Gene expression profiling and multiplex immunofluorescence analysis of bullous pemphigoid immune-related adverse event reveal upregulation of toll-like receptor 4/complement-induced innate immune response and increased density of TH 1 T-cells.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based cancer therapies cause a variety of cutaneous immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including immunobullous skin eruptions like bullous pemphigoid (BP). However, little is known about the underlying immunopathogenic drivers of these reactions, and understanding the unique gene expression profile and immune composition of BP-irAE remains a critical knowledge gap in the field of oncodermatology/oncodermatopathology. METHODS: BP-irAE (n = 8) and de novo BP control (n = 8) biopsy samples were subjected to gene expression profiling using the NanoString® Technologies nCounter PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel. Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) studies using markers for T-cells (CD3 and CD8), T helper 1 (TH 1) cells (Tbet), TH 2 cells (Gata3), TH 17 cells (RORγT), and regulatory T-cells (Tregs; FoxP3) were further evaluated using InForm® image analysis. RESULTS: Compared with de novo BP controls, BP-irAE samples exhibited upregulation of 30 mRNA transcripts (p < 0.025), including toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and genes associated with complement activation, and downregulation of 89 mRNA transcripts (p < 0.025), including genes associated with TH 2, TH 17, and B-cell immune response. BP-irAE demonstrated a greater density of Tbet+ (TH 1) cells in the dermis (p = 0.004) and fewer Tregs in the blister floor (p = 0.028) when compared with that of de novo control BP samples. CONCLUSIONS: BP-irAE exhibited activation of the TLR4/complement-driven classical innate immune response pathway, with dermal TH 1 immune cell polarization and decreased Tregs in the blister floor. TLR/complement signaling may underlie the immunopathogenesis of BP-irAE.

Cutaneous adverse events in 155 patients with metastatic melanoma consecutively treated with anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 combination immunotherapy: Incidence, management, and clinical benefit.

BACKGROUND: In response to the increased use of combination checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) and the resulting increased cutaneous adverse events (CAEs), this study reviewed patients with melanoma treated with combination CPIs to characterize CAE features and their clinical impact, correlation to adverse events in other organs, and correlation to tumor response. METHODS: Patients from the authors' institutional database who received at least 1 dose of ipilimumab in combination with either nivolumab or pembrolizumab between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017, for stage IV or unresectable stage III melanoma were identified. The time to next treatment (TTNT) was calculated from the start of CPI therapy to the start of the next treatment or death, and the development of CAEs was tested in a time-dependent Cox regression to identify associations with TTNT. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients (52.3%) experienced a total of 92 CAEs, including eczematous dermatitis (25.0%), morbilliform eruption (22.8%), vitiligo (12.0%), and pruritus without rash (8.7%). The median times to the onset and resolution of CAEs were 21 days (range, 0-341 days) and 50 days (range, 1-352 days), respectively. Most CAEs resolved after patients entered the CPI maintenance phase and treatment with oral antihistamines with or without topical steroids. CPI discontinuation occurred in 4 patients (2.6%) because of CAEs, in 49 (31.6%) because of other immune-related adverse events, and in 20 (12.9%) because of melanoma progression or death. For patients definitively treated with CPIs (n = 134; 86.5%), TTNT was significantly longer with CAEs than without CAEs (hazard ratio, 0.567; 95% CI, 0.331-0.972; P = .039). CONCLUSIONS: CAEs were mostly reversible and rarely required therapy discontinuation. The development of CAEs was associated with a longer TTNT, and this suggested a possible clinical benefit.

Biologic therapies for checkpoint inhibitor-induced cutaneous toxicities: a single-institution study of 17 consecutively treated patients.

