Minimum 19-Year Clinical Results and Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Long-term (minimum 19-year) outcome data on clinical results and patient satisfaction after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) are missing in the literature. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results as well as patient satisfaction at a mean of 21.2 years after posterior-stabilized TKAs. METHODS: This study included 756 patients (1,350 knees) who had undergone TKAs. There were 96 men and 660 women (mean age, 58 years; range, 40 to 84). The mean follow-up was 21.2 years (range, 19 to 23). At each follow-up visit, the patients were assessed radiographically and clinically. Furthermore, patient satisfaction was determined. RESULTS: The Knee Society total, pain, function, and deformity scores were 42, 18, 33, and 5 points, respectively, at the final follow-up. The mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index score was 25 points at the final follow-up. With revision or aseptic loosening as the end point, the 23-year intimated survival for the implant was 96% (95% confidence interval, 91 to 100%). The overall patient satisfaction score at the final follow-up was 83.3 points (range, 81 to 86). Patient satisfaction scores with regard to pain, housework, recreation, and surgery were 84, 81, 82, and 86 points, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present, mean 21-year follow-up clinical study suggest excellent results with regard to the revision rates and survivorship of the posterior-stabilized total knee implants. However, consistent with the literature, we found that about 80% of patients expressed overall satisfaction with their primary TKAs. About 8% of patients were either somewhat or very dissatisfied with the procedure.

Minimum 30-Year Results of Bilaterally Implanted Cemented and Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 50 Years.

BACKGROUND: The rate of failure of cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) in younger patients is higher than that in elderly patients. The purpose of this study is to document the long-term clinical results of THA with the so-called third-generation cementing and the results of second-generation cementless THA in patients <50 years of age. METHODS: This study included 106 patients who had had bilateral THA with a cemented stem in one hip and a cementless stem in the other. There were 78 men and 28 women. Their mean age was 47 years (range, 21-49). The average follow-up duration was 31 years (range, 30-32.5). RESULTS: There were similar mean Harris Hip Scores (90 versus 91 points) between the groups at the final follow-up. Forty-six acetabular components (43%) in the cemented group and 48 acetabular components (45%) in the cementless group were revised. Five femoral components (5%) in the cemented group and 4 femoral components (4%) in the cementless group were revised. Survivorship of the acetabular component at 30.8 years was similar in both groups (57% in the cemented group versus 55% in the cementless group). Survivorship of the femoral component at 30.8 years was also similar in both groups (95% in the cemented group versus 96% in the cementless group). CONCLUSION: Long-term fixation of the cemented or cementless femoral stem was outstanding. There was a high rate of the acetabular component revision due to conventional polyethylene wear and periacetabular osteolysis in both hybrid and fully cementless THA groups.

Is Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Safe for Use in High-Flexion Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Application of highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) to a posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) might add the risk of fracture and failure of the tibial polyethylene insert. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term (up to 19 years) clinical and radiographic results of posterior cruciate-substituting TKAs with HXLPE or conventional polyethylene. METHODS: This study analyzed the results of 1,217 patients (444 men and 773 women; mean age of 65 ± 7 years, range, 31-85) (2,434 knees) who had received a NexGen LPS-Flex prosthesis with a conventional tibial insert in one knee and the same prosthesis with an HXLPE tibial insert in the contralateral knee. The mean duration of follow-up was 17 years (range, 15-19). RESULTS: The 2 groups did not differ significantly (P > .05) with regard to the clinical and radiographic results. No knee in either group had a fracture of the tibial polyethylene post or failure of the locking mechanism of the tibial polyethylene insert or osteolysis. Twenty-eight knees (2.3%) in the HXLPE group and 26 knees (2.1%) in the conventional polyethylene group were revised. The estimated survival rate at 17 years was 97.7% in the HXLPE group and 97.9% in the conventional polyethylene group. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that clinical and radiographic findings at a mean of 17 years after posterior cruciate-substituting TKA are the same for patients treated with HXLPE and those treated with conventional polyethylene.

