Confounding mitigation for the exposure-response relationship of bevacizumab in colorectal cancer patients.

AIMS: The exposure-response relationship of bevacizumab may be confounded by various factors, including baseline characteristics, time-dependent target engagement and recursive relationships between exposure and response, requiring effective mitigation. This study aimed to investigate the exposure-response relationships of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients while mitigating potential biases. METHODS: Bevacizumab pharmacokinetics was described using target-mediated drug disposition modelling. Relationships between target kinetics, progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survivals were assessed using joint pharmacokinetic and parametric hazard function models. Both prognostic-driven and response-driven potential biases were mitigated. These models evaluated the impact of increased antigen target levels, clearance and intensified dosing regimen on survival. RESULTS: Estimated target-mediated pharmacokinetic parameters in 130 assessed patients were baseline target levels (R0 = 8.4 nM), steady-state dissociation constant (KSS = 10 nM) and antibody-target complexes elimination constant (kint = 0.52 day-1). The distribution of R0 was significantly associated with increased baseline concentrations of carcinoembryonic antigen, circulating vascular endothelial growth factor and the presence of extrahepatic metastases. Unbound target levels (R) significantly influenced both progression and death hazard functions. Increasing baseline target levels and/or clearance values led to decreased bevacizumab unbound concentrations, increased R levels and shortened PFS and OS, while increasing bevacizumab dose led to decreased R and longer survival. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to demonstrate the relationship between bevacizumab concentrations, target involvement and clinical efficacy by effectively mitigating potential sources of bias. Most of the target amount may be tumoural in mCRC. Future studies should provide a more in-depth description of this relationship.

Eculizumab dose tapering should take into account the nonlinearity of its pharmacokinetics.

AIMS: Eculizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting complement protein C5 used in renal diseases. As recommended dosing regimen leads to unnecessarily high concentrations in some patients, tailored dosing therapeutic drug monitoring was proposed to reduce treatment cost. The objectives of the present work were (i) to investigate the target-mediated elimination of eculizumab and (ii) whether a pharmacokinetic model integrating a nonlinear elimination allows a better prediction of eculizumab concentrations than a linear model. METHODS: We analysed 377 eculizumab serum concentrations from 44 patients treated for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathy with a population pharmacokinetic approach. Critical concentrations (below which a non-log-linear decline of concentration over time is evidenced) were computed to estimate the relevance of the target-mediated elimination. Simulations of dosing regimens were then performed to predict probabilities of target attainment (i.e. trough >100 mg/L). RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics of eculizumab was nonlinear and followed a mixture of first-order (CL = 1.318 mL/day/kg) and Michaelis-Menten elimination (Vmax = 26.07 mg/day, Km = 24.06 mg/L). Volume of distribution (72.39 mL/kg) and clearance were weight-dependent. Critical concentrations (Vmax/CL) ranged from 144.7 to 759.7 mg/L and were inversely related to body weight (P = .013). Nonlinearity was thus noticeable at therapeutic concentrations. Simulations predicted that 1200 mg of eculizumab every 21 days would allow 85% and 76% of patients to maintain a therapeutic exposure, for 50 or 90 kg body weight, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study investigates the nonlinear elimination of eculizumab and discusses the importance of accounting for eculizumab target-mediated elimination in therapeutic drug monitoring.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous bevacizumab on severe bleeding associated with hemorrhagic hereditary telangiectasia: A national, randomized multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab-a humanized monoclonal antibody-has been widely used to treat patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), but no randomized trial has yet been conducted. METHODS: This study is a double-blind multicenter randomized phase 2 trial with a 1:1 active-treatment-to-placebo ratio. We included patients over the age of 18 with a confirmed diagnosis and the need for at least four red blood cell (RBC) units transfused in the 3 months before study enrollment. Bevacizumab was administered at a dose of 5 mg/kg every 14 days with a total of six injections. The primary efficacy criterion was a decrease of at least 50% in the cumulative number of RBC units transfused in a 3-month period before and after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients (12 in each group) were included and randomized at 4 different centers. In intention-to-treat analysis, 63.6% of patients (7/11) in the bevacizumab group versus 33.3% of patients (4/12) in the placebo group decreased the number of blood transfusions by at least 50% (p = 0.22). Hemoglobin levels significantly improved at 6 months in the bevacizumab versus placebo group (p = 0.02). The pharmacokinetics study revealed that patients with high exposure to bevacizumab had a significant decrease in RBC transfusions (p = 0.03). Fifty-nine adverse events were observed, 34 in the placebo arm versus 25 in the bevacizumab arm. CONCLUSION: Though the present trial was underpowered, patients with HHT receiving bevacizumab required numerically fewer red blood cell transfusions than those receiving placebo, particularly those with high exposure.

