarkers for bevacizumab responsiveness and does their assessment provide additional information for tumor management and prognosis beyond that learned by standard histologic analysis? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: No established Bevacizumab biomarkers are currently available based upon the inclusion criteria of this guideline.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of cytotoxic chemotherapy and other cytotoxic therapies in the management of progressive glioblastoma in adults.

TARGET POPULATION: These recommendations apply to adult patients diagnosed with progressive glioblastoma (pGBM). QUESTION (Q1): In adult patients with pGBM does the use of temozolomide (TMZ) with alternative dosing or the use of TMZ in combination with other cytotoxic treatments result in increased overall survival compared to other chemotherapy? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: Adult patients with pGBM might derive benefit in treatment with TMZ, especially those who progress after more than 5 months of TMZ-treatment free interval. LEVEL III: Combination of TMZ with other cytotoxic agents such as nitrosourea, cisplatin, electrohyperthermia, or tamoxifen is not suggested in adult patients with pGBM as a stand-alone therapy. There is insufficient data to make a recommendation about which alternative TMZ dosing provides the best benefits. QUESTION (Q2): In adult patients with pGBM does the use of systemic or in situ nitrosourea result in increased overall survival compared to other chemotherapy? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: In the setting of pGBM, fotemustine is suggested in elderly patients with methylated MGMT promoter status. There is insufficient evidence to compare fotemustine to other nitrosoureas. There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation about the use of in situ nitrosourea in patients with pGBM who underwent the Stupp regimen. QUESTION (Q3): In adult patients with pGBM does the use of platinum compounds and topoisomerase result in increased survival compared to other chemotherapy? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: Other chemotherapy including platinum compounds and topoisomerase inhibitors are not suggested to be used in adult patients with pGBM. LEVEL III: Other cytotoxic therapies like perillyl acohol or ketogenic diet are not suggested for use in adult patients with pGBM as a stand-alone therapy. QUESTION (Q4): In adult patients with pGBM does the use of tumor treating field (TTF) result in increased overall survival compared to chemotherapy? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: The use of TTF with other chemotherapy may be considered when treating adult patients with pGBM. There is insufficient evidence to recommend TTF to increase overall survival in adult patients with pGBM. QUESTION (Q5): In adult patients with pGBM does the use of oncolytic virotherapy result in increased survival compared to chemotherapy? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: Oncolytic virotherapy is not suggested in patients with pGBM.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of imaging in the management of progressive glioblastoma in adults.

TARGET POPULATION: These recommendations apply to adults with glioblastoma who have been previously treated with first-line radiation or chemoradiotherapy and who are suspected of experiencing tumor progression. QUESTION: In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, is standard contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging including diffusion weighted imaging useful for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes? LEVEL II: Magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement including diffusion weighted imaging is recommended as the imaging surveillance method to detect the progression of previously diagnosed glioblastoma. QUESTION: In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, does magnetic resonance spectroscopy add useful information for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes beyond that derived from standard magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement? LEVEL II: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy is recommended as a diagnostic method to differentiate true tumor progression from treatment-related imaging changes or pseudo-progression in patients with suspected progressive glioblastoma. QUESTION: In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, does magnetic resonance perfusion add useful information for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes beyond that derived from standard magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement? LEVEL III: Magnetic resonance perfusion is suggested as a diagnostic method to differentiate true tumor progression from treatment-related imaging changes or pseudo-progression in patients with suspected progressive glioblastoma. QUESTION: In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, does the addition of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) provide additional useful information for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes beyond that derived from standard magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement? LEVEL III: Single-photon emission computed tomography imaging is suggested as a diagnostic method to differentiate true tumor progression from treatment-related imaging changes or pseudo-progression in patients with suspected progressive glioblastoma. QUESTION: In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, does 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography add useful information for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes beyond that derived from standard magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement? LEVEL III: The routine use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to identify progression of glioblastoma is not recommended. QUESTION: In patients with previously treated glioblastoma, does positron emission tomography with amino acid agents add useful information for diagnosing tumor progression and differentiating progression from treatment-related changes beyond that derived from standard magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement? LEVEL III: It is suggested that amino acid positron emission tomography be considered to assist in the differentiation of progressive glioblastoma from treatment related changes.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of targeted therapies and immunotherapies in the management of progressive glioblastoma.