PURPOSE: Treatment options for corticosteroid-refractory and/or high-grade checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-induced cutaneous adverse events (CAEs) are limited; however, anecdotal reports of biologic therapies have been successful. We aim to characterize the appropriate treatment scenarios and safety and efficacy profiles of biologics used to treat patients with CPI-induced CAEs at a single institution. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of patients from January 1st, 2015 to October 20th, 2020, with CPI-induced CAEs who were treated with biologics at a single cancer center. Patients were identified using institutional electronic medical record who underwent CPI therapy with subsequent CAEs that necessitated biologic therapy. Diagnostic criteria utilized for CAEs were based on documentation by four board-certified dermatologists, in combination with detailed chart reviews and pathology findings. Primary study outcome measurements include CAE response, tumor response, and adverse events during biologics treatment. RESULTS: We identified 17 patients who fit study criteria. Sixteen patients experienced some degree of CAE improvement on biologics, with 10 of 10 patients reaching CAE resolution at 6 months post biologics. Eight patients needed new systemic treatment post biologics treatment, while 9 patients received no further treatment or stayed on the CPI. Thirteen patients tolerated biologics well with no significant adverse events or blood abnormalities, with only 2 patients experiencing biologic dose delays. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, biologics appear to be extremely efficacious in the treatment of severe-grade and/or steroid refractory CAEs. They also appeared to be well-tolerated without overtly negative effects on tumor response. In patients with limited cancer treatment options and good tumor response to CPIs, biologics should be considered for severe-grade and/or refractory CAEs.

Surgical Intervention for Paronychia Induced by Targeted Anticancer Therapies.

BACKGROUND: Paronychia is a common toxicity associated with targeted anticancer therapies. Antibiotics and steroids are the standard treatments for severe paronychia, yet they are often inadequate, prolonging the patient's suffering and resulting in changes to effective cancer therapy. OBJECTIVE: This article describes the clinical course of drug-induced paronychia and attempts to identify circumstances under which nail surgery may be beneficial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective case series from a single institution's electronic medical record for patients on paronychia-inducing anticancer therapies with nail disease visit diagnosis codes. RESULTS: The authors identified 36 nail procedures performed on 12 patients, all of whom were managed with conservative steroid and antibiotic therapy with varying degrees of improvement; however, no further improvement was seen after 90 days. Partial matricectomy, nail avulsion, debridement/clipping, and incision and drainage were performed with resolution rates of 100% (11/11), 38.5% (5/13), 12.5% (1/8), and 0% (0/4), respectively. The average time to surgical intervention was 196 days, and the average time to resolution was 268 days. CONCLUSION: This series highlights the prolonged course of severe drug-induced paronychia and the importance of surgical intervention to reduce pain and impact on cancer treatment. Partial matricectomy should be considered for paronychia unresponsive to conservative therapy by 3 months.

Skin Reactions to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Due to the novelty of immune checkpoint inhibitors, their cutaneous adverse events (AEs) have only been recently characterized. This, along with the substantial rate of cutaneous reactions, has left many clinicians without sufficient familiarity to diagnose and treat cutaneous AEs. Pruritus and rash are among the top five immune-related AEs reported in clinical trials for this class of therapy. Incidence varies between 35 and 60% for cutaneous AEs among the seven FDA-approved drugs used as monotherapy or combination therapy. Although only 2% are reported as grade 3 or 4 events with monotherapy, the incidence can be as high as 6-9% for combination therapy and the impact on quality of life can be significant for these patients. Of ipilimumab patients, 43.5% have a cutaneous AE, and, at our institution, 20% of them had a dose interruption as a result. This means potentially 9% of patients have dose interruption of ipilimumab because of their cutaneous AEs. In the following chapter, we review the categories of these drugs, common cutaneous effects, their grading, and management options.

Skin Reactions to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Due to the novelty of immune checkpoint inhibitors, their cutaneous adverse events (AEs) have only been recently characterized. This, along with the substantial rate of cutaneous reactions, has left many clinicians without sufficient familiarity to diagnose and treat cutaneous AEs. Pruritus and rash are among the top five immune-related AEs reported in clinical trials for this class of therapy. Incidence varies between 35 and 50% for cutaneous AEs among the eight FDA-approved drugs. Although only 2% are reported as grade 3 or 4 events, the impact on quality of life can be significant for these patients and is best described and most severe in ipilimumab trials. Of ipilimumab patients, 43.5% have a cutaneous AE and, at our institution, 20% of them had a dose interruption as a result. This means potentially 9% of patients have dose interruption of ipilimumab because of their cutaneous AEs. In the following chapter, we review the categories of these drugs, common cutaneous effects, their grading, and management options.

Suprabasal acantholytic dermatologic toxicities associated checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A spectrum of immune reactions from paraneoplastic pemphigus-like to Grover-like lesions.

