Postoperative Casting of Below-Knee Amputation Reduces StumpComplications.

BACKGROUND: Against the technological advances in limb salvage, below-the-knee amputation (BKA) remains a common procedure. Although most elective BKA is classified as clean operation, the reported stump complication rate is much higher than predicted. Postoperative casting (PC) may reduce the number of these complications. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of elastic bandage with knee immobilizer (EBKI) and PC in BKA stump complications. METHODS: Retrospective cohort comparison design identified patients who underwent BKA between 2000 and 2023 for non-correctable critical limb ischemia (CLI), or excessive tissue loss secondary to CLI, infection, severe neuropathy, or the combination of these and stratified them into 2 cohorts based on their postoperative stump dressing: EBKI and PC. BKAs that were done for trauma or neoplastic processes were excluded. The primary outcome measures: wound healing in 6 weeks and length of stay (LOS). SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: stump injury, infection, dehiscence, necrosis, number of higher-level amputations, knee contracture, and post-BKA mobility with Special Interest Group of Amputee Medicine score. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen patients with 122 limbs (52 EBKI and 70 PC) were found who met inclusion criteria and analyzed. The groups were comparable in demographics and comorbidities and preoperative variables, including mobility. The primary wound healing at 6 weeks was higher (P = 0.007); wound dehiscence (P = 0.01) and LOS (P = 0.006) was lower in the PC group compared to EBKI group. The PC group achieved higher Special Interest Group of Amputee Medicine mobility score and lower number of contractures developed compared to the EBKI group. CONCLUSIONS: Applying and maintaining PC to the BKA stump during the first month of healing reduced the incidence of stump complications, shortened the LOS, and improved postrehabilitation mobility results. We found no effect of PC on postoperative infections, stump necrosis, and higher-level amputations.

Autogenous Vascular Access in American Indians.

BACKGROUND: American Indians (AI) or Alaska Natives, or in combination with another race, comprised 6.8 million individuals in 2010 and the population is expected to exceed 10 million in the current census. Diabetes is more common in AIs than in other races in the United States and is responsible for 69% of new onset end stage renal disease in AI patients. The incidence of obesity is also higher among AIs. As both diabetes and obesity make creating a successful autogenous vascular access more challenging, we reviewed our experience creating arteriovenous fistulas in AI patients. METHODS: Our vascular access database was reviewed for consecutive new AI patients undergoing creation of a hemodialysis vascular access during a 10-year period. Each patient underwent ultrasound vessel mapping by the operating surgeon in addition to history and physical examination. The goal for initial cannulation was 4-6 weeks after access creation. Minimal AVF flow volume for cannulation was 500 mL/min with an outflow vein diameter of 6 mm. RESULTS: 235 consecutive new AI patients were identified. All patients had an autogenous access constructed. The median age was 56 years (range, 15-89 years). Diabetes was present in 85% and 42% were female. Obesity was noted in 27% of the patients and 37% had previous vascular access operations. Primary patency at 12 and 24 months was 62% and 46%, respectively. Cumulative patency at 12 and 24 months was 96% and 94%, respectively. Female gender and previous access operations were associated with lower primary (P = 0.002 and 0.02, respectively) and cumulative patency (P = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). Obesity was associated with lower cumulative access patency (P = 0.02). Overall, 74% of the access operations used the radial or ulnar artery for AVF inflow. Distal radial artery inflow AVFs were associated with longer patient survival (P = 0.01) and individuals with proximal radial inflow had longer survival when compared to brachial artery AVFs. Previous access operations were associated with shorter patient survival (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Safe and functional arteriovenous fistulas can be created for American Indians despite a higher prevalence of vascular access risk factors such as diabetes and obesity.

Frailty Syndrome in Patients With Lower Extremity Amputation: Simplifying How We Calculate Frailty.