The following questions and recommendations are pertinent to the following: TARGET POPULATION: These recommendations apply to adults with progressive GBM who have undergone standard primary treatment with surgery and/or chemoradiation. QUESTION 1: In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of bevacizumab as monotherapy superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: Treatment with bevacizumab is suggested in the treatment of progressive GBM, as it provides improved disease control compared to historical controls as measured by best imaging response and progression free survival at 6 months, while not providing evidence for improvement in overall survival. QUESTION 2: In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of bevacizumab as combination therapy with cytotoxic agents superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: There is insufficient evidence to show benefit or harm of bevacizumab in combination with cytotoxic therapies in progressive glioblastoma due to a lack of evidence supporting a clearly defined benefit without significant toxicity. QUESTION 3: In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of bevacizumab as a combination therapy with targeted agents superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival? RECOMMENDATION: There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question. QUESTION 4: In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of targeted agents as monotherapy superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival? RECOMMENDATION: There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question. QUESTION 5: In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of targeted agents in combination with cytotoxic therapies superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival? RECOMMENDATION: There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question. QUESTION 6: In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of immunotherapy monotherapy superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival? RECOMMENDATION: There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question. QUESTION 7: In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of immunotherapy in combination with targeted agents superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival? RECOMMENDATION: There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question. QUESTION 8: In adults with progressive glioblastoma is the use of immunotherapy in combination with bevacizumab superior to standard salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy as measured by progression free survival and overall survival? RECOMMENDATION: There is insufficient evidence to support a recommendation regarding this question.

Clinical and radiographic characteristics of diffuse astrocytic glioma, IDH-wildtype, with molecular features of glioblastoma: a single institution review.

PURPOSE: Genetic analyses of gliomas have identified key molecular features that impact treatment paradigms beyond conventional histomorphology. Despite at-times lower grade histopathologic appearances, IDH-wildtype infiltrating gliomas expressing certain molecular markers behave like higher-grade tumors. For IDH-wildtype infiltrating gliomas lacking traditional features of glioblastoma, these markers form the basis for the novel diagnosis of diffuse astrocytic glioma, IDH-wildtype (wt), with molecular features of glioblastoma (GBM), WHO grade-IV (DAG-G). However, given the novelty of this approach to diagnosis, literature detailing the exact clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic findings associated with these tumors remain in development. METHODS: Data for 25 patients matching the DAG-G diagnosis were obtained from our institution's retrospective database. Information regarding patient demographics, treatment regimens, radiographic imaging, and genetic pathology were analyzed to determine association with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The initial radiographic findings, histopathology, and symptomatology of patients with DAG-G were similar to lower-grade astrocytomas (WHO grade 2/3). Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) associated with our cohort, however, were similar to that of IDH-wt GBM, indicating a more severe clinical course than expected from other associated features (15.1 and 5.39 months respectively). CONCLUSION: Despite multiple features similar to lower-grade gliomas, patients with DAG-G experience clinical courses similar to GBM. Such findings reinforce the need for biopsy and subsequent analysis of molecular features associated with any astrocytoma regardless of presenting characteristics.

82Rubidium chloride positron emission tomography discrimination of recurrent intracranial malignancy from radiation necrosis.

BACKGROUND: Accurate identification and discrimination of post treatment changes from recurrent disease remains a challenge for patients with intracranial malignancies despite advances in molecular and magnetic resonance imaging. We have explored the ability of readily available Rubidium-82 chloride (82RbCl) positron emission tomography (PET) to identify and distinguish progressive intracranial disease from radiation necrosis in patients previously treated with radiation therapy. METHODS: Six patients with a total of 9 lesions of either primary (N.=3) or metastatic (N.=6) intracranial malignancies previously treated with stereotactic radiation surgery (SRS) and persistent contrast enhancement on MRI underwent brain 82RbCl PET imaging. Two patients with arteriovenous malformations previously treated with SRS, also had brain 82RbCl PET imaging for a total of 11 lesions studied. Histological confirmation via stereotactic biopsy/excisional resection was obtained for 9 lesions with the remaining 2 classified as either recurrent tumor or radiation necrosis based on subsequent MRI examinations. 82RbCl PET time activity curve analysis was performed which comprised lesion SUVmax, contralateral normal brain SUVmax, and tumor to background ratios (TBmax). RESULTS: 82RbCl demonstrates uptake greater than normal brain parenchyma in all lesions studied. Time activity curves demonstrated progressive uptake of 82RbCl in all lesions without evidence of washout. While recurrent disease demonstrated a greater mean SUVmax compared to radiation necrosis, no statistically significant difference between lesion SUVmax nor TBmax was found (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 82RbCl PET produces high-contrast uptake of both recurrent disease and radiation necrosis compared to normal brain. However, no statistically significant difference was found between recurrent tumor and radiation necrosis.

