RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clostridiodies difficile infection (CDI) has been characterized by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as an urgent public health threat and a major concern in hospital, outpatient and extended-care facilities worldwide. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥ 18 hospitalized with CDI in New York State (NYS) between January 1, 2014-December 31, 2016. Data were extracted from NY Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative (SPARCS) and propensity score matching was performed to achieve comparability of the CDI (exposure) and non-CDI (non-exposure) groups. Of the 3,714,486 hospitalizations, 28,874 incidence CDI cases were successfully matched to 28,874 non-exposures. RESULTS: The matched pairs comparison demonstrated that CDI cases were more likely to be readmitted to the hospital at 30 (28.26% vs. 19.46%), 60 (37.65% vs. 26.02%), 90 (42.93% vs. 30.43) and 120 days (46.47% vs. 33.74), had greater mortality rates at 7 (3.68% vs. 2.0%) and 180 days (20.54% vs. 11.96%), with significant increases in length of stay and total hospital charges (p < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CDI is associated with a large burden on patients and health care systems, significantly increasing hospital utilization, costs and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium , Infección Hospitalaria , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitalización , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Traditional practice suggests the abandonment of veins smaller than 3 mm in diameter for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation because of a low rate of maturation. This study aims to show that with balloon-assisted maturation (BAM), undersized veins can be used to create functional AVFs with a high rate of success. METHODS: All patients who underwent AVF creation between 2014 and 2018 at a tertiary academic medical center were retrospectively reviewed. The patients without preoperative vein mapping, those who failed to follow-up, and the patients who were not on dialysis were excluded. A fistula was considered to be mature if it was successfully cannulated for dialysis. A total of 596 patients were identified for analysis. The cohort was divided into the small-vein group (SVG, <2.5 mm) and large-vein group (LVG, ≥2.5 mm) based on preoperative vein size. Categorical variables were analyzed with the chi-squared test for their association with maturation status. Continuous variables were analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank sum test. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In the study cohort, 61.9% of the patients were male, with an average age of 62.8 ± 13.7 years, and an average preoperative vein size of 2.9 ± 1.1 mm. With similar demographic distribution, the participants in the SVG (n = 216) had significantly smaller preoperative vein size of 1.9 ± 0.4 mm than the patients in the LVG (n = 380), 3.5 ± 0.8 mm (P = 0.001). There were significantly more radio-cephalic AVFs created in the SVG (77.8% versus 48.7%, P < 0.0001). The overall maturation rate was 83.1% (n = 495), 219 fistulas (36.7%) matured primarily and 276 (46.3%) required interventions. Ninety-one percent of the patients required only 1 or 2 BAMs to achieve maturation. The SVG achieved a maturation rate of 75.9% as compared with 87.1% in the LVG (P = 0.002). A significantly higher number of patients in the SVG required BAM for maturation as compared with the LVG (67.7% versus 49.9%, P = 0.0002); however, there was no difference in the average number of BAMs required for fistula maturation between the groups (1.5 ± 0.8 for the SVG vs. 1.4 ± 0.7 for the LVG). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, vein size ≥2.5 mm (odds ratio (OR) = 2.11, confidence interval (CI): 1.36-3.27, P = 0.0009) and male sex (OR = 2.30, CI: 1.49-3.57, P = 0.0002) were independent predictors of maturation. CONCLUSIONS: Small veins can be used for AVF creation with lower but still favorable maturation rates using BAM interventions, especially in male patients. This practice can increase the creation of autogenous dialysis access and potentially reduce complications related to prosthetic dialysis access.