BACKGROUND: Frailty syndrome is an established predictor of adverse outcomes after surgical procedures. Our study aimed to compare the simplified National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 5-factor-modified frailty index (mFI-5) to its prior 11-factor-modified frailty index (mFI-11) with respect to the predictive ability for mortality, postoperative complications, and unplanned 30-d readmission in patients undergoing lower limb amputation. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005-2012) databank was queried for all geriatric patients (>65 y) who underwent above-knee and below-knee amputations. We calculated each mFI by dividing the number of factors present for a patient by the total number of available factors. To assess the correlation between the mFI-5 and mFI-11, we used Spearman's rho rank coefficient. We then compared the two indices for each outcome (30-d complication, 30-d mortality, and 30-d readmission) and C-Statistic using predictive models. RESULTS: A total of 8681 patients were included with mean age of 76 ± 9 y, complication rate 35.8%, mortality rate 10.2%, and readmission rate 15.9%. There was no difference in type of amputation in frail and nonfrail. Correlation between the mFI-5 and mFI-11 was above 0.9 for all outcome measures. Both mFI-5 and mFI-11 indexes had strong predictive ability for mortality, postoperative complications, and 30-d readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing major lower limb amputation, we found mFI-5 and the mFI-11 were equally effective in predicting postoperative outcomes. Frailty remained a strong predictor of postoperative complications, mortality, and 30-d readmission.

Effect of frailty syndrome on the outcomes of patients with carotid stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Frailty syndrome confers a greater risk of morbidity and mortality after operative interventions. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of frailty on the outcomes after carotid interventions, including both carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS). METHODS: We performed an 8-year (2005-2012) retrospective analysis of the National Surgery Quality and Improvement Program database, including patients who had undergone CEA or CAS for carotid artery stenosis. A modified frailty index score was calculated. Frail status was defined as a modified frailty index score of ≥0.27. The outcome measures were inpatient complications, mortality, failure to rescue (FTR), hospital length of stay, and 30-day readmissions. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to study the association between frailty and the perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: The data from 37,875 patients were included. Of the 37,875 patients, 95.7% had undergone CEA, and 27.3% of the patients were frail (27% of the CEA and 26% of the CAS groups had qualified as frail). Overall, 11.7% of the patients had experienced complications, 2.2% had died, and 6.7% had been readmitted after discharge. On regression analysis, after controlling for age, gender, albumin level, type of surgery, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class, frail status was an independent predictor of complications (23.5% vs 7.2%; P < .001), mortality (5.2% vs 1.1%; P = .02), FTR (12.1% vs 4.7%; P = .02), and 30-day readmissions (14.9% vs 3.7%; P = .03). On subanalysis of the patients who had undergone CAS, no association was found between frail status and the occurrence of complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-3.2), mortality (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.6-2.7), FTR (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.4-2.3), and 30-day readmission rate (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.5-3.1). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty syndrome was associated with morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing surgical interventions for carotid stenosis. In the present study, frailty was associated with significant mortality and morbidity for those who had undergone CEA but not for those who had undergone CAS. However, the present study was not designed to determine the optimal treatment of frail patients. Incorporating frailty status into the treatment algorithm (CEA vs CAS) might provide a more accurate risk assessment and improve patient outcomes.

A Protocol-Driven Reduction in Surgical Site Infections After Colon Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is an established quality indicator and predictor for adverse patient outcomes. Multiple strategies have been established to reduce SSI; however, optimum protocol remains unclear. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of established protocol on SSI after colon surgery. METHODS: We established a colon SSI bundle in 2017, which includes a chlorhexidine prescrub followed by chloraPrep, betadine wound wash, antibiotic infused irrigation, use of closure tray, and incision coverage with silver impregnated dressing. Retrospective analysis of a 2-y (2016-2017) prospectively collected before and after analysis of all patients undergoing elective colon surgery was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: preprotocol (PP: year 2016) and postprotocol (PoP: year 2017). Patients in the two groups were matched using propensity score matching for age, gender, comorbidities, Anesthesiology Severity Score, indication of procedure, and procedure type. Outcome measures were SSI, hospital length of stay, and readmission rate. RESULTS: A total of 328 patients were analyzed, and after propensity matching, 94 patients (PP:47 and PoP:47) were included. The mean age was 63.7 ± 16.4 y, 43.6% male, and 44.6% of procedures were performed laparoscopically. There was no difference in demographics, comorbidities, and procedure details between two groups. PoP patients had significantly lower superficial (odds ratio: 0.91 [0.74-0.98]; P = 0.045) and deep SSI (odds ratio:0.97 [0.65-0.99]; P = 0.048) than PP patients. PoP patient had shorter length of stay (P = 0.049) and trend toward lower readmission rate (P = 0.098) compared with PP patients and an 85% reduction in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services standardized infection rate. CONCLUSIONS: Protocol-driven patient care improves patient outcomes. SSI bundle reduced SSI in patient undergoing colon surgery. Establishing national SSI bundles will help standardize care and help optimize patient outcomes.

