Immunosuppressives discontinuation after renal response in lupus nephritis: predictors of flares, time to withdrawal and long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal duration of immunosuppressive (IS) treatment for lupus nephritis (LN) remains uncertain. We assessed the prevalence and predictors of IS tapering and discontinuation (D/C) in LN patients. METHODS: Data from 137 inception cohort LN patients were analyzed. We examined determinants of flares during tapering and after IS D/C, D/C achievement and time to D/C, and adverse long-term outcomes applying logistic and linear regression models. RESULTS: IS tapering was attempted in 111 (81%) patients, and D/C was achieved in 67.5%. Longer time to achieve complete renal response (CR) (OR : 1.07, p= 0.046) and higher SLEDAI-2K at tapering initiation (OR : 2.57, p= 0.008) were correlated with higher risk of renal flares during tapering. Persistent hydroxychloroquine use (≥2/3 of follow-up) (OR : 0.28, p= 0.08) and lower SLEDAI-2K 12 months before IS D/C (OR : 1.70, p= 0.013) decreased the risk of post-D/C flares. Adverse outcomes (>30% eGFR decline, chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, death) at the end of follow-up (median124 months) were more frequent in patients with flares during IS tapering (53% vs 16%, p< 0.0038) but did not differ between IS D/C achievers and non-achievers. In proliferative LN, differences mirrored those in entire cohort, except for time to D/C, which occurred 20 months earlier in membranous vs proliferative LN (ß-coef=-19.8, p= 0.014). CONCLUSION: Earlier CR achievement and lower SLEDAI-2K at tapering initiation prevent flares during IS tapering, while persistent hydroxychloroquine use and lower SLEDAI-2K 12 months before IS D/C prevent post-D/C flares. Flares during tapering increase the risk of unfavorable long-term outcomes. Earlier IS D/C is feasible in membranous LN.

Relapses and serious adverse events during rituximab maintenance therapy in ANCA-associated vasculitis: a multicentre retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: There are limited real-life data regarding the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) as a remission-maintenance agent in microscopic-polyangiitis (ΜPA) and granulomatosis-with-polyangiitis (GPA). We aimed to estimate the incidence and risk factors for relapses, as well serious-adverse-events (SAEs) in MPA/GPA patients during RTX-maintenance. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of newly-diagnosed/relapsing GPA/MPA patients who received RTX-maintenance (≥1 RTX-cycle, ≥6 months follow-up) following complete-remission (Birmingham-Vasculitis-Activity-Score-version-3 = 0 plus prednisolone ≤7.5 mg/day) with induction regimens. SAEs included serious-infections, COVID-19-associated hospitalizations, deaths, cardiovascular-events, malignancies and hypogammaglobulinemia. Incidence-rates (IR) and relapse-free survival through Kaplan-Meier plots were estimated. Cox-regression was conducted to investigate factors associated with the time-to-relapse. RESULTS: 101 patients were included; 48% females, 69% GPA, 53% newly diagnosed, median age: 63 years. During follow-up (294.5 patient-years, median: 3 RTX-cycles), 30 relapses (57% major) occurred among 24 patients (24%, IR 10.2/100 patient-years). Kidney involvement (adjusted-Hazard-Ratio/aHR: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.06-0.74, p= 0.016), prior induction with RTX plus cyclophosphamide (vs RTX monotherapy: aHR = 0.02; 95% CI: 0.001-0.43, p= 0.012) and shorter time-interval until complete-remission (aHR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, p= 0.023) were associated with decreased relapse-risk. We recorded 17 serious-infections (IR 5.8/100 patient-years), 11 COVID-19-associated hospitalizations (IR 3.7/100 patient-years), 4 malignancies (IR 1.4/100 patient-years), 6 cardiovascular-events (IR 2/100 patient-years) and 10 deaths (IR 3.4/100 patient-years). CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, relapses during RTX-maintenance occurred in approximately in 1 out of 4 patients. Kidney involvement, induction with RTX plus cyclophosphamide and earlier achievement of complete-remission were associated with lower relapse-risk. Serious-infections rate was consistent with previous reports, whereas an increased rate of COVID19-associated hospitalizations was observed.

