Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 20(5): 206, 2019 May 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31147791

RESUMEN

The multi-stage cascade impactor (CI) is the mainstay method for the determination of the aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) of aerosols emitted from orally inhaled products (OIPs). CIs are designed to operate at a constant flow rate throughout the measurement process. However, it is necessary to mimic an inhalation maneuver to disperse the powder into an aerosol when testing passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), which constitute a significant portion of available products in this inhaler class. Methods in the pharmacopeial compendia intended for product quality assurance initiate sampling by applying a vacuum to the measurement apparatus using a timer-operated solenoid valve located downstream of the CI, resulting in a period when the flow rate through the impactor rapidly increases from zero towards the target flow rate. This article provides recommendations for achieving consistent APSD measurements, including selection of the CI, pre-separator, and flow control equipment, as well as reviewing considerations that relate to the shape of the flow rate-sampling time profile. Evidence from comparisons of different DPIs delivering the same active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) is indicative that the compendial method for APSD measurement is insensitive as a predictor of pharmacokinetic outcomes. Although inappropriate for product quality testing, guidance is therefore provided towards adopting a more clinically realistic methodology, including the use of an anatomically appropriate inlet and mimicking patient inhalation at the DPI while operating the CI at constant flow rate. Many of these recommendations are applicable to the testing of other OIP classes.


Asunto(s)
Aerosoles/normas , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco/métodos , Diseño de Equipo/métodos , Tamaño de la Partícula , Control de Calidad , Administración por Inhalación , Aerosoles/administración & dosificación , Aerosoles/química , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo/instrumentación , Humanos , Polvos , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/administración & dosificación , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/química , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/normas , Tecnología Farmacéutica/métodos
2.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 18(8): 3296-3306, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28589305

RESUMEN

This article reports on results from a two-lab, multiple impactor experiment evaluating the abbreviated impactor measurement (AIM) concept, conducted by the Cascade Impaction Working Group of the International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS). The goal of this experiment was to expand understanding of the performance of an AIM-type apparatus based on the Andersen eight-stage non-viable cascade impactor (ACI) for the assessment of inhalation aerosols and sprays, compared with the full-resolution version of that impactor described in the pharmacopeial compendia. The experiment was conducted at two centers with a representative commercially available pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) containing albuterol (salbutamol) as active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Metrics of interest were total mass (TM) emitted from the inhaler, impactor-sized mass (ISM), as well as the ratio of large particle mass (LPM) to small particle mass (SPM). ISM and the LPM/SPM ratio together comprise the efficient data analysis (EDA) metrics. The results of the comparison demonstrated that in this study, the AIM approach had adequate discrimination to detect changes in the mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of the ACI-sampled aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD), and therefore could be employed for routine product quality control (QC). As with any test method considered for inclusion in a regulatory filing, the transition from an ACI (used in development) to an appropriate AIM/EDA methodology (used in QC) should be evaluated and supported by data on a product-by-product basis.


Asunto(s)
Albuterol/análisis , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida/normas , Tamaño de la Partícula , Tecnología Farmacéutica/métodos , Tecnología Farmacéutica/normas , Administración por Inhalación , Aerosoles , Albuterol/química , Broncodilatadores/análisis , Broncodilatadores/química , Diseño de Equipo/métodos , Diseño de Equipo/normas , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida/tendencias , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores/normas , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores/tendencias , Control de Calidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA