A Multimodal Sensory Apparatus for Robotic Prosthetic Feet Combining Optoelectronic Pressure Transducers and IMU.

Timely and reliable identification of control phases is functional to the control of a powered robotic lower-limb prosthesis. This study presents a commercial energy-store-and-release foot prosthesis instrumented with a multimodal sensory system comprising optoelectronic pressure sensors (PS) and IMU. The performance was verified with eight healthy participants, comparing signals processed by two different algorithms, based on PS and IMU, respectively, for real-time detection of heel strike (HS) and toe-off (TO) events and an estimate of relevant biomechanical variables such as vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) and center of pressure along the sagittal axis (CoPy). The performance of both algorithms was benchmarked against a force platform and a marker-based stereophotogrammetric motion capture system. HS and TO were estimated with a time error lower than 0.100 s for both the algorithms, sufficient for the control of a lower-limb robotic prosthesis. Finally, the CoPy computed from the PS showed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.97 (0.02) with the same variable computed through the force platform.

A Locomotion Mode Recognition Algorithm Using Adaptive Dynamic Movement Primitives.

Control systems of robotic prostheses should be designed to decode the users' intent to start, stop, or change locomotion; and to select the suitable control strategy, accordingly. This paper describes a locomotion mode recognition algorithm based on adaptive Dynamic Movement Primitive models used as locomotion templates. The models take foot-ground contact information and thigh roll angle, measured by an inertial measurement unit, for generating continuous model variables to extract features for a set of Support Vector Machines. The proposed algorithm was tested offline on data acquired from 10 intact subjects and 1 subject with transtibial amputation, in ground-level walking and stair ascending/descending activities. Following subject-specific training, results on intact subjects showed that the algorithm can classify initiatory and steady-state steps with up to 100.00% median accuracy medially at 28.45% and 27.40% of the swing phase, respectively. While the transitory steps were classified with up to 87.30% median accuracy medially at 90.54% of the swing phase. Results with data of the transtibial amputee showed that the algorithm classified initiatory, steady-state, and transitory steps with up to 92.59%, 100%, and 93.10% median accuracies medially at 19.48%, 51.47%, and 93.33% of the swing phase, respectively. The results support the feasibility of this approach in robotic prosthesis control.

A low-power ankle-foot prosthesis for push-off enhancement.

Passive ankle-foot prostheses are light-weighted and reliable, but they cannot generate net positive power, which is essential in restoring the natural gait pattern of amputees. Recent robotic prostheses addressed the problem by actively controlling the storage and release of energy generated during the stance phase through the mechanical deformation of elastic elements housed in the device. This study proposes an innovative low-power active prosthetic module that fits on off-the-shelf passive ankle-foot energy-storage-and-release (ESAR) prostheses. The module is placed parallel to the ESAR foot, actively augmenting the energy stored in the foot and controlling the energy return for an enhanced push-off. The parallel elastic actuation takes advantage of the amputee's natural loading action on the foot's elastic structure, retaining its deformation. The actuation unit is designed to additionally deform the foot and command the return of the total stored energy. The control strategy of the prosthesis adapts to changes in the user's cadence and loading conditions to return the energy at a desired stride phase. An early verification on two transtibial amputees during treadmill walking showed that the proposed mechanism could increase the subjects' dorsiflexion peak of 15.2% and 41.6% for subjects 1 and 2, respectively, and the cadence of about 2%. Moreover, an increase of 26% and 45% was observed in the energy return for subjects 1 and 2, respectively.