Is CD25 blockade optimal in kidney transplant patients treated with basiliximab? A target-mediated drug disposition model.

AIMS: Basiliximab, an anti-CD25 chimeric monoclonal antibody, is approved in prevention of acute kidney transplant rejection. This study aims at investigating target-mediated pharmacokinetics of basiliximab. METHODS: Data from the IDEALE study, where 16 kidney transplant patients were treated with 2 40- or 80-mg basiliximab injections, were reanalysed. Basiliximab pharmacokinetics was described using a population 2-compartment target-mediated drug disposition model with the quasi-steady-state approximation. RESULTS: Volume of distribution was significantly higher in males (P = .029). Estimated baseline target antigen (CD25) level was lower is patients cotreated with cyclosporine (P = .026). CONCLUSION: This analysis allows the first description of the target-mediated nonlinear elimination of basiliximab. Our results suggest that cyclosporine cotreatment is associated with decreased target level and that an optimized dosing regimen may improve basiliximab effects.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: virological and pharmacological aspects / Traitement de l'hépatite B chronique par ténofovir : aspects virologiques et pharmacologiques

Tenofovir is a nucleotidic analog inhibitor used in monotherapy as first line treatment of chronic Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. This drug requires a two-step phosphorylation by cellular kinases. The active triphosphate form inhibits viral DNA polymerase. Tenofovir has a very low oral bioavailability following oral administration. Hence, its oral administration requires the use of prodrugs: tenofovir disoproxil fumararate (TDF) or tenofovir alafénamide (TAF). TAF demonstrated a lower kidney and bone toxicity than TDF. TAF and TDF treatments allow prevention of chronic hepatitis B complications, which are cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Prevention of these complications requires a virological response to the treatment, defined as undetectable HBV DNA. TDF and TAF are associated with virological response rates from 64 to 94 % after one year of treatment. This rate depends on HBV viral load at diagnostic, HBe antigen status, mutations in the HBV polymerase gene (Pol/RT) and patient compliance to the treatment. Tenofovir has a high genetic barrier and resistance mutations to this drug have not yet been described. However, mutations rt181T/V and/or rtN236T have been associated with reduced susceptibility to TDF/TAF in vitro and delayed response in vivo. Recently described mutations CYEI and rtA194T have been associated with reduced susceptibility to TDF/TAF in vitro without any change in viral response in vivo. Patient compliance can be improved using cognitive behavioral therapy, supporter interventions and use of short message service. Finally, some genetic polymorphisms in MRP(multidrug resistance-associated protein)-2 and MRP4 efflux transporters could be associated with TDF toxicity and virological response to TDF or TAF. In the perspective of functional HBV cure, TDF and TAF are likely to be still used, in association with new class of antivirals. For this reason, it is important to further characterize the pharmacological and virological factors associated with partial virological response to tenofovir.