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) restore the function of effector immunocytes to target and destroy cancer cells. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are a consequence of immune reactivation, with unpredictable inflammatory response, loss of self-tolerance, and development of autoimmunity. Adverse events from CPIs that present as dermatologic toxicities have diverse clinical and histopathologic features. CPI-associated dermatologic toxicities may exhibit histopathologic features of lichenoid dermatitis, bullous pemphigoid, and granulomatous/sarcoid-like reactions. Suprabasal acantholytic dermatologic toxicities associated with CPIs are particularly rare but represent an emerging histopathologic pattern and include lichenoid dermatitis with suprabasal acantholysis/vesicle formation to Grover disease (transient acantholytic dermatosis). Here, we report two patients who developed suprabasal acantholytic dermatologic toxicities during CPI therapy. One patient exhibited a CPI-associated autoimmune blistering disease with paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP)-like features restricted to histopathology and immunofluorescence, while the other patient had Grover-like lesions. A review of the literature revealed a spectrum of suprabasal acantholytic dermatologic toxicities associated CPIs that may present as lichenoid dermatitis with acantholysis/vesicle formation, Grover-like eruptions, and lesions with PNP-like features restricted to histopathology and immunofluorescence. It is important for clinicians and pathologists to recognize the types of dermatologic toxicities associated with CPIs to direct appropriate therapeutic strategies.

Skin Reactions to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

The novelty of immune checkpoint inhibitors has only recently led to the characterization of cutaneous adverse events (AEs). This, along with the substantial rate of cutaneous reactions, has left many clinicians without sufficient familiarity to diagnose and treat. Pruritus and rash are among the top five immune-related AEs reported in clinical trials for this class of therapy. Incidence varies between 35 and 50% for cutaneous AEs among the three FDA-approved drugs. Although only 2% are reported as grade 3 or 4 events, the quality of life impact can be significant for these patients and is best described in ipilimumab trials. 43.5% of ipilimumab patients have a cutaneous AE and, at our institution, 20% of them had a dose interruption as a result. This means potentially 9% of patients having dose interruption of ipilimumab because of their cutaneous AEs. In the following chapter, we will review the categories of these drugs, common cutaneous effects, their grading, and management options.

Skin Reactions to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

The novelty of immune checkpoint inhibitors has only recently led to the characterization of cutaneous adverse events (AEs). This, along with the substantial rate of cutaneous reactions, has left many clinicians without sufficient familiarity to diagnose and treat. In the following chapter, we will review the categories of these drugs, common cutaneous effects, their grading, and management options.

Ecthyma gangrenosum and neutropenia in a previously healthy child.

Ecthyma gangrenosum is the cutaneous manifestation of pseudomonas infection in patients with sepsis. A previously healthy 7-month-old girl who developed ecthyma gangrenosum without apparent inciting factors became neutropenic secondary to autoimmune neutropenia 2 months after initial presentation. She was treated with appropriate surgical and medical intervention and was discharged in stable condition only to die suddenly 2 days after discharge.

Scrotal Buschke-Lowenstein tumor in an AIDS patient.

Giant condyloma acuminatum, also known as Buschke-Lowenstein tumor, is a slow-growing neoplasm notable for its size and presentation in the anogenital region. A viral etiology suggests it should be more common in the immunocompromised; however, few reports exist in the literature. The evaluation, treatment, and role of preventative measures are reviewed.

Retroperitoneal sarcoma presenting as acute renal failure, secondary to bilateral renal artery invasion.

Retroperitoneal sarcoma is a rare tumor accounting for 10 - 15% of all soft tissue malignancies with an incidence of 2.5 per million. Of those, liposarcoma is the most common type of retroperitoneal sarcoma accounting for 41% of cases. It usually presents late with vague symptoms such as abdominal discomfort or palpable mass. Vascular invasion is seen in 18% of retroperitoneal sarcomas but acute renal failure secondary to bilateral renal artery invasion/stenosis by these tumors has never been described yet. In this report, we describe the first case, to our knowledge, in the medical literature and discuss epidemiology, diagnosis, and management. Treatment is primarily surgical and the ability to completely resect the tumor is the most important predictor of survival. Active clinical trials are currently testing the use of adjunct chemotherapy and radiotherapy to improve morbidity and mortality.

A review of beta antagonist treatment for infantile hemangioma.