Long-Term Results (Minimum of 20 Years) of a Pure Proximal-Loading Metaphyseal-Fitting Anatomic Cementless Stem Without Distal Stem Fixation in Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There are no reported results for more than 20 years of a pure proximal-loading anatomic cementless femoral stem without diaphyseal stem fixation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term (minimum 20 years) clinical results, bone remodeling, revision rate, and survivorship of these implants in patients aged less than 60 years. METHODS: We included 523 patients (657 hips), including 319 men and 204 women. The mean body mass index was 26.7 (range, 23-29 kg/m2). The mean age of patients at index surgery was 55 years (range, 20-59 years). The Harris Hip Score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the University of California, Los Angeles activity score were recorded preoperatively and at each follow-up. Mean follow-up was 23.5 years (range, 20-27 years). RESULTS: The Harris Hip Score at the final follow-up was a mean 93 points (range, 70-100 points). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and University of California, Los Angeles activity scores at the final follow-up were 16 and 7.6 points, respectively. Five femoral components (0.8%) and 13 acetabular components (2.0%) were revised. All cases in the current series had grade 2 stress shielding; no hips had grade 3 or 4 stress shielding. Kaplan-Meier survivorship of the implants at 23.5 years was 98.0% (95% confidence interval 92%-100%) for the acetabular component and 99.2% (95% confidence interval 93%-100%) for the femoral component. CONCLUSION: A pure proximal-loading metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless stem with alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearing couples functioned well, with no osteolysis or mild stress-shielding at an average 23.5-year follow-up.

Does an Ultra-Short Anatomic Cementless Femoral Stem Improve Long-Term (Up to 17 Years) Results in Patients Younger Than 30 Years?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this long-term (up to 17 years) follow-up study was to determine: (1) clinical results and evidence of clicking or squeaking sounds; (2) radiographic results, including rates of osseointegration, bone remodeling, and osteolysis; (3) rates of complications including thigh pain, periprosthetic fracture, and ceramic fracture; (4) rates of revision; and (5) survival rates of implants in patients younger than 30 years. METHODS: We analyzed the results of 240 consecutive primary total hip arthroplasty in 180 patients (118 men and 62 women who had a mean age of 27 years (range, 21 to 30 years)). The mean follow-up was 16 years (range, 14 to 17 years). RESULTS: Mean Harris hip score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities score, and University of California, Los Angeles activity score were 93 points, 18 points, and 7 points, respectively, at final follow-up. Radiographically, all of the acetabular components and all but two femoral components were well-fixed at the final follow-up. No hip had osteolysis or exhibited Grade 3 stress shielding. All but two patients had no groin or thigh pain. No hip had a periprosthetic or ceramic fracture. Eight hips (3%) exhibited squeaking sounds. Two acetabular components and two femoral stems were revised. The survival of the acetabular and femoral component was 99.2% (95% confidence interval, 94 to 100%). CONCLUSION: The results of the present long-term study of ultra-short anatomic cementless femoral stems suggest excellent clinical and radiographic results in patients younger than 30 years.

Long-Term (up to 38 Years) Failure Modes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Adult Patients Who Had Childhood Infection of Hip.