Le ténofovir est un analogue nucléotidique inhibiteur de l'ADN polymérase à activité de transcriptase inverse du virus de l'hépatite B (VHB). Il nécessite une métabolisation intra-cellulaire par des kinases cellulaires pour obtenir la forme triphosphate active. Cette dernière est incorporée à l'ADN viral en cours de synthèse et exerce un effet terminateur de chaîne. Le ténofovir est administré sous forme de promédicaments : le ténofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) ou le ténofovir alafénamide (TAF). Le TAF se caractérise par une meilleure tolérance rénale et osseuse que le TDF. Le TDF et le TAF sont indiqués en monothérapie de longue durée pour le traitement de première intention des hépatites B chroniques. Ce traitement permet de prévenir la cirrhose et le carcinome hépatocellulaire qui sont les principales complications de l'hépatite B chronique. Le critère principal de suivi est l'obtention d'une réponse virologique, définie par une charge virale VHB indétectable. Le TDF et le TAF sont associés à des taux de réponse virologique de 64 à 94 % après un an de traitement. Ce taux de réponse dépend de facteurs virologiques, notamment le statut antigène HBe, la charge virale VHB au diagnostic et la présence de certaines mutations dans la polymérase virale (Pol/RT). Aucune résistance au ténofovir n'a été décrite au cours des essais cliniques, ce qui reflète la barrière génétique élevée associée à cette molécule. Néanmoins, les mutations rt181T/V et/ou rtN236T peuvent réduire la sensibilité au ténofovir in vitro et retarder la réponse virologique in vivo. Les mutations CYEI et A194T, récemment décrites, diminuent aussi la sensibilité au ténofovir in vitro mais ne semblent pas avoir d'impact sur la réponse au traitement. La réponse virologique dépend aussi de facteurs de l'hôte, principalement l'observance au traitement, cruciale pour prévenir les complications de l'infection. Cette observance peut être améliorée par des approches comportementales, le soutien d'un tiers ou des rappels par message texte. Enfin, certains polymorphismes génétiques au niveau des transporteurs MRP (multidrug resistance-associated protein)-2 ou MRP4 pourraient moduler la réponse virologique et la tolérance rénale du ténofovir. Dans une perspective de guérison fonctionnelle de l'hépatite chronique B, le ténofovir sera très probablement toujours utilisé, en association avec de nouveaux antiviraux. Pour ces raisons, il semble important de poursuivre l'identification des facteurs pharmacologiques et virologiques associés à la réponse virologique au ténofovir.

Feasibility and safety of tailored dosing schedule for eculizumab based on therapeutic drug monitoring: Lessons from a prospective multicentric study.

AIMS: Eculizumab is an anti-C5 monoclonal antibody approved for rare diseases including atypical haemolytic-uraemic syndrome. The maintenance phase dosing regimen is identical for all adult patients: 1200 mg every 2 weeks. Recent studies reported an overexposure in many patients when considering a target trough concentration range of 50-100 mg/L. The aim of the present work was to validate the feasibility of therapeutic drug monitoring of eculizumab in atypical haemolytic-uraemic syndrome patients. METHODS: We performed a 2-step prospective multicentre study. In the first phase, we developed a pharmacokinetic population model using data from 40 patients and identified patients for whom a 1-week lengthening of interval between infusions would lead to a trough concentration above 100 mg/L. In the second phase, selected patients were allocated a 1-week extension and eculizumab trough concentrations were monitored. RESULTS: The model confirmed the previously reported influence of bodyweight on elimination clearance and predicted that 36 (90%) patients would be eligible for interval extension. In the second phase of the study, a 1-week lengthening of interval between infusions was performed in 15 patients whose trough concentration at the next visit was predicted with a Bayesian model to be above 100 mg/L. After interval extension, 10 patients (67%) presented measured trough concentrations over 100 mg/L. No biological or clinical recurrence of disease was observed, even in the 5 patients with concentrations below 100 mg/L in whom the initial dosing regimen was resumed. CONCLUSION: Safe eculizumab interval adjustment is feasible with a PK monitoring.

Association of IgG1 Antibody Clearance with FcγRIIA Polymorphism and Platelet Count in Infliximab-Treated Patients.