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Diálisis Renal , Extremidad Superior/irrigación sanguínea , Venas/cirugía , Anciano , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Venas/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Home telemonitoring is a promising approach to optimizing outcomes for patients with Type 2 Diabetes; however, this care strategy has not been adapted for use with understudied and underserved Hispanic/Latinos (H/L) patients with Type 2 Diabetes. METHODS: A formative, Community-Based Participatory Research approach was used to adapt a home telemonitoring intervention to facilitate acceptability and feasibility for vulnerable H/L patients. Utilizing the ADAPT-ITT framework, key stakeholders were engaged over an 8-month iterative process using a combination of strategies, including focus groups and structured interviews. Nine Community Advisory Board, Patient Advisory, and Provider Panel Committee focus group discussions were conducted, in English and Spanish, to garner stakeholder input before intervention implementation. Focus groups and structured interviews were also conducted with 12 patients enrolled in a 1-month pilot study, to obtain feedback from patients in the home to further adapt the intervention. Focus groups and structured interviews were approximately 2 hours and 30 min, respectively. All focus groups and structured interviews were audio-recorded and professionally transcribed. Structural coding was used to mark responses to topical questions in the moderator and interview guides. RESULTS: Two major themes emerged from qualitative analyses of Community Advisory Board/subcommittee focus group data. The first major theme involved intervention components to maximize acceptance/usability. Subthemes included tablet screens (e.g., privacy/identity concerns; enlarging font sizes; lighter tablet to facilitate portability); cultural incongruence (e.g., language translation/literacy, foods, actors "who look like me"); nursing staff (e.g., ensuring accessibility; appointment flexibility); and, educational videos (e.g., the importance of information repetition). A second major theme involved suggested changes to the randomized control trial study structure to maximize participation, including a major restructuring of the consenting process and changes designed to optimize recruitment strategies. Themes from pilot participant focus group/structured interviews were similar to those of the Community Advisory Board such as the need to address and simplify a burdensome consenting process, the importance of assuring privacy, and an accessible, culturally congruent nurse. CONCLUSIONS: These findings identify important adaptation recommendations from the stakeholder and potential user perspective that should be considered when implementing home telemonitoring for underserved patients with Type 2 Diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03960424; ClinicalTrials.gov (US National Institutes of Health). Registered 23 May 2019. Registered prior to data collection. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03960424?term=NCT03960424&draw=2&rank=1.
Asunto(s)
Asistencia Sanitaria Culturalmente Competente/organización & administración , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Monitoreo Ambulatorio/métodos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Telemedicina/métodos , Asistencia Sanitaria Culturalmente Competente/métodos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Estudios de Factibilidad , Grupos Focales , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Proyectos Piloto , Investigación Cualitativa , Telemedicina/normas , Poblaciones VulnerablesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with genetic, hormonal, and environmental influences. In Western Europe and North America, individuals of West African descent have a 3-4 fold greater incidence of SLE than Caucasians. Paradoxically, West Africans in sub-Saharan Africa appear to have a low incidence of SLE, and some studies suggest a milder disease with less nephritis. In this study, we analyzed sera from African American female SLE patients and four other cohorts, one with SLE and others with varying degrees of risk for SLE in order to identify serologic factors that might correlate with risk of or protection against SLE. METHODS: Our cohorts included West African women with previous malaria infection assumed to be protected from development of SLE, clinically unaffected sisters of SLE patients with high risk of developing SLE, healthy African American women with intermediate risk, healthy Caucasian women with low risk of developing SLE, and women with a diagnosis of SLE. We developed a lupus risk index (LRI) based on titers of IgM and IgG anti-double stranded DNA antibodies and levels of C1q. RESULTS: The risk index was highest in SLE patients; second highest in unaffected sisters of SLE patients; third highest in healthy African-American women and lowest in healthy Caucasian women and malaria-exposed West African women. CONCLUSION: This risk index may be useful in early interventions to prevent SLE. In addition, it suggests new therapeutic approaches for the treatment of SLE.
