Energy wavelet signal processed ECG and standard 12 lead ECG: Diagnosis of early diastolic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is the result of impaired LV relaxation and identifies those at risk of developing heart failure. Echocardiography has been used as the gold standard to identify early LVDD. The signal processed electrocardiogram (hsECG) has demonstrated effectiveness to detect early LVDD. Whether or not the standard 12­lead electrocardiogram (ECG) can accurately predict early LVDD is not known. METHODS: A standard 12­lead ECG including signal processing (hsECG) was performed in 569 patients. Patients with atrial fibrillation, bundle branch block, pre-excitation, left ventricular hypertrophy or known cardiovascular disease were excluded, leaving 464 examinations for analysis. Early LVDD was diagnosed by established methods using echocardiography. Repolarization abnormalities (T wave discordance) in V1, V6, I and aVL and the hsECG were compared to the echocardiographic findings to establish diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: A total of 84 (18.1%) patients were diagnosed with early LVDD. A combination of a borderline or abnormal finding on the hsECG produced the best diagnostic model (sensitivity 84.5%, specificity 47.9%). The best performing ECG lead was V1 with a sensitivity of 38.1% and specificity of 92.1%. Regression analysis demonstrated increasing age and V1 to be predictive of LVDD. CONCLUSIONS: The hsECG displayed reasonable ability to detect early LVDD. Other than V1, repolarization abnormalities on the standard 12­lead ECG did not. While lead V1 showed promise in detecting LVDD, whether this or any other simple ECG variable can predict future LVDD would be of further interest.

Scientist-led Exercise Testing Is Safe With Diagnostic Interpretation Equivalent to a Cardiologist.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of nonphysician-led exercise stress testing (EST) has increased over the last 30 years, with endorsement by many cardiovascular societies around the world. The comparable safety of nonphysician-led EST to physician-led studies has been demonstrated, with some studies also showing agreement in diagnostic preliminary interpretations. OBJECTIVE: The study aim was to firstly confirm the safety of nonphysician-led EST in a large cohort and secondly compare the interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy of cardiac scientist and junior medical officer (JMO)-led EST reports to cardiology consultant overreads. METHODS: All ESTs performed between 1/7/2010 and 30/6/2013 were included in the study for JMO led tests (n = 1332). ESTs performed for the investigation of coronary artery disease between 1/7/2013 and 30/6/2016 were included for scientist-led testing (n = 1904). RESULTS: There was one adverse event, an ST segment myocardial infarction during the recovery phase of a JMO-led EST. Interobserver agreement was superior between the cardiologist and the scientist compared with the cardiologist and the JMO (P < 0.0001). Sensitivity for JMO-led tests differed from the cardiologist overread (86.96% vs. 96.77%, P = 0.03). There were no other significant differences between the cardiologist overread and the JMO- or scientist-led interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: Scientist-led EST is safe in intermediate risk patients and their preliminary reports are equally diagnostic as cardiologist overreads. While JMO-led ESTs are just as safe, the preliminary reports differ significantly from cardiologist overread particularly with respect to sensitivity.

Exercise guidelines for gestational diabetes mellitus.

The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing worldwide. This disease has many detrimental consequences for the woman, the unborn foetus and child. The management of GDM aims to mediate the effects of hyperglycaemia by controlling blood glucose levels. Along with pharmacology and dietary interventions, exercise has a powerful potential to assist with blood glucose control. Due to the uncertainty of risks and benefits of exercise during pregnancy, women tend to avoid exercise. However, under adequate supervision exercise is both safe and beneficial in the treatment of GDM. Therefore it is vital that exercise is incorporated into the continuum of care for women with GDM. Medical doctors should be able to refer to competently informed exercise professionals to aid in GDM treatment. It is important that exercise treatment is informed by research. Hence, the development of evidence-based guidelines is important to inform practice. Currently there are no guidelines for exercise in GDM. This review aims to assess the efficacy of exercise for the management of GDM in order to establish an exercise prescription guideline specific to the condition. It is recommended that women with GDM should do both aerobic and resistance exercise at a moderate intensity, a minimum of three times a week for 30-60 min each time.