The FcγRIIA/CD32A is mainly expressed on platelets, myeloid and several endothelial cells. Its affinity is considered insufficient for allowing significant binding of monomeric IgG, while its H131R polymorphism (histidine > arginine at position 131) influences affinity for multimeric IgG2. Platelet FcγRIIA has been reported to contribute to IgG-containing immune-complexe clearance. Given our finding that platelet FcγRIIA actually binds monomeric IgG, we investigated the role of platelets and FcγRIIA in IgG antibody elimination. We used pharmacokinetics analysis of infliximab (IgG1) in individuals with controlled Crohn's disease. The influence of platelet count and FcγRIIA polymorphism was quantified by multivariate linear modelling. The infliximab half-life increased with R allele number (13.2, 14.4 and 15.6 days for HH, HR and RR patients, respectively). It decreased with increasing platelet count in R carriers: from ≈20 days (RR) and ≈17 days (HR) at 150 × 109/L, respectively, to ≈13 days (both HR and RR) at 350 × 109/L. Moreover, a flow cytometry assay showed that infliximab and monomeric IgG1 bound efficiently to platelet FcγRIIA H and R allotypes, whereas panitumumab and IgG2 bound poorly to the latter. We propose that infliximab (and presumably any IgG1 antibody) elimination is partly due to an unappreciated mechanism dependent on binding to platelet FcγRIIA, which is probably tuned by its affinity for IgG2.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-D Immunoglobulins versus Intravenous Immunoglobulins for Immune Thrombocytopenia in Children: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and anti-D immunoglobulin (anti-D) in pediatric immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines, including all randomized controlled trials that have assessed the efficacy and safety of anti-D and IVIG in children with ITP. We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Primary outcomes were the proportion of children achieving platelet count responses as defined in each study and bleeding response. Other safety outcomes included infusion reactions and hemolysis. RESULTS: Eleven studies with 558 children were included. Anti-D was significantly inferior to IVIG at increasing platelet counts, both for thresholds of >20 × 109/L at 24-72 hours (response rate ratio for anti-D vs IVIG: 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.94) and >50 × 109/L at 24-72 hours (response rate ratio for anti-D vs IVIG: 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.92). Bleeding response was assessed in 4 studies, but some heterogeneity in reporting leads to unclear conclusion. General symptoms after anti-D infusion were less frequent than after IVIG (Peto OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.62). Hemolysis was more frequent after anti-D. The overall quality of the studies was low. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with anti-D, IVIG led to a better response in terms of platelet count and may be preferred as a first-line treatment of ITP in children with acute hemorrhagic symptoms. However, the clinical significance of IVIG superiority on platelet count remains unclear.

Rituximab exposure is influenced by baseline metabolic tumor volume and predicts outcome of DLBCL patients: a Lymphoma Study Association report.

High variability in patient outcome after rituximab-based treatment is partly explained by rituximab concentrations, and pharmacokinetic (PK) variability could be influenced by tumor burden. We aimed at quantifying the influence of baseline total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV0) on rituximab PK and of TMTV0 and rituximab exposure on outcome in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). TMTV0 was measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography in 108 previously untreated DLBCL patients who received four 375 mg/m2 rituximab infusions every 2 weeks in combination with chemotherapy in 2 prospective trials. A 2-compartment population model allowed describing rituximab PK and calculating rituximab exposure (area under the concentration-time curve; AUC). The association of TMTV0 and AUC with metabolic response after 4 cycles, as well as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), was assessed using logistic regression and Cox models, respectively. Cutoff values for patient outcome were determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Exposure to rituximab decreased as TMTV0 increased (R2 = 0.41, P < .0001). A high AUC in cycle 1 (≥9400 mg × h per liter) was associated with better response (odds ratio, 5.56; P = .0006) and longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38; P = .011) and OS (HR, 0.17; P = .001). A nomogram for rituximab dose needed to obtain optimal AUC according to TMTV0 was constructed, and the 375 mg/m2 classical dose would be suitable for patients with TMTV0 <281 cm3 In summary, rituximab exposure is influenced by TMTV0 and correlates with response and outcome of DLBCL patients. Dose individualization according to TMTV0 should be evaluated in prospective studies. These studies were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00498043 and #NCT00841945.

Intra-tracheal amikacin spray delivery in healthy mechanically ventilated piglets.