Frailty Syndrome in Patients with Carotid Disease: Simplifying How We Calculate Frailty.

BACKGROUND: Frailty syndrome is an established predictor of adverse outcomes after carotid surgery. Recently, a modified 5-factor National Surgical Quality Improvement Program frailty index has been used; however, its utility in vascular procedures is unclear. The aim of our study was to compare the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) with the 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI-11) regarding value and predictive ability for mortality, postoperative infection, and unplanned 30-day readmission. METHODS: The mFI was calculated by dividing the number of factors present for a patient by the number of available factors for which there were no missing data. Spearman rho test was used to assess the correlation between the mFI-5 and mFI-11. Predictive models, using both unadjusted and adjusted logistic regressions, were created for each outcome for carotid endarterectomy using 2005-2012 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data, the last year all mFI-11 variables existed. RESULTS: A total of 36,000 patients were included with mean age of 74.6 ± 5.9 years, complication rate of 10.7%, mortality rate of 3.1%, and readmission rate of 6.2%. Correlation between mFI-5 and mFI-11 was above 0.9 across all outcomes for patients. mFI-5 had strong predictive ability for mortality, postoperative complications, and 30-day readmission. CONCLUSIONS: The mFI-5 and mFI-11 are equally effective predictors of postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. mFI-5 is a strong predictor of postoperative complications, mortality, and 30-day readmission.

Failure to Rescue in Postoperative Patients With Colon Cancer: Time to Rethink Where You Get Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Failure to rescue (FTR) is an important measure of quality of care. The aim of this study was to assess FTR in patients with colon cancer (CC) who underwent surgical resection. We hypothesized that patient managed in urban centers had lower FTR. METHODS: We performed a 1-y (2011) retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample database and identified all patients with CC who underwent surgical management. Patients were stratified based on the location of treatment: urban versus rural. Outcome measure was FTR, which was defined as death after major complications. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate the independent predictors of FTR. RESULTS: A total of 49,789 patients with CC who underwent surgery were analyzed. The mean age was 71 ± 20.2 y and 59% were males. About 21.5% patients developed in-hospital complications. The overall rates of complications, mortality, and FTR were 21.5%, 3.0%, and 33.8% respectively. Patient managed in rural centers had higher FTR compared with urban centers (39.5% versus 30.1%, P = 0.01). On regression analysis after controlling for age, gender, type of procedure, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and insurance status, management in rural center was independently associated with FTR (odds ratio: 1.9 [1.4-3.7]). On subanalysis of urban centers, management in teaching urban hospital was independently associated with higher FTR (odds ratio: 1.4 [1.2-3.8]). CONCLUSIONS: Disparities exist among centers managing patients with CC undergoing surgical intervention. Rural centers have higher FTR compared with similar cohort of patients managed in urban centers. Teaching urban hospital performed worse than nonteaching urban centers. Understanding the reason for these differences may help standardize care across centers and help improve patient outcomes.