BACKGROUND: The long-term failure modes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in adult patients who had childhood infection have not been documented. The purpose of this study is to analyze the longer term clinical and radiographic results, prevalence of osteolysis, and survival rate of THA. METHODS: We reviewed the results of 142 patients (145 hips) (mean age 41.9 years). The age of the patients at the time that the infection was contracted was an average of 7.1 years (range 1-11). The average interval between active infection and THA was 34.5 years. All but 2 hips (1 patient) had a quiescent period of infection of more than 10 years. The average duration of follow-up after THA was 31.5 years (range 25-38). RESULTS: All but 2 hips with more than 10 years of quiescent infection had no recurrence of infection. The remaining 2 hips in the 1 patient with only 7 years of quiescent infection had a recurrence of infection. Seventy-eight of 145 hips (54%) underwent isolated cup revision for loosening, or osteolysis, or dislocation. Thirty (21%) femoral components were revised for aseptic loosening and/or osteolysis. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve at 31.5 years showed that the survival rate of the acetabular component was 46% (95% confidence interval 39-74) and that of the femoral component was 79% (95% confidence interval 73-89). CONCLUSION: Contributing factors to the high failure rate of THAs were less than optimal prostheses and poor quality of polyethylene during the time period of this study.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Management of the Hypoplastic Femur With Femoral Episiotomy and Onlay Allograft During Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: To insert the regular-sized stem for a dysplastic femoral canal, controlled episiotomy of the femur can be performed. The purpose of this study is to determine the long-term (up to 19 years) results of total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using strut allografts combined with an episiotomy over an extensively porous-coated stem. METHODS: We reviewed the results of 65 total hip arthroplasties in 63 patients (mean age 42.1 years; range 21-61) with dysplastic femur after childhood sepsis. The patients were treated using controlled episiotomy of the femur to widen the femoral canal, extensively porous-coated femoral stems, and cortical strut allografts because primary axial or rotational stability could not be achieved without grafting. The mean follow-up was 17.1 years (range 15-19). RESULTS: The mean Harris Hip Score at the final follow-up was 85 ± 15 points (range 45-100). The mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score was 23 ± 15 points (range 13-53). The mean University of California, Los Angeles score was 6.3 points (range 5-8). A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis at 19 years of follow-up showed that the survival rate of the femoral components was 92% (95% confidence interval 89-98), and it was 88% (95% confidence interval 85-92) for the acetabular component with aseptic loosening or revision for any reason. CONCLUSION: We found good results in terms of longevity and functional outcome using this technique. Future mechanical studies, in addition to controlled clinical studies, are warranted.

20-Year Minimum Outcomes and Survival Rate of High-Flexion Versus Standard Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting reports of early and mid-term results of the high-flexion total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). The purpose of the present long-term follow-up study was to determine the long-term (minimum 20 years) clinical and radiographic and CT scan results, and the survival rates of high-flexion versus standard TKAs. METHODS: Ninety-five patients (190 knees) were included (mean age, 65 ± 6.5 years). The mean follow-up was 20.3 years (range, 20 to 20.6 years). RESULTS: Revision of the TKA was performed in 5 knees (5.2%) with high-flexion TKA and in 3 knees (3.2%) with standard TKA. The rate of survival at 20 years was 94.8% (95% CI, 91%-98%) in the high-flexion TKA group and 96.8% (95% CI, 92%-100%) in the standard TKA group with reoperation for any reason. No knee had osteolysis in either group. CONCLUSIONS: At this length of follow-up, high-flexion TKA has comparable outcomes and survivorship to standard TKA.

The 22 to 25-Year Survival of Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty in Young Patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite cementless total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) have potential advantages over cemented TKAs, there are conflicting results. The purpose of the present study is to determine the long-term clinical and radiographic results, the survival rate, and the prevalence of osteolysis of cemented vs cementless TKAs. METHODS: A total of 261 patients (522 knees) who underwent bilateral simultaneous TKAs were included in the present study (mean age, 62.5 ± 5.5 years). Patients were evaluated clinically, radiographically, and also using computed tomography scans. A mean follow-up period was 23.8 years (range, 22-25 years). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the Knee Society total score, change in total score, knee function score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score in the 2 groups. In total, 8 knees (3%) were revised in the cementless group and 5 knees (2%) in the cemented group. Radiographs and computed tomography scans showed no femoral, tibial, or patellar osteolysis in either group. The rate of survival at 25 years was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92%-100%) in the cementless group and 98% (95% CI, 94%-100%) in the cemented group, with reoperation for any reason as the end point. The rate of survival at 25 years was 98% (95% CI, 94%-100%), with reoperation for aseptic loosening as the end point in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: At this length of follow-up, cementless TKA has comparable outcomes and survivorship to cemented TKA.

Combined Strut Onlay Allografting, Reduction Osteotomy, and Extensively Porous-Coated Stem for Reconstruction of Severe Femoral Defects During Revision Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to determine the long-term (up to 27 years) results of a modified technique applying strut allografts combined with a reduction osteotomy over an extensively porous-coated stem. METHODS: We reviewed the results of 399 revision total hip arthroplasties (for aseptic loosening in 390 hips and septic loosening in 9 hips) in 369 patients (mean age 58 ± 13 years, range 22-65) performed with an extensively porous-coated femoral stem combined with a cortical strut onlay allograft. The mean follow-up was 23 years (range 20-27). RESULTS: The mean Harris Hip Score was 84 ± 16 points (range 35-100) at the final follow-up. The mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score was 21 ± 16 points (range 12-53) at the final follow-up. The mean University of California Los Angeles activity score was 6.1 points (range 5-8). A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis at 23 years of follow-up showed that the survival rate of the femoral component was 95.5% (95% confidence interval 89-98) with aseptic loosening or revision for any reason and it was 91.5% (95% confidence interval 85-95) if septic loosening was included. CONCLUSION: We found good results in terms of longevity and functional outcome using this modified technique. Future mechanical studies in addition to controlled clinical studies are warranted.