BACKGROUND: Nebulization during mechanical ventilation is impeded by large extra-pulmonary drug deposition and long administration durations which currently limit implementation of inhaled antibiotic therapy. Direct intra-tracheal delivery using a sprayer represents an appealing alternative investigated in small animal models, but large animal data are lacking. METHODS: Amikacin was administered through intravenous infusion (20 mg/kg), nebulization (60 mg/kg) and direct intra-tracheal spray (30 mg/kg) to 10 intubated piglets, in a randomized cross-over design. Amikacin concentrations were measured in the serum and pulmonary parenchyma. Anatomic deposition was investigated using immuno-histochemistry. RESULTS: Spray delivery resulted in higher amikacin outputs than nebulization and infusion. Pulmonary inhaled delivery techniques yielded much higher lung concentrations and much lower serum concentrations than intravenous infusion. However, unlike nebulization and infusion, intra-tracheal spray delivery was associated with more than 100- and 1000-fold variability in lung concentrations between and within animals. Amikacin specific immuno-histochemistry showed consistent bronchial and alveolar drug deposition with all modalities. CONCLUSION: Nebulization remains the most reliable and simple technique to deliver inhaled amikacin uniformly to the lung during mechanical ventilation. Further development of tracheal sprays is required to take advantage of potential benefits related to high drug output and low extra-pulmonary deposition in large animals.

CD4+ count-dependent concentration-effect relationship of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis.

AIMS: Rituximab is approved in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A substantial decrease in CD4+ count was observed in responders after a single cycle of treatment. This study aimed to describe and quantifying the influence of CD4+ count depletion on the concentration-response relationship of rituximab in RA patients. METHODS: In this retrospective monocentric observational study, 52 patients were assessed. Repeated measurements of rituximab concentrations (pharmacokinetics), CD4+ counts (biomarker) and disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28, clinical response) were made. Rituximab pharmacokinetics was described using a 2-compartment model, and CD4+ cell counts and DAS28 measurements were described using indirect turnover and direct Emax pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models, respectively. Delay between rituximab concentrations and responses was accounted for by including biophase compartments. RESULTS: Elimination half-life of rituximab was 18 days. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model showed that DAS28 response to rituximab was partly associated with CD4+ cell depletion. At 6 months, a deeper DAS28 decrease was observed in patients when CD4+ cell count is decreased: median [interquartile range] of DAS28 was 3.7 [2.9-4.4] and 4.5 [3.7-5.3] in patients with and without CD4+ decrease, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to quantify the relationship between rituximab concentrations, CD4+ count and DAS28 in RA patients. This model showed that approximately 75% of patients had CD4+ count decrease, and that the clinical improvement is 2-fold higher in patients with CD4+ cells decrease than in others.

Nonlinear pharmacokinetics of rituximab in non-Hodgkin lymphomas: A pilot study.

AIMS: Rituximab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody approved in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). This study aimed to assess the relationship between antigen mass and nonlinear pharmacokinetics of rituximab in NHL patients. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort of 25 NHL patients treated with rituximab, antigen mass was assessed at baseline by measuring metabolic tumour volume (MTV) by positron emission tomography. Rituximab pharmacokinetics was described using a semimechanistic 2-compartment model including a latent target antigen. Rituximab target-mediated elimination was described as irreversible binding between rituximab and it target. Histology (follicular or diffuse large B-cell lymphomas), initial MTV and body weight were tested as covariates on pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS: The model allowed a satisfactory description of rituximab serum concentrations. Target-mediated elimination was maximum at the beginning of treatment and became negligible towards the end of follow-up. The second-order elimination of rituximab due to target binding and complex elimination increased with baseline MTV. Central volume of distribution increased with body weight (P = .022) and baseline MTV (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: This study quantified for the first time the target-mediated elimination of rituximab in NHL patients and confirmed rituximab retention by antigen mass.

Crucial Role for Immune Complexes but Not FcRn in Immunization against Anti-TNF-α Antibodies after a Single Injection in Mice.

The immunogenicity of infliximab and adalimumab is a major concern because patients may develop Abs also called antidrug Abs (ADA), directed against these anti-TNF-α Abs after just a few weeks of treatment. These ADAs can lead to a decrease in biologic concentration, which is associated with lower treatment efficacy. Our aim was to study the involvement of immune complexes and neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) in the emergence of ADAs in the case of anti-TNF-α Abs. Wild type and FcRn knockout mice were injected once with either infliximab or adalimumab, alone or preincubated with TNF-α. Adalimumab cross-reacts with murine TNF-α whereas infliximab is species specific. When injected alone, only adalimumab elicited a humoral response. By preforming immune complexes with TNF-α, an anti-infliximab response was elicited. Surprisingly, both wild type and FcRn knockout mice were able to mount an immune response against anti-TNF-α Abs, suggesting that immune complexes are a major determinant of this immunization.

