The degree of cortisol secretion is associated with diabetes mellitus and hypertension in patients with nonfunctioning adrenal tumors.

BACKGROUND: Similarly to cortisol-secreting adrenal tumors, also non-functioning adrenal tumors (NFAT) may be associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. We assessed in NFAT patients: (i) the association between hypertension (HT), diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity (OB), dyslipidemia (DL) and cardiovascular events (CVE) and cortisol secretion; (ii) the cut-off of the cortisol secretion parameters for identifying NFAT patients with a worse cardiometabolic profile. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 615 NFAT patients (with cortisol levels after 1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test, F-1mgDST < 1.8 µg/dL [50 nmol/L]) F-1mgDST and adrenocorticotroph hormone (ACTH) levels and data on HT, DM, OB, DL and CVEs prevalence were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: HT, DM and HT plus DM were associated with F-1mgDST levels (area under the ROC curve: 0.588 ± 0.023, 0.610 ± 0.028, 0.611 ± 0.033, respectively, p < 0.001 for all comparisons) but not with ACTH. The cut-off for identifying patients with either HT or DM or HT plus DM was set at ≥ 1.2 µg/dL (33 nmol/L). As compared with patients with F-1mgDST < 1.2 µg/dL (n = 289), patients with F-1mgDST 1.2-1.79 µg/dL (33-49.4 nmol/L) (n = 326) had lower ACTH levels (17.7 ± 11.9 vs 15.3 ± 10.1 pg/mL, respectively, p = 0.008), older age (57.5 ± 12.3 vs 62.5 ± 10.9 years, respectively, p < 0.001), and higher prevalence of HT (38.1% vs 52.5% respectively p < 0.001), DM (13.1% vs 23.3%, respectively, p = 0.001), HT plus DM (8.3% vs 16.9%, respectively, p < 0.002) and CVE (3.2% vs 7.3%, respectively, p = 0.028). F-1mgDST 1.2-1.79 µg/dL was associated with either HT (odd ratio, OR, 1.55, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.08-2.23, p = 0.018) or DM (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.01-2.57, p = 0.045) after adjusting for age, gender, OB, DL, and DM (for HT) or HT (for DM), and with the presence of HT plus DM (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.12-3.41, p = 0.018) after adjusting for age, gender, OB and DL. CONCLUSIONS: In NFAT patients, F-1mgDST 1.2-1.79 µg/dL seems to be associated with a higher prevalence of HT and DM and a worse cardiometabolic profile, even if the poor accuracy of these associations suggests caution in interpreting these results.

Pathophysiology of Mild Hypercortisolism: From the Bench to the Bedside.

Mild hypercortisolism is defined as biochemical evidence of abnormal cortisol secretion without the classical detectable manifestations of overt Cushing's syndrome and, above all, lacking catabolic characteristics such as central muscle weakness, adipose tissue redistribution, skin fragility and unusual infections. Mild hypercortisolism is frequently discovered in patients with adrenal incidentalomas, with a prevalence ranging between 5 and 50%. This high variability is mainly due to the different criteria used for defining this condition. This subtle cortisol excess has also been described in patients with incidentally discovered pituitary tumors with an estimated prevalence of 5%. To date, the mechanisms responsible for the pathogenesis of mild hypercortisolism of pituitary origin are still not well clarified. At variance, recent advances have been made in understanding the genetic background of bilateral and unilateral adrenal adenomas causing mild hypercortisolism. Some recent data suggest that the clinical effects of glucocorticoid (GC) exposure on peripheral tissues are determined not only by the amount of the adrenal GC production but also by the peripheral GC metabolism and by the GC sensitivity. Indeed, in subjects with normal cortisol secretion, the combined estimate of cortisol secretion, cortisone-to-cortisol peripheral activation by the 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase enzyme and GC receptor sensitizing variants have been suggested to be associated with the presence of hypertension, diabetes and bone fragility, which are three well-known consequences of hypercortisolism. This review focuses on the pathophysiologic mechanism underlying both the different sources of mild hypercortisolism and their clinical consequences (bone fragility, arterial hypertension, subclinical atherosclerosis, cardiovascular remodeling, dyslipidemia, glucose metabolism impairment, visceral adiposity, infections, muscle damage, mood disorders and coagulation).