Long-Term Survival (up to 34 Years) of Retained Cementless Anatomic Femoral Stem in Patients <50 Years Old.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of studies longer than 30 years to determine clinical and radiographic results of retained cementless anatomic stem. The purpose of this study is to determine the long-term (up to 34 years) survival rate of the retained cementless anatomic femoral stem in patients <50 years of age. METHODS: Isolated cup revision was performed with retaining primary cementless anatomic femoral stem in 206 patients (149 men and 57 women). Clinical and radiographic results were monitored at each follow-up. At the latest follow-up, computed tomography scans were carried out in all hips to determine the prevalence of osteolysis. The mean follow-up of the retained femoral stem was 30.3 years (range 27-34). The mean follow-up of the revised cup was 25.5 years (range 22-29). RESULTS: The mean Harris Hip Score was 91 ± 7.8 points (range 71-100) and the mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis score was 16 ± 7 points (range 7-34) at the final follow-up. The mean University of California, Los Angeles activity score was 7 ± 4 points (range 5-10) at the final follow-up. The overall survival rate of retained cementless femoral stems was 98.9% (95% confidence interval 91-100) at 30.3 years. The survival rate of the revised cup was 93% (95% confidence interval 89-98) at 25.5 years. CONCLUSION: The rate of aseptic loosening of already osseointegrated femoral stem remains low with ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in young active patients.

Long-Term (Up to 27 Years) Prospective, Randomized Study of Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasties in Patients <60 Years of Age With Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Our study determined long-term (up to 27 years) results of fixed-bearing vs mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) in patients <60 years with osteoarthritis. METHODS: This study included 291 patients (582 knees; mean age 58 ± 5 years), who received a mobile-bearing TKA in one knee and a fixed-bearing TKA in the other. The mean duration of follow-up was 26.3 y (range 24-27). RESULTS: At the latest follow-up, the mean Knee Society knee scores (91 ± 9 vs 89 ± 11 points, P = .383), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (35 ± 7 vs 37 ± 6 points, P = .165), range of knee motion (128° ± 13° vs 125° ± 15°, P = .898), and University of California, Los Angeles activity score (6 ± 4 vs 6 ± 4 points, P = 1.000) were below the level of clinical significance between the 2 groups. Revision of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing TKA occurred in 16 (5.5%) and 20 knees (6.9%), respectively. The rate of survival at 27 years for mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing TKA was 94.5% (95% confidence interval 89-100) and 93.1% (95% confidence interval 88-98), respectively, and no significant differences were observed between the groups. Osteolysis was identified in 4 knees (1.4%) in each group. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in functional outcomes, rate of loosening, osteolysis, or survivorship between the 2 groups.