Asunto(s)
Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Antinucleares/sangre , Población Negra , Complemento C1q/análisis , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/sangre , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/etnología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/genética , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/inmunología , Malaria/sangre , Malaria/etnología , Malaria/genética , Malaria/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Población Blanca , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An optimal approach for providing sufficient postpartum analgesia while minimizing the risk of opioid misuse or diversion has yet to be elucidated. Moreover, there is scant literature on the efficacy of around-the-clock (ATC) scheduled dosing of opioid analgesia compared to pro re nata (PRN; as-needed) dosing for postpartum pain management. Here we evaluate a quality improvement intervention that aimed to proactively provide pain relief with a multimodal analgesic regimen that includes oxycodone at scheduled time intervals. This new protocol stands in stark contrast to many contemporary postpartum pain management regimens in which oral opioid medications are reserved for treating breakthrough pain. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine how inpatient oxycodone use is affected by as-needed compared to ATC scheduled dosing of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and low-dose oxycodone, with the option to decline any of these medications. We also sought to determine the effect of each modality on patient satisfaction with pain control. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of singleton deliveries at ≥37 weeks of gestation at a tertiary hospital from 2013 to 2016. In month 21 of the 48-month study period, a new institutional protocol for postpartum pain management was implemented which consisted of scheduled dosing of a multimodal analgesic regimen. Prior to this, patients received pain relief only as needed, by reporting elevated pain scores to nursing staff. Patients were excluded for the following: NSAID or opioid allergies, protocol deviations, transition month deliveries, history of drug abuse, positive urine toxicology, delivery with general anesthesia, prolonged hospitalization, postpartum hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, incomplete records. Outcomes evaluated were the percentage of patients receiving oxycodone and mean oxycodone use per inpatient day (milligrams). Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series was performed to estimate linear time trends of oxycodone consumption pre- and post-protocol implementation. Results of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) standardized survey were also compared before and after implementation. RESULTS: A total of 19,192 deliveries were included. After adjusting for confounders, a significant downward trend in the percentage of patients receiving oxycodone was noted among both cesarean (0.004% decrease per month; p < .006) and vaginal deliveries (0.005% decrease per month; p < .0001) before implementation of the scheduled pain management protocol. Among cesarean deliveries, there was no shift at the time of implementation, and no change in the slope of the trend after implementation. Among vaginal deliveries, there was an upward shift at implementation (+7.4%, p < .0001) but no change in the slope of the trend after implementation. Regardless of mode of delivery, no trend in monthly mean oxycodone consumption per day existed before or after implementation of the new protocol, and there was no shift at the time of implementation. Scheduled multimodal analgesia was associated with an improvement in HCAHPS scores for patient reported pain control after cesarean section (63 versus 71% reporting "Always" well controlled; p < .001) but had no effect after vaginal delivery. CONCLUSION: After cesarean delivery, scheduled multimodal analgesia that includes ATC dosing of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and low-dose oxycodone, with the option to decline any of these medications, does not increase the percentage of women who receive oxycodone or mean oxycodone consumption per inpatient day compared to as-needed analgesia. After vaginal delivery, scheduled multimodal analgesia is associated with an increase in the percentage of women who receive oxycodone but no change in mean oxycodone consumption per inpatient day.