Restricting Intraoperative Fluid Volume Allows Earlier Return of Bowel Function After Colon and Rectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Return of bowel function (ROBF) after abdominal surgery is an important determinant of patient outcomes. The role of intraoperative fluids (IOFs) in colon surgery remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of IOF on ROBF in patients undergoing colon surgery. We hypothesized that minimizing IOFs allows earlier ROBF. METHODS: A 2-year (2016-2017) retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing elective colon resection was performed at our tertiary hospital using a protocol limiting IOF and postoperative narcotics. Patients were divided into two groups: preprotocol (2016) and postprotocol (PoP) (2017). Patients were matched using propensity score matching for age, gender, comorbidities, Anesthesiology Severity Score, indication for procedure, and procedure type. The outcome measured was ROBF. Secondary outcome measures were complication rates and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients were analyzed. After propensity matching, 90 patients (preprotocol: 45; PoP: 45) were included. The mean age was 62.2 ± 14.8 y, 43.3% male, and 44.4% of procedures were performed laparoscopically. There was no difference in demographics and comorbidities between groups. PoP patients received lower IOF (P = 0.036, 2016: 1198.8 ± 1096.5 mL, 2017: 2176.7 ± 1458.3 mL) and lower postoperative narcotics (P = 0.042). PoP patients had earlier ROBF 2[2-4], 4[3-5] (odds ratio: 1.18 [1.05-1.52], P = 0.04), shorter length of stay 3[2-5] d versus 5[4-7] (odds ratio: 1.11 [1.09-1.89], P = 0.043), and trended toward lower complication rates (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: IOF volume independently impacts ROBF after colon surgery. Restricting IOF allows for earlier bowel function and shorter hospital stay. Further studies defining optimum fluid management impacting ROBF may help optimize patient care.

Does it matter where you get your surgery for colorectal cancer?

BACKGROUND: The influence of hospital-related factors on outcomes following colorectal surgery is not well-established. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between hospital factors on outcomes in surgically managed colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: We performed a 2-year (2014-2015) analysis of the NIS database. Adult (> 18 years) patients who underwent open or laparoscopic colorectal resection were identified using ICD-9 codes. Patients were stratified based on hospital: volume (low vs. high), teaching status, and location (urban vs. rural). Outcome measures were complications and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: A total of 153,453 patients with CRC were identified of which 35.3% underwent surgical management. Mean age was 69 ± 13 years, 51.6% were female, and 67% were white. Twenty-seven percent of the patients were managed at a high-volume center, 48% at intermediate-volume center while 25% at a low-volume center. Complications and mortality rates were lower in patients who were managed at high-volume centers and urban hospitals, while no difference was noticed based on teaching status. On regression analysis, patients managed at high-volume centers (OR 0.76 [0.56-0.89]) and urban hospitals (OR 0.83 [0.64-0.91]) have lower odds of complications; similarly, high-volume centers (OR 0.79 [0.65-0.90]) and urban facility (OR 0.87 [0.70-0.92]) were associated with lower odds of mortality. However, there was no association between teaching status and outcomes. CONCLUSION: Hospital factors significantly influence outcomes in patients with CRC managed surgically. High-volume centers and urban facilities have relatively better outcomes. Regionalization of care along with the appropriate availability of resources may improve outcomes in patients with CRC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective Observational Study.

Colon cancer in the young: contributing factors and short-term surgical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The incidence in young patients has increased significantly over the last few decades. The aim of this study is to evaluate demographic and tumor characteristics of young patients and analyze the short-term surgical outcomes of patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: We performed a 2-year review (2015-2016) of the ACS-NSQIP and included all patients with CC who underwent surgical management. Patients were stratified into two groups: early-onset CC (< 50 years old) and late-onset CC (≥ 50 years old). Outcome measures were hospital length of stay, 30-day complications, mortality, and readmission. RESULTS: We included a total of 15,957 patients in the analysis. Mean age was 65 ± 13 years, and 52% were male. Overall 10% of the patients had early-onset CC. Patients with early-onset CC were more likely to be black (11% vs 7%, p = 0.04) and Hispanic (8% vs 4%, p = 0.02). Additionally, they presented with a more aggressive tumor and higher TNM staging. Patients with early onset CC had lower 30-day complications (18% vs 22%, p = 0.02), shorter hospital length of stay (6[3-8] vs 8[5-11], p = 0.03) and lower 30-day mortality (0.4% vs 1.8%, p = 0.04) compared to their counterparts. However, there was no difference between the two groups regarding 30-day readmission. On regression analysis, there was no difference between the two groups regarding study outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparity does exist in the incidence of colon cancer in the young with higher incidence in blacks. Younger patients with CC tend to have better surgical outcomes on univariate analysis. On regression analysis, the surgical outcomes between the two groups are comparable.

Primary repair for pediatric colonic injury: Are there differences among adult and pediatric trauma centers?