Does Robotic-assisted TKA Result in Better Outcome Scores or Long-Term Survivorship Than Conventional TKA? A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted TKA was introduced to enhance the precision of bone preparation and component alignment with the goal of improving the clinical results and survivorship of TKA. Although numerous reports suggest that bone preparation and knee component alignment may be improved using robotic assistance, no long-term randomized trials of robotic-assisted TKA have shown whether this results in improved clinical function or survivorship of the TKA. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this randomized trial, we compared robotic-assisted TKA to manual-alignment techniques at long-term follow-up in terms of (1) functional results based on Knee Society, WOMAC, and UCLA Activity scores; (2) numerous radiographic parameters, including component and limb alignment; (3) Kaplan-Meier survivorship; and (4) complications specific to robotic-assistance, including pin-tract infection, peroneal nerve palsy, pin-site fracture, or patellar complications. METHODS: This study was a registered prospective, randomized, controlled trial. From January 2002 to February 2008, one surgeon performed 975 robotic-assisted TKAs in 850 patients and 990 conventional TKAs in 849 patients. Among these patients 1406 patients were eligible for participation in this study based on prespecified inclusion criteria. Of those, 100% (1406) patients agreed to participate and were randomized, with 700 patients (750 knees) receiving robotic-assisted TKA and 706 patients (766 knees) receiving conventional TKA. Of those, 96% (674 patients) in the robotic-assisted TKA group and 95% (674 patients) in the conventional TKA group were available for follow-up at a mean of 13 (± 5) years. In both groups, no patient older than 65 years was randomized because we anticipated long-term follow-up. We evaluated 674 patients (724 knees) in each group for clinical and radiographic outcomes, and we examined Kaplan-Meier survivorship for the endpoint of aseptic loosening or revision. Clinical evaluation was performed using the original Knee Society knee score, the WOMAC score, and the UCLA activity score preoperatively and at latest follow-up visit. We also assessed loosening (defined as change in the position of the components) using plain radiographs, osteolysis using CT scans at the latest follow-up visit, and component, and limb alignment on mechanical axis radiographs. To minimize the chance of type-2 error and increase the power of our study, we assumed the difference in the Knee Society score to be 25 points to match the MCID of the Knee Society score with a SD of 5; to be able to detect a difference of this size, we calculated that a total of 628 patients would be needed in each group in order to achieve 80% power at the α = 0.05 level. RESULTS: Clinical parameters at the latest follow-up including the Knee Society knee scores (93 ± 5 points in the robotic-assisted TKA group versus 92 ± 6 points in the conventional TKA group [95% confidence interval 90 to 98]; p = 0.321) and Knee Society knee function scores (83 ± 7 points in the robotic-assisted TKA group versus 85 ± 6 points in the conventional TKA group [95% CI 75 to 88]; p = 0.992), WOMAC scores (18 ± 14 points in the robotic-assisted TKA group versus 19 ± 15 points in the conventional TKA group [95% CI 16 to 22]; p = 0.981), range of knee motion (125 ± 6° in the robotic-assisted TKA group versus 128 ± 7° in the conventional TKA group [95% CI 121 to 135]; p = 0.321), and UCLA patient activity scores (7 points versus 7 points in each group [95% CI 5 to 10]; p = 1.000) were not different between the two groups at a mean of 13 years' follow-up. Radiographic parameters such as the femorotibial angle (mean 2° ± 2° valgus in the robotic-assisted TKA group versus 3° ± 3° valgus in the conventional TKA group [95% CI 1 to 5]; p = 0.897), femoral component position (coronal plane: mean 98° in the robotic-assisted TKA group versus 97° in the conventional TKA group [95% CI 96 to 99]; p = 0.953; sagittal plane: mean 3° in the robotic-assisted TKA group versus 2° in the conventional TKA group [95% CI 1 to 4]; p = 0.612) and tibial component position (coronal plane: mean 90° in the robotic-assisted TKA group versus 89° in the conventional TKA group [95% CI 87 to 92]; p = 0.721; sagittal plane: 87° in the robotic-assisted TKA group versus 86° in the conventional TKA group [95% CI 84 to 89]; p = 0.792), joint line (16 mm in the robotic-assisted TKA group versus 16 mm in the conventional TKA group [95% CI 14 to 18]; p = 0.512), and posterior femoral condylar offset (24 mm in the robotic-assisted TKA group versus 24 mm in the conventional TKA group [95% CI 21 to 27 ]; p = 0.817) also were not different between the two groups (p > 0.05). The aseptic loosening rate was 2% in each group, and this was not different between the two groups. With the endpoint of revision or aseptic loosening of the components, Kaplan-Meier survivorship of the TKA components was 98% in both groups (95% CI 94 to 100) at 15 years (p = 0.972). There were no between-group differences in terms of the frequency with which complications occurred. In all, 0.6% of knees (four) in each group had a superficial infection, and they were treated with intravenous antibiotics for 2 weeks [corrected]. No deep infection occurred in these knees. In the conventional TKA group, 0.6% of knees (four) had motion limitation (< 60°) [corrected]. CONCLUSIONS: At a minimum follow-up of 10 years, we found no differences between robotic-assisted TKA and conventional TKA in terms of functional outcome scores, aseptic loosening, overall survivorship, and complications. Considering the additional time and expense associated with robotic-assisted TKA, we cannot recommend its widespread use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Comparison of Modular Conventional and High-Flexion Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasties in the Same Patients at a Mean Follow-Up of 15 Years.