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia , Oxicodona , Analgésicos Opioides , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Manejo del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Purpose: We present the findings of our final prospective study submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for New Drug Application (NDA) approval for the use of 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]fluoro-l-phenylalanine (F-18 FDOPA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for Parkinson's disease (PD). The primary aim was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of F-18 FDOPA PET in parkinsonian patients with respect to clinical standard-of-truth (SOT). Secondary outcomes included the inter-rater reliability, and correlation of quantitative measures for PET with dopaminergic status. Methods: In 68 parkinsonian subjects, F-18 FDOPA PET scan from 80 to 100 min was acquired following a CT scan. Scan images were presented to one expert in F-18 FDOPA image interpretation and two physicians with prior experience in I-123 FPCIT single-photon emission computed tomography image interpretation. Fifty-six subjects completed the study with a follow-up for SOT determination. Image readers were blind to the clinical/quantitative data; SOT clinician was blind to the image data. Results: For 47 of the 56 patients, SOT was in agreement with the PET scan results. For nine patients, SOT suggested dopaminergic deficit, whereas the imaging showed normal uptake. The specificity and positive predictive values are 91% and 92%, respectively, suggesting high probability that those who test positive by the PET scan truly have dopaminergic degeneration. The sensitivity was 73%. Inter-rater agreement was 0.6-0.8 between the different readers. Conclusion: Our prospective study demonstrates high specificity and moderate sensitivity of F-18 FDOPA PET for PD. We received NDA approval in October 2019. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13139-022-00748-4.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite a growing cohort of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors, little is known about the early ICU aftercare period. OBJECTIVE: To identify gaps in early ICU aftercare and factors associated with poor hospital outcomes. METHODS: A multisite, retrospective study (January 1 to December 31, 2017) was conducted among randomly selected patients admitted to the medical ICU and subsequently transferred to acute medical care units. Records were reviewed for patient characteristics, ICU course, and early ICU aftercare practices and syndromes. Associations between practices and hospital outcomes were calculated with χ2 and Wilcoxon rank sum tests, followed by logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one patients met inclusion criteria (mean [SD] age, 64.2 [19.1] years; 51.7% male; 44.4% White). The most frequent diagnoses were sepsis (35.8%) and respiratory failure (33.8%). During early ICU aftercare, 46.4% had dietary restrictions, 25.8% had bed rest orders, 25.0% had a bladder catheter, 26.5% had advance directive documentation, 33.8% had dysphagia, 34.3% had functional decline, and 23.2% had delirium. Higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (odds ratio, 1.6) and midodrine use on medical units (odds ratio, 7.5) were associated with in-hospital mortality; mechanical ventilation in the ICU was associated with rapid response on medical unit (odds ratio, 12.9); and bladder catheters were associated with ICU readmission (odds ratio, 5.2). CONCLUSIONS: Delirium, debility, and dysphagia are frequently encountered in early ICU aftercare, yet bed rest, dietary restriction, and lack of advance directive documentation are common. Future studies are urgently needed to characterize and address early ICU aftercare.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Anciano , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Long-term breast cancer survivors are at risk for cardiotoxicity after treatment, but there is insufficient evidence to provide long-term (~10 years) cardiovascular disease (CVD) screening recommendations. We sought to evaluate a tri-modality CVD screening approach. METHODS: This single-arm, feasibility study enrolled 201 breast cancer patients treated ≥6 years prior without CVD at diagnosis. Patients were sub-grouped: cardiotoxic (left-sided) radiation (RT), cardiotoxic (anthracycline-based) chemotherapy, both cardiotoxic chemotherapy and RT, and neither cardiotoxic treatment. Patients underwent electrocardiogram (EKG), transthoracic echocardiogram with strain (TTE with GLS), and coronary artery calcium computed tomography (CAC CT). The primary endpoint was preclinical or clinical CVD. RESULTS: Median age was 50 (29-65) at diagnosis and 63 (37-77) at imaging; median interval was 11.5 years (6.7-14.5). Among sub-groups, 44% had no cardiotoxic treatment, 31.5% had cardiotoxic RT, 16% had cardiotoxic chemotherapy, and 8.5% had both. Overall, 77.6% showed preclinical and/or clinical CVD and 51.5% showed clinical CVD. Per modality, rates of any CVD and clinical CVD were, respectively: 27.1%/10.0% on EKG, 50.0%/25.3% on TTE with GLS, and 50.8%/45.8% on CAC CT. No statistical difference was seen among the treatment subgroups (NS, χ2 test, p = 0.58/p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: This study identified a high incidence of CVD in heterogenous long-term breast cancer survivors, most >10 years post-treatment. Over half had clinical CVD findings warranting follow-up and/or intervention. Each imaging test independently contributed to the detection rate. This provides early evidence that long-term cardiac screening may be of value to a wider group of breast cancer survivors than previously recognized.