Left atrial hypertension and the risk of early incident heart failure after atrial fibrillation ablation.

INTRODUCTION: Elevated left atrial pressure (LAP) during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence, but it is unknown if this correlates with heart failure (HF). The objective of the study was to determine if elevated LAP after AF ablation correlates with HF events. METHODS: Prospective, single-center, cohort study measuring LAP and right atrial pressure (RAP) during AF ablation in 100 patients. The primary endpoint was clinical HF within 30 days of ablation. The secondary outcome was AF-free HF. RESULTS: One hundred patients (63% male, mean age 64.5) were enrolled and 20% had clinical HF within 30 days. Bivariate correlates included mitral valve (MV) disease, persistent AF, class III antiarrhythmics, LAP, and recurrent AF. Multivariate analysis revealed class III antiarrhythmics were protective (odds ratio [OR]: 0.24 [0.1-0.5], p = .04), while MV disease (OR: 8.7 [3.3-23], p = .03) and loop diuretics (OR: 4.8 [2.6-9.1], p = .01) were hazardous. AF-free HF occurred in 9% of patients and correlated with higher LAP and RAP, and chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSION: Patients with HF after AF ablation had higher LAP. MV disease, diuretic use, and class III antiarrhythmics also correlated to HF. These present opportunities to target future interventions to reduce a common complication of AF ablation.

Guidelines in the management of CNS tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines in the management of central nervous system tumors (CNS) continue to be developed and updated through the work of the Joint Section on Tumors of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS). METHODS: The guidelines are created using the most current and clinically relevant evidence using systematic methodologies, which classify available data and provide recommendations for clinical practice. CONCLUSION: This update summarizes the Tumor Section Guidelines developed over the last five years for non-functioning pituitary adenomas, low grade gliomas, vestibular schwannomas, and metastatic brain tumors.

3D whole-brain metabolite imaging to improve characterization of low-to-intermediate grade gliomas.

PURPOSE: MRI is the standard imaging modality used for diagnosis, treatment planning, and post-treatment management of gliomas. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1w) MRI is used to plan biopsy and radiation for grade IV gliomas but is less effective for grade II and III gliomas (i.e., low-to-intermediate grade gliomas) which may have minimal or no enhancement. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) is an advanced MRI technique that has been shown, to improve diagnostic yield of biopsy and target delineation for grade IV glioma. The purpose of this study is to determine if MRSI can improve characterization and tissue sampling of low-to-intermediate grade gliomas. METHODS: Prospective grade II and grade III glioma patients were enrolled to undergo whole brain high-resolution MRSI prior to tissue sampling. Choline/N-acetyl-aspartate (Cho/NAA) maps were overlaid on anatomic imaging and imported into stereotactic biopsy software. Patients were treated with standard-of-care surgery and radiation. Volumes of spectroscopically abnormal tissue were generated and compared with anatomic imaging and areas of enhancing recurrence on follow-up imaging. RESULTS: Ten patients had pathologic diagnosis of grade II (n = 4) or grade III (n = 6) with a median follow-up of 27.3 months. Five patients had recurrence, and regions of recurrence were found to overlap with metabolically abnormal regions on MRSI at the time of diagnosis. CONCLUSION: MRSI in low-to-intermediate grade glioma patients is predictive of areas of subsequent recurrence. Larger studies are needed to determine if MRSI can be used to guide surgical and radiation treatment planning in these patients.