When to Suspect Hidden Hypercortisolism in Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the available literature helps to identify the characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) more frequently associated with hidden hypercortisolism (HidHyCo). METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed using studies that assessed both the prevalence of HidHyCo in patients with T2D and the characteristics of these patients with and without HidHyCo. The DerSimonian and Laird (DSL) and Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) methods were utilized. RESULTS: Among the 18 available studies, 6 provided the necessary data. The association between HidHyCo and advanced T2D (based on the patients' description given in each study in the presence of microvascular/macrovascular complications or insulin treatment plus hypertension or hypertension treated with 2 or more drugs), hypertension, insulin treatment, and dyslipidemia was reported in 5 (2184 patients), 6 (2283 patients), 3 (1440 patients), and 3 (987 patients) studies, respectively. HidHyCo was associated with advanced T2D as assessed by both the DSL (odds ratio [OR], 3.4; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.12-5.67) and HKSJ (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.03-6.41) methods and with the prevalence of hypertension or insulin treatment as assessed by the DSL method (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.05-3.50 and OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.07-4.91, respectively) but not as assessed by the HKSJ method. CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced T2D have a higher prevalence of HidHyCo. These data inform about the selection of patients with T2D for HidHyCo screening.

Inflammation-based scores in patients with pheochromocytoma.

BACKGROUND: Pheochromocytoma is associated with systemic inflammation, but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between plasma metanephrine levels and haematological parameters - as a surrogate of inflammation - in patients with pheochromocytoma and the influence of preoperative α-blockade treatment. DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 68 patients with pheochromocytoma who underwent adrenalectomy (median age 53 years, 64.7% females) and two control groups matched for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI): 68 patients with non-functioning adrenocortical tumors (NFAT) and 53 with essential hypertension (EAH). The complete blood count (CBC) and several inflammation-based scores [Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio (LMR), Systemic-Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Prognostic-Nutrition Index (PNI)] were assessed in all patients and, in a subset of pheochromocytomas, after adrenalectomy (n=26) and before and after preoperative α-blockade treatment (n=29). RESULTS: A higher inflammatory state, as indicated by both CBC and inflammation-based scores, was observed in patients with pheochromocytoma compared to NFAT and EAH. Plasma metanephrine levels showed a positive correlation with NLR (r=0.4631), PLR (r=0.3174), SII (r=0.3709), and a negative correlation with LMR (r=0.4368) and PNI (r=0.3741), even after adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, BMI and tumor size (except for PLR). After adrenalectomy, we observed a reduction in NLR (p=0.001), PLR (p=0.003), SII (p=0.004) and a concomitant increase in LMR (p=0.0002). Similarly, α-blockade treatment led to a reduction in NLR (p=0.007) and SII (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Inflammation-based scores in patients with pheochromocytoma showed pro-inflammatory changes that correlated with plasma metanephrine levels and are ameliorated by adrenalectomy and α-blockade.

Predicting morphological and functional variations of benign adrenal incidentalomas in relation to initial characteristics.

The follow-up strategy for unresected non-functional adrenal tumors (NFAT) is a major controversial issue in endocrinological clinical practice, as the natural history of adrenal incidentalomas (AI) is partially unknown and a consensus on their adequate management is lacking. In a recent longitudinal study by Ceccato et al., a large cohort of patients with conservatively treated AI were evaluated for possible radiological variations over time and their relationship with autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS). Starting from this paper, we performed a literature review of available longitudinal studies focus on the same issue. Notwithstanding the high variability in the duration of follow-up and in the criteria used to define ACS in the included studies, our findings support the idea that there is a not negligible risk of morphological and functional changes, which may have metabolic implications, especially after 5-10 years of follow-up. Unfortunately, these variations seem to be scarcely predictable. Therefore, it may be risky to interrupt the follow-up in patients with NFAT, in particular in the presence of larger diameter of the adenoma and higher cortisol levels at diagnosis. These results should be considered in defining the optimal management of these patients.

Cardiovascular complications of mild autonomous cortisol secretion.

Adrenal incidentalomas (AI) may be associated with a mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) in up to one third of cases. There is growing evidence that MACS patients actually present increased risk of cardiovascular disease and higher mortality rate, driven by increased prevalence of known cardiovascular risk factors, as well as accelerated cardiovascular remodelling. Adrenalectomy seems to have cardiometabolic beneficial effects in MACS patients but their management is still a debated topic due to the lack of high-quality studies. Several studies suggested that so called "non-functioning" AI may be actually "functioning" with an associated increased cardiovascular risk. Although the individual cortisol sensitivity and peripheral activation have been recently suggested to play a role in influencing the cardiovascular risk even in apparently eucortisolemic patients, to date the degree of cortisol secretion, as mirrored by the cortisol levels after dexamethasone suppression test remains the best predictor of an increased cardiovascular risk in AI patients. However, whether or not the currently used cut-off set at 50 nmol/L for cortisol levels after dexamethasone suppression could be considered completely reliable in ruling out hypercortisolism remains unclear.