BACKGROUND: Management of colonic injuries (colostomy [CO] versus primary anastomosis [PA]) among pediatric patients remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes in pediatric trauma patient with colonic injury undergoing operative intervention. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank (2011-2012) was queried including patients with isolated colonic injury undergoing exploratory laparotomy with PA or CO with age ≤18 y. Missing value analysis was performed. Patients were stratified into two groups: PA and CO. Outcome measures were mortality, in-hospital complications, and hospital length of stay. Multivariate regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 1151 patients included. Mean ± standard deviation age was 11.61 ± 2.8 y, and median [IQR] Injury Severity Score was 12 [8-16]; 39% (n = 449) of the patients had CO, and 35.6% (n = 410) were managed in pediatric trauma centers (PC). Patients with CO had a higher Injury Severity Score (P < 0.001), a trend toward lower blood pressure (P = 0.40), and an older age (P < 0.001). There was no difference in mortality between the PA and CO groups. However, patients who underwent PA had a shorter length of stay (P < 0.001) and lower in-hospital complications (P < 0.001). A subanalysis shows that, after controlling for all confounding factors, patients managed in PC were 1.2 times (1.2 [1.1-2.1], P = 0.04) more likely to receive a CO than those patients managed in adult trauma centers (AC). Moreover, there was no difference in mortality between the AC and the PC (P = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate no difference in mortality in pediatric trauma patients with colonic injury who undergo primary repair or CO. However, adult trauma centers had lower rates of CO performed as compared to a similar cohort of patients managed in pediatric trauma centers. Further assessment of the reasons underlying such differences will help improve patient outcomes.

Seasonal Variation in Emergency General Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the seasonal variation in emergency general surgery (EGS) admissions. BACKGROUND: Seasonal variation in medical conditions is well established; however, its impact on EGS cases remains unclear. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried over an 8-year period (2004-2011) for all patients with diagnosis of acute appendicitis, acute cholecystitis, and diverticulitis. Elective admissions were excluded. The following data for each admission were recorded: age, sex, race, admission month, major operative procedure, hospital region, and mortality. Seasons were defined as follows: Spring (March, April, May), Summer (June, July, August), Fall (September, October, November), and Winter (December, January, February). X11 procedure and spectral analysis were performed to confirm seasonal variation. RESULTS: A total of 63,911,033 admission records were evaluated of which 493,569 were appendicitis, 395,838 were cholecystitis, and 412,163 were diverticulitis. Seasonal variation is confirmed in EGS (F = 159.12, P < 0.0001) admissions. In the subanalysis, seasonal variation was found in acute appendicitis (F = 119.62, P < 0.0001), acute cholecystitis (F = 37.13, P < 0.0001), and diverticulitis (F = 69.90, P < 0.0001). The average monthly EGS admission in Winter was 11,322 ± 674. The average monthly EGS admission in Summer was higher than that of Winter by 13.6% (n = 1542; 95% CI: 1180-1904, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization due to EGS adheres to a consistent cyclical pattern, with more admissions occurring during the Summer months. Although the reasons for this variability are unknown, this information may be useful for hospital resource reallocation and staffing.

Changing paradigms in the management of 2184 patients with traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the change in trends in the management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) at a level I trauma center and the utilization of resources as a result of this change in management. BACKGROUND: The management of TBI has been evolving with trends toward management of minimally injured patients with intracranial hemorrhage exclusively by trauma surgeons. METHODS: A 5-year (2009-2014) prospective database on all patients with TBI (skull fracture/intracranial hemorrhage on head computed tomography) presenting to a level I trauma center was analyzed for patient demographics, injuries, admission physiology, computed tomographic scan results, and hospital outcomes. These records were matched to the institutional registry and hospital financial database. RESULTS: A total of 2184 patients were included with median (interquartile range) Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15 (12-15), and median (interquartile range) head-abbreviated injury scale score of 3 (2-4). The distribution of types and size of intracranial bleeds remained unchanged throughout the study period. The proportion of TBI managed exclusively by trauma surgeons increased significantly over the years from 6.8% to 40.1% (P < 0.001). Proportion of patients who received neurosurgical consultations (P < 0.001) and repeat head computed tomographic scans (P < 0.001), hospital length of stay (P = 0.028), and costs (P < 0.001) decreased significantly over time. The overall mortality rate (18.5%) and rate of intervention (14.1%) remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: TBI patients can be selectively managed without initially involving neurosurgeons safely in a cost-effective manner, resulting in more effective use of precious resources.

Intracranial pressure monitor in patients with traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) guidelines recommend intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or less with an abnormal head computed tomography, or a normal head computed tomography scan with systolic blood pressure ≤90 mm Hg, posturing, or in patients of age ≥40. The benefits of these guidelines on outcome remain unproven. We hypothesized that adherence to BTF guidelines for ICP monitoring does not improve outcomes in patients with TBI. METHODS: All TBI patients with an admission Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8 admitted to our level I trauma center over a 3-y period were identified. Adherence to the individual components of our institutional TBI Bundle (ICP monitoring, SpO2 ≥95%, PaCO2 30-39 mm Hg, systolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg, cerebral perfusion pressure ≥60 mm Hg, ICP ≤25 mm Hg, and temperature 36°C-37°C) was assessed. Patients were stratified into two groups as follows: patients with ICP monitoring (ICP) and patients without ICP monitoring (no-ICP). Outcome measures were survival and discharge disposition. Multivariate regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: We identified 2618 TBI patients, 261 of whom met the BTF criteria for ICP monitoring. After excluding those with nonsurvivable injuries (n = 67), 194 patients were available for analysis. The two groups were similar in demographics and severity of head injury. Survival rate was higher in the no-ICP group compared with that in the ICP group (98% versus 76%, P < 0.004). Non-monitored patients were discharged with higher levels of function per discharge location (28% home versus 4% home; P < 0.001). Patients without ICP monitoring were 1.21 times more likely to survive compared with that of patients with ICP monitoring (odds ratio: 1.21, 95% confidence interval [1.1-1.9], P = 0.01). In the ICP group, the overall compliance rate to the ICP and cerebral perfusion pressure goals as required by the BTF guidelines was poor. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that there is a subset of patients meeting BTF criteria for ICP monitoring that do well without ICP monitoring. This finding should provoke reevaluation of the indication and utility of ICP monitoring in TBI patients.

Age and Obesity are Independent Predictors of Bile Duct Injuries in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic bile duct injury is a serious complication of cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to assess predictors of bile duct injury using a national database. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2010-2012) was queried for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We used a) diagnoses for bile duct injury and b) bile duct injury repair procedure codes as a surrogate marker for bile duct injuries. RESULTS: A total of 1,015 patients had bile duct injury. The mean age was 58.2 ± 19.7 years, 53.5 % were males, and median Charlson co-morbidity score was 2 [2, 3]. Multivariate analysis revealed morbid obesity [2.8 (2.1-4.3); p = 0.03] and age >65 [1.5 (1.05-2.1); p = 0.01] as the independent predictors for bile duct injury in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION: Our study finds a new association between obesity, aging, and bile duct injuries which has never been reported in literature before.

Traumatic intracranial aneurysm in blunt trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) is being used to identify traumatic intracranial aneurysms (TICA) in patients with findings such as skull fracture and intracranial haemorrhage on initial Computed Tomography (CT) scans after blunt traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the incidence of TICA in patients with blunt TBI is unknown. The aim of this study is to report the incidence of TICA in patients with blunt TBI and to assess the utility of CTA in detecting these lesions. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective study (2003-2012) was performed at a Level 1 trauma centre. All patients with blunt TBI who had an initial non-contrasted head CT scan and a follow-up head CTA were included. Head CTAs were then reviewed by a single investigator and TICAs were identified. The primary outcome measure was incidence of TICA in blunt TBI. RESULTS: A total of 10 257 patients with blunt TBI were identified, out of which 459 patients were included in the analysis. Mean age was 47.3 ± 22.5, the majority were male (65.1%) and median ISS was 16 [9-25]. Thirty-six patients (7.8%) had intracranial aneurysm, of which three patients (0.65%) had TICAs. CONCLUSION: The incidence of traumatic intracranial aneurysm was exceedingly low (0.65%) over 10-years. This study adds to the growing literature questioning the empiric use of CTA for detecting vascular injuries in patients with blunt TBI.

Mild traumatic brain injury defined by Glasgow Coma Scale: Is it really mild?

INTRODUCTION: Conventionally, a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13-15 defines mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The aim of this study was to identify the factors that predict progression on repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) and neurosurgical intervention (NSI) in patients categorized as mild TBI with intracranial injury (intracranial haemorrhage and/or skull fracture). METHODS: This study performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with traumatic brain injury who presented to a level 1 trauma centre. Patients with blunt TBI, an intracranial injury and admission GCS of 13-15 without anti-platelet and anti-coagulation therapy were included. The outcome measures were: progression on RHCT and need for neurosurgical intervention (craniotomy and/or craniectomy). RESULTS: A total of 1800 patients were reviewed, of which 876 patients were included. One hundred and fifteen (13.1%) patients had progression on RHCT scan. Progression on RHCT was 8-times more likely in patients with subdural haemorrhage ≥10 mm, 5-times more likely with epidural haemorrhage ≥10 mm and 3-times more likely with base deficit ≥4. Forty-seven patients underwent a neurosurgical intervention. Patients with displaced skull fracture were 10-times more likely and patients with base deficit >4 were 21-times more likely to have a neurosurgical intervention. CONCLUSION: In patients with intracranial injury, a mild GCS score (GCS 13-15) in patients with an intracranial injury does not preclude progression on repeat head CT and the need for a neurosurgical intervention. Base deficit greater than four and displaced skull fracture are the greatest predictors for neurosurgical intervention in patients with mild TBI and an intracranial injury.

Increasing trauma deaths in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of the increasing aging population on trauma mortality relative to mortality from cancer and heart disease in the United States. BACKGROUND: The population in the United States continues to increase as medical advancements allow people to live longer. The resulting changes in the leading causes of death have not yet been recognized. METHODS: Data were obtained (2000-2010) from the Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System database of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We defined trauma deaths as unintentional injuries, suicides, and homicides. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2010, the US population increased by 9.7% and the number of trauma deaths increased by 22.8%. Trauma deaths and death rates deceased in individuals younger than 25 years but increased for those 25 years and older. During this period, death rates for cancer and heart disease decreased. The largest increases in trauma deaths were in individuals in their fifth and sixth decades of life. Since 2000, the largest proportional increase (118%) in crude trauma deaths occurred in 54-year-olds. Overall, in 2010, trauma was the leading cause of death in individuals 46 years and younger. Trauma remains the leading cause of years of life lost. RESULTS: Trauma is now the leading cause of death for individuals 46 years and younger. The largest increase in the number of trauma deaths and the highest crude number of trauma deaths occurred in baby boomers. Policy makers allocating resources should be made aware of the larger impact of trauma on our aging and burgeoning US population.

Low-dose aspirin therapy is not a reason for repeating head computed tomographic scans in traumatic brain injury: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Most studies have categorized all antiplatelet drugs into one category. The aim of our study was to evaluate the utility of repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) and outcomes in patients on low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid; ASA) therapy. METHODS: Patients with traumatic brain injury with intracranial hemorrhage on initial head computed tomography (CT) were prospectively enrolled. Patients on prehospital low-dose (81 mg) aspirin therapy were matched with patients exclusive of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy using propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio for age, Glasgow Coma Scale, head Abbreviated Injury Scale score, Injury Severity Score, and neurological examination. Outcome measures were progression on RHCT and subsequent neurosurgical intervention. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients who had intracranial hemorrhage on initial CT scan (ASA group: 72; No-ASA group: 72) were enrolled. The mean age was 72.8 ± 11.7 years, 59.7% were male, and median head Abbreviated Injury Scale was 3 (2-3). There was no difference in progression on RHCT (25% in ASA versus 16.6% in no-ASA), change in management as a result of RHCT (1.4% versus 1.4%), RHCT as a result of neurological decline (0 versus 1.4%), discharge Glasgow Coma Scale (15 [14-15] versus 15 [14-15]), and mortality (0 versus 1.4%) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose aspirin therapy is not associated with progression of initial insult on RHCT or clinical deterioration. Prehospital low-dose aspirin therapy as a sole criterion should not warrant a routine repeat head CT in traumatic brain injury.