IgG1 Allotypes Influence the Pharmacokinetics of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies through FcRn Binding.

Because IgG1 allotypes might have different half-lives, their influence on infliximab (G1m17,1 allotype) pharmacokinetics was investigated in a group of spondyloarthritis patients. Infliximab was found to have a shorter half-life in patients homozygous for the G1m17,1 allotypes than in those carrying the G1m3 with no G1m1 (G1m3,-1) allotype. Because the neonatal FcR (FcRn) is involved in the pharmacokinetics of mAbs, the interaction of different IgG1 allotypes with FcRn was examined using cellular assays and surface plasmon resonance. G1m17,1 mAbs, such as infliximab and rituximab, were shown to bind more efficiently to FcRn and to be transcytosed better than the G1m3,-1 mAb cetuximab, which explains why infliximab is a better competitor for endogenous IgG1 in G1m3,-1 allotype-bearing patients. A set of four allotype variants of adalimumab (G1m17,1; G1m17,-1; G1m3,1; and G1m3,-1) was also tested for its binding to FcRn, revealing that the G1m3,1 variant, not present in commercial mAbs, binds more efficiently to FcRn and is transcytosed better than the other three variants, all of which are found in therapeutic mAbs.

A possible association of baseline serum IL-17A concentrations with progression-free survival of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with a bevacizumab-based regimen.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is a major public health issue worldwide. Interleukin-17 (IL-17) and Th17 (T-helper cell type 17)-related molecules are involved in tumor development and in resistance to bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody used in association with chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Some studies have previously shown that IL-17A and IL-17F polymorphisms, respectively rs2275913 and rs763780, are associated with gastric or colorectal cancer risk. Here we aimed at studying the influence of IL-17A-related individual factors on overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with a bevacizumab-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Pre-treatment serum biomarkers were retrospectively evaluated in 122 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated by bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy at 2-weeks intervals in a prospective cohort study (NCT00489697). The polymorphisms of IL-17A and IL-17F were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction - restriction fragment length polymorphism. Serum concentrations of Th17-related cytokines were measured by MultiPlex. The impact of individual parameters on overall survival and progression-free survival was assessed using multivariate Cox models. RESULTS: High baseline IL-17A serum concentrations were significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival [p = 0.043]. Other baseline serum Th17-related cytokines and polymorphisms of IL-17 were not associated with overall survival or progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this ancillary study, baseline serum IL-17A concentration is the only Th17/IL-17 related factor that was significantly associated with the response of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to bevacizumab. But this main significant result is highly dependent on one case which, if left out, weakens the data. Other clinical studies are required to confirm this association. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00489697 . June 20, 2007.

Antigenic burden and serum IgG concentrations influence rituximab pharmacokinetics in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

AIMS: Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody directed against CD20, which is approved in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aimed at assessing the influence of CD19+ cell counts as target-antigen amount, and of immunoglobulin G (IgG) serum concentrations on rituximab pharmacokinetics in RA patients. METHODS: In a cohort of 64 RA patients who had received repetitive courses of rituximab, the influence of CD19+ cell count, IgG serum concentration, body surface area, sex and disease activity score in 28 joints on rituximab pharmacokinetic parameters was assessed using a population pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS: A two-compartment model, with first-order distribution and elimination best described the data. The volume of distribution of central compartment and clearance of rituximab were estimated at 4.7 l and 0.56 l day-1 , respectively. Distribution and elimination half-lives were 0.9 days and 17.3 days, respectively. As expected, the central volume of distribution increased with body surface area (P = 0.012) and was higher in male than in female (P = 0.004). We found that the elimination rate constant (k10 ) increased with CD19+ count (P = 0.00022) and IgG concentration (P = 7.4 × 10-8 ), and that k10 decreased with time (P = 0.00015), partly explained by a change in target-antigen amount. CONCLUSIONS: The association between CD19+ count and k10 may be explained by target-mediated drug disposition, while the association between IgG serum concentration and k10 may be explained by a saturation of the neonatal Fc receptor at high IgG concentrations, resulting in decreased recycling of rituximab.