BACKGROUND: As previous studies are limited to short-term clinical data on conventional and high-flexion total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), long-term clinical data on these TKAs remain unclear. Therefore, we evaluated long-term functional outcome, range of knee motion, revision rate, implant survival, and the prevalence of osteolysis after conventional and high-flexion TKAs in the same patients. METHODS: The authors evaluated a cohort of 1206 patients with a mean age of 65.3 ± 7 years (range: 22-70) who underwent bilateral simultaneous sequential TKAs. One knee received a conventional TKA and the other received a high-flexion TKA. The mean duration of follow-up was 15.6 years (range: 14-17). RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the 2 groups at the latest follow-up with respect to Knee Society score (93 vs 92 points, P = .765), pain score (45 vs 44 points, P = .641), range of knee motion (125° vs 126°, P = .712), and radiographic and computed tomography scan results. Furthermore, no significant revision rate differences were found between the 2 groups (1.3% for conventional TKA vs 1.6% for high-flexion TKA; P = .137). There was no osteolysis recorded in either group. The rate of survivorship free of implant revision or aseptic loosening was 98.7% (95% CI = 91-100) for conventional TKA and 98.4% (95% CI = 91-100) for high-flexion TKA at 17 years. CONCLUSION: At the latest follow-up, we were not able to demonstrate any significant difference between conventional and high-flexion TKAs with respect to functional outcome scores, range of knee motion, revision rate, implant survival, and prevalence of osteolysis.

Ultra-Short Anatomic Uncemented Femoral Stem and Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearing in Patients With Idiopathic or Ethanol-Induced Femoral Head Osteonecrosis.

BACKGROUND: Long-term result of the ultra-short anatomic cementless stem in the patients with idiopathic or ethanol-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head has not been assessed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term clinical, radiographic, computed tomography scan, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning results, and survivorship of this specific femoral stem in patients with idiopathic or ethanol-induced femoral head osteonecrosis. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-six patients (335 hips) with an average age of 49.8 years (range 20-63) were enrolled in the current study. All patients underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning of the acetabulum and proximal femur preoperatively and at final follow-up. Computed tomography scan was obtained in all patients at final follow-up. The mean follow-up was 14.7 years (range 13-16). RESULTS: At final follow-up, the average Harris hip score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, and University of California, Los Angeles activity score were 94 points, 12 points, and 8 points, respectively. Four stems (1%) underwent revision for aseptic loosening. One acetabular component (0.3%) was revised for recurrent dislocation. No hip was revised for squeaking or clicking sound. Survivorship of the femoral stem was 99.0% (95% confidence interval 94-100) and that of the acetabular component was 99.4% (95% confidence interval 95-100) at 14.7 years. CONCLUSION: Ultra-short proximal loading anatomic uncemented femoral stems with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have excellent survivorship free from aseptic loosening and good clinical results at long term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Eighteen-Year Follow-Up Study of 2 Alternative Bearing Surfaces Used in Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Same Young Patients.

BACKGROUND: This study compares the long-term functional, radiographic, and computed tomography scan outcomes and implant survivorship of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty (C-O-C THA) and ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene total hip arthroplasty (C-O-HXLPE THA) in the same patients. METHODS: In this randomized, prospective trial conducted between January 1999 and April 2003, 133 patients (266 hips) younger than 55 years were enrolled. Each patient received C-O-C THA in 1 hip and a C-O-HXLPE THA in the other. The mean follow-up was 17.1 years (range, 15-18 years); there were 84 men and 49 women with a mean age of 53 ± 7 years (range, 25-55 years). RESULTS: At the latest follow-up, mean Harris hip scores (94 vs 93 points; P = .861), pain scores (43 vs 42 points; P = .651), and patient satisfaction scores (7.8 vs 7.6 points; P = .379) were not different between the 2 groups. Eight hips (3%) in the C-O-C THA had an audible squeaking sound. The mean annual penetration rate of HXLPE was 0.0162 ± 0.032 mm per year. No osteolysis was recorded on radiographs or computed tomography scans in either group. At 17.1 years, the survival rate of the acetabular component was 97% in the C-O-C bearing group and 98% in the C-O-HXLPE bearing group (P = .923). The survival rate of the femoral component was 99% in both groups. CONCLUSION: Both C-O-C THA and C-O-HXLPE THA functioned well, with no osteolysis at mean of 17.1-year follow-up.

