The usability of ventilators: a comparative evaluation of use safety and user experience.

BACKGROUND: The design complexity of critical care ventilators (CCVs) can lead to use errors and patient harm. In this study, we present the results of a comparison of four CCVs from market leaders, using a rigorous methodology for the evaluation of use safety and user experience of medical devices. METHODS: We carried out a comparative usability study of four CCVs: Hamilton G5, Puritan Bennett 980, Maquet SERVO-U, and Dräger Evita V500. Forty-eight critical care respiratory therapists participated in this fully counterbalanced, repeated measures study. Participants completed seven clinical scenarios composed of 16 tasks on each ventilator. Use safety was measured by percentage of tasks with use errors or close calls (UE/CCs). User experience was measured by system usability and workload metrics, using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). RESULTS: Nine of 18 post hoc contrasts between pairs of ventilators were significant after Bonferroni correction, with effect sizes between 0.4 and 1.09 (Cohen's d). There were significantly fewer UE/CCs with SERVO-U when compared to G5 (p = 0.044) and V500 (p = 0.020). Participants reported higher system usability for G5 when compared to PB980 (p = 0.035) and higher system usability for SERVO-U when compared to G5 (p < 0.001), PB980 (p < 0.001), and V500 (p < 0.001). Participants reported lower workload for G5 when compared to PB980 (p < 0.001) and lower workload for SERVO-U when compared to PB980 (p < 0.001) and V500 (p < 0.001). G5 scored better on two of nine possible comparisons; SERVO-U scored better on seven of nine possible comparisons. Aspects influencing participants' performance and perception include the low sensitivity of G5's touchscreen and the positive effect from the quality of SERVO-U's user interface design. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides empirical evidence of how four ventilators from market leaders compare and highlights the importance of medical technology design. Within the boundaries of this study, we can infer that SERVO-U demonstrated the highest levels of use safety and user experience, followed by G5. Based on qualitative data, differences in outcomes could be explained by interaction design, quality of hardware components used in manufacturing, and influence of consumer product technology on users' expectations.

Evaluation of Financial Interventions in Breast Cancer Care Worldwide: A Systematic Review.

Background: Out-of-pocket costs are burdensome for breast cancer patients. Cost-reducing interventions, though implemented, have unclear comparative efficacy. This study aimed to critically evaluate characteristics of successful versus unsuccessful interventions designed to decrease out-of-pocket costs for breast cancer patients. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA checklist. Embase, PubMed, Global Index Medicus, and Global Health were queried from inception to February 2021. Articles describing a financial intervention targeting costs for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, or treatment and addressing clinical or patient-level financial outcomes were included. Methodological quality was evaluated using the QualSyst tool. Interventions were organized in accordance with timing of implementation, with narrative description of intervention type, success, and outcomes. Results: Of the 11,086 articles retrieved, 21 were included in this review. Of these, 14 consisted of interventions during screening, and seven during diagnosis or treatment. Free/subsidized screening mammography was the most common screening intervention; 91% of these programs documented successful outcomes. Patient navigation and gift voucher programs demonstrated mixed success. The most successful intervention implemented during diagnosis/treatment was reducing medication costs. Low-cost programs and direct patient financial assistance were also successful. Limitations included lack of standardization in outcome metrics across studies. Conclusions: Financial interventions reducing prices through free screening mammography and decreasing medication costs were most successful. Less successful interventions were not contextually tailored, including gift card incentivization and low-cost treatment modalities. These findings can facilitate implementation of broader, more generalizable programs to reduce costs and improve outcomes during evaluation and management of breast cancer.

Awareness and Constraints towards the Implementation of Green Dentistry amongst Dental Students and Private Practitioners of West India.

Background: Dentistry is a resource-intensive discipline of healthcare that has a notable impact on the environment. Sustainability should be the major consideration for healthcare service providers to support climate change policies. Green dentistry is an efficient strategy for practicing eco-friendly dentistry. This study was conducted to assess the awareness, knowledge, and barriers to practicing green dentistry among dental practitioners and dental students. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical online questionnaire survey with 22 questions was carried out. Results: 51.8% of participants were not aware of the concept of green dentistry. Practitioners of the age group 20-30 years are more willing to transform their dental practice into green practice to reduce the carbon footprint of their clinic (P < 0.05). Chi-square data analysis shows that dental practitioners treating more than 20 patients in a week have a better awareness of the concept of green dentistry (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, dental professionals in the younger age group are eager to transform their dental practices to green practices to lessen their clinics' carbon footprints. Financial constraints limit the implementation of green dentistry into clinical practice.

Mucormycosis, Diabetes and COVID-19 Pneumonia: Unleashing the Facts.

Background Mucormycosis (MM) is an angioinvasive locally destructive fungal infection. Before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it was associated with diabetes (particularly diabetic ketoacidosis), immunosuppressive drugs and trauma. Among its various forms, cerebral invasion is considered to be highly fatal even if with long-term treatment. Treatment with injection amphotericin B (Amph-B) with early surgical interventions is highly efficacious. Liposomal preparation is considered to be superior in the context of fewer side effects. Methods We present a single-centre prospective study of 124 patients with MM in a tertiary care hospital. After the approval from the ethics committee, basic information was taken from all patients including all available past history about the COVID-19 infection and treatment. The studied outcomes were discharge, death and number of days of hospitalisation. Secondary objectives were to estimate the association of MM with known risk factors, to find the association of an outcome with various inflammatory markers, to determine adverse events with the use of injection Amph-B and posaconazole and to find the case fatality rate of MM. Results In our study, we observed that the number of patients with MM was double in the less than 60 years age group. However, mortality was 33.3% in the elderly as compared to 15.29% in patients less than 60 years of age. The majority of the patients (69.35%) were males, but no significant difference in mortality was seen between males and females. The case fatality rate was 20.97%. Ocular symptoms such as orbital swelling and pain were the common presenting symptoms. Almost all patients (93.54%) were diabetics. The non-diabetic group consisted of only 8 (6.4%) patients, and therefore, the comparison was not possible. A total of 20 (16%) out of 124 patients who had received high-dose steroids showed higher mortality (55%). Maximum patients (65.32%) had presented with MM following a past COVID-19 infection. However, a significant number of MM patients (20.96%) had a recent COVID infection and had higher mortality (57.69%) compared to their counterparts. The most common site of involvement in our study was the paranasal sinus (50%) and the outcome was the best in those patients whose disease was localised only to the sinuses, although among 14 (11.29%) patients with cerebral involvement, mortality was maximum (42.85%). Renal impairment and dyselectrolytemia were the most common adverse effects of Amph-B, and 46.42% of patients required surgical removal of the local part. Conclusion We saw that diabetes was a major contributory factor in the etiopathogenesis of MM. COVID-19 could also be a major causative factor by impairing the immune system; however, further studies at the molecular level are required to establish an association. The use of steroid cannot be the only independent risk factor, and other associated factors must be present. Treatment with antifungal and early surgical intervention had good outcomes. Treatment with conventional lyophilized Amph-B was equally efficacious as lipid-based solutions, but with more side effects. Hypokalemia and hypocalcemia were the most common electrolyte abnormalities associated with the use of injection Amph-B. Uncontrolled diabetes, the severity of the COVID-19 infection at presentation, acidosis, a high C-reactive protein level (above 100) and local brain involvement were associated with a poor outcome.