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Cardiotoxicidad/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de Mama Unilaterales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Mama Unilaterales/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Antraciclinas/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Cardiotoxicidad/epidemiología , Cardiotoxicidad/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedad Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Coronaria/epidemiología , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Corazón/efectos de los fármacos , Corazón/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) scores are the single, most objective criteria for admission into residency programs in the country. Underrepresented minorities in medicine (URiM) are found to have lower USMLE scores compared to their White counterparts. The objective of this study is to examine how USMLE step 1 cutoff scores may exclude self-reported URiM from the residency interview process across various specialties. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of 10 541 applicants to different residency programs at Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health between May 2014 and May 2015. We identified Blacks and Hispanics as URiM. The primary outcome is the percentage of applicants with USMLE step 1 score above different ranges of cutoff score, from 205 to 235 in five-point increments, by race/ethnicity and by URiM status. Secondary outcome is percentages of URiM vs non-URiM above and below mean USMLE step 1 scores by different specialties (internal medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, pediatrics, and psychiatry). RESULTS: The study sample included 2707 White, 722 Black, 805 Hispanic, 5006 Asian, and 562 Other Race/Ethnicity applicants. Overall, 50.2% were male, 21.3% URiM, 7.4% had limited English proficiency, 67.6% attended international medical schools, and 2.4% are Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society (AOA) members. The mean (±SD) USMLE step 1 score was significantly greater among non-URiM applicants as compared to URiM applicants (223.7 ± 19.4 vs 216.1 ± 18.4, P < .01, two-sample t-test). Non-URiM applicants were younger, and the percentage of male and AOA applicants was greater among non-URiM applicants as compared to URiM applicants (50.5% vs 47.7%, P = .02, Chi-Square test; 2.9% vs 1.2%, P < .01, Chi-Square test, respectively). CONCLUSION: Using a USMLE step 1 cutoff score as an initial filter for applicant recruitment and selection could jeopardize the benefits of a diverse residency program. Practical implications are discussed.
RESUMEN
Objective: To determine if vaginal misoprostol is more effective than oral misoprostol for cervical ripening in obese women.Study design: A retrospective cohort study of obese women undergoing induction of labor from Jan 2013 to Dec 2016 with singleton, viable pregnancies beyond 37 completed weeks of gestational age. Women with an initial Bishop score of 7 or less, with a cervical dilatation of less than 2 cm, who received either vaginal or oral misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent, were included. Primary outcome was interval from the start of induction to the attainment of 3 cm cervical dilatation. Secondary outcomes included the interval from the start of induction to delivery and the rate of cesarean delivery (CD).Result: Of women who met the inclusion criteria, 966 (75.5%) women received oral misoprostol and 314 (24.5%) received vaginal misoprostol. The mean time-interval from the start of induction to attainment of 3-cm dilatation was shorter in the vaginal group (10.5 ± 10.4 h) compared to the oral group (17.2 ± 11.5 h), (p < .0001). Significantly shorter times to delivery were also noted in the vaginal group (17.4 h for vaginal vs. 24.8 h for oral, p < .0001). In the subgroup analysis of nulliparous women, shorter time intervals from the start of induction to attainment of 3-cm dilatation, as well as to delivery, were noted in the vaginal misoprostol group (p < .0001 for both). Multiple linear regression model confirmed route of misoprostol administration as an independent variable in predicting the outcomes (time from start of induction to 3 cm as well as to delivery). Significant findings amongst neonatal outcomes included lower umbilical artery pH and higher rates of neonatal jaundice in the oral misoprostol group.Conclusion: In a population of obese women undergoing induction of labor, vaginal administration of misoprostol was associated shorter time intervals from the start of induction to the attainment of 3 cm of dilatation, as well as to delivery, without increasing the rate of cesarean deliveries or the incidence of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.