The 2018 Mark Coventry, MD Award: Does a Ceramic Bearing Improve Pain, Function, Wear, or Survivorship of TKA in Patients Younger Than 55 Years of Age? A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Methods to reduce the revision rate of total knee prostheses because of wear-related issues are important to examine, particularly because younger patients have a disproportionately high risk of revision. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are long-term Knee Society knee and function scores better in younger patients with an oxidized zirconium (OxZr) TKA compared with those with a cobalt-chrome (CoCr) TKA? (2) Are there differences in radiographic signs of loosening or CT findings of osteolysis between OxZr TKAs and CoCr TKAs? (3) Are there fewer polyethylene wear particles in the OxZr TKA than CoCr TKA? (4) Do the groups differ in terms of survivorship free from revision surgery at 13 years? METHODS: From April 2003 to January 2007, we enrolled 110 patients younger than 55 years of age in this randomized, double-blind, prospective trial. Each patient served as his or her own control and each received an OxZr femoral component in one knee and a CoCr femoral component in the other. The minimum followup was 10 years (mean, 13 years; range, 10-14 years); two died and nine were lost to followup before that time, leaving 99 patients (198 knees) for analysis. There were 28 men and 71 women with a mean age of 53 ± 6 years (range, 40-55 years). We obtained Knee Society knee scores for each knee, but Knee Society function scores, WOMAC scores, and UCLA activity scores were obtained for each patient preoperatively and at each followup. Additionally, we performed radiographic examination preoperatively and at each followup. At a minimum of 10 years (mean, 13 years) followup, we obtained CT scans in all patients. Polyethylene wear particles in the synovial fluid were analyzed at the final followup using thermogravimetric methods and scanning electron microscopy. Survivorship was ascertained using the Kaplan-Meier calculator. A sample size calculation determined that to detect a difference in the Knee Society knee score of 5 points, assuming a SD of 5 points, with an α = 0.05 and ß = 0.80, a total of 90 patients would be needed in each group. RESULTS: At the most recent followup, the mean Knee Society knee scores (92 versus 93 points; p = 0.857), function scores (85 versus 85 points; p = 1.000), WOMAC scores (23 versus 23 points; p = 1.000), UCLA activity scores (6.5 versus 6.5 points; p = 1.000), and range of knee motion (125° versus 127°; p = 0.365) were not different between the two groups. There was no radiographic evidence of loosening and no osteolysis visible on CT scan in either group. The weight of polyethylene wear particles produced at the bearing surface was 0.046 ± 0.010 g in 1 g of synovial fluid in patients with an OxZr femoral component and 0.0448 ± 0.0108 g in patients with a CoCr femoral component (p = 0.583). Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from revision was 97% for the OxZr group (95% confidence interval [CI], 93-100) and 98% for the CoCr group (95% CI, 93-100) at 13 years after surgery (p = 0.918). CONCLUSIONS: Given the absence of demonstrated superiority of either the CoCr implant or the OxZr implant, we recommend that surgeons and healthcare systems can reasonably choose the less expensive device for routine use, unless there is some compelling reason in an individual patient to choose one over the other (such as severe, documented metal sensitivity). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Long-Term Outcomes of Ultra-Short Metaphyseal-Fitting Anatomic Cementless Femoral Stem in Total Hip Arthroplasty With Ceramic-on-Ceramic Articulation for Young Patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the long-term outcomes of this specific stem in patients younger than 50 years old, with regard to clinical and radiographic outcomes, survivorship, and complication rate. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-nine consecutive series of patients (324 hips) who were younger than 50 years old at the time of surgery were enrolled in the study. Osteonecrosis (50%) and dysplastic hip (34%) were most common diagnoses. Patients were informed to use crutches or walker for 4 weeks to protect the femoral component against rotational stress. The mean follow-up was 15.6 years (range 14-17). RESULTS: At the latest follow-up, the mean Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, and University of California, Los Angeles activity score were 93 points, 13 points, and 7 points, respectively. Three patients (1.3%) had moderate thigh pain. All of the acetabular components and 321 (99%) femoral stems were solidly fixed at the time of the latest follow-up. Three stems (0.9%) were revised for aseptic loosening. Two hips (0.6%) had a dislocation and 2 hips (0.6%) had a periprosthetic fracture. Ceramic fracture or osteolysis was not found in any hip at the time of the final follow-up. Survival rate of the femoral component was 99.1% (95% confidence interval 94-100) and that of the acetabular component was 100% (95% confidence interval 94-100) at 15.6 years. CONCLUSION: In this series, THA using an ultra-short metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless femoral stem provided excellent long-term clinical and radiographic results in patients younger than 50 years old. Furthermore, our initial theoretical concerns about early aseptic loosening due to the absence of distal stem fixation were not justified.