Infantile hemangiomas are benign vascular neoplasms of childhood that often have implications on development, cosmesis, and comfort. Traditional therapy has involved either observation or corticosteroids, depending on location and size. Recent studies have reported the successful use of beta-adrenergic antagonists in treating infantile hemangiomas. This succinct review discusses the properties and current applications of beta-adrenergic antagonists as well as the established treatments for infantile hemangioma.

Periorbital edema associated with alpelisib.

Alpelisib is an alpha isoform-specific phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor approved for use in the treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer in combination with fulvestrant. Hyperglycemia, rash, and gastrointestinal upset are the most commonly reported adverse events associated with alpelisib. Although rash is a known on-target effect of alpelisib, patients typically present with a morbilliform rash. We describe two cases of periorbital edema associated with alpelisib. We discuss the clinical findings, management, and prognosis of this unique reaction. These cases highlight the importance of early involvement of dermatology to manage adverse cutaneous events associated with alpelisib.

Clinical Outcome After Replacement of Distal Femur/Proximal Tibia in a Heterogeneous Patient Cohort: Function Following Tumour, Trauma, and Loosening.

BACKGROUND: Distal femur and proximal tibia replacements as limb-salvage procedures with good outcome parameters for patients with tumours have been broadly described. However, the overall midterm outcome in a mixed, heterogeneous patient collective is still unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 59 consecutive patients (33 for primary and 26 for revision surgery) between 1998 and 2017. Indication for implantation was tumour (n=16), periprosthetic fracture (n=14), traumatic fracture (n=14), infection (n=10), aseptic loosening (n=3), and pathological fracture (n=2). The mean follow-up duration was 3 years. Clinical functions were evaluated by Toronto Extremity Salvage Score and Knee Society Score. Knee extension and flexion force were measured. RESULTS: The overall survival rate of arthroplasties was 59% (n=35). Major complications were observed in 36 (61%) patients. During the follow-up period, 14 (24%) patients died. We recorded periprosthetic joint infection in 21 (36%) patients, recurrence of tumour in two (3%), and aseptic implant failure in three (5%). The mean Toronto Extremity Salvage Score was 66±33, and the mean Knee Society Score was 49±30. The mean extension force on the operated side was significantly reduced at 60° and 180° compared to the healthy side (p=0.0151 and p=0.0411, respectively). CONCLUSION: Distal femur and proximal tibia replacements showed limited clinical function in a heterogeneous patient collective. Indication for implantation should be considered carefully.

Osteonecrosis secondary to antiphospholipid syndrome: a case report, review of the literature, and treatment strategy.

Osteonecrosis is commonly present in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Treatment of this condition remains extremely controversial. We present a treatment strategy of avascular necrosis of the knee in a patient with catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome with a history of SLE and APS. Aggressive treatment with 12 rounds of plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide led to the patient's recovery with no recurrence of symptoms during 16 months of follow up. In this report, we further discuss the pathogenesis of osteonecrosis and current understanding of the treatment of this disease.

Characterization of Cutaneous Adverse Events Associated With PI3K Inhibitors in 11 Patients.

Introduction: Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors are a new class of cancer therapeutics that inhibits one or more enzymes in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR tumor growth pathway. As compared to other tyrosine kinase inhibitors, there is evidence that PI3K inhibitors have a higher incidence of severe cutaneous adverse events (CAEs) ranging from 2-21%. There is a lack of further characterization of clinical trials and management options for these CAEs. Methods: A retrospective chart review of our institution's records between January 2015 and May 2019 was conducted; electronic medical records were queried by using a pharmacy database and ICD-10 codes for patients receiving PI3K inhibitor who experienced CAEs during therapy. These CAEs were characterized by two board-certified dermatologists at a major cancer center. Results: Eleven patients were identified as having 12 cumulative CAEs. Average time to rash onset was 4 weeks, and the most common identified rashes were eczematous (25%) and morbilliform (17%). Four patients experienced a dose delay, and one patient immediately discontinued their PI3K inhibitor. Conclusion: Although most CAEs caused by PI3K inhibitors in this study were limited to grade 1-2 and were controlled with topical corticosteroids and oral antihistamines, a number of patients experienced dose impact. This highlights the dermatologist's role in managing and minimizing interruption of therapy while maintaining quality of life.