Systemic Sclerosis Sine Scleroderma: A Time of Reappraisal.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic sclerosis sine scleroderma (ssSSc), formally described in 1962, is a subset of SSc that, unlike limited cutaneous (lcSSc) and diffuse cutaneous (dcSSc) forms, lacks skin fibrosis. According to the 2013 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria, SSc can be diagnosed in the absence of skin thickening, even if this is expected to develop later in disease course. Driven by a fatal case of ssSSc with cardiac involvement, we analyzed published data on ssSSc prevalence and severity. METHODS: A systematic literature review and qualitative synthesis of SSc cohorts with data on ssSSc were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies involving a total of 25,455 patients with SSc, published between 1976 and 2023, were identified. Although different definitions were used, the mean prevalence of ssSSc was almost 10% (range 0-23%), with the largest study reporting a cross-sectional prevalence of 13%. In 5 studies with a follow-up period of up to 9 years, reclassification of ssSSc into lcSSc or dcSSc ranged 0-28%. Interstitial lung disease, pulmonary arterial hypertension, scleroderma renal crisis, and cardiac diastolic dysfunction were present in 46% (range 9.3-59.1%), 15% (range 5.9-24.6%), 5% (range 1.6-24.6%), and 26.5% (range 1.8-40.7), respectively, of patients with ssSSc. Survival across studies was comparable to lcSSc and better than dcSSc. CONCLUSION: Published data on ssSSc vary widely on prevalence, clinical expression, and prognosis, partly due to underdiagnosis and misclassification. Although classification criteria should not affect appropriate management of patients, updated ssSSc subclassification criteria that takes into account time from disease onset should be considered.

Outcomes of COVID-19 re-infections: a single-center cohort of 167 patients with systemic rheumatic diseases.

Data on COVID-19 re-infections in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases (SRDs) are lacking. We aimed to describe the course and outcomes of COVID-19 re-infections in these patients versus controls. In this single-center retrospective study, we included 167 consecutive SRD patients with at least one COVID-19 re-infection (mean age 47.3 years, females 70.7%). SRD patients were compared in terms of patient-perceived COVID-19 re-infection severity and hospitalizations/deaths with 167 age/sex-matched non-SRD controls. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess potential milder re-infection versus primary infection severity, adjusting for study group, demographics (age, sex), vaccination status, body mass index, smoking, and comorbidities. 23 and 7 out of 167 re-infected SRD patients experienced two and three re-infections, respectively, which were comparable to the re-infection rates in controls (two: 32; and three: 2) who also had comparable COVID-19 vaccination history (89% and 95% vaccinated, respectively). In the initial infection, patients with SRDs were hospitalized (7.2% versus 1.8%, p = 0.017), and had received antiviral treatment (16.1% versus 4.7%, p < 0.001) more frequently than controls. However, hospitalizations (1.8% vs 0.6%) and antiviral treatment (7.8% vs 3.5%) did not differ (p > 0.05) between patients and controls at the first re-infection, as well as during the second and third re-infection; no deaths were recorded. Perceived severity of re-infections was also comparable between patients and controls (p = 0.847) and among those on biologic DMARDs or not (p = 0.482). In multivariable analysis, neither SRDs presence nor demographics or comorbidities were associated with COVID-19 re-infection severity. COVID-19 re-infection severity (patient-perceived/hospitalizations/deaths) did not differ between SRDs and controls.

Efficacy of canakinumab in patients with Still's disease across different lines of biologic therapy: real-life data from the International AIDA Network Registry for Still's Disease.

Introduction: The effectiveness of canakinumab may change according to the different times it is used after Still's disease onset. This study aimed to investigate whether canakinumab (CAN) shows differences in short- and long-term therapeutic outcomes, according to its use as different lines of biologic treatment. Methods: Patients included in this study were retrospectively enrolled from the AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance (AIDA) International Registry dedicated to Still's disease. Seventy-seven (51 females and 26 males) patients with Still's disease were included in the present study. In total, 39 (50.6%) patients underwent CAN as a first-line biologic agent, and the remaining 38 (49.4%) patients were treated with CAN as a second-line biologic agent or subsequent biologic agent. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between patients treated with CAN as a first-line biologic agent and those previously treated with other biologic agents in terms of the frequency of complete response (p =0.62), partial response (p =0.61), treatment failure (p >0.99), and frequency of patients discontinuing CAN due to lack or loss of efficacy (p =0.2). Of all the patients, 18 (23.4%) patients experienced disease relapse during canakinumab treatment, 9 patients were treated with canakinumab as a first-line biologic agent, and nine patients were treated with a second-line or subsequent biologic agent. No differences were found in the frequency of glucocorticoid use (p =0.34), daily glucocorticoid dosage (p =0.47), or concomitant methotrexate dosage (p =0.43) at the last assessment during CAN treatment. Conclusion: Canakinumab has proved to be effective in patients with Still's disease, regardless of its line of biologic treatment.