Current Practice for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biopharmaceuticals in Spondyloarthritis.

Treatment of spondyloarthritis (SpA) has greatly improved in the biopharmaceutical era. These compounds, primarily tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, are effective, but some patients may show poor response, sometimes due to the presence of antidrug antibodies (ADAs). In some instances, clinicians may increase or taper the dose, depending on the clinical response. Besides the current clinical practice, a tailored strategy based on drug monitoring is emerging as a way to improve the use of these drugs. However, the relevance of this therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals for SpA is still unknown. In this literature review, we examined the most relevant articles dealing with the concentration-response relation, ADA detection, and pharmacokinetics in SpA treated with biopharmaceuticals. ADAs were associated with low or undetectable concentration of monoclonal antibodies. The relation between drug concentration and clinical response in SpA is debated, some studies showing an association and others not. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals for SpA requires a better understanding of the association among the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of these drugs.

Rationale for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biopharmaceuticals in Inflammatory Diseases.

Biopharmaceuticals bring together a number of specific characteristics as compared with other drugs. However, as it is done for most drugs, an individual adjustment of their dose may be necessary. Similar to "chemical" drugs, biopharmaceuticals used in immunoinflammatory diseases have a rather narrow therapeutic range, lack good early clinical or biological marker of response, have variable pharmacokinetics, and their serum concentrations are most often related with response. Monoclonal antibodies have additional specific sources of pharmacokinetic variability. Low concentrations may increase the risks of immunization, plasmapheresis may increase their elimination, and subcutaneous formulations may be associated with decreased adherence. For all these reasons, pharmacokinetic therapeutic drug monitoring may be useful. However, few randomized controlled therapeutic drug monitoring studies have been published. For monoclonal antibodies, a precise definition of the therapeutic concentrations is challenging because of the interindividual variability in their concentration-effect relationship.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biopharmaceuticals May Benefit From Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling.

Biopharmaceuticals, especially monoclonal antibodies, have been increasingly used to treat several chronic inflammatory diseases. Due to the complexity of their pharmacokinetics and concentration-effect relationship, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been used to optimize their dosing regimen. Up to date, several decisional algorithms have been developed to provide tools for monoclonal antibodies' therapeutic drug monitoring. However, these algorithms are unable to determine the individual optimal dosing scheme. The aim of this article is to deal with population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling. Allowing the quantification of the variability of the dose-concentration-response relationship, population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling may be a valuable tool to determine the optimal dosing scheme. Based on population modeling, Bayesian estimators may be developed to optimize dosing schemes for each patient using limited sampling strategies. These estimators may allow accurate dosing adjustment for each patient individually.

Immunoassays for Measuring Serum Concentrations of Monoclonal Antibodies and Anti-biopharmaceutical Antibodies in Patients.

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) may be used as biopharmaceuticals to treat various diseases, ranging from oncology to inflammatory and cardiovascular affections. Trustworthy analytical methods are necessary to study their pharmacokinetics, both during their development and in post-marketing studies. Because biopharmaceuticals are macromolecules, ligand-binding assays (both immunoassays and bioassays) are methods of choice to measure their concentrations. Immunoassays are based on the capture of biopharmaceuticals by their target, which may be a circulating or membrane antigen or by an antibody recognizing their structure. Bioassays measure the activity of the biopharmaceutical in a specific in vitro test. A number of techniques have been reported, but their limits of detection and quantification vary widely. Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against biopharmaceuticals are often formed and sometimes interfere with clinical efficacy. Accurate and reliable detection of ADA is therefore necessary. Binding of ADA is dependent on affinity and avidity, which makes quantification challenging. In this review, we discuss the benefits and limitations of each method to determine mAb levels and carefully compare ADA assays.