The Long-Term Results of Simultaneous High-Flexion Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasties Performed in the Same Patients.

BACKGROUND: Our study determined the long-term clinical, radiographic, and computed tomography scanning results of high-flexion mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) in the same younger patients. In addition, the survivorship and complication rates of both groups were evaluated. METHODS: Bilateral simultaneous sequential TKAs were performed in 164 patients (328 knees). There were 142 women and 22 men with a mean age of 63 ± 9 years (range 41-65), who received a high-flexion mobile-bearing prosthesis in one knee and a high-flexion fixed-bearing prosthesis in the other. The mean follow-up was 16.9 years (range 15-18). RESULTS: At the latest follow-up, the mean Knee Society knee scores (94 ± 8 vs 95 ± 9 points, P = .7), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (20 ± 11 vs 20 ± 11 points, P = 1.0), range of knee motion (125° ± 10° vs 127° ± 9°, P = .8), and University of California, Los Angeles activity scores (7.8 vs 7.8 points, P = 1.0) were below the level of clinical significance between the 2 groups. Survival rate of high-flexion mobile-bearing TKA was 98.2% and that of high-flexion fixed-bearing TKA was 97% at 16 years. No osteolysis was identified in either group. CONCLUSION: After a minimum duration of follow-up of 13 years, we found no significant difference between these 2 groups with regard to functional outcome, knee motion, prevalence of osteolysis, or survivorship. This study does not clearly direct the surgeon toward either arm of treatment. Longer term follow-up is needed to prove the superiority of one type of implant over the other one.

Mechanical thromboprophylaxis would suffice after total knee arthroplasties in Asian patients?

PURPOSE: Our prospective study evaluated the incidence and location of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), the risk factors for PE and the natural history of DVT after TKA in patients who have received only mechanical compression device without having any chemical thromboprophylaxis or therapeutic treatment. METHODS: We studied 408 consecutive patients (691 knees) who underwent primary TKA; 283 patients had one-stage bilateral TKAs and 125 had unilateral TKAs. Coagulation assays, the full blood count and blood typing tests, and serum chemical profiles were undertaken in all patients on three separate occasions. Molecular genetic testing was performed preoperatively to detect the genetic traits involving DVT. Bilateral simultaneous or unilateral venograms were carried out at 6 or 7 days after operation. Perfusion lung scanning was undertaken before and at 7 or 8 days after operation. RESULTS: In the 691 venograms in 408 patients, only 4 knees (0.6%) were positive for fresh thrombi. In the 4 knees with DVT, thrombi were located in the calf veins. We observed factor V Leiden mutation, antithrombin-III level, and prothrombin promoter G20210A mutation were absent in all patients. We saw no relationship between DVT and coagulation or thrombophilic data. No pulmonary embolism (PE) occurred as shown by negative perfusion lung scan and absence of symptoms. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the combinations of absent thrombophilic polymorphisms with low clinical prothrombotic risk factors led to low prevalence of DVT and virtually absent PE after TKA in the current series of patients, who had received mechanical compression device only without